Bible

 

Genesis 34

Studie

   

2 Inay-tat Šəkem, ahaya ən Xiwi, iṃos rures ən Xamor wa n əmənokal n akal, ibaz-tat issəxram daɣ-as. iṃan-net, Dina ta n elles ən Yaqub, ig-as tara n iblis ir-et wəllen aṃaran ad-igammay d a wa as tu-za-tirəw.

4 Iṇṇa Šəken y abba-nnet Xamor: «Agu arat kul wa fəl z-əzləfa tabarart a.»

5 Isla Yaqub as tabarart-net tətiwajajargan, mišan id zama as maddan-əs əhan əṣuf d aharay iffəsta, wər iṇṇa arat har d-əqqalan.

6 Xamor, šis ən Šəkem, ikka Yaqub dər-əs ammagrad

7 As d-əfalan maddanəs ən Yaqub əṣuf əgrawan isalan n a wa igan. Əɣšadan ṃan nasan, iggaz-tan alhan səksədan fəl as əmazal wa tan iṣṣəkna Šəkem iṃosan əsəxrəm daɣ Dina, elles ən Yaqub, isifallas Kəl Israyel.Əmazal wa iṃos arat wər nəmməkkan.

8 Iṇṇ-asan Xamor: «Barar-in, Šəkem təbaz-tu tarramt ən tabarart-nawan, areɣ daɣ-wan das-tat takfim y azalaf.

9 «Nazlafatana, akfat-ana ašše-kawan, təkəlam šin nana.

10 Təham əlxəyyar n ad-təɣsəram ɣur-naar-ena. Əgeɣ akal daɣ fassan nawan, əggəzat-tu, təssəɣləyam daɣ as tilem daɣ as ərrəzəɣan.»

11 Šəkem iṃan -net iṇṇa y abba ən Dina əd məqqaran-net: «Əqbəlat maṇsay-nin, a kawan-akfa a wa dər təṣṣəstanam kul.

12 «Əgməyat daɣ-i taggalt zəwwərat əd təṇafuten aggotnen ad awan-ərzəma a wa dər təṣṣəstanam kul mišan akfat-i tabarart a-tat-əzləfa!»

13 Maddan-əs ən Yaqub iḍgaz ətəwəjəjərgan ən tamaḍrayt nasan Dina as əjjəwwaban i Šəkem əd šis Xamor əkkrrasan tan.

14 Əṇṇan-asan: «Wər nəfreg ad-nakfu tamaḍrayt-nana aləs wər nəmməṇkad izləf-tat, id a di issiras-ana.

15 «Wər kawan-za-nakfu tərəddat-nana, ar s-ad-təsəmməṇkədam yayyan kul win əzdaɣnen aɣrəm a.

16 «Assaɣa di a-kawan-nakfu aššek-ana, nəzləf šin nawan, nəɣsər daɣ-wan, nəkrəs aɣrəf iyyan-da.

17 «Mišan as wər təqbelam ad-tammaṇkadam ad nətkəl tabarart-nana, naglu.»

18 Əljəmat ten ogaman-tat id Xamor əd rures Šəkem.

19 Daɣ əḍḍəguz ən tara ən tabarart ən Yaqub issətrab Šəkem əlqəbulat n a wa daɣ-san itawagmayan. Ənta iṃos wa itawaṣofan daɣ ahan-nasan.

20 Ikka Xamor əd rures Šəkem edag wa n əṃənəy daɣ əmi n əɣrəm, əmməgradan i meddan n əɣrəm, əṇṇan:

21 «Meddan en ənniyen-ana alxer, ayyatanaq-qan ad-əɣsəran daɣ akal,əssəɣləyan daɣ-as.Akal elwa fall-ana nakkanay dər-san! Nəfrəg azalaf n ašš-essan, nakf-en šin nana.

22 «Mišan dər əššərəd n as meddan en wər z-əqbəlan tartit dər-na, nəqqəl aɣrəf iyyan-da ar s ad-əmmiṇkadan yayyan-nana kul šilat-nasan.

23 «Ardatana s ad-nəqbəl əššərəd-di, aṃaran as əɣsaran daɣ-na, əddi ihərwan-nasan d ərrəzaɣan nasan ad-əqqəlan in nana.»

24 Əqbalan aytedan kul winn əɣrəm a wa dasan-iṇṇa Xamor əd rures Šəkem, aṃaran əmməṇkadan yayyan n əɣrəm.

25 Mišan əzəl wa n karad, daɣ əknan yayyan win əṃṃənkadnen təzzurt, ənkaran du maddanəs ən Yaqub əššin, iməqqaran ən Dina, Šimehon əd Lefi, ətkalan šikabiwen-nasan, əggazan aɣrəm wər nənked ad ənaqqan yayyan kul win t-əhanen.

26 Ənɣan Xamor iṃan-net əd rures Šəkem əs takoba, əbazan-du Dina daɣ ahan ən Šəkem, əglan dər-əs.

27 Maddanəs ən Yaqub saffaykan šiməɣsa, oɣan aɣrəm wa ijajjarganan tamaḍrayt-nasan.

28 Ətkalan eharay wa ənḍərran əd wa zuwwaran, d əzdan, d a wa ihan aɣrəm kul d əṣuf.

29 Oɣan, ewayan təgərgist-nasan kul, əd maddan-əsan əd təḍoden-nasan, d a wa ihan iṇan-nasan kul.

30 Iṇṇa Yaqub i Šimehon əd Lefi: «Təgam-i daɣ aššawaša, təgam-i ark aḍu dat Kəl-Kanan əd Kəl-Fəriz. Nak wər əleɣ ar təkəbəzzet ən meddan s iga adi əntanay as namannakan fall-i, əṣrayan-i, a-di-əhləkan nak d aɣaywan-in.»

31 Mišan əṇṇan-as: «Wər nəfreg ad-nayyu aləs wa išaššalan tamaḍrayt-nana əd tənəssexrəmt.»

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4433

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4433. 'And he took her, and lay with her, and ravished her' means that there was no other way in which it could be joined to the affection for truth meant by the sons of Jacob, her brothers. This is clear from the meaning of 'taking her, lying with her, and ravishing her' as being joined together, though not in the rightful way, which is through betrothal. But the meaning these words carry, that there was no other way in which they could be joined together, cannot be seen by anyone unless he knows the fuller implications of them. Interior truth received from the Ancients, which is meant by 'Shechem the son of Hamor the Hivite', is the truth which among the Ancients had served the internal dimension of the Church, and so had been the internal dimension of their statutes, judgements, and laws, in short of their religious observances and the like. Those truths were their matters of doctrine on which they based their lives, which were in fact matters of doctrine concerning charity; for in ancient times those who belonged to the genuine Church had no other kind of doctrine. These same truths may be called, in relation to doctrine, the interior truths of faith, but in relation to life, goods. If a Church was to be established among the nation descended from Jacob it was necessary for them to be introduced into those truths and goods. For unless internal things are present within external ones, that is, unless people have internal things in mind when involved with external ones - and unless at the same time they feel an affection for internal things or at least unless they feel an affection for external things on account of internal ones, nothing of the Church is there. Internal things constitute the Church, for the Lord is present within these; that is to say, spiritual and celestial things originating in Him are present within them.

[2] But the nation descended from Jacob, that is, the Israelitish and Jewish nation, was unable to be introduced in the rightful way which is through betrothal, for the reason that their external worship did not correspond [to anything internal]. For they received from their fore-fathers - from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob - the worship established by Eber, which was different externally from the worship of the Ancient Church, see 1238, 1241, 1343, 2180. And because that worship was different, interior truths which existed among the Ancients were not able to be joined to it in the rightful way through betrothal, only in the way described in this chapter. This enables one to understand what is involved in the assertion that there was no other way in which it could be joined to the affection for truth meant by 'the sons of Jacob, Dinah's brothers'.

[3] But although a joining together could have been effected in this way, in accordance with the law, also known to the Ancients, which is set out in Exodus 22:16; Deuteronomy 22:28-29, the character of that nation was nevertheless such that it would by no means allow any joining of interior truth received from the Ancients to the external forms of worship that existed among the descendants of Jacob, 4281, 4290, 4293, 4307, 4314, 4316, 4317. Among that nation therefore no Church could be established, but instead merely that which was a representative of the Church, see 4281, 4288, 4307. The character of that nation, which was such that it was not only unable to receive interior truths but also completely annihilated them among themselves, is represented in this chapter by the sons of Jacob answering Shechem and Hamor deceitfully, verse 13; and after that by Simeon and Levi's smiting the city with the edge of the sword and killing Shechem and Hamor, verses 25-26; and by the rest of the sons coming upon the slain and plundering the city, and taking away the flocks, the herds, and whatever there was in the city, in the field, and in the houses, verses 27-29. This shows what is meant by the prophetical utterances of Jacob, who by then was Israel,

Simeon and Levi are brothers; instruments of violence are their swords. Into their secret place let my soul not come; in their congregation let not my glory be united; for in their anger they killed a man, and in their pleasure they hamstrung an ox. Cursed be their anger, for it is fierce, and their fury, for it is severe. I will divide them in Jacob, and will scatter them in Israel. Genesis 49:5-7.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.