Bible

 

Genesis 9

Studie

   

1 Iga Məššina albaraka fəl Nux əd maddan-əs amaran iṇṇ-asan: «Əggəzat šin n ara təfələyləyam təḍkəram amaḍal.

2 Tawaqqast əd hərwan əd g̣ədad əd lumət-lumət, əd kifitan əntanay kul a tan təggəz ṭasa-nnawan, iksadan-kawan, təggəz taṇat-nasan ifassan-nawan.

3 A wa iddaran itiməṭəkwəy kul ad-awan-iqqəl išətša. Əkfeɣ-awan-tan kul zun d əmmək as kawan əkfeɣ ilattan ən təwəgas.

4 Mišan ad wər təṭattim iṣan iha əzni a əṃosnen iṣan wər əg̣medan ṃan.

5 Azzama azni-nnawan ənta təməddurt-nawan wədi əṣṣənat as a-dər-əs-əṣṣəstana a iqqal wa igan iṃan-nawan, gər z-iqqal əmudar wala awedan. Ad-əssəṣtəna awedan iqqal əd ṃan n əmidi-nnet win iga.

6 I inɣalan azni n awedan, ad-inɣəl awedan azni-nnet fəlas awedan šaššela ən Məššina as du-itawaxlak.

7 Amaran əggəzat šin n ara, təfələyləyam, təwəšənkəlam fəl aṃadal, təwəziwəzam fall-as.»

8 Iṇṇa Məššina tolas i Nux əd maddan-əs:

9 «Ad-awan-əssəbdəda arkawal ən taṣṣaqq-in dər-wan kawanay d əzzurriya-nnawan

10 əd mudaran kul win dər-wan əddəwnen: ig̣ədad, ihərwan, tawaqqast əd lumet-lumet, əṃosnen imudaran kul win dər du-tənnəg̣madam attin əṃosnen win tu z-əməlnen daɣ əddənet.

11 A-dawan-əssəbdəda arkawal ən taṣṣaqq-in dər-wan: wər za tələs təxlək a təqqal ahluk s aṃan n əlwabil. Wər du-z-iləs əlwabil ihlakan əddənet aṣṣa.»

12 Ilas iṇṇa: «Ənta da asannal n arkawal ən taṣṣaq ta dər-wan z-aga kawanay əd təxəllak kul šin əddarnen a ɣur-wan əllanen daɣ azzaman kul win d-əzaynen.

13 Ad aga təzzəladar daɣ jənnawan ad təqqəl asannal n arkawal ən taṣṣaqq-in d əddənet.

14 Id d-əšammašadawa šignawen fəl afalla n əddənet tənafalal-du təzzəladar daɣ-asnat

15 ad-d-aktaɣ arkawal ən taṣṣaqq-in dər-wan, kawanay əd təxəllak kul šin əddarnen, amaran har faw wər tu-z-iləs əlwabil ihlakan šixəllak kul emel.

16 I du-tənafalal təzzəladar daɣ təgnawen a daɣ-as əṣwəda fəl ad-d-aktaɣ arkawal iɣlalan ən taṣṣaqq-in nak əd təxəllak kul daɣ əddənet.»

17 Iṇṇa Məššina tolas i Nux: «Ənta da asannal n arkawal ən taṣṣaqq-in əd təxlək kul təddarat daɣ əddənet.»

18 Bararan ən Nux win d əg̣madnen attin əṃosan Šem, Xam əd Yafet. Xam ənta erawan Kanan.

19 Bararan a ən karad a ən Nux əntanay imarwan n aytedan kul daɣ əddənet.

20 Nux əmagayak a iṃos, iggaz šin n aṇabal n eškan win as itagg esmad daɣ aratan-nasan.

21 Išwa esmad, imməswad, əfalan-tu səlsa-nnet, izalallat izzaf daɣ ahaket-net.

22 Xam, a erawan Kanan, as inay šis izzaf igla imal i məqqaran-net win n əššin.

23 Təzzar idkal Šem əd Yafet afər əssəwaran-tu izeran-nasan ad zankazan dəffər-san har əssəlsan izuf ən ši-ssan, mišan wər t-ənayan fəlas əssidagan aṣawad-nasan s as wər illa.

24 As d-ila Nux iggi dəffər əməswəd iṣṣan daɣ arat wa das iga barar-net wa ənḍərran, Xam.

25 Təzzar iṇṇa Nux: «Təwar allaɣanat Kanan, ad-iqqəl akli wa irasan daɣ eklan ən məqqaran-net.»

26 Iṇṇa tolas: «Idkal Əməli, Məššina wa n Šem! Amaran iqqəlet Kanan akli ən Šem.»

27 Isənnəfləyet Məššina Yafet, ahharaget əd Šem, amaran iqqəlet Kanan akli ən Yafet.»

28 Dəffər əlwabil iga Nux karadat ṭəmad n awatay əd ṣəmmosat təṃərwen iddar.

29 Nux aba-tu dəffər as iga tazayat ṭəmad n awatay əd ṣəmmosat təṃərwen.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1008

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1008. 'Requiring the soul of man' is avenging profanation. This is clear from what has been stated in the previous verse and in the present one, for the subject is the eating of blood, which means profanation. Few know what profanation is, still less what the penalty for it may be in the next life. Profanation takes many forms. A person who totally denies the truths of faith does not profane them any more than gentiles do who live outside of the Church and outside of all knowledge of them. That person profanes however who does know the truths of faith, and still more one who acknowledges them, bears them on his lips, proclaims them, and persuades others of the truth of them, while at the same time he leads a life of hatred, revenge, cruelty, robbery, and adultery, and confirms such behaviour in himself by many statements which he scrapes together from the Word. He profanes by perverting the truths of faith, and so immerses them in those foul deeds. This is the person who profanes, and these are the things that above all else spell death to a person. That they spell death becomes clear from the fact that in the next life unholy things are completely separated from holy, the unholy being in hell, and the holy in heaven. When this type of person enters the next life, every idea within his thought contains holy things clinging to unholy, as it was during his lifetime. There he is unable to produce one idea of what is holy without the unholy that clings to it being seen clear as daylight; for such perception of another person's ideas exists in the next life. So in every detail of his thinking profanation manifests itself, and because heaven has such a horror of profanation he is inevitably forced down into hell.

[2] The nature of ideas is hardly known to anyone. People imagine that there is nothing complex about them, when in fact every idea within thought contains countless elements variously linked together so as to produce a certain form and consequent picture image of the person, the whole of which is perceived and even seen with the eyes in the next life. Take this merely as an example: When the idea of a place comes to mind - whether of a region, or a city, or a house - the idea and an image of all the things the person has ever done in that place crop up at the same time, and spirits and angels see them all. Or, if the idea of somebody whom he has hated presents itself, the idea of all he has thought, said, and done against that person arises at the same time. The same applies to ideas of all things, but when these present themselves every single detail that he has conceived of and impressed upon himself regarding a particular matter becomes apparent. For instance, if he has been an adulterer, when the idea of marriage crops up, all the muck and filth of adultery, even of thought about it, does so too, likewise all the arguments used to confirm adulterous practices, whether based on the evidence of the senses, or on rational grounds, or on the Word. And the way in which he has adulterated and perverted the truths of the Word crops up too.

[3] Furthermore, the idea of one thing merges into the idea of the next and colours it just as a tiny quantity of black placed in water darkens the whole volume of water. Consequently a spirit is recognized by his ideas, and what is remarkable, each one of his ideas bears his own image or likeness. When such an idea is presented visually it is so ugly that it is horrible to look at. All this makes clear the nature of the state of people who profane holy things, and the image they present in the next life. But people who in simplicity have believed statements made in the Word can never be said to profane holy things, not even if they have believed statements which are not literally true; for what is said in the Word is expressed in accordance with appearances, about which see 589.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.