Bible

 

创世记 36

Studie

   

1 以扫就是以东,他的後代记在下面。

2 以扫迦南的女子为妻,就是赫人以伦的女儿亚大和希未人祭便的孙女、亚拿的女儿阿何利巴玛,

3 又娶了以实玛利的女儿、尼拜约的妹子巴实抹。

4 亚大给以扫生了以利法;巴实抹生了流珥;

5 阿何利巴玛生了耶乌施、雅兰、可拉。这都是以扫的儿子,是在迦南生的。

6 以扫带着他的妻子、儿女,与家中一切的人口,并他的羊、牲畜,和一切货财,就是他在迦南所得的,往别处去,离了他兄弟雅各

7 因为二人的财物群畜甚多,寄居的方容不下他们,所以不能同居。

8 於是以扫在西珥里;以扫就是以东

9 以扫是西珥以东人的始祖,他的後代记在下面。

10 以扫众子的名字如下。以扫妻子亚大生以利法;以扫妻子巴实抹生流珥。

11 以利法的儿子是提幔、阿抹、洗玻、迦坦、基纳斯。

12 亭纳是以扫儿子以利法的妾;他给以利法生了亚玛力。这是以扫妻子亚大的子孙。

13 流珥的儿子是拿哈、谢拉、沙玛、米撒。这是以扫妻子巴实抹的子孙。

14 以扫妻子阿何利巴玛是祭便的孙女,亚拿的女儿;他给以扫生了耶乌施、雅兰、可拉

15 以扫子孙中作族长的记在下面。以扫长子以利法的子孙中,有提幔族长、阿抹族长、洗玻族长,基纳斯族长、

16 可拉族长、迦坦族长、亚玛力族长。这是在以东从以利法所出的族长,都是亚大的子孙。

17 以扫儿子流珥的子孙中,有拿哈族长、谢拉族长、沙玛族长、米撒族长。这是在以东从流珥所出的族长,都是以扫妻子巴实抹的子孙。

18 以扫妻子阿何利巴玛的子孙中,有耶乌施族长、雅兰族长、可拉族长。这是从以扫妻子,亚拿的女儿,阿何利巴玛子孙中所出的族长。

19 以上的族长都是以扫的子孙;以扫就是以东

20 原有的居民─何利人西珥的子孙记在下面:就是罗坍、朔巴、祭便、亚拿、

21 底顺、以察、底珊。这是从以东的何利人西珥子孙中所出的族长。

22 罗坍的儿子是何利、希幔;罗坍的妹子是亭纳。

23 朔巴的儿子是亚勒文、玛拿辖、以巴录、示玻、阿南。

24 祭便的儿子是亚雅、亚拿〈当时在旷野放他父亲祭便的,遇着温泉的,就是这亚拿〉。

25 亚拿的儿子是底顺;亚拿的女儿是阿何利巴玛。

26 底顺的儿子是欣但、伊是班、益兰、基兰。

27 以察的儿子是辟罕、撒番、亚干。

28 底珊的儿子是乌斯、亚兰。

29 从何利人所出的族长记在下面:就是罗坍族长、朔巴族长、祭便族长、亚拿族长、

30 底顺族长、以察族长、底珊族长。这是从何利人所出的族长,都在西珥,按着宗族作族长。

31 以色列人未有君治理以先,在以东的记在下面。

32 比珥的儿子比拉在以东作王,他的京城名叫亭哈巴。

33 比拉死了,波斯拉人谢拉的儿子约巴接续他作王。

34 约巴死了,提幔的人户珊接续他作王。

35 户珊死了,比达的儿子哈达接续他作王;这哈达就是在摩押地杀败米甸人的,他的京城名叫亚未得。

36 哈达死了,玛士利加人桑拉接续他作王。

37 桑拉死了,大边的利伯人扫罗接续他作王。

38 扫罗死了,亚革波的儿子巴勒哈南接续他作王。

39 亚革波的儿子巴勒哈南死了,哈达接续他作王,他的京城名叫巴乌;他的妻子名叫米希他别,是米萨合的孙女,玛特列的女儿。

40 以扫所出的族长,按着他们的宗族、住处、名字记在下面:就是亭纳族长、亚勒瓦族长、耶帖族长、

41 阿何利巴玛族长、以拉族长、比嫩族长、

42 基纳斯族长、提幔族长、米比萨族长、

43 玛基叠族长、以兰族长。这是以东人在所得为业的上,按着他们的处。〈所有的族长都是以东人的始祖以扫的後代。〉

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4581

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4581. And he poured out a drink-offering thereon. That this signifies the Divine good of truth, is evident from the signification of a “drink-offering,” as being the Divine good of truth, of which below; but first I will state what the good of truth is. The good of truth is that which has elsewhere been called the good of faith, and is love toward the neighbor, or charity. There are two universal kinds of good, one of which is called the good of faith, and the other the good of love. The good of faith is what is signified by a “drink-offering,” and the good of love by “oil.” They who are brought by the Lord to good by an internal way are in the good of love, but they who are brought by an external way are in the good of faith. The men of the celestial church, and likewise the angels of the inmost or third heaven, are in the good of love; but the men of the spiritual church, and likewise the angels of the middle or second heaven, are in the good of faith. For this reason the former good is called celestial good, but the latter spiritual good. The difference is the same as that between willing well from good will, and willing well from good understanding. The latter therefore, namely, spiritual good, or the good of faith, or the good of truth, is what is signified by a “drink-offering;” but the former, namely, celestial good, or the good of love, is what is understood in the internal sense by “oil.”

[2] That such things were signified by the “oil” and the “drink-offering” cannot indeed be seen except from the internal sense, and yet it must be apparent to everyone that holy things were represented, for otherwise what else would be the pouring out of a drink-offering and of oil upon a pillar of stone than a ridiculous and idolatrous performance? And so in the making of a king, unless holy things were signified and involved in the putting of a crown on his head, anointing him with oil from a horn upon his forehead and upon his wrists, putting a scepter into his hand besides a sword and keys, investing him with a crimson robe and then seating him upon a throne of silver; and afterwards in his riding on a horse in royal trappings and being served at table by those of highest rank, not to mention other formalities, unless all these ceremonies represented holy things, and were venerable through their correspondence with the things of heaven and thence of the church, they would be like babies’ plays on a larger scale, or like plays on the stage.

[3] Nevertheless all these rituals derived their origin from the most ancient times, when rituals were holy from their representing holy things, and from correspondence with the holy things in heaven and thence in the church. Moreover, at the present day they are regarded as venerable, not because it is known what they represent, or to what they correspond, but by an interpretation as of emblems that are in use. But if it were known what each of these things represents, and to what holy thing it corresponds—the crown, the oil, the horn, the scepter, the sword, the keys, riding upon a white horse, and eating while nobles are serving-men would think of them with much more reverence. But this they do not know, and wonderful to say, do not desire to know, to such a degree have the representatives and significatives which are in such things and everywhere in the Word been at the present day destroyed in the minds of men.

[4] That a “drink-offering” signifies the good of truth, or spiritual good, may be seen from the sacrifices in which it was employed. Sacrifices were made from the herd or from the flock, and were representative of the internal worship of the the Lord, (n. 922, 923, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3519). To these were added the meat-offering and the drink-offering. The meat-offering, which consisted of fine flour mingled with oil, signified celestial good, or what is the same, the good of love, “oil” signifying love to the Lord, and “fine flour” charity toward the neighbor. But the drink-offering, which consisted of wine, signified spiritual good, or what is the same, the good of faith. Both together therefore (namely, the meat-offering and the drink-offering) signified the same things as the bread and wine in the Holy Supper.

[5] That these were added to the burnt-offerings and sacrifices is evident in Moses:

Thou shalt offer two lambs of the first year day by day continually; the one lamb thou shalt offer in the morning, and the other lamb shalt thou offer between the evenings; and a tenth of fine flour mingled with beaten oil, a fourth of a hin, and drink offering of the fourth of a hin of wine for the first lamb; and so also for the second lamb (Exodus 29:38-41).

In the day when ye wave the sheaf of the firstfruits of the harvest, ye shall offer a lamb without blemish of the first year, for a burnt-offering unto Jehovah, the meat-offering whereof shall be two tenths of fine flour mingled with oil, and the drink offering whereof shall be of wine, the fourth of a hin (Leviticus 23:12-13, 18).

On the day when the days of his Naziriteship are fulfilled, he shall offer his gift unto Jehovah (sacrifices), and a basket of unleavened things of fine flour, cakes mingled with oil, with unleavened wafers anointed with oil, with their meat-offering and their drink-offerings (Numbers 6:13-15, 17).

Upon the burnt-offering they shall offer a meat-offering of a tenth of fine flour mingled with the fourth of a hin of oil; and wine for the drink offering, the fourth of a hin, in one manner for the burnt-offering of a ram, and in another manner for that of an ox (Numbers 15:3-5, 11).

With the burnt-offering of the daily sacrifice thou shalt offer a drink-offering, the fourth of a hin for a lamb; in the holy place shalt thou pour out a drink-offering of wine unto Jehovah (Numbers 28:6-7).

Moreover concerning the meat-offerings and drink-offerings in the sacrifices of various kinds, see Numbers 28:7-31 29:1-40.

[6] That the meat-offering and the drink-offering had this signification may be seen from the fact that love and faith effect everything of worship; and it may be seen above that the bread (which here is of fine flour mingled with oil) and the wine in the Holy Supper signify love and faith, thus everything of worship (n. 1798, 2165, 2177, 2187, 2343, 2359, 3464, 3735, 3813, 4211, 4217).

[7] But when the people fell away from the genuine representative of the worship of the Lord, and turned away to other gods and poured out drink-offerings to them, then by the drink-offerings were signified things which are opposite to charity and faith, namely, the evils and falsities of the love of the world, as in Isaiah:

Ye did become heated with gods under every green tree, thou hast also poured out to them a drink-offering, thou hast offered a meat-offering (Isaiah 57:5-6);

“to become heated with gods” denotes the concupiscences of falsity (that “gods” denote falsities, n. 4402, 4544); “under every green tree” denotes from the belief of all falsities (n. 2722, 4552); “to pour out to them a drink-offering and offer a meat-offering” denotes the worship of them. Again:

Ye that forsake Jehovah, that forget the mountain of My holiness, that prepare a table for Gad, and fill a drink-offering to Meni (Isaiah 65:11).

In Jeremiah:

The sons gather wood, and the fathers kindle a fire, and the women knead dough, to make cakes to the queen of the heavens, and to pour out a drink-offering to other gods (Jeremiah 7:18).

[8] Again:

Doing we will do every word that is gone forth out of our mouth, to burn incense to the queen of the heavens, and to pour out drink-offerings to her as we and our fathers have done, and our princes in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem (Jeremiah 44:17-19);

“the queen of the heavens” denotes all falsities, for in the genuine sense the “armies of the heavens” are truths, but in the opposite sense falsities, and in like manner the “king and queen;” thus the “queen” denotes all of them, and “to pour drink-offerings to her” is to worship.

[9] Again:

The Chaldeans shall burn the city, and the houses upon whose roofs they have offered incense to Baal, and have poured out drink-offerings to other gods (Jeremiah 32:29);

“the Chaldeans” denote those who are in worship in which there is falsity; “to burn the city” denotes to destroy and vastate those who are in doctrinal things of what is false; “to offer incense to Baal upon the roofs of the houses” denotes the worship of what is evil; “to pour out drink-offerings to other gods” denotes the worship of what is false.

[10] In Hosea:

They shall not dwell in Jehovah’s land, and Ephraim shall return into Egypt, and they shall eat what is unclean in Assyria; they shall not pour out wine to Jehovah (Hos. 9:3-4);

“not to dwell in Jehovah’s land” denotes not to be in the good of love; “Ephraim shall return into Egypt” denotes that the intellectual of the church will become mere knowledge and sensuous; “they shall eat what is unclean in Assyria” denotes impure and profane things from reasoning; “they shall not pour out wine to Jehovah” denotes no worship from truth.

[11] In Moses:

It shall be said, Where are their gods, the rock in which they trusted, that did eat the fat of the sacrifices, and drank the wine of their drink-offering? Let them arise and help them (Deuteronomy 33:37-38 [NCBSW: 32:37-38]);

“gods,” as above, denote falsities; “that did eat the fat of the sacrifices” denotes that they destroyed the good of worship; “that drank the wine of their drink-offering” denotes that they destroyed the truth of worship. Drink-offerings are also predicated of blood, in David:

They shall multiply their griefs, they have hastened to another, lest I pour out their drink-offerings of blood, and lest I take up their names upon my lips (Psalms 16:4);

and by these words are signified the profanations of truth; for in this sense “blood” denotes violence offered to charity (n. 374, 1005), and profanation (n. 1003).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3464

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3464. And showed him concerning the well which they had digged; and they said, We have found waters. That this signifies interior truths by means of these things, is evident from the signification of a “well,” as being the Word (n. 3424); and from the signification of “waters,” as being truths (n. 2702t is, truths which are from the Word; thus to “show him concerning the well which they had digged,” signifies concerning the Word from which they had doctrinal things; “and they said, We have found waters,” signifies that in them, that is, in the doctrinal things, there were interior truths. For as before said, there are interior truths in all the doctrinal things that are drawn from the literal sense of the Word, because the literal sense of the Word is like a well that contains water; for in each and everything of the Word there is an internal sense, which is also in the doctrinal things that are from the Word.

[2] As regards the doctrinal things that are from the literal sense of the Word, the case is this: When a man is in them, and at the same time in a life according to them, he has a correspondence in himself; for the angels who are with him are in interior truths, while he is in exterior ones, and thus through the doctrinal things he has communication with heaven, but according to the good of his life. As for example, when in the Holy Supper he thinks in simplicity of the Lord from the words then used, “This is My body, and this is “My blood,” the angels with him are in the idea of love to the Lord and charity toward the neighbor; for love to the Lord corresponds to the Lord’s body, and to bread; and charity toward the neighbor corresponds to the blood, and the wine (n. 1798, 2165, 2177, 2187); and because there is such a correspondence, there flows an affection out of heaven through the angels into that holy state in which the man then is, which affection he receives in accordance with the good of his life.

[3] For the angels dwell with everyone in his life’s affection, thus in the affection of the doctrinal things according to which he lives; but in no case if his life disagrees therewith; for if the life disagrees, as for instance if he is in the affection of gaining honors and riches by means of doctrinal things, then the angels retire, and infernals dwell in this affection, who either infuse into him confirmations of the doctrinal things for the sake of self and the world, thus a persuasive faith-which is such that it is regardless whether a thing is true or false provided it captivates the minds of others-or else they take away all faith, and then the doctrine of his lips is only a sound excited and modified by the fire of these loves.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.