3302. And they called his name Esau. That this signifies its quality, namely, the quality of the natural as to good, is evident from the signification of “calling a name,” or of “calling by name,” as being to know what the thing is, thus its quality (see n. 144, 145, 440, 768, 1754, 1896, 2009, 2724, 3237); and from the fact that all names whatever in the Word in the internal sense denote actual things (n. 1224, 1888); and such is the case with the name Esau. That “Esau” signifies the Lord’s Divine natural as to Divine good when first conceived, is evident from what has been already said, and from what follows concerning Esau, as also from other parts of the Word; but as Esau and Edom have nearly the same signification, with the difference that “Edom” is the Divine natural as to good to which are adjoined the doctrinal things of truth, therefore at verse 30, where Esau is called “Edom,” of the Lord’s Divine mercy this will be confirmed by passages from the Word.

16. I have several times talked with angels about this matter. They declared their surprise that men of the Church do not know that loving the Lord and the neighbour is loving good and truth and doing this as a result of willing them, when yet they might know that one shows his love by willing and doing whatever the other wills, and that in this way he is loved in return and is conjoined with the one he loves, not by loving him without doing his will, which in itself is not loving. They also said that men should know that the good going forth from the Lord is a likeness of Himself because He is in it, and that those who make good and truth the principles of their life by intention and action become likenesses of Him and are conjoined to Him. Indeed, to will is to love doing. Besides, the Lord teaches in the Word that this is so, saying,

He that hath My commandments and doeth them, he it is that loveth Me... and I will love him. . . and will make My abode with him. John 14:21, 23.

And again,

If ye do My commandments, ye shall abide in My love. John 15:10, 12.

768. That by “Noah” is signified what was of the church, and by “Shem, Ham, and Japheth” what pertained to the churches that were derived therefrom, is evident from the fact that here they were not called merely his “sons” as before in the seventh verse (Genesis 7:7), but are called by their names. When thus named they signify the man of the church. The man of the church is not merely the church itself, but is everything that belongs to the church. It is a general term comprehending whatever is of the church, as was said before of the Most Ancient Church, which was called “Man” and likewise of the other churches that were named. Thus by “Noah” and by “Shem, Ham, and Japheth” is signified whatever is of the church and of the churches that were derived from it, in one complex.

[2] Such is the style and manner of speaking in the Word. Thus where “Judah” is named, in the Prophets, the celestial church is mostly signified, or whatever is of that church; where “Israel” is named, the spiritual church is mostly signified, or whatever is of that church; where “Jacob” is named, the external church is signified; for with every man of the church there is an internal and an external of the church, the internal being where the true church is, and the external being what is derived therefrom, and this latter is “Jacob.”

[3] But the case is different when the men are not named. The reason why this is so is that when named they refer representatively to the kingdom of the Lord. The Lord is the only Man, and is the all of His kingdom; and as the church is His kingdom on earth, the Lord alone is the all of the church. The all of the church is love or charity; and therefore a man (or what is the same, one called by name), signifies love or charity, that is, the all of the church; and then his “wife” signifies simply the church thence derived. So it is here. But what kind of churches are signified by “Shem, Ham, and Japheth” will of the Lord’s Divine mercy be stated hereafter.