Bible

 

耶利米书 27

Studie

   

1 犹大王约西亚的儿子约雅敬约雅敬是西底家的别名,看第三节)登基的时候,有这耶和华临到耶利米说:

2 耶和华对我如此:你做绳索与轭,加在自己的颈项上,

3 藉那些耶路撒冷犹大王西底家的使臣之,把绳索与轭送到以东王、摩押王、亚扪王、推罗王、西顿王那里,

4 且嘱咐使臣,传与他们的,万军之耶和华以色列的如此

5 我用能和伸出来的膀,创造上的人民、牲畜。我看谁相宜,就把谁。

6 现在我将这些地都交仆人巴比伦王尼布甲尼撒,我也将田野的走兽他使用。

7 列国都必服事他和他的儿孙,直到他本国遭报的日期到。那时,多国和要使他作他们的奴仆。

8 无论哪一邦哪一国,不肯服事这巴比伦王尼布甲尼撒,也不把颈项放在巴比伦王的轭,我必用刀、饥荒、瘟疫刑罚那邦,直到我藉巴比伦王的将他们毁灭。这是耶和华的。

9 至於你们,不可从你们的先知和占卜的、圆梦的、观兆的,以及行邪术的;他们告诉你们:你们不致服事巴比伦王。

10 他们向你们假预言,要叫你们迁移,远离本地,以致我将你们赶出去,使你们灭亡。

11 但哪一邦肯把颈项放在巴比伦王的轭服事他,我必使那邦仍在本地存留,得以耕种居住。这是耶和华的。

12 我就照这一切的犹大王西底家:要把你们的颈项放在巴比伦王的轭,服事他和他的百姓,便得存活。

13 你和你的百姓为何要因刀、饥荒、瘟疫亡,正如耶和华论到不服事巴比伦王的那国的话呢?

14 不可那些先知对你们所;他们:你们不致服事巴比伦王,其实他们向你们预言

15 耶和华:我并没有打发他们,他们却托我的名预言,好使我将你们和向你们预言的那些先知赶出去,一同灭亡。

16 我又对祭司和这众民耶和华如此:你们不可先知对你们所预言。他们耶和华殿中的器皿快要从巴比伦带回来;其实他们向你们预言

17 不可从他们,只管服事巴比伦王便得存活。这城何致变为荒场呢?

18 他们若果是先知,有耶和华的临到他们,让他们祈求万军之耶和华,使那在耶和华殿中和犹大王宫内,并耶路撒冷剩下的器皿,不被带到巴比伦去。

19 (因为万军之耶和华论到子、铜、盆座,并在这城里的器皿,

20 就是巴比伦王尼布甲尼撒掳掠犹大约雅敬儿子耶哥尼雅,和犹大耶路撒冷一切贵胄的时候所没有掠去的器皿。)

21 论到那在耶和华殿中和犹大王宫内,并耶路撒冷下的器皿,万军之耶和华以色列的如此

22 必被到巴比伦存在那里,直到我眷顾以色列人的日子。那时,我必将这器皿回来,交还此地。这是耶和华的。

   

Komentář

 

Bring

  
The Offering, by François-Alfred Delobbe

To bring, in Genesis 37:28, signifies consultation.

As with common verbs in general, the meaning of “bring” is highly dependent on context, but in general it represents an introduction to a new spiritual state or to new ideas.

(Odkazy: Arcana Coelestia 3943, 5543, 5641, 5645, 8988)

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 8987

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

8987. 'I will not go out free' means the delight of obedience. This is clear from the meaning of 'going out free' as a state after conflict, which is solely one of strengthened and implanted truth, dealt with above in 8976, 8980, 8984. For servitude which lasted for six years and is called 'a week', Genesis 29:27-28, means labour or some conflict such as that undergone by those who are imbued with truths and not with complementary good, that is, those who are meant in the spiritual sense by 'Hebrew slaves'. The character of these people is such that they are not able to be regenerated, only to be reformed. The expression to be regenerated is used in reference to those who allow the Lord to lead them by means of truths, called the truths of faith, to the good of spiritual life; but to be reformed is used in reference to those who cannot be led by means of the truths of faith to the good of spiritual life, only to the delight of natural life.

[2] Those who allow themselves to be regenerated act from affection when they act in accordance with the commandments of faith; but those who do not allow themselves to be regenerated, only to be reformed, act not from affection but from obedience. The difference is that those who act from affection do so from the heart, which means that they act in freedom, and also that they do what is true for its own sake, and what is good for its own sake, and in so doing exercise charity for their neighbour's sake. But those who act from obedience do not act in that way from the heart, or therefore in freedom. If it seems to them that their actions do spring from the heart and are done in freedom, this is due to something of personal glory causing them to feel that way about their actions. Nor do they do what is true for its own sake or good for its own sake, but for the sake of the delight resulting from that glory. Thus they do not exercise charity towards the neighbour for the neighbour's sake, but in order that they themselves may be seen and receive reward. From all this it is clear who exactly they are, and what they are like, who were represented by 'the children of Israel', and who exactly they are, and what they are like, who ho were represented by 'Hebrew slaves'.

[3] But within the Church at the present day recognition of the difference between them has been lost. The reason for this is that faith, not charity, is declared to be and spoken of as the be-all of the Church at the present day. Yet few know what faith is. Most people think that faith consists in knowing the things taught by the Church and in firmly believing that they are true, but not in leading a life in keeping with them. A life in keeping with them is called by them the moral life, which they set apart from the teachings of the Church and term Moral Theology. The learned however think that faith is the confidence or assurance that they are saved through the Lord's having suffered for them and redeemed them from hell. And they say that those possessing this confidence are saved, thus by faith alone. But they do not take into account the truth that the confidence belonging to faith cannot exist except with those who lead a charitable life.

[4] These are the reasons for the loss of the recognition of the difference between those imbued with the truths of faith and not with complementary goodness of life and those who are imbued with goodness of life complementing truths of faith. And since that recognition has been lost the things that are being said about those imbued with truths and not with good, who are meant by 'Hebrew slaves', inevitably appear to be far-fetched.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.