Bible

 

Genesis 37

Studie

   

2 Ənta da əttarix ən maddanəs ən Yaqub. Yusəf iṃos abi ilan ṃaraw elan d əṣṣa, faw itakku təməḍint ən hərwan nasan iddew əd məqqaran-net maddanəs ən Bilha əd Zilfa, šiḍoden n abba nnet. Faw itaway du i ši-s isalan n arak təṇṇawen šin əgannin.

3 Israyil(eṣəm wahaḍan ən Yaqub) iṣṣof Yusəf bararan-net kul win haḍatnen fəlas tušaray-net a daq q igraw. Ig'as takatkat təknat šihussay.

4 Ənayan məqqaran-net as əntanay iṣṣof tan ši-ssan Yusəf, təzzar əgzaran tu har as abas əfragan dər-əs ələsan takkayt.

5 Iga Yusəf targət, imal asan tat, təzzar əsannahalan tu gezzar.

6 Iṇṇ'asan: «Səsəmat i ad awan əməla targət ta əgeɣ,

7 iṃan nana a nayaɣ nəha šiwəgas nətaqqan šibolasen n alkaman, as din əgreɣ təbolast ta nnu təbdad, əkkanat tat du šin nawan əɣalayɣalaynat tat, əssəjadnat as.»

8 Əṇṇan as məqqaran-net: «Əngəm kay a z iqqəlan əmənokal nana, təxkəmaɣ ana?» Əsannahalan tu məqqaran-net gezzar wəllen fəl tərgət ta sər-san iga da, d amel wa dasan tat iga.

9 Ilas Yusəf igi ən tərgət iyyat imal tat i məqqaran-net. Iṇṇa: «Əgeɣ targət iyyat tolas təṃosat as ənaya təfuk əd təllit d eṭran əṃosnen maraw d iyyan, a di sajadnen.»

10 Targət ta imal i məqqaran-net da, imal tat i ši-s ənta da. Iharaššat tu ši-s iṇṇ'as: «Ma iṃos almaɣna ən tərgət ta? Mərda nnak ad ak nəssəjəd nak, d anna nak əd məqqaran nak?»

11 Təzzar əmmənzaɣan tu məqqaran-net mišan ši-s imməɣras in ikiṭṭəw targət ta.

12 As əzəl iyyan əglan məqqaran-net əḍanan eharay ən ši-ssan daɣ aṃadal ən Šəkem.

13 Iṇṇa Israyil i Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nak wərgeɣ əkkan təməḍint əs Šəkem, ayaw a kay zəmmizəla sər-san.» Ikkəwan as Yusəf, iṇṇ'as: «Nak da.»

14 Iṇṇ'as: «Aglu əṣṣən iməqqaran nak əɣlasan, əntanay d aharay nasan, təqqəla du təməlaɣ i. Təzzar immozal Yusəf, ifal aɣlal wa n Xebron ikka Šəkem.

15 Ijiwankat as t igraw aləs iyyan, ixrak daɣ əṣuf. Iṇṇ'as: «M'as təṣaggada?»

16 Iṇṇ'as Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nin as əṣaggada, təfraga ad i təməla edag wa daɣ əssəḍanan.»

17 Iṇṇ-as aləs: «Əg̣madan edag wa fəlas əsallaɣ asan as əṇṇan:" Əndawatana aṃadal wa n Dotan!"» Iggaz Yusəf ədəriz ən məqqaran-net har tan in oṣa daɣ Dotan.

18 As t ənayan daɣ igəg, izay tan in, əgan eɣaf fəl at t anɣin.

19 Ənamaṇṇan gar-essan: «Əməggi ən tərgəten den ad d izayan den.

20 Anɣiwatanaq qu a tu nəgər daɣ iyyat daɣ təgaziwen a, ad naṇṇu əmudar at t itšan, ad nəṣṣən a wa z'əqqəlnat tərgəten-net.»

21 Isl asan Ruben, igmay d efsan-net iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tagim iṃan-net.»

22 Ilas iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tənɣəlam azni nnet, əgərat t in ɣas daɣ tagaza a təhat əṣuf da, da wər das təɣšedam arat.» Ruben ira at t assafsu har t issuɣəl i ši-s.

23 As d ewad Yusəf iməqqaran-net əzzafan tu əkkaṣan daɣ-as takatkat-net ta təknat šihussay izlag.

24 Təzzar ədkalan tu əgaran tu daɣ tagaza wər əhen aṃan.

25 Dəffər adi əqqiman ad əṭattin as d ətkalan aṣawad nasan, ənayan taɣlamt ən Kəl Ismaɣil a du təfalat aṃadal ən Gilad. Olaman nasan əggiggan ilalan əganen daɣ məglan d aḍutan əzodnen, əgan anamod ən Masar.

26 Təzzar iṇṇa Yuda i məqqaran-net: «Ma dana z'aknu ad nanɣu amaḍray nnana nəɣbər azni nnet?

27 Əndawat a t in nazzanzu i Kəl Ismaɣil, da wər das nəɣšed arat, fəlas amaḍray nnana a iṃos, nəṃos dər-əs arat iyyanda.» Təzzar əṭṭafan məqqaran-net batu ta, ənamarḍan dər-əs fall-as.

28 As d okoyan mazanzan wiyyaḍ ən Kəl Midyan, əkkasan du Yusəf daɣ tagaza, əzzənzan t in i Kəl Ismaɣil ṣanatat təmərwen ən tamma n əzrəf. Ewayan tu Kəl Ismaɣil win əs Masar.

29 Iqqal du Ruben tagaza inay as Yusəf wər tat iha. Təzzar irmaɣ ad izazarrat isəlsa nnet.

30 Iqqal iməḍrayan-net, iṇṇ'asan: «Barar wər t'illa! Əmərədda, nak ma z'aga?»

31 Təzzar əgzaman əzolaɣ ədkalan takatkat ən Yusəf, əssəlmaɣan tat daɣ əzni nnet.

32 Əsassawayan takatkat ta təknat šihussay əs ši-ssan, əṇṇan as in: «A wa da a din nog̣az əṣṣən kud takatkat ən barar nak adi wala.»

33 Izday tat iṇṇa: «Takatkat ən barar in a wa! Əmudar n əmətši at t'itšan! Yusəf barar in iqqal idesan immətša!

34 Ad izazarrat Yaqub telassay-net fəl tərəmmeq, iggaz afartay ən rur-es har ig'azzaman aggotnen.

35 Ad gammayan bararan-net əd təbararen-net ket nasan ad t'əsəssikəyan tərəmmeq mišan ugay, iṇṇa: «Kala kala, har faw əheɣ afartay iket wər əlkema i barar in s alaxirat.» Imməɣras in ihallu fall-as.

36 Siga wen Yusəf əzzənzan t'in Kəl Midyan daɣ akal wa n Masar y aləs igan eṣəm Fotifar illan ɣur Firɣawna, iṃos əmuzar ən mag̣azan-net ən nammagaran.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4721

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4721. 'And Joseph went to his brothers, and found them in Dothan' means that they were steeped in the specific details belonging to false assumptions. This is clear from the representation of 'Joseph' as the Lord as regards Divine Truth, dealt with in 4669; from the representation of 'his brothers' as the Church which turns aside from charity to faith, and at length to faith separated from charity, dealt with in 4665, 4671, 4679, 4680, 4690; and from the meaning of 'Dothan' as the specific details belonging to false assumptions' deals with immediately above in 4720. From this it is evident that the words used here mean that he found them steeped in the specific details belonging to false assumptions.

[2] So that anyone can know what 'specific details belonging to false assumptions' is used to mean, let some of the ideas taught by the Church making and acknowledging faith alone as its basic assumption serve to illustrate that phrase. That is to say, the ideas that a person is justified by faith alone; that in this case all sins are wiped away from him; that by faith alone he is saved even in the last hour of his life; that salvation is simply being admitted by grace into heaven; that even young children are saved through faith; that because they do not possess that faith gentiles are not saved; besides many other ideas that are taught. These ideas and others like them are the specific details belonging to the basic assumption made regarding faith alone. But if the Church were to make and acknowledge the life of faith as its basic assumption it would acknowledge charity towards the neighbour and love to the Lord, and consequently the works of charity and love. Then all those specific details that have just been mentioned would fall to the ground. Instead of justification the Church would acknowledge regeneration, of which the Lord speaks in John,

Unless anyone is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God. John 3:3.

It would also acknowledge that regeneration is effected by means of the life of faith, not by faith separated from charity. It would not acknowledge that all sins are in that case wiped away from a person, but that in the Lord's mercy he is withheld from them and maintained in good and from this in truth; so the Church would acknowledge that all good originates in the Lord and all evil in oneself. Nor would it acknowledge that a person is saved through faith even in the last hour of his life but through his life of faith which awaits his arrival [in heaven]. It would not acknowledge either that salvation is simply being admitted by grace into heaven, for heaven is refused to none by the Lord, but that if his life is not the kind that enables him to exist together with angels he is impelled to flee from it, 4674. Nor would the Church acknowledge that young children are saved through faith, but that in the next life they are taught about the good deeds of charity and about the truths of faith by the Lord and in this way are accepted into heaven, 2289-2308. Nor also would it acknowledge that because they do not possess faith gentiles are not saved, but that the life they have led awaits their arrival in heaven, and that those who have led charitable lives with one another are taught about the good deeds of faith and are equally accepted in heaven. Those who lead a good life also desire the same and believe in it, see 2589-2604. And so on with many other specific ideas.

[3] The Church which makes and acknowledges faith alone as its basic assumption cannot possibly know what charity is, not even what the neighbour is, and so cannot know what heaven is. It will be astonished whenever anyone says that the happiness of the life after death and the joy in heaven consist in the Divine which flows into desiring and doing for others that which is good, and that the happiness resulting from this, and the bliss, surpass one's entire ability to perceive them. It will be astonished to learn that the reception of that influx from the Divine is by no means possible with anyone who has not been leading the life of faith, that is, with whom the good of charity has not been present. That the life of faith is what saves a person is also explicitly taught by the Lord in Matthew 25:31-end. The same teaching is found in many other places, and that too is why the Creed, called the Athanasian, states towards the end of it,

Everyone will give an account of his works: he who has done well will go into eternal life, but he who has done wickedly into eternal fire.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.