Bibeln

 

Matthew 4

Studie

   

1 IWCI Cisus e'kimacinkot KcI CipamIn now'mtukwakik, e'wikwcItupe'nmukot ni mIcImIne'ton.

2 IcI pic, KapwawisnIt nie'waptuk tso kishuk, ipi nie'waptuk tso tpuk; iwcI e'pkIte't.

3 IcI pic kakocItpe'nmukocIn kapianIt e'cIiIt otI okikon; KishpIn kin We'kwIsmukwiIn Kshe'mIne'to, kIton notI sIniIn e'wiwshIckate'k e'wikwe'shkInwuk.

4 Okinkwe'twancI ipi otI okinan otI e'shonupie'kate'k; NInI cowitapmatsIsi, pe'pshuk pkwe'shkIn mtIno; mtIno ie'ki cak kikitowun we'cpie'sakumom kuk otonik Kshe'mIne'to.

5 IucI mIcImIne'ton okisho'wnukon iukwuanuk kcI otanuk, e'kiw cipitupukot shi kwItupuk nume'okumkok.

6 OtIcI otukon, KishpIn kin, okwIsmukwiIn Kshe'mIne'to, pie'ocIniswe'pnItson; otukwshI e'shonIpie'kate'k, Win okuwitmowan omIshInIwe'mIn, e'wikuwapmukwiIn ipi onIciwak kupumukwitInukok wikake' e'wipwapaksite'shnIn sInik.

7 Cisus cI otI okinan, otukwshI e'shwunIpie'ka te'k minI, Ke'kowi kwcItupe'nmakIn Te'pe'nmukwiIn Kshe'mIne'to.

8 MinI cI, mIcImIne'to okishonan e'cI kcI pkotnianuk e'kiwaptuat, caye'k okumauwun shotI kik, e'pic wuntInuk.

9 Ipi otI okinan, caye'k notI, kuminIn, KishpIn pmukocnIn, ipi nume'kItoiIn.

10 OtIcI Cisus okinan, Nkoci, shian, MIcImIne'to, otukwshI e'shwunupie'kate'k, Nume'kito‘w Te'pe'nmukwuiIn, Kshe'mIne'to wintIno kie'pmItwut.

11 IwcIni, mIcImIne'ton kashInkInkot, ipi pInI mIshInwe'n e'pianIt, icI e'pie'pmitakot.

12 IcI pic Cisus kanotuk, ni CanIn e'kikpakwukasnIt, kishImaci shi Ke'niniuk;

13 IcI e'nkItuk Ne'se'nIt; e'kishiat e'wIiIt cikcukum Ke'panium e'te'nuk, ipi e'pie'kokumukianuk Se'pwnIn, ipi Ne'ptInum.

14 Niiw ie'ni te'pwe'onIn kakitot Ise'us iacimot otI kItwak,

15 Iw e'kiwuk Se'pwnIn, ipi e'kiwuk Ne'ptInum shiw cikcukum wus ipI Catan: o Ke'nIni mawak Me'ikIscIk;

16 Kiw nIshInape'k kacipitupcuk, e'kiskupkonianuk okiwaptanawa e'kikcI wase'anuk, kiw cI kacipitupIcuk, e'tnukie'wat, ipi e'cipamtomkuk npowIn; wase'iak kipie'mokse'mkIt.

17 IwcI pic Cisus e'pmowe'pkie'kwe't, otI kikIto; Kisate'ntumok; iukwankwshI okumauwun e'te'k shpumuk kishkot pe'shoc pie'iumkIt.

18 IcI Cisus e'pmose't cikcukum Ke'nIniuk, okiwapman nish we'wikane'itIncIn; Sayiman e'shnukasot Pitu, ipi E'nto, ni wikane'iIn, e'tshI pukInanIt supiIn kiukumik; kikikoske'‘onInwuk.

19 IcI otI okinan, Naktone'o‘shuk; kaoshe'num e'wikikoskawe'p nInwuk.

20 IcI papuk e'kinkaawat otIsupimwan, icI e'kinaktone'wawat.

21 IcI e'nmaocImacit shiw, okiwapman minI, anIt nish we'wikane'itIncIn, Ce'ms, We'kwIsmukot Se'pitiIn, ipi Can wikane'iIn pic napkwanuk, Se'pitiIn, oswan e'na'towat, otusupimwan; icI e'kintomat.

22 IcI papuk e'kinkItmowat onapkwanwa ipi oswan; e'kinaktone'wawat.

23 IcI Cisus e'kipashiat Ke'nIniuk e'pmuknomake't; iukwanuk otInume'okumkomwak, ipi e'pmukie'kwe't mnoacImowun, iukwan okumauwun, ipi e'pmIne'se'we't cak, e'shnakwuk iakwnoke'wun, ipi cak e'shnakwuk kwtuke'ntumwun ki nIshInape'k.

24 IcIi, otI win wiacmukwsIwun e'kipashiamke'tnuk kiswe'shkie'nI shi caye'k Sinie'uk; okipie'twawancI niw caye'k iakwnokancIn ni nIshInape'n, ipi ni na‘we'napinIncIn, ipi kwe'tukitoncIn, ipi niw packakwancIn mIcImIne'ton, ipi ni ne'kaptIncIn, ipi niw ne'nie'psIncIn, icI win e'kine'se'at.

25 IcI okipme'nashkakon ke'cmaoce'‘tincIn nIshInape'n, pie'ocupie'n Ke'nIniuk, ipi kiwcupie'n Tike'ponIsuk, ipi kiwcupie'n Cinose'ne'muk, ipi kiwcupie'n Cwtie'uk, ipi kiwcupie'n wus ipI Catanuk.

   

Från Swedenborgs verk

 

Arcana Coelestia #9002

Studera detta avsnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

9002. 'If he takes another one for himself' means being joined to an affection for truth stemming from some other source. This is clear from the meaning of 'taking (or betrothing) another' as being joined to, as in 8996; for in the spiritual sense marriage, which is implied here by betrothal, is the joining of the life of one to that of another. Divine order decrees that the life of the truths of faith and the life of the good of charity should be joined together; this is where all spiritual joining together begins, from which, as its origin, natural joining springs. 'Taking another one' means being joined to an affection for truth stemming from some other source, because 'a female slave', dealt with before, is an affection for truth springing from natural delight, 8993, and therefore 'another one' is an affection for truth stemming from some other source

[2] An idea of what an affection from some other source is may be gained from the consideration that every affection belonging to love is very broad and wide indeed, so broad that it extends far beyond all human understanding. Human understanding cannot go so far as to know even the genera of the varieties of such affection, still less the species making up the genera, and least of all the particular aspects and individual details of those aspects. For all that exists within the human being, especially that which belongs to affection or love there, is infinitely varied. This becomes perfectly clear from the consideration that the affection for what is good and true, an affection that belongs to love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour, constitutes the whole of heaven, and yet in respect of good those in the heavens, where millions live, are all different from one another. And they would still all be different even if multiplied into countless millions of millions. For it is not possible in the universe for one thing to be exactly like another and have separate existence. It must vary, that is, be different from another, if it is to be something by itself, see 684, 690, 3241, 3744, 3745, 3986, 4005, 4149, 5598, 7236, 7833, 7836, 8003. All this gives some idea of what one should understand by an affection from some other source, namely an affection which is different from another but can nevertheless be joined to the same spiritual truth. Such affections, which are represented by female slaves betrothed to the same man, belong to the same genus but different species, the difference between them being called a specific difference. Various examples could be used to illustrate these matters; but the general idea conveyed by the things that have just been said is better.

[3] So that the joining of such affections to the same spiritual truth, and their subordination to it, might be represented, it was permissible within the Israelite and Jewish nation for men to have a number of concubines. Abraham had them, Genesis 25:6, and so did David, Solomon, and others. For anything permitted among that nation existed because of what that thing represented; or to be more precise, it existed so that by means of outward things that nation might represent the inner realities of the Church, 3246. But when the inner realities of the Church were disclosed by the Lord, representations of inner realities through outward things came to an end; for now it was the inner realities - forms of faith and love - that were to be apprehended by a member of the Church and to be the means by which he worshipped the Lord. For this reason they were no longer permitted to have a number of wives, or concubines as well as wives, see 865, 2727-2759, 3246, 4837.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.