5354. “他给老二起名叫以法莲” 表属世层里面的一个新理解力及其本质. 这从 “名” 和 “起名” 的含义, 以及 “以法莲” 的代表清楚可知: “名” 和 “起名” 是指性质 (参看144, 145, 1754, 1896, 2009, 2724, 3006, 3421节); “以法莲” 是指属世层里面的理解力, 如下文所述. 不过, 首先必须说一说何谓 “以法莲和玛拿西” 所表示的新理解力和新意愿. 在教会, 虽然众所周知, 人必须再次出生, 也就是必须重生才能进神的国; 因为主在约翰福音 (3:3, 5) 非常明确地声明了这一点. 然而, 只有少数人知道重生意味着什么. 原因在于, 很少有人知道何为良善与邪恶. 人们之所以不知道何为良善与邪恶, 是因为他们不知道何为对邻之仁. 他们若知道何为对邻之仁, 也会知道何为良善, 并通过良善知道何为邪恶; 因为凡出自真正的对邻之仁的, 皆为良善.

但对每个人来说, 这良善都无法来源于他自己, 或说没有人能从自己处于这良善, 因为它完全是从主所流入的某种天上的事物. 这天上的良善不断流入, 而邪恶与虚假却阻碍它被接受. 因此, 为叫它能被接受, 人有必要除去邪恶, 并尽可能地除去, 虚假也要除去, 由此将自己带入接受所流入的这良善的状态. 当邪恶被除去后, 此人便接受良善的流注, 同时获得一个新意愿和一个新的理解力. 这新意愿使他能在出于无私的目的向邻舍行善的过程中感受到快乐, 而新的理解力使他能以为了良善与真理, 以及生活的缘故而学习良善与真理为快乐. 由于这新的理解力和新的意愿通过来自主的流注产生, 所以重生之人承认并相信, 感动他的良善与真理并非源于他自己, 而是源于主, 以及凡源于他自己, 或属于他自己的东西, 无非是邪恶.

由此可见何谓重生, 何谓新的意愿和新的理解力. 但带来新意愿和新理解力的重生并非瞬间完成, 而是从幼年一直持续到生命终结, 此后在来世直到永远; 这一切通过无数难以描述的神性手段实现. 因为人本身无非是邪恶, 这邪恶不断从他, 如同从一个火炉冒出, 不断试图灭绝新生的良善. 移除这种邪恶, 牢固植入良善以取代之, 只能通过人的整个一生, 通过无数难以描述的神性手段实现. 如今人们对这些手段几乎一无所知, 因为人们不让自己重生. 他们以为重生什么都不是, 因为他们不相信死后有生命. 重生的过程涉及无法描述的事物, 构成天使智慧的主要部分, 并且具有这样的性质: 任何天使都永远无法穷尽它. 正因如此, 该过程是圣言的内义论述的主要问题.

“以法莲” 表示属世层里面的新理解力, 这一点从圣言中的许多经文, 尤其大量论述 “以法莲” 的先知书何西阿书明显看出来, 其中有如下经文:

我认识以法莲, 以色列也瞒不住我; . 以法莲哪, 现在你竟然行淫, 以色列被玷污了. 以色列和以法莲必因自己的罪孽灭亡; 犹大也必与他们一同灭亡. 在责罚的日子, 以法莲必变为荒场. 我对以法莲竟如飞蛾, 向犹大家竟如蛀虫. 以法莲见自己有病, 犹大见自己有伤, 以法莲往亚述去, 打发人去见耶雷布王; 这一个却不能医治你们. (何西阿书 5:3, 5, 9, 12-13)

同一先知书:

我医治以色列的时候, 以法莲的罪孽和撒马利亚的罪恶就显露出来. 他们行事虚谎, 内有贼人入侵, 外有群盗劫掠. 以法莲好像一只愚蠢无心的鸽子; 他们求告埃及, 投奔亚述. 他们去的时候, 我必将我的网撒在他们身上. (何西阿书 7:1, 11-12)

又:

以色列被吞吃, 现今在列族中, 好像没有愿望的器皿; 他们上去投奔亚述, 如同独行的野驴. 以法莲用妓女的淫资贿买爱情. (何西阿书 8:8-9)

以色列必不得住耶和华的地; 以法莲却要归回埃及, 他们必在亚述吃不洁净之物. (何西阿书 9:3)

以法莲用谎话, 以色列家用诡计围绕我; 犹大却靠神掌权, 向圣者有忠心; 以法莲吃风, 且追赶东风, 他终日增添虚谎和强暴, 与亚述立约, 把油送到埃及. (何西阿书 11:12; 12:1)

在此先知书中还有许多其它经文论及以法莲 (如何西阿书 4:17-19; 5:3, 5, 9, 11-14; 7:8, 9; 9:8, 11, 13, 16; 10:6, 11; 11:3, 8, 9; 12:8, 14; 13:1, 12; 14:8).

在所有这些经文中, “以法莲” 皆表示教会的理解力部分, “以色列” 表示它的属灵部分, “犹大” 表示它的属天部分. 正因 “以法莲” 表示教会的理解力部分, 所以经上如此频繁地论及他说, 以法莲往埃及或亚述去. 这是因为 “埃及” 表示记忆知识, “亚述” 表示基于这些的推理; 记忆知识和推理都是与理解力有关的事物. “埃及” 表示记忆知识 (参看1164, 1165, 1186, 1462, 2588, 3325, 4749, 4964, 4966节); “亚述” 表示理由和推理 (119, 1186节).

在以下经文中, “以法连” 同样表示教会的理解力:

锡安的女子哪, 应当大大喜乐! 耶路撒冷的女子哪, 应当欢呼! 看哪, 你的王来到你这里! 我必除灭以法莲的战车和耶路撒冷的战马, 争战的弓也必除灭. 祂必向列族讲和平, 祂的权柄必从这海管到那海, 从大河管到地极. 我为自己把犹大弯紧, 我使以法莲满了弓. 锡安哪, 我要激发你的众子, 攻击雅完的众子. (撒迦利亚书 9:9-10, 13)

这论及主的到来和外邦人当中的教会. “除灭以法莲的战车和耶路撒冷的战马” 表示除灭教会的一切理解力; “使以法莲满了弓” 表示赐予一个新的理解力. “车” 表示教义 (参看 (5321节), “马” 表示理解力 (2760-2762, 3217, 5321节); “弓” 也表示教义 (2685, 2686, 2709节); 教义依靠理解力, 因为人对它理解到何等程度, 他就信它到何等程度; 他对教义的理解决定了信仰的品质.

因此, 以法莲的子孙被称为 “弓箭手弓箭手”, 诗篇:

以法莲的子孙带着兵器, 拿着弓 (他们是), 临阵之日, 转身退后. (诗篇 78:9)

以西结书:

人子啊, 你要取一根木棍, 在其上写为犹大和他的同伴以色列人; 又取一根木棍, 在其上写为约瑟, 就是为以法莲, 又为他的同伴以色列全家的. 然后把它们彼此相接, 连为一根木棍, 使这两根在你手中成为一根. 看哪! 我要取以法莲手中约瑟的棍, 和他同伴以色列支派的棍, 将在它上面的加到犹大的棍上, 使它们成为一根棍, 在我手中合而为一. (以西结书 37:16-17, 19)

此处 “犹大” 也表示教会的属天部分, “以色列” 表示教会的属灵部分, “以法莲” 表示教会的理解力部分. 两根变为一根棍表示这些通过仁之良善合而为一. “木棍” 表示系仁之良善的良善, 因而是指行为的良善 (参看1110, 2784, 2812, 3720, 4943节).

耶利米书:

必有一天, 守望的人从以法莲山呼叫说, 起来吧! 我们可以上锡安, 到耶和华我们的神那里去. 我是以色列的父, 以法莲是我的长子. (耶利米书 31:6, 9)

同一先知书:

我清楚听见以法莲为自己哀叹, 说, 你责罚我, 我便受责罚, 像不惯负轭的牛犊一样. 求你使我回转, 我便回转. 以法莲是我的宝贝儿子么? 是可喜悦的孩子吗? 因为我每逢说了话遣责他, 仍深顾念他. (耶利米书 31:18, 20)

我必再领以色列回他的故土, 他必在迦密和巴珊吃草, 他的灵魂又在以法莲山上和基列境内得以饱足. (耶利米书 50:19)

以赛亚书:

祸哉! 高傲的冠冕, 以法莲酒徒, 凋残之花, 装饰的荣耀, 它们在肥美谷山顶上, 被酒困扰. (以赛亚书 28:1)

在这些经文中, “以法莲” 也表示教会的理解力部分. 教会的理解力部分就是教会成员对于真理与良善, 也就是信与仁的教义事物所拥有的理解. 因此, 这理解就是他们对于这些问题所持的观点, 概念或想法. 真理本身是教会的属灵部分, 良善是教会的属天部分; 但不同的人对真理与良善的理解是不同的; 因此, 人对真理的理解如何, 他所知道的真理就如何, 或也可说, 人对真理的理解决定了他所知道的真理的种类. 每个人对良善的理解也一样.

至于何为 “玛拿西” 所表示的教会意愿部分, 这可从教会的理解力部分, 也就是 “以法莲” 得知. 教会意愿的性质与其理解力的性质相似, 即它是因人而异的. 在以赛亚书, “玛拿西” 就表示这意愿部分:

因万军之耶和华的烈怒, 地都变暗, 百姓成了烧火的燃料, 无人怜惜弟兄. 各人吃自己膀臂上的肉. 玛拿西吞吃以法莲; 以法莲吞吃玛拿西, 他们一同攻击犹大. (以赛亚书 9:19-21)

“各人吃自己膀臂上的肉. 玛拿西吞吃以法莲; 以法莲吞吃玛拿西” 表教会成员的意愿将攻击他的理解力, 他的理解力则攻击他的意愿.

诗篇:

神已经指着他的圣洁说, 我要欢乐, 我要分开示剑, 丈量疏割谷. 基列是我的, 玛拿西也是我的, 以法莲是护卫我头的力量. (诗篇 60:6-7)

又:

领约瑟如领羊群之以色列的牧者啊, 侧耳听哦! 坐在二基路伯上的啊, 求你发出光来! 在以法莲, 便雅悯, 玛拿西前面, 施展你的大能. (诗篇 80:1-2)

此处 “以法莲” 也表示教会的理解力部分, “玛拿西” 表示它的意愿部分. 这层含义也可从雅各临死前对以法莲和玛拿西的祝福 (创世记 48:13-20), 雅各接受以法莲以取代流便, 接受玛拿西以取代西缅 (创世记 48:3, 5) 明显看出来; 因为流便代表教会的理解力部分, 也就是理解力或教义上的信仰 (参看3861, 3866节); 西缅代表行为上的信仰, 或顺从和实践真理的意愿, 仁爱就源于真理并通过真理来表达自己, 因而代表行为上的真理, 也就是新意愿的良善 (3869-3872节).

那时叫以色列的雅各更多地祝福以法莲, 而不是玛拿西, 将右手放在前者身上, 左手放在后者身上 (创世记 48:13-20), 其原因和雅各为自己获得以扫的长子名分的原因是一样的, 也与犹大从他玛所生的儿子法勒斯和谢拉的情况是一样的, 当时谢拉虽为长子, 仍在法勒斯之后出来 (创世记 38:28-30). 这个原因就是, 在人重生期间, 属于理解力的信之真理看似占据第一位, 而属于意愿的仁之良善则看似占据第二位; 而事实上, 良善占据第一位, 一旦此人重生, 这一点是显而易见的 (关于这个主题, 可参看3324, 3539, 3548, 3556, 3563, 3570, 3576, 3603, 3701, 4243, 4244, 4247, 4337, 4925, 4926, 4928, 4930, 4977节).

4844. 'Remain a widow in your father's house' means the alienation of this Church from the Jewish Church. This becomes clear from the fact that Judah's wish was that by doing this she would go away and not return to him any more. He did, it is true, say that she should remain there until Shelah his son was grown up; nevertheless he had it in mind not to give her to Shelah his son, for he said to himself, 'In case he also dies, like his brothers'. He gave further proof of his intentions by his actions, as is evident from verse 14 - 'Tamar saw that Shelah had grown up, and she had not been given to him as a wife'. From all this it is evident that the words used here mean that he alienated her from himself. That is, the meaning in the internal sense is that he alienated the Church representative of spiritual and celestial things - the Church represented by 'Tamar', 4811, 4831 - from the Jewish Church represented by 'Judah'. The two could not be in agreement with each other because Judaism was not a representative Church, only a representative of the Church, 4307, 4500; for it acknowledged what was external but not that which was internal.

[2] 'A widow' also means the truth of the Church without its good; for in the representative sense 'a wife' means truth and 'a husband' good, 4823, 4843, and therefore 'a wife without a husband' means the truth of the Church without its good. This being so, when it is said in reference to Tamar that she should remain in the house of her father, the meaning is that the truth of the Church would be alienated, and also that it would not find acceptance in his house, even as the Jewish nation could not accept it because not good but evil was present among that nation.

[3] A widow is referred to many times in the Word; but anyone unacquainted with the internal sense inevitably thinks that 'a widow' means a widow. In the internal sense 'a widow' means the truth of the Church without good, that is, people who have truth that is without good but who nevertheless have a desire for good, who consequently love to be led by good; for 'a husband' means good which ought to take the lead. In the Ancient Church people like these were meant in the good sense by 'the widowed', whether they were women or men. For the Ancient Church distinguished the neighbour to whom charity was to be performed into many separate classes. Some were called the poor, some the wretched and afflicted, some the bound and in prison, some the blind and the lame, and others strangers, orphans, and widows. It performed different charitable works, whichever were appropriate to the character each class possessed. The teachings of that Church showed them what those works were, for that Church had no other teachings than these. Therefore whenever those living in those times either taught or wrote, they did so in conformity with these teachings, so that when they spoke of 'widows' they meant none but the kind of persons among whom truth existed without good but who nevertheless had a desire to be led to good.

[4] From this it is also evident that the teachings of the Ancient Church were ones that had to do with charity and the neighbour, and that all its religious knowledge and factual knowledge existed to enable people to know what was meant spiritually by external things. For the Church was representative of spiritual and celestial things, and therefore it was these spiritual and celestial things, represented and meant by that Church, that people came to know about through the Church's teachings and through its factual knowledge. But those teachings and factual knowledge have become at the present day completely wiped out, so completely indeed that there is no knowledge of their having existed. For their place has been taken by teachings to do with faith which, if widowed and separated from those to do with charity, have virtually nothing to teach. For teachings to do with charity show what good is, but those to do with faith show what truth is. Teaching what truth is without what good is amounts to walking like someone blind, it being good that is the teacher and leader, truth the one that is taught and led. Between the two kinds of teaching there is a vast difference, as great as that between light and darkness. If the darkness is not lightened by means of the light, that is, if truth is not lightened by good, or faith by charity, it is nothing but darkness. For this reason no one knows intuitively, nor consequently by perception, whether truth is the truth; he knows it only from what he was taught and what he absorbed in childhood and substantiated in adult years. This also explains why Churches are so much at variance with one another, one giving the name truth to that which another calls falsity, and are never in agreement.

[5] The meaning in the good sense of 'widows' as people who have truth existing without good but who nevertheless have a desire to be led by good may be seen from places in the Word where widows are mentioned, as in David,

Jehovah who executes judgement for the oppressed, who gives bread to the starving, Jehovah who sets the bound free; Jehovah who opens the blind [eyes]; Jehovah who lifts up the bowed down; Jehovah who loves the righteous; Jehovah who guards sojourners, upholds the orphan and the widow. Psalms 146:7-9.

This refers, in the internal sense, to those whom the Lord furnishes with truths and leads to good. But some of them are called the oppressed, some the starving, while others are called the bound, the blind, the bowed down, sojourners, orphans and widows, each name appropriate to the character of the ones to whom it is applied. No one however can know what each particular nature is except from the internal sense; but the teachings of the Ancient Church showed what any particular nature was. Here, as in many other places, sojourner, orphan, and widow are referred to jointly because 'a sojourner' means those who wish to be furnished with the truths of faith, 1463, 4444, 'an orphan' those with whom good exists without truth but who have a desire to be led to good by means of truth, and 'a widow' those with whom truth exists without good and who have a desire to be led to truth by means of good. These three are referred to jointly here and elsewhere in the Word because in the internal sense they form a single group, for all three together mean those who wish to be taught and to be led to good and truth.

[6] In the same author,

A father of the orphans, and a judge of the widows, is God in the habitation of His holiness. Psalms 68:5.

'The orphans' stands for those with whom, like young children, the good that goes with innocence is present but no truth as yet. The Lord is said to be 'a father' of these because He leads them like a father; He leads them by means of truth into good, that is to say, into the good constituting life or wisdom. 'The widows' stands for those who as adults know the truth but are not as yet doing good. The Lord is said to be 'a judge' of these because He leads them; He leads them by means of good into truth, that is to say, into the truth constituting intelligence. For by 'a judge' a leader is meant. Good without truth, meant by 'an orphan', is made into good filled with wisdom by means of teaching about truth; and truth without good, meant by 'a widow', is made into truth filled with intelligence by means of a life of good.

[7] In Isaiah,

Woe to those decreeing decrees of iniquity, to turn aside the poor from judgement and to carry off into judgement the wretched of My people, so that widows may be their spoil and so that they may make orphans their prey. Isaiah 10:1-2.

Here 'the poor', 'the wretched', 'widows', and 'orphans' do not mean those who are literally so but those who are spiritually such. Now because in the Jewish Church, as in the Ancient, everything was representative, so also was doing good to orphans and widows, for doing good to these represented in heaven charity towards those who are orphans and widows in the spiritual sense.

[8] In Jeremiah,

Do judgement and righteousness, and deliver the plundered out of the hand of the oppressor; and do not defraud the sojourner, the orphan, and the widow, and do not use force, and do not shed innocent blood in this place. Jeremiah 22:3.

Here also 'the sojourner, the orphan, and the widow' means those who are spiritually such. In the spiritual world or heaven they do not know who a sojourner, orphan, or widow is, for the condition of such persons there is not the same as what it had been in the world. When therefore these words are read by man, angels perceive the spiritual or internal meaning they possess.

[9] Similarly in Ezekiel,

Behold, the princes of Israel, each according to his power, ¹ have in you been intent on shedding blood; in you they have treated father and mother with contempt; in you they have dealt with the sojourner by means of oppression; in you they have defrauded the orphan and the widow. Ezekiel 22:6-7.

Also in Malachi,

I will draw near to you to judgement, and I will be a swift witness against the sorcerers, and against those who swear falsely, and against oppressors of the hireling in his wages, of the widow and the orphan, and [against] those who turn aside the sojourner, and do not fear Me. Malachi 3:5.

Similarly in Moses,

You shall not press down a sojourner or oppress him. You shall not afflict any widow or orphan. If you do indeed afflict him, and if he indeed cries out to Me, I will surely hear his cry, and My anger will burn, and I will kill you with the sword, so that your wives become widows, and your children orphans. Exodus 22:21-24.

[10] This, like every other commandment, judgement, and statute in the Jewish Church, was representative. Also, members of that Church were tied down to things of an external nature so that they would observe that command, and by means of their observance of it they represented the inner spirit of charity, even though they themselves had no charity, that is, they did not act from any inner affection. An inner spirit flowed from an affection to furnish with truths those who were without knowledge, and to lead those people to good by means of truths. If they had done this, members of the Jewish Church would have been doing good, in a spiritual sense, to the sojourner, orphan, and widow. But so that what was external might be kept going for the sake of what it represented, the curses declared on Mount Ebal included 'turning aside the judgement of the sojourner, the orphan, and the widow', Deuteronomy 27:19. 'Turning aside the judgement of these' stands for doing the reverse, that is, leading through teaching and life to falsity and evil. Also, because taking goods and truths away from others, and then making them one's own so as to enhance one's own position and gain, was included among curses, the Lord therefore said,

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees! for you devour widows' houses, and for a presence you make long prayers; on account of this you will receive greater condemnation. ² Matthew 23:14; Luke 20:47.

'Devouring widows' houses' stands for taking truths away from those who have a desire for them, and teaching them falsities.

[11] To leave for the sojourner, orphan, and widow that which remained in fields, olivegroves, and vineyards, Deuteronomy 24:19-22, was likewise representative. So too was the command that when they had finished paying the tithes of their produce in the third year, the people should give to the sojourner, orphan, and widow, so that they ate within their gates and were satisfied, Deuteronomy 26:12-13. It being the Lord alone who teaches a person and leads him to good and truth, it is said in Jeremiah,

Leave your orphans, I will keep them alive; and the widows will trust in Me. Jeremiah 49:10-11.

And in Moses,

Jehovah executes judgement for the orphan and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him bread and clothing. Deuteronomy 10:18.

'Bread' stands for the good of love, 2165, 2177, 3478, 3735, 3813, 4211, 4217, 4735, and 'clothing' for the truth of faith, 4545, 4763.

[12] It is recorded in 1 Kings 17:1-17 that Elijah was sent, when there was a famine because there was no rain in the land, to a widow in Zarephath. He asked her for a little cake, which she had to make for him first and give it to him; after that she was to make one for herself and her son. When she did so her jar of meal was not used up and her cruse of oil did not run dry. All this was representative, like everything else recorded about Elijah, and in general throughout the Word. 'A famine in the land because there was no rain' represented truth laid waste within the Church, 1460, 3364; 'a widow in Zarephath' those outside the Church who have a desire for truth; 'a cake which she had to make for him first' the good of love to the Lord, 2177, whom, from the very little she had, she was to love above herself and her son. 'The jar of meal' means truth derived from good, 2177, and 'the cruse of oil' charity and love, 886, 3728, 4582. 'Elijah' represents the Word, by means of which such things are effected, 2762.

[13] The same is also meant, in the internal sense, by the Lord's words in Luke,

No prophet is accepted in his own country. In truth, I tell you, there were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months, while there was a great famine over the whole land; yet Elijah was sent to none of them, except to a woman - a widow - in Zarephath of Sidon. Luke 4:24-26.

That is, he was sent to those outside the Church who had a desire for truth. But 'widows' within the Church that had been laid waste, to whom Elijah was not sent, are those with whom no truth exists because no good does so; for where there is no good neither is there any truth. However much among those people truth seems to outward appearance like truth it is nothing more so to speak than a shell without any nut in it.

[14] Those among whom this kind of truth exists, also those among whom falsity exists, are meant by 'widows' in the contrary sense, as in Isaiah,

Jehovah will cut off from Israel head and tail, the branch and the bulrush in one day. The old and the honourable in face is the head, and the prophet, the teacher of a lie, the tail. Therefore the Lord will not rejoice over its young men, and He will not have compassion on its orphans and its widows. Isaiah 9:14-15, 17.

In Jeremiah,

I will winnow them with a winnowing-fork in the gates of the land; I will bereave, I will destroy My people; they have not turned from their ways. Their widows are increased to Me more than the sand of the seas. I will bring to them, against the mother of the young men, one who lays waste at midday. She who bore seven languishes; she has breathed her last. Her sun is going down while it is still day. Jeremiah 15:7-9.

In the same prophet,

Our inheritance has been turned over to aliens, our houses to foreigners. We have become orphans with no father; our mothers are widows. Lamentations 5:2-3.

[15] Because 'widows' meant those with whom no truth existed because no good did so, it was therefore shameful for Churches to be called widows, even those Churches governed by falsities springing from evil, as in John,

In her heart she said, A queen I sit, and I am no widow, and shall not see mourning. On account of this in one day will her plagues come, death and mourning and famine, and she will be burned with fire. Revelation 18:7-8.

This refers to Babel. A similar reference to Babel occurs in Isaiah,

Hear this, you lover of pleasures, sitting securely, saying in her heart, I am, and there is no one else like me; a widow I shall not sit, nor shall I know loss of children. But these two things will come to you in a moment in one day - loss of children and widowhood. Isaiah 47:8-9.

[16] From these quotations one may now see what is meant by 'a widow' in the internal sense of the Word. One may see that since 'a widow' represented and consequently meant the truth of the Church without its good - for 'a wife' meant truth and 'a husband' good - priests in the Ancient Churches, in which every single thing was representative, were therefore forbidden to marry any widow who was not a priest's widow, as the following in Moses declares,

The high priest shall take a wife in her virginity; a widow or a woman that has been put away or one defiled or a prostitute, these he shall not take, but a virgin of his own people shall he take as his wife. Leviticus 21:13-15.

And in the references to a new temple and a new priesthood in Ezekiel,

Priests the Levites shall not take as wives for themselves a widow or a woman that has been put away, but virgins from the seed of the house of Israel; but a widow who is the widow of a priest may they take. Ezekiel 44:22.

For 'the virgins' whom they were to marry represented and consequently meant the affection for truth, and 'the widow of a priest' the affection for truth from good, since 'a priest' in the representative sense is the good of the Church. For this reason also any widow [who was the daughter] of a priest and who had no children was allowed to eat some of the offerings or holy things, Leviticus 22:12-13.

[17] Those who belonged to the Ancient Church knew this meaning of 'a widow' from the teachings of the Church, for among them these teachings had to do with love and charity, which included countless matters which at the present day have become completely wiped out. From them they knew which particular kind of charitable act they were required to perform - that is, which service they ought to render towards the neighbour - for those who were called 'widows', for those who were called 'orphans', for those who were called 'sojourners', and so on. From their religious knowledge of truth and from factual knowledge they had a discernment and a knowledge of what the ritual observances of their Church represented and meant. The learned among them knew what it was that things on earth and in this world represented, for they recognized that the whole natural creation was a theatre representative of the heavenly kingdom, 2758, 2989, 2999, 3483. Such knowledge raised their minds up to heavenly things, and the teachings of their Church led the way to life. But after the Church turned aside from charity to faith, more so after it separated faith from charity, and made faith without charity and the works of charity the bringer of salvation, their minds could no longer be raised up by means of religious knowledge to heavenly things, nor be led by any means of the teachings of the Church to life. Indeed the decline has been so great that in the end scarcely anyone believes in a life after death, and scarcely anyone knows anything about heaven. Also, there is no belief at all in the existence of a spiritual sense of the Word which is not visible in the letter. In this way people's minds have become closed.

Poznámky pod čarou: