Bibeln

 

創世記 22

Studie

   

1 這些事以要試驗亞伯拉罕,就呼叫他亞伯拉罕!他:我在這裡。

2 :你帶著你的兒子,就是你獨生的兒子,你所以撒,往摩利亞去,在我所要指示你的上,把他獻為燔祭。

3 亞伯拉罕起來,備上,帶著兩個僕人和他兒子以撒,也劈好了燔祭的柴,就起身往所指示他的地方去了。

4 到了第三日,亞伯拉罕舉目遠遠的見那地方

5 亞伯拉罕對他的僕人:你們和在此等候,我與童子往那裡去拜一拜,就回到你們這裡來。

6 亞伯拉罕把燔祭的柴放在他兒子以撒身上,自己裡拿著與刀;於是人同行。

7 以撒對他父親亞伯拉罕父親哪!亞伯拉罕:我兒,我在這裡。以撒:請看,與柴都有了,但燔祭的羊羔在那裡呢?

8 亞伯拉罕:我兒,必自己預備作燔祭的羊羔。於是人同行。

9 他們到了所指示的地方亞伯拉罕在那裡築,把柴擺好,捆綁他的兒子以撒,放在的柴上。

10 亞伯拉罕就伸拿刀,要殺他的兒子

11 耶和華的使者從呼叫亞伯拉罕亞伯拉罕!他:我在這裡。

12 天使:你不可在這童子身上下。一點不可害他!現在我知道你是敬畏的了;因為你沒有將你的兒子,就是你獨生的兒子,留下不給我。

13 亞伯拉罕舉目觀,不料,有一隻公,兩角扣在稠密的小樹中,亞伯拉罕就取了那隻公來,獻為燔祭,代替他的兒子

14 亞伯拉罕給那地方起名耶和華以勒(意思就是耶和華必預備的意思),直到今日人還:在耶和華的上必有預備。

15 耶和華的使者第二次從呼叫亞伯拉罕說:

16 耶和華:你既行了這事,不留下你的兒子,就是你獨生的兒子,我便指著自己起誓

17 論福,我必賜大福給你;論子孫,我必叫你的子孫多起來,如同上的邊的沙。你子孫必得著仇敵的城

18 並且上萬國都必因你的後裔得福,因為你聽從了我的話。

19 於是亞伯拉罕回到他僕人那裡,他們一同起身往別是巴去,亞伯拉罕在別是巴。

20 這事以,有人告訴亞伯拉罕說:密迦給你兄弟拿鶴生了幾個兒子

21 長子是烏斯,他的兄弟是布斯和亞蘭的父親基母利,

22 並基薛、哈瑣、必達、益拉、彼土利(彼土利生利百加)。

23 個人都是密迦給亞伯拉罕的兄弟拿鶴生的。

24 拿鶴的妾名叫流瑪,生了提八、迦含、他轄,和瑪迦。

   

Från Swedenborgs verk

 

Arcana Coelestia #3469

Studera detta avsnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

3469. And Esau was a son of forty years. That this signifies a state of temptation as to the natural good of truth, is evident from the representation of Esau, as being the natural good of truth (n. 3300, 3302, 3322); and from the signification of “forty years,” as being states of temptation. (That “forty” signifies temptations may be seen above, n. 730, 862, 2272; and that “years” signify states, n. 487, 488, 493, 893.) The reason why these things concerning Esau are joined to what has been related concerning Abimelech and Isaac, is that those are treated of who are in the good of truth, that is, who are in life according to things that are derived from the literal sense of the Word; for these are signified by “Abimelech, Ahuzzath, and Phicol,” as before repeatedly said.

[2] They therefore who are in the good of truth, or in a life according to doctrinal things, are regenerate as to the interiors, which are their rational, but not yet as to the exteriors, which are their natural things; for man is regenerated as to the rational before he is regenerated as to the natural (n. 3286, 3288); because the natural is altogether in the world, and in the natural as in a plane there are founded man’s thought and will. This is the reason why during regeneration man observes a combat between his rational or internal man and his natural or external man; and why his external man is regenerated much later, and likewise with much greater difficulty, than his internal man. For that which is nearer to the world and nearer to the body cannot be easily constrained to render obedience to the internal man; but only after considerable length of time and by means of many new states into which the man is introduced, which are states of self-acknowledgment, and of acknowledgment of the Lord, that is, of one’s own wretchedness, and of the Lord’s mercy; thus states of humiliation resulting from temptation combats. Because this is so, there is here next adjoined what is said of Esau and his two wives, whereby such things are signified in the internal sense.

[3] Everyone knows what natural good is, namely, that it is the good into which man is born; but what the natural good of truth is, is known to few, if any. There are four kinds of natural good, that is, of the good that is born with man, namely, natural good from the love of good, natural good from the love of truth, and also natural good from the love of evil, and natural good from the love of falsity. For the good into which man is born he derives from his parents, either father or mother; for all that which parents have contracted by frequent use and habit, or have become imbued with by actual life until it has become so familiar to them that it appears as if natural, is transmitted into their children, and becomes hereditary. If parents who have lived in the good of the love of good and in this life have perceived their delight and blessedness, conceive offspring in this state, the offspring receive therefrom an inclination to similar good; and if parents who have lived in the good of the love of truth (concerning which good see n. 3459, 3463) and in this life have perceived their delight, are in this state when they conceive offspring, the offspring receive therefrom an inclination to the like good.

[4] The case is similar with those who receive hereditarily the good of the love of evil and the good of the love of what is false. These latter are called goods by reason of their appearing in outward form as goods in those persons in whom they are, although they are the very reverse of goods. Very many in whom natural good appears have such good. They who are in the natural good of the love of evil are pliant and prone to evils of every kind; for they suffer themselves to be easily led astray, and from this good are compliant, especially to foul pleasures, to adulteries, and also to cruelties; and they who are in the natural good of falsity are prone to falsities of every kind, and from this good learn with avidity what is persuasive, especially from hypocrites and cunning persons, who know how to captivate the mind, to insinuate themselves into the affections, and to feign innocence. At the present day most people who in the Christian world are in natural good, are born into these so-called goods of evil and falsity, because their parents have by actual life contracted the delight of evil and of falsity, and thus have implanted it in their children, and thereby in their descendants.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.