圣经文本

 

Genesi第38章

学习

   

1 OR avvenne in quel tempo, che Giuda discese d’appresso a’ suoi fratelli, e si ridusse ad albergare in casa di un uomo Adullamita, il cui nome era Hira.

2 E Giuda vide quivi una figliuola di un uomo Cananeo, il nome del quale era Sua; ed egli la prese per moglie, ed entrò da lei.

3 Ed ella concepette e partorì un figliuolo, al quale Giuda pose nome Er.

4 Poi ella concepette ancora, e partorì un figliuolo, e gli pose nome Onan.

5 Ed ella partorì ancora un figliuolo, e gli pose nome Sela; or Giuda era in Chezib, quando ella lo partorì.

6 E Giuda prese una moglie ad Er, suo primogenito, il cui nome era Tamar.

7 Ma Er, primogenito di Giuda, dispiacque al Signore, e il Signore lo fece morire.

8 E Giuda disse ad Onon: Entra dalla moglie del tuo fratello, e sposala per ragion di consanguinità, e suscita progenie al tuo fratello.

9 Ma Onan, sapendo che quella progenie non sarebbe sua, quando entrava dalla moglie del suo fratello, si corrompeva in terra, per non dar progenie al suo fratello.

10 E ciò ch’egli faceva dispiacque al Signore; ed egli fece morire ancora lui.

11 E Giuda disse a Tamar, sua nuora: Stattene vedova in casa di tuo padre, finchè Sela, mio figliuolo, sia divenuto grande; perciocchè egli diceva: E’ si convien provvedere che costui ancora non muoia, come i suoi fratelli. Tamar adunque se ne andò, e dimorò in casa di suo padre.

12 E, dopo molti giorni, morì la figliuola di Sua, moglie di Giuda; e, dopo che Giuda si fu consolato, salì in Timna, con Hira Adullamita, suo famigliare amico, a’ tonditori delle sue pecore.

13 Ed e’ fu rapportato a Tamar, e detto: Ecco, il tuo suocero sale in Timna, per tonder le sue pecore.

14 Allora ella si levò d’addosso gli abiti suoi vedovili, e si coperse di un velo, e se ne turò il viso, e si pose a sedere alla porta di Enaim, ch’è in sulla strada, traendo verso Timna; perciocchè vedeva che Sela era divenuto grande, e pure ella non gli era data per moglie.

15 E Giuda la vide, e stimò lei essere una meretrice; conciossiachè ella avesse coperto il viso.

16 E, stornatosi verso lei in su la via, le disse: Deh! permetti che io entri da te perciocchè egli non sapeva ch’ella fosse sua nuora. Ed ella gli disse: Che mi darai, perchè tu entri da me?

17 Ed egli le disse: Io ti manderò un capretto della greggia. Ed ella disse: Mi darai tu un pegno, finchè tu me l’abbi mandato?

18 Ed egli disse: Qual pegno ti darò io? Ed ella disse: Il tuo suggello, e la tua benda, e il tuo bastone che tu hai in mano. Ed egli le diede quelle cose, ed entrò da lei, ed ella concepette di lui.

19 Poi si levò, e se ne andò, e si levò d’addosso il suo velo, e si rivestì i suoi abiti vedovili.

20 E Giuda mandò il capretto per le mani di quell’Adullamita, suo famigliare amico, per ritrarre il pegno da quella donna; ma egli non la trovò.

21 E ne domandò gli uomini del luogo dove era stata, dicendo: Dove è quella meretrice ch’era alla porta di Enaim in sulla strada? Ed essi risposero: Qui non è stata alcuna meretrice.

22 Ed egli se ne ritornò a Giuda, e gli disse: Io non ho trovata colei; ed anche gli uomini di quel luogo mi hanno detto: Qui non è stata alcuna meretrice.

23 E Giuda disse: Tengasi pure il pegno, che talora noi non siamo in isprezzo: ecco, io le ho mandato questo capretto; ma tu non l’hai trovata.

24 Or intorno a tre mesi appresso, fu rapportato, e detto a Guida: Tamar, tua nuora, ha fornicato, ed anche ecco, è gravida di fornicazione. E Giuda disse: Menatela fuori, e sia arsa.

25 Come era menata fuori, mandò a dire al suo suocero: Io son gravida di colui al quale appartengono queste cose. Gli mandò ancora a dire: Riconosci ora di cui è questo suggello, e queste bende, e questo bastone.

26 E Giuda riconobbe quelle cose, e disse: Ell’è più giusta di me; conciossiachè ella abbia fatto questo, perciocchè io non l’ho data per moglie a Sela, mio figliuolo. Ed egli non la conobbe più da indi innanzi.

27 Or avvenne che al tempo ch’ella dovea partorire, ecco, avea due gemelli in corpo.

28 E, mentre partoriva, l’uno porse la mano; e la levatrice la prese, e vi legò dello scarlatto sopra, dicendo: Costui è uscito il primo.

29 Ma avvenne ch’egli ritrasse la mano; ed ecco, il suo fratello uscì fuori; e la levatrice disse: Qual rottura hai tu fatta? la rottura sia sopra te; e gli fu posto nome Fares.

30 Poi uscì il suo fratello che avea lo scarlatto sopra la mano; e gli fu posto nome Zara.

   


To many Protestant and Evangelical Italians, the Bibles translated by Giovanni Diodati are an important part of their history. Diodati’s first Italian Bible edition was printed in 1607, and his second in 1641. He died in 1649. Throughout the 1800s two editions of Diodati’s text were printed by the British Foreign Bible Society. This is the more recent 1894 edition, translated by Claudiana.

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#4884

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

4884. 'And put on the clothes of her widowhood' means intelligence. This is clear from the meaning of 'a widow' as one with whom truth exists without good but who nevertheless desires to be led by good, dealt with above in 4844; and from the meaning of 'clothes' as truths, dealt with in 297, 2576, 4545, 4763. The reason why these taken together mean intelligence is that nothing else than truths constitute intelligence, for those in possession of truths rooted in good possess intelligence. Indeed truths rooted in good enable the human understanding to dwell in the light of heaven, and the light of heaven is intelligence because Divine Truth rooted in Divine Good constitutes it. Also, a further reason why 'putting on the clothes of widowhood' here means intelligence is that 'a widow' in the genuine sense means one with whom truth exists and who desires to be led by good to truth that constitutes intelligence, as also shown above in 4844, and so to intelligence itself.

[2] To enable the implications of all this to be seen a brief explanation is necessary. When a person knows the truth it is not truth constituting intelligence until he is led by good; but when he is led by good it starts to become the truth of intelligence. For truth does not receive its life from itself but from good; and truth receives its life from good when the person lives in conformity with that truth. When he does this, truth injects itself into the intentions of his will, and from these into his actions, and so into the entire person. Truth that is merely known or grasped intellectually by a person remains excluded from his will, and so from his life since the intentions of a person's will constitute his life. But once he is intent on truth it stands at the gateway into his life; and when he is intent on it and therefore practices it, that truth is present within the entire person. Then, when his practice of that truth is frequent its reappearance is attributable not merely to habit but also to an affection for it and so to a free desire to practise it. Let anyone at all consider whether anything can be taken in by a person apart from that which he is intent on putting into practice. That which he merely thinks about but does not actually do, more so that which he thinks about but does not wish to do, is nothing else than something which remains excluded from that person, and is also driven away like a straw by the smallest puff of wind, and is actually blown away in that manner in the next life. From this one can know what faith without works is. These considerations now show what truth constituting intelligence is, namely truth which is rooted in good. Truth is the characteristic feature of the understanding and good that of the will; or what amounts to the same, truth is the substance of doctrine and good that of life.

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#4763

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

4763. 'And he rent his clothes' means mourning. This is clear from the meaning of 'rending clothes' as mourning, that is to say, mourning on account of the loss of truth, or the fact that no faith exists. In the Word, especially the historical part, one often reads about people rending their clothes, but the origin of that practice is not known at the present day. Nor is it known that it was representative of grief on account of the loss of truth. This practice became representative from the fact that 'clothes' meant truths, as has been shown and may be seen in 4545. Further on in this chapter it is also said that when Jacob recognized his son's tunic he rent his clothes, verse 34, by which mourning for lost truth is meant. Similar instances of this practice occur elsewhere in the Word, where it is stated that when the Rabshakeh was sent by Sennacherib king of Asshur and uttered insults against Jerusalem, Eliakim who was over the king's house, and Shebna the secretary, and Joash the recorder 1 rent their clothes and reported these things to king Hezekiah; and when he heard them the king too rent his clothes and covered himself with sackcloth, Isaiah 36:22; 37:1; 2 Kings 18:37; 19:1. The insults he uttered were directed against God, the king, and Jerusalem, and so against Divine Truth, as is even more evident from the internal sense of this narrative. It was to express mourning therefore that their clothes were rent.

[2] When Jehudi had read before the king the scroll which Jeremiah wrote, it is said that he threw it into the fire, but the king and his servants who were listening to all those words did not tear their clothes apart, Jeremiah 36:23-24. 'They did not tear their clothes apart' meant that they did not mourn on account of the non-acceptance of Divine Truth. Something similar is implied by Joshua the son of Nun and Caleb the son of Jephunneh rending their clothes, when the spies spoke in opposition to them, by speaking unfavourably about the land of Canaan, Numbers 14:6; for 'the land of Canaan' means the Lord's kingdom, and 'to speak in opposition to this' describes falsity in opposition to Divine Truth. Mourning over the loss of Divine Truth and Divine Good is meant where it is said, in 1 Samuel 4:11-12, that when the ark of God was captured by the Philistines and both of Eli's sons died, a man ran from the line of battle to Shiloh, with rent clothes and dust on his head. Because 'the ark' represented the Lord's kingdom, and in the highest sense the Lord Himself, and consequently represented everything holy in the Church, 'rent clothes' meant grief over the loss of Divine Truth, while 'dust on his head' meant grief over the loss of Divine Good.

[3] In the narrative about Samuel and Saul one reads,

When Samuel turned to go away Saul took hold of the skirt of his tunic, and it was torn away. Therefore Samuel said to him, Jehovah has torn the kingdom of Israel from upon you this day and has given it to your companion. I will not return with you, for you have rejected the word of Jehovah, and Jehovah has rejected you from being king over Israel. 1 Samuel 15:26-28.

The tearing away by Saul of the skirt of Samuel's tunic represented that which Samuel then stated - that the kingdom would be torn from him and that he would not be the king of Israel any longer. For 'the kingdom' in the internal sense means Divine Truth, 1672, 2547, 4691, as also does 'king' and 'kingship', 1672, 1728, 2015, 2069, 3009, 3670, 4575, 4581, especially the king and the kingdom of Israel, since 'Israel' represented the Lord's kingship. The meaning is similar in what is recorded concerning Jeroboam and Ahijah the prophet,

When Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem, and Ahijah the prophet found him on the road, when he was covered with a new garment and both were alone in the field, Ahijah took hold of the new garment that was on him and rent it into twelve pieces; and he said to Jeroboam, Take for yourself ten pieces; for thus said Jehovah, the God of Israel, behold, I am rending [the kingdom] from the hand of Solomon and I will give you ten tribes. 1 Kings 11:29-31.

[4] The second Book of Samuel likewise records that when Saul was killed in battle they tore their clothes apart,

When Saul was killed in battle, on the third day a man came from the camp, whose clothes had been rent. And when David heard about the death of Saul, David took hold of his garments and tore them apart; and so did all his servants who were with him. 2 Samuel 1:2, 10-12.

This too represented mourning because of Divine Truth, lost and cast away by those who adhered to faith separated from charity. For as stated above, 'kingship' meant Divine Truth, while 'the Philistines' by whom Saul was slain represented adherents to faith separated from charity, 1197, 1198, 3412, 3413. The same is also evident from David's lament over him, in verses 18-27 of the same chapter.

[5] When Absalom had slain Amnon his brother and the news reached David that Absalom had slain all the king's sons, David tore his clothes apart and lay on the ground; and all his servants standing by tore their clothes apart, 2 Samuel 13:28, 30-31. This too was done for the sake of the representation that truths from the Divine were lost, those truths being meant in the internal sense by 'the king's sons'. A similar meaning exists in the reference to Hushai the Archite who with his tunic torn apart came to meet David when he fled from Absalom, 2 Samuel 15:32; for in the Word 'a king', and in particular David, represents Divine Truth. The meaning is also very similar in the reference to Ahab, who tore his clothes apart and put sackcloth over his flesh when Elijah told Ahab the king of Israel the words of Jehovah, to the effect that he would be completely wiped out for the evil he had done, 1 Kings 21:27-29.

[6] The fact that tearing apart or rending clothes represented mourning the loss of Truth is additionally clear from the following: Hilkiah the priest found the Book of the law in the house of Jehovah. When Shaphan read it before king Josiah and the king heard the words of the Book of the law, he tore his clothes apart, 2 Kings 22:11. Plainly the king did so because the Word, that is, Divine truth, had been lost for so long and in their hearts and life had been blotted out.

[7] The tearing apart of his own clothes by the high priest, when the Lord confessed He was the Christ the Son of God, and his declaration that He had spoken utter blasphemy, Matthew 26:63-65; Mark 14:63-64, meant that the high priest was absolutely convinced that the Lord had spoken against the Word and so against Divine truth. When Elijah went up in the whirlwind, and Elisha saw it, it is said,

He took hold of his own clothes and tore them into two pieces. And he took up Elijah's tunic that had fallen from upon him, and he struck the waters and they were divided this way and that, and Elisha went over. 2 Kings 2:11-14.

Elisha tore his own clothes apart at that time to express mourning the loss of the Word, that is, of Divine Truth; for 'Elijah' represents the Lord as regards the Word, that is, Divine Truth, 2762. When the tunic fell from Elijah and was picked up by Elisha, the continuation of Elijah's representation by Elisha was represented, 'the tunic' meaning Divine Truth, see 4677. This also explains why the garment torn apart when such mourning took place was the tunic, as is evident from some of the places that have been quoted. Because 'a garment' meant the truth possessed by the Church, and in the highest sense Divine Truth, it was therefore shameful, except when one was mourning, to go about with clothes that were torn. This is evident from what was done to David's servants by Hanun king of the children of Ammon, when he cut off half the beard of each one, and their garments at the middle even to their buttocks, for which reason they were not allowed to come to David, 2 Samuel 10:4-5.

脚注:

1. Reading commemorator (recorder) for commentator (interpreter)

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.