Bible

 

Genesis 42

Studie

   

2 «Nak əsleɣ as Masar ih'et alkama, ərəsat tat, zanzat ana du daɣ-as a dana wər anɣu laz.»

3 Ərasan ṃaraw məqqaran ən Yusəf sas Masar ad d azzanzin daɣ-as alkama.

4 Yaqub wər dər-san iššedaw Benyamin wa n amaḍray ən Yusəf fəlas iṇṇa iksud a tu təgrəw təkma iyyat əntada.

5 Əglan maddanəs n Israyil əddewan d aytedan wiyyaḍ əntanay da əgmaynen alkama fəlas akal ən Kanan əntada ewad t'in laz.

6 Yusəf ənta azzaran y akal, ənta a innəṭṭafan əd taɣawšay ta n nazzan n alkama y aytedan kul win n akal. Iməqqaran-net as t'in oṣan əssəjadan dat-əs daɣ aṃadal.

7 Inay Yusəf iməqqaran-net ɣas izday tan mišan iṣṣəkn'en as wər tan izday, iharaššat tan iṇṇ'aṣan: «Məni du təfalam?» Əjjəwwaban as, əṇṇan as: «Akal wa n Kanan a du nəfal fəl a du nəzzanzu isudar.»

8 Yusəf izday iməqqaran-net mišan əntanay wər t'əzdayan.

9 Iktad du Yusəf targəten ši ṇad itag sər-san, təzzar iṇṇ'aṣan: «Kawanay inaṣṣasaman a təṃosam, toṣam du fəl ad tənəyam idaggan win ərkamnen daɣ akal.»

10 Əṇṇan as: «Kala kala əmizwar, eklan nak nakkanay, aṣṣa ɣas a du nəga ad nazzanzu isudar.

11 Nakkanay ket nana abba nnana iyyanda, nakkanay aytedan ən təfləst a nəṃos, wər nəṃos inaṣṣasaman.»

12 «Kala, kala, iṇṇ-asan, toṣam du fəl ad tənəyam idaggan win ərkamnen daɣ akal!»

13 Əjjəwwaban as: «Nakkanay eklan nak ṃaraw-ena d əššin eraw ana aləs iyyanda ən Kanan. Amaḍray nnana wa ənḍərran noyyay in ɣur abba nnana, aṃaran wa das waššaran aba tu.»

14 Iṇṇ-assan Yusəf: «Nak adi da a dawan əṇṇe kawanay inaṣṣasaman a təṃosam.

15 Aṃaran a kawan ajjarraba: " Əhadaɣ awan s eṣəm ən Firɣawna kud təfalam da iket wər di d oṣa amaḍray nnawan.

16 Saglat iyyan daɣ wan a t'id'awəy, kawanay aṃaran at takkim kasaw, a kawan ajjarraba har əṣṣəna kud a wa di təgannam tidət wala bahu, as wər iga di əhada s eṣəm ən Firɣawna as kawanay inaṣṣasaman.»

17 Ig'en daɣ kasaw har əgan karad aḍan.

18 As ig'əzəl wa n karad, iṇṇ'asan Yusəf: «Agat a wa dawan z aṇṇa, a kawan ayya təddaram, fəlas Məššina a əksuda.

19 Kud tidət as təṃosam aytedan ən təfləst ayyaq qawan, aqqam du iyyan daɣ wan daɣ kasaw, kawanay taglim tawəyam alkama y aɣaywan nawan iha laz.

20 Təzzar tawəyam i du amaḍray nnawan ad əṣṣənaɣ as tidət a di təgam aṃaran wər za taṃṃatim.» Ərdan s a wen da.

21 Ad ətinəməṇṇin gar-essan, tidət as nətawaddab fəl əddəlil n amaḍray nnana. Tərəmmeq ta iga as daɣ-na igammay a tu nayyu mišan wər das nəṣṣəsam, tərəmmeq tədi da a nəga azal a.

22 Iššewal Ruben iṇṇ-asan: «Wərge əmalaɣ awan as dawan əṇṇeɣ ad wər tagim abakkaḍ iṃosan təkma ən barar di? Mišan wər di təṣṣəsamam. Əmərədda azni-net a daɣ-na itawaran.»

23 Iməqqaran-net wər əṣṣenan as Yusəf igra a wa əgannan, fəlas əməššewəl a illan gar-es dər-san.

24 Igguk kan in ad ihallu. adi iqqal du fəl ad asan iššiwəl, obaz daɣ-san Šimehon issəɣfal tu dat šiṭṭawen nasan.

25 Omar Yusəf y a dasan təwəṭkəran sumad nasan alkama, itəwəssuɣəl tan əzrəf nasan, akk iyyan itəwəgget as əzrəf-net daɣ əsaməd-net. Omar tolas a tan itəwəkfu allaw. Itawagg'asan a wen da.

26 Əṭṭərken isumad nasan fəl əzdan nasan, əglan.

27 As oṣan edag iyyan a daɣ z aṇsin ora iyyan daɣ-san əsaməd wa-net fəl ad d'ikkəs y ajad-net a itša təzzar inay azrəf-net daɣ əmi n əsaməd.

28 Iṇṇa i midawan-net: «Ənəyat azrəf in itawasaɣal i du, ənta da ihan əsaməd in da,» təzzar təggaz tan ṭasa, təṇdaw tan taysəst, ad ətinəməṇṇin gar-essan: «Ma dana itag Məššina da?»

29 As din oṣan abba nnasan Yaqub daɣ Kanan əmalan as arat wa tan igrawan kul, əṇṇan as:

30 «Aləs wa iṃosan əmizwar ən Masar as din noṣa iharaššat ana, iṇṇa:" Kawanay inaṣṣasaman a təṃosam. "

31 Nəṇṇ'as nakkanay aytedan ən təfləst, wər nəṃos inaṣṣasaman.

32 Nakkanay ṃaraw-ena d əššin nədraw abba, iyyan daɣ-na aba tu, wa daɣ-na ənḍarran iqqim in ɣur abba nnana daɣ akal ən Kanan. Təzzar iṇṇ-ana əmizwar ən Masar: " Arat w'as z əṣṣəna kud aytedan ən təfləst a təṃosam,

33 wədi a du tayyim ɣur-i iyyan daɣ-wan tətkəlam alkama tawəyam tu y iɣawnatan nawan a əlluznen.

34 As din toṣam tawəyam i du aṃadray nnawan wa n alallawa ad əṣṣənaɣ as wər təṃosam inaṣṣasaman mišan aytedan ən təfləst, amaran əssuɣəlaq qawan amaḍray nnawan, akfaq qawan turagat ad təssəɣləyam i təɣawšiwen nawan daɣ akal."»

35 As əggazan šin n ikus n alkama akk iyyan oṣ'in daɣ əsaməd-net əsəkməs n əzrəf-net. As ənnayan isəkmas n əzrəf nasan təggaz tan ṭasa əntanay əd ši-ssan.

36 Iṇṇ'asan abba nnaṣan Yaqub: «Bararan in a dər-i təzammazzayam, Yusəf abas t'illa, ilkam as Šimehon, amaran taram ad tawəyam Benyamin. Adi kul nak ad d iqqal.»

37 Iṇṇ'as Ruben: «As dak du wər ewaya Benyamin tanɣa bararan in ann əššin. Əfləs i sər-əs, a dak k'id'əssuɣəla.»

38 Iṇṇ'as Yaqub: «Barar in wər dər-wan iddew, fəlas amaqqar-net aba tu iqqim du ɣas-net. As tu təgraw təkma daɣ əšikəl nawan nak a waššaran a a di tawəyam s alaxirat fəl tayyant-net.»

   

Komentář

 

322 - A Way Forward, Part 1 of 7

Napsal(a) Jonathan S. Rose

Title: A Way Forward, Part 1

Topic: Second Coming

Summary: The events depicted in the biblical exodus are a picture of how we as individuals and as a world culture can move forward spiritually.

References:
Genesis 37:36; 42:1-3; 47:27
Exodus 1:1-14; 3:1-8; 14:26-31; 19:1
Numbers 9:1-5; 10:11-12; 13; 14:1-4, 34
Deuteronomy 34:1-5, 9-10
Judges 1:1; 2:7-11

This video is a part of the Spirit and Life Bible Study series, whose purpose is to look at the Bible, the whole Bible, and nothing but the Bible through a Swedenborgian lens.

Přehrát video
Spirit and Life Bible Study broadcast from 11/8/2017. The complete series is available at: www.spiritandlifebiblestudy.com

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5428

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5428. 'And they did not recognize him' means that truth from the Divine was not seen in natural light that was not yet brightened with heavenly light. This becomes clear from what has gone immediately before this, for since 'Joseph recognized his brothers' means that general truths known to the Church were seen by the celestial of the spiritual by the light this possessed, it follows that 'they did not recognize him' means that the celestial of the spiritual, which is truth from the Divine, was not seen by the general truths known to the Church while these were in natural light not yet brightened with heavenly light. This meaning may indeed be seen from what has been stated immediately above; but as it belongs among arcana let some examples be used to shed light on the matter. Take as an example the glory of heaven. Consider those who, when they think about the glory of heaven, see this in natural light that has not been brightened with heavenly light because no intermediary is present, especially if no agreement exists. Such people's idea of the glory of heaven cannot be anything different from the kind of idea they possess about the glory of the world when they read, for instance, about the revelations made to prophets, in particular those made to John and described in the Book of Revelation, in which everything is most magnificent. One may tell these people that the glory of heaven surpasses all worldly magnificence, so completely that one cannot begin to compare it with that glory. One may also tell them that even this is not really the glory of heaven, but that the glory of heaven consists in that which is of God shining out of every individual thing to be seen there, and in a perception of Divine realities and in the wisdom gained from that perception. One may tell these people too that this alone is the glory to those who are there, for they consider worldly magnificence, in comparison with such wisdom, to be nothing at all, and they attribute all wisdom to the Lord and none whatsoever to themselves. But if people behold the glory of heaven in natural light devoid of an intermediary, and especially if no agreement exists, that glory goes completely unrecognized.

[2] Take angelic power as another example. Consider those who, when they think about angelic power, in particular that of the archangels who are mentioned in the Word, do so in natural light that has not been brightened with heavenly light because no intermediary is present, especially if because no agreement exists. Such people's idea of that power cannot be anything different from the idea they have of the power wielded by powerful rulers in the world. That is to say, they think that angels have thousands upon thousands of subordinates over whom they rule, and that high positions in heaven involve that kind of domination. One may tell these people that angelic power does indeed surpass all power wielded by powerful rulers in the world and is so great that just one of the subordinate angels can drive away millions of hellish spirits and send them down into their own hells, which is why in the Word angels are called 'powers' and 'dominions'. One may also tell those people that the least of the angels is the greatest; that is, the one who believes, wishes, and perceives that all power originates entirely within the Lord and never at all within himself is a very highly powerful ruler. And therefore those who are 'powers' in heaven utterly detest any power that derives from themselves. But neither is any of this recognized when beheld in natural light devoid of the intermediary, and more so if no agreement exists.

[3] Take yet another example. Consider a person who looks at freedom from a natural idea devoid of an intermediary linking it to a spiritual one, and especially if no agreement exists between the two. He cannot see freedom as anything else than thinking and willing from what is within himself and being able to carry out without restriction whatever he so thinks and wills. More than that, to the end that he can have whatever he thinks and wills the natural man wishes to become very rich; and to the end that he can carry out whatever he thinks and wills he wishes to become very powerful. Once he has attained this he imagines that he is in perfect freedom and consequently possesses real happiness. If however one tells people like this that true freedom, called heavenly freedom, is not at all like that, but that it involves no willing from what is within oneself, only from the Lord, and does not involve any thinking from what is within oneself, only from heaven, and that feelings of pain and sorrow ensue if one is allowed to think from what is within oneself and to will from what is in oneself, nothing of this is recognized.

These examples may serve to some extent to show what is implied by truth from the Divine not being seen in natural light that has not yet been brightened with heavenly light, meant by Joseph's brothers not recognizing him.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.