圣经文本

 

Genesis第35章

学习

   

2 Iṇṇa Yaqub y aytedan-net əd win dər-əs əddewnen: «Əgərat-in aṣṣanaman win ɣur-wan əllanen, zəzdəgat, təsəṃṃəttəyam isəlsa!

3 Ad-nəfəl edagg a, ad-nakku Bet-El dad z-əkrəsa edagg ən təkutay i Məššina wa di-isannaflayan assaɣa wa ad əmaɣatara, iṣṣan daɣ-i edag oṣe.»

4 Təzzar əkfan Yaqub aṣṣanaman win əlan kul, əd təzabaten ən təməzzugen kul id əṃosnat addabaratan. Iṇbal-tan Yaqub daw ašək igan eṣəm ela illan dagma n əɣrəm ən Šəkem.

5 Dəffər a wen əṣṣəntan əšikəl. Ixrab Məššina kəl ɣərman win tan ɣalayɣalaynen a di da fəlas wər ilkem awedan i maddan-əs ən Yaqub.

6 Yaqub əd win dər iddew kul oṣan-in Luz igan eṣəm tolas Bet-El, ihan akal ən Kanan.

7 Əddi ikras edagg ən təkutay, ig-as eṣəm El-Betel (almaɣna-nnet Məššina ən Betel) id dada a das-d-inafalal Məššina as iḍḍəggag y amaqqar-net.

8 Aba Dəbora taklit ən Raqqiyyetu, tətawaṇbal daw ašək illan daw betel, igan eṣəm elon as har harwa eṣəm-net Elon wa n Tala.

9 Inafalal-du Məššina tolas i Yaqub ɣur tawaɣlay-nnet Mesofotami, iga fall-as albaraka,

10 iṇṇ-as: «Eṣəm-nak Yaqub mišan dəffər azala ad-tagaɣ eṣəm Israyel.» A di da fəl-as itawagga eṣəm Israyel.

11 Təzzar iṇṇ-as Məššina: «Nak Məššina di maqqaran zəddig. A fall-ak aga albaraka fəl ad ifələyləy əzzurriya-nnak. Əzzurriya-nnak di a daɣ-as tətəwəggu tamattay madeɣ tidawat ən təmattiwen. Agin mənokalan daɣ-as.

12 «Akal wa əkfeɣ Ibrahim d Isxaq, a-dak-akfa kay da, akfaq-qu y əzzurriya-nnak dəffər-ək.»

13 Təzzar ig̣mad Məššina edag wa daɣ iššewal i Yaqub.

14 Issəɣta Yaqub daɣ adag wa sər-əs iššewal Məššina təhunt təzzar inɣal fall-as esmad iṃosan takutay, issəlal-tat widi, təqqal təṃətirt ən Məššina.

15 Təzzar iga adagg-en wa sər-əs iššewal Məššina eṣəm Bet-El (almaɣna-nnet Ehan ən Məššina).

16 Yaqub əd tələqqawen-net əg̣madan Bet-El. Daɣ tarrayt n əɣrəm n Efrata, daq-qu əggugan, təggaz Raxil šin ig̣uz n əṃzur, das-wər-nələmmid.

17 Alwaq wa daɣ fall-as təṣṣas talɣa təṇṇ-as təṇtut ta n tənakbalt: «Dawat, barar iyyan tolas!»

18 Mišan s iga di da təlla ɣur-əs taṃattant, aṃaran dad zama təgraw tu daɣ amazay wa, təg-as eṣəm Benoni (almaɣna ag talawayt-in) mišan abba-nnet ig-as eṣəm Benyamin (almaɣna ag əɣil).

19 Aba Raxil. Tətawaṇbal daɣ tarrayt n Efrata, s əmərədda aɣrəm di itawagg-as eṣəm Betlehem.

20 Issəɣta Yaqub təhunt təqqal təṃətirt fəl tasaṣkawt-net.Təṃətirt-en təmmunn fəl tasaṣkawt ən Raxil har azalada.

21 Dəffər awen iggəlat, ikras ahaket dənnəg Migdal-Eder.

22 As iɣsar Israyel daɣ aṃadal wa, itinəməṇsu Ruben əd Bilha, tawahayt n abba-nnet. Isla Israyel a di wər t-ogem. Ila Yaqub ṃaraw bararan d əššin.

23 Ila əd Leyya: Ruben, aɣafadday, dəffər-əs Šimehon, Lefi, Yuda, Issakar əd Zəbulun

24 Ila əd Raxil: Yusəf əd Benyamin.

25 Ila əd Bilha, taklit ən Raxil: Dan əd Naftali.

26 Ila əd Zilfa, taklit ən Leyya: Gad d Aššer. Əntanay da da maddanəs ən Yaqub win das-d-əhunen daɣ Mesofotami.

27 Oṣ-in Yaqub aɣaywan n abba-nnet Isxaq daɣ Mamre, daɣ Kiryat-Arba, iṃos əmərədda Xebron, dad iga Ibrahim d Isxaq təməɣsurt ən magaran.

28 Iga Isxaq təməddurt ən ṭameday n awatay d əṭṭamat təṃərwen,

29 təzzar aba-tu. Dəffər təɣrəst zagret ilkam i win əglanen. Əṇbalan-tu bararan-net fəl əššin-essan Esaw əd Yaqub.

   

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#4541

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

4541. 'And make there an altar to the God who appeared to you' means that which is holy there. This is clear from the meaning of 'an altar' as the chief representative of the Lord, dealt with in 921, 2777, 2811, 4489. This being so, the holiness of worship is meant by 'making an altar to God'.

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#4489

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

4489. 'Will these not be ours?' means that these two kinds of goods and truths would be alike and take the same form. This becomes clear from the train of thought, the essence of which is that the goods and truths of the Most Ancient Church, which in some measure still remained in existence among Hamor and Shechem and their families, would accord with the goods and truths which came from the Ancient Church and existed among the descendants of Jacob. For the observances which were established among the descendants of Jacob were nothing other than external things which represented and meant the internal things of the Most Ancient Church. 'Will these not be ours?' - or, Would they not belong to them? - means that they would be alike and take the same form.

[2] But let an example illustrate this matter. The altar on which they used to offer sacrifice was the chief representative of the Lord, 921, 2777, 2811. The altar was also for that reason fundamental to the worship in the Ancient Church that was called the Hebrew Church, and therefore every single thing that went into the construction of the altar was representative, such as its dimensions - its height, breadth, and length - its stones, its network of bronze, its horns; and so was the fire which was kept burning on it perpetually; and above all the sacrifices and burnt offerings. What they represented were the truths and goods which are the Lord's and which come from the Lord. These were the internal things of worship which, because they were represented in that external object, were alike and took the same form as the truths and goods of the Most Ancient Church. Its dimensions - its height, breadth, and length - meant in general the good, the truth, and the holiness from these, see 650, 1613, 3433, 3434, 4482. 'Its stones' meant in particular those truths that are more basic, 1298, 3720. 'The bronze' from which the network around the altar was made meant natural good, 425, 1551. 'The horns' meant the power of truth that springs from good, 2832. 'The fire' on the altar meant love, 934. 'The sacrifices and burnt offerings' meant celestial and spiritual things, according to their various kinds, 922, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3519. From all this it becomes clear that internal things were to be contained within external ones, and that internally the two sets of goods and truths would be alike. The same applies to all other external aspects of worship.

[3] But those who belonged to the Most Ancient Church had no interest in those external things because they were internal people, and the Lord flowed in by an internal way existing with them and taught them what was good. To them the variations and differences of good were truths, and from this they knew what every single thing in the world represented in the Lord's kingdom; for the whole world or whole natural order is a theatre representative of the Lord's kingdom, 2758, 3483. Those however who belonged to the Ancient Church were not internal people but external, as a consequence of which the Lord was not able with them to flow in by an internal way and teach them what was good, only by an external way. At first He flowed in and taught them by means of such things as were representatives and meaningful signs, from which the representative Church arose, and later on by means of matters of doctrine concerning good and truth which were so represented and meant, from which the Christian Church arose. In essence the Christian Church is identical so far as its internal form is concerned with the representative Church, but the representatives and meaningful signs of the latter were done away with after the Lord came into the world, for the reason that every single thing represented Him Himself and as a consequence the things of His kingdom, for these are derived from Him and are so to speak the Lord Himself.

[4] But the difference between the Most Ancient Church and the Christian Church is as great as that between the bright light of the sun by day and the inferior light of the moon or stars by night. For seeing goods by the internal or earlier way is like seeing in the daytime by the bright light of the sun, whereas seeing by the external or later way is like seeing in the night by the inferior light of the moon or stars. The difference was almost the same between the Most Ancient Church and the Ancient, except that those who belonged to the Christian Church could have dwelt in fuller light if they had acknowledged internal things, that is, if they had believed and practiced the truths and goods which the Lord taught. The actual good is the same in both, but the difference between them is that one sees that good in brightness, the other in obscurity. Those who see in brightness see countless arcana almost as angels in heaven do and also feel an affection for those which they see, whereas those who see in obscurity see scarcely anything that is free from doubt, and the things they do see mingle themselves with the shades of night, that is, with falsities. Nor can they inwardly feel any affection for them. Now because the good is the same in both, so also as a consequence is the truth; and this is why the words 'will these not be ours?' mean that the two sets of goods and truths would be alike and take the same form. For as stated already, Hamor and Shechem were part of the remnants of the Most Ancient Church, while the descendants of Jacob belonged to the Ancient Church called the Hebrew Church, though they were interested only in the external things of that Church. But the fact that Hamor and Shechem his son committed an enormous sin by accepting circumcision will be seen below in 4493.

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.