Bible

 

Genesis 37

Studie

   

2 Ənta da əttarix ən maddanəs ən Yaqub. Yusəf iṃos abi ilan ṃaraw elan d əṣṣa, faw itakku təməḍint ən hərwan nasan iddew əd məqqaran-net maddanəs ən Bilha əd Zilfa, šiḍoden n abba nnet. Faw itaway du i ši-s isalan n arak təṇṇawen šin əgannin.

3 Israyil(eṣəm wahaḍan ən Yaqub) iṣṣof Yusəf bararan-net kul win haḍatnen fəlas tušaray-net a daq q igraw. Ig'as takatkat təknat šihussay.

4 Ənayan məqqaran-net as əntanay iṣṣof tan ši-ssan Yusəf, təzzar əgzaran tu har as abas əfragan dər-əs ələsan takkayt.

5 Iga Yusəf targət, imal asan tat, təzzar əsannahalan tu gezzar.

6 Iṇṇ'asan: «Səsəmat i ad awan əməla targət ta əgeɣ,

7 iṃan nana a nayaɣ nəha šiwəgas nətaqqan šibolasen n alkaman, as din əgreɣ təbolast ta nnu təbdad, əkkanat tat du šin nawan əɣalayɣalaynat tat, əssəjadnat as.»

8 Əṇṇan as məqqaran-net: «Əngəm kay a z iqqəlan əmənokal nana, təxkəmaɣ ana?» Əsannahalan tu məqqaran-net gezzar wəllen fəl tərgət ta sər-san iga da, d amel wa dasan tat iga.

9 Ilas Yusəf igi ən tərgət iyyat imal tat i məqqaran-net. Iṇṇa: «Əgeɣ targət iyyat tolas təṃosat as ənaya təfuk əd təllit d eṭran əṃosnen maraw d iyyan, a di sajadnen.»

10 Targət ta imal i məqqaran-net da, imal tat i ši-s ənta da. Iharaššat tu ši-s iṇṇ'as: «Ma iṃos almaɣna ən tərgət ta? Mərda nnak ad ak nəssəjəd nak, d anna nak əd məqqaran nak?»

11 Təzzar əmmənzaɣan tu məqqaran-net mišan ši-s imməɣras in ikiṭṭəw targət ta.

12 As əzəl iyyan əglan məqqaran-net əḍanan eharay ən ši-ssan daɣ aṃadal ən Šəkem.

13 Iṇṇa Israyil i Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nak wərgeɣ əkkan təməḍint əs Šəkem, ayaw a kay zəmmizəla sər-san.» Ikkəwan as Yusəf, iṇṇ'as: «Nak da.»

14 Iṇṇ'as: «Aglu əṣṣən iməqqaran nak əɣlasan, əntanay d aharay nasan, təqqəla du təməlaɣ i. Təzzar immozal Yusəf, ifal aɣlal wa n Xebron ikka Šəkem.

15 Ijiwankat as t igraw aləs iyyan, ixrak daɣ əṣuf. Iṇṇ'as: «M'as təṣaggada?»

16 Iṇṇ'as Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nin as əṣaggada, təfraga ad i təməla edag wa daɣ əssəḍanan.»

17 Iṇṇ-as aləs: «Əg̣madan edag wa fəlas əsallaɣ asan as əṇṇan:" Əndawatana aṃadal wa n Dotan!"» Iggaz Yusəf ədəriz ən məqqaran-net har tan in oṣa daɣ Dotan.

18 As t ənayan daɣ igəg, izay tan in, əgan eɣaf fəl at t anɣin.

19 Ənamaṇṇan gar-essan: «Əməggi ən tərgəten den ad d izayan den.

20 Anɣiwatanaq qu a tu nəgər daɣ iyyat daɣ təgaziwen a, ad naṇṇu əmudar at t itšan, ad nəṣṣən a wa z'əqqəlnat tərgəten-net.»

21 Isl asan Ruben, igmay d efsan-net iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tagim iṃan-net.»

22 Ilas iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tənɣəlam azni nnet, əgərat t in ɣas daɣ tagaza a təhat əṣuf da, da wər das təɣšedam arat.» Ruben ira at t assafsu har t issuɣəl i ši-s.

23 As d ewad Yusəf iməqqaran-net əzzafan tu əkkaṣan daɣ-as takatkat-net ta təknat šihussay izlag.

24 Təzzar ədkalan tu əgaran tu daɣ tagaza wər əhen aṃan.

25 Dəffər adi əqqiman ad əṭattin as d ətkalan aṣawad nasan, ənayan taɣlamt ən Kəl Ismaɣil a du təfalat aṃadal ən Gilad. Olaman nasan əggiggan ilalan əganen daɣ məglan d aḍutan əzodnen, əgan anamod ən Masar.

26 Təzzar iṇṇa Yuda i məqqaran-net: «Ma dana z'aknu ad nanɣu amaḍray nnana nəɣbər azni nnet?

27 Əndawat a t in nazzanzu i Kəl Ismaɣil, da wər das nəɣšed arat, fəlas amaḍray nnana a iṃos, nəṃos dər-əs arat iyyanda.» Təzzar əṭṭafan məqqaran-net batu ta, ənamarḍan dər-əs fall-as.

28 As d okoyan mazanzan wiyyaḍ ən Kəl Midyan, əkkasan du Yusəf daɣ tagaza, əzzənzan t in i Kəl Ismaɣil ṣanatat təmərwen ən tamma n əzrəf. Ewayan tu Kəl Ismaɣil win əs Masar.

29 Iqqal du Ruben tagaza inay as Yusəf wər tat iha. Təzzar irmaɣ ad izazarrat isəlsa nnet.

30 Iqqal iməḍrayan-net, iṇṇ'asan: «Barar wər t'illa! Əmərədda, nak ma z'aga?»

31 Təzzar əgzaman əzolaɣ ədkalan takatkat ən Yusəf, əssəlmaɣan tat daɣ əzni nnet.

32 Əsassawayan takatkat ta təknat šihussay əs ši-ssan, əṇṇan as in: «A wa da a din nog̣az əṣṣən kud takatkat ən barar nak adi wala.»

33 Izday tat iṇṇa: «Takatkat ən barar in a wa! Əmudar n əmətši at t'itšan! Yusəf barar in iqqal idesan immətša!

34 Ad izazarrat Yaqub telassay-net fəl tərəmmeq, iggaz afartay ən rur-es har ig'azzaman aggotnen.

35 Ad gammayan bararan-net əd təbararen-net ket nasan ad t'əsəssikəyan tərəmmeq mišan ugay, iṇṇa: «Kala kala, har faw əheɣ afartay iket wər əlkema i barar in s alaxirat.» Imməɣras in ihallu fall-as.

36 Siga wen Yusəf əzzənzan t'in Kəl Midyan daɣ akal wa n Masar y aləs igan eṣəm Fotifar illan ɣur Firɣawna, iṃos əmuzar ən mag̣azan-net ən nammagaran.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1616

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1616. And Abram pitched his tent, and came and dwelt in the oak-groves of Mamre that are in Hebron. That this signifies that the Lord attained to a perception still more internal, is evident from the signification of “pitching a tent,” that is, of moving and fixing a tent, as being to be conjoined,—for a “tent” is the holy of worship (as shown before, n. 414, 1452), by which the external man is conjoined with the internal-and from the signification of an “oak-grove,” as being perception, as explained above (n. 1442, 1443), where it was “the oak-grove of Moreh,” which is the first perception; but here, “the oak-groves of Mamre,” in the plural, which signify more perception, that is, perception more internal. This perception is called “the oak-groves of Mamre that are in Hebron.” “Mamre” is also mentioned elsewhere (as in Genesis 14:13; 18:1; 23:17-19; 35:27), and Hebron likewise (as in Genesis 35:27; 37:14; Josh. 10:36, 39; 14:13-14, 15; 15:13, 54; 20:7; 21:11, 13; Judges 1:10, 20; and in other places); but with what signification, will of the Lord’s Divine mercy be seen where these passages are explained.

[2] As to “the oak-groves of Mamre that are in Hebron” signifying a still more internal perception, the case is as follows. As the things that are of the external man are conjoined with the celestial things of the internal man, so perception increases and becomes more internal. Conjunction with celestial things gives perception; for in the celestial things that are of love to Jehovah is the very life of the internal man; or what is the same, in the celestial things that are of love, that is, in celestial love, Jehovah is present, which presence is not perceived in the external man until conjunction has been effected, all perception being from conjunction.

[3] From the internal sense it is here evident how the case was with the Lord, namely, that His external man, or the Human Essence, was conjoined with the Divine Essence by degrees, according to the multiplication and fructification of knowledges. In no way can anyone, as a man, be conjoined with Jehovah or the Lord, except by means of knowledges, for by means of knowledges a man becomes a man; and so the Lord, because born as are other men, was also instructed as they are, but into His knowledges as receptacles celestial things were constantly being insinuated, so that the knowledges continually became the recipient vessels of celestial things, and themselves also became celestial.

[4] He continually advanced in this way to the celestial things of infancy for, as before said, the celestial things that are of love are insinuated from the earliest infancy up to childhood, and also to youth, when being a man he is then and afterwards imbued with knowledges [scientiae et cognitiones]. If the man is such that he can be regenerated, these knowledges are then filled with the celestial things that are of love and charity, and are thus implanted in the celestial things with which he has been gifted from infancy up to childhood and youth; and thus his external man is conjoined with his internal man.

They are first implanted in the celestial things with which he was gifted in youth, next in those with which he was gifted in childhood, and finally in those with which he was gifted in infancy; and then he is a “little child,” of whom the Lord said that “of such is the kingdom of God.” This implantation is effected by the Lord alone; and for this reason nothing celestial is possible with man, nor can be, that is not from the Lord, and that is not the Lord’s.

[5] But the Lord from His own power conjoined His external man with His internal man, and filled His knowledges with celestial things, and implanted them in the celestial things, and this in fact according to Divine order; first in the celestial things of His childhood, next in the celestial things of the age between childhood and infancy; and finally in the celestial things of His infancy; and thus at the same time became, as to the Human Essence, innocence itself and love itself, from which are all innocence and all love in the heavens and on earth. Such innocence is true infancy, because it is at the same time wisdom. But the innocence of infancy, unless by means of knowledges it becomes the innocence of wisdom, is of no use; and therefore in the other life infants are imbued with knowledges. As the Lord implanted knowledges in celestial things, so had He perception, for, as before said, all perception is from conjunction. He had His first perception when He implanted the memory-knowledges of childhood, which perception is signified by “the oak-grove of Moreh;” and His second, treated of here, which is more internal, when He implanted knowledges, which perception is signified by “the oak-groves of Mamre that are in Hebron.”

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.