ബൈബിൾ

 

2 Mose 2

പഠനം

   

1 Und es ging hin ein Mann vom Hause Levi und nahm eine Tochter Levis.

2 Und das Weib ward schwanger und gebar einen Sohn. Und da sie sah, daß es ein fein Kind war, verbarg sie ihn drei Monden.

3 Und da sie ihn nicht länger verbergen konnte, machte sie ein Kästlein von Rohr und verklebte es mit Ton und Pech und legte das Kind drein und legte ihn in das Schilf am Ufer des Wassers.

4 Aber seine Schwester stund von ferne, daß sie erfahren wollte, wie es ihm gehen würde.

5 Und die Tochter Pharaos ging hernieder und wollte baden im Wasser; und ihre Jungfrauen gingen an dem Rande des Wassers. Und da sie das Kästlein im Schilf sah, sandte sie ihre Magd hin und ließ es holen.

6 Und da sie es auftat, sah sie das Kind; und siehe, das Knäblein weinete. Da jammerte es sie, und sprach: Es ist der ebräischen Kindlein eins.

7 Da sprach seine Schwester zu der Tochter Pharaos: Soll ich hingehen und der ebräischen Weiber eine rufen, die da säuget, daß sie dir das Kindlein säuge?

8 Die Tochter Pharaos sprach zu ihr: Gehe hin! Die Jungfrau ging hin und rief des Kindes Mutter.

9 Da sprach Pharaos Tochter zu ihr: Nimm hin das Kindlein und säuge mir's, ich will dir lohnen. Das Weib nahm das Kind und säugete es.

10 Und da das Kind groß ward, brachte sie es der Tochter Pharaos, und es ward ihr Sohn; und hieß ihn Mose, denn sie sprach: Ich habe ihn aus dem Wasser gezogen.

11 Zu den Zeiten, da Mose war groß worden, ging er aus zu seinen Brüdern und sah ihre Last und ward gewahr, daß ein Ägypter schlug seiner Brüder, der ebräischen, einen.

12 Und er wandte sich hin und her, und da er sah, daß kein Mensch da war, erschlug er den Ägypter und verscharrete ihn in den Sand.

13 Auf einen andern Tag ging er auch aus und sah zween ebräische Männer sich miteinander zanken; und sprach zu dem Ungerechten: Warum schlägest du deinen Nächsten?

14 Er aber sprach: Wer hat dich zum Obersten oder Richter über uns gesetzt? Willst du mich auch erwürgen, wie du den Ägypter erwürget hast? Da fürchtete sich Mose und sprach: Wie ist das laut worden?

15 Und es kam vor Pharao, der trachtete nach Mose, daß er ihn erwürgete. Aber Mose floh vor Pharao und hielt sich im Lande Midian und wohnete bei einem Brunnen.

16 Der Priester aber in Midian hatte sieben Töchter, die kamen, Wasser zu schöpfen, und fülleten die Rinnen, daß sie ihres Vaters Schafe tränketen.

17 Da kamen die Hirten und stießen sie davon. Aber Mose machte sich auf und half ihnen und tränkte ihre Schafe.

18 Und da sie zu ihrem Vater Reguel kamen, sprach er: Wie seid ihr heute so bald kommen?

19 Sie sprachen: Ein ägyptischer Mann errettete uns von den Hirten und schöpfte uns und tränkte die Schafe.

20 Er sprach zu seinen Töchtern: Wo ist er? Warum habt ihr den Mann gelassen, daß ihr ihn nicht ludet, mit uns zu essen?

21 Und Mose bewilligte, bei dem Manne zu bleiben. Und er gab Mose seine Tochter Zipora.

22 Die gebar einen Sohn: und er hieß ihn Gersom; denn er sprach: Ich bin ein Fremdling worden im fremden Lande. (Und sie gebar noch einen Sohn, den hieß er Elieser, und sprach: Der Gott meines Vaters ist mein Helfer und hat mich von der Hand Pharaos errettet.)

23 Lange Zeit aber danach starb der König in Ägypten. Und die Kinder Israel seufzeten über ihre Arbeit und schrieen; und ihr Schreien über ihre Arbeit kam vor Gott.

24 Und Gott erhörete ihr Wehklagen und gedachte an seinen Bund mit Abraham, Isaak und Jakob.

25 Und er sah drein und nahm sich ihrer an.

   

വ്യാഖ്യാനം

 

Wells

  

''To stop up wells,' as inGenesis 26:15, denotes to be unwilling to know truths, and to deny them, and so to obliterate them. In Genesis 21, 'wells' signify doctrines, both those disputed and not disputed. Without this significance digging wells and disputing about them would have been too trivial to be mentioned in the divine Word.

(റഫറൻസുകൾ: Arcana Coelestia 2702 [1-17])


സ്വീഡൻബർഗിന്റെ കൃതികളിൽ നിന്ന്

 

Arcana Coelestia #3387

ഈ ഭാഗം പഠിക്കുക

  
/ 10837  
  

3387. 'For he was afraid to say, My wife, [thinking,] The men of the place may perhaps kill me on account of Rebekah' means that it was impossible for Divine Truths themselves to be disclosed, and so for Divine Good to be received. This is clear from the meaning of 'being afraid to say' as an inability to disclose; from the meaning of 'wife', who is Rebekah here, as the Lord's Divine Rational in respect to Divine Truth, dealt with in 3012, 3013, 3077; from the meaning of 'killing me' as good not being received, for 'Isaac', to whom 'me' refers here, represents the Divine Good of the Lord's Rational, 3012, 3194, 3210 - good being said 'to be killed' or to perish when it is not received, for it ceases to exist with that person; and from the meaning of 'the men of the place' as people who possess matters of doctrine concerning faith, dealt with just above in 3385. From these meanings it is now evident what the internal sense of these words is, namely: If Divine truths themselves were disclosed they would not be received by those who possess matters of doctrine concerning faith because those truths go beyond the whole range of their rational grasp of things, and so go beyond the whole of their faith, and as a consequence of this no good at all could flow in from the Lord. For good from the Lord, or Divine good, cannot flow in except into truths, for truths are the vessels for good, as shown many times.

[2] Truths or appearances of truth are given to a person to enable Divine Good to develop the understanding part of his mind, and so the person himself, for truths exist to the end that good may flow in. Indeed without vessels or receptacles good has nowhere to go, for it can find no condition answering to itself. Where no truths exist therefore, that is, where they have not been received, neither does any rational or human good exist; and as a consequence the person does not possess any spiritual life. Therefore, so that a person may nevertheless possess truths, and from these receive spiritual life, appearances of truth are given, to everyone according to his ability to grasp them; and these appearances are acknowledged as truths because they have the capacity to hold Divine things within them.

[3] So that it may be known what appearances are and that they are what serve a person as Divine truths, let the following be used by way of illustration: If man were told that in heaven angels have no concept of place, and so no concept of distance, but that instead they have concepts of state, he could not possibly grasp it, for he would suppose from this that nothing distinct and separate existed but that everything was fused together, that is to say, all the angels were together in a single place. Yet everything there is so distinct and separate that nothing could ever be more so. Places, distances, and intervals of space which exist in the natural order exist in heaven as states, see 3356. From this it is evident that all the things that are stated in the Word about places and intervals of space between objects, also ideas that are formed from these and expressed through them, are appearances of truth; and unless everything were stated by means of those appearances it would in no way be received and would as a consequence be scarcely anything; for the concept of space and time is present in almost every single detail of a person's thought as long as he is in the world, that is, living within space and time.

[4] The fact that the Word speaks according to appearances involving space is clear from almost every single part of it, as in Matthew,

Jesus said, How is it that David says, The Lord [said] to my Lord, Sit at My right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool? Matthew 22:43-44.

Here the expression 'sitting at the right hand' is derived from the concept of place and so according to the appearance - when in fact it is a state of the Lord's Divine power which is described by that expression. In the same gospel,

Jesus said, Hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven. Matthew 26:64.

Here similarly 'sitting at the right hand' and also 'coming on clouds' are expressions derived from men's concept of place, whereas the concept angels have is one of the state of the Lord's power. In Mark,

The sons of Zebedee said to Jesus, Grant us to sit in Your glory, one on Your right hand and the other on Your left. Jesus replied, To sit at My right hand and at My left is not Mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared. Mark 10:37, 40.

From this it is evident what kind of concept the disciples had of the Lord's kingdom, that is to say, one that involved sitting on the right hand and on the left. Such being the concept they had of it the Lord also replied to them in a way they could understand and so by an appearance that could be seen by them.

[5] In David,

Like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, he rejoices as a mighty man to run the course. From the end of the heavens is His going forth, and His circuit to the ends of them. Psalms 19:5-6.

This refers to the Lord, the state of whose Divine power is described by means of such things as belong to space. In Isaiah,

How you have fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the dawn! You said in your heart, I will go up into the heavens, above the stars of God 1 I will raise my throne. I will go up above the heights of the clouds. Isaiah 14:12-14.

'Falling from heaven', 'going up the heavens', 'raising a throne above the stars of God', 'going up above the heights of the clouds' are all expressions derived from the concept and appearance of space or a place, and are used to describe self-love profaning holy things. Since celestial and spiritual things are presented to man by means of and according to visual objects like these, heaven too is therefore described as being on high when in fact it is not on high but in that which is internal, 450, 1380, 2148.

അടിക്കുറിപ്പുകൾ:

1. The Latin means heaven; but the Hebrew means God which Swedenborg has in other places where he quotes this verse.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.