Bible

 

Genesis 31

Studie

   

2 Iay Yaqub əṃəttəy daɣ mazalan ən Laban fəl win n anin.

3 Iṇṇa Əməli i Yaqub: «Əqqəl akal ən marawan nak, ɣur aɣaywan n abba nnak, əṣṣana daɣ ak.»

4 Iɣra ddu Yaqub Raxil əd Leyya s əṣuf wa iha ənta d aharay-net wa ənḍərran.

5 Iṇṇ asnat: «Əgrəɣ in as šiṃətəkwəyen n abba nnakmat wər di əṇfenat šilat n anin, mišan Məššina n abba nin illa ɣur-i.

6 Təṣṣanmat iṃan nakmat as wər din əglema daɣ təɣurad in wala, y əššəɣəl n abba nnakmat.

7 Mišan iyyəwan i təkaddilt, iyyəwan əsəṃṃəttəy n alxaqq in. Mišan wər t'ikfa Məššina turagat n a di agu əššur.

8 S əmmək en da kud a iṇṇa win šaɣarnen a əṃosnen alxaqq in, ket-nasnat təntawen erawnat du ikərwatan šaɣarnen, kudeɣ iṇṇa win golənditan a iṃosan alxaqq in ənta da təntawen erawnat du ikərwatan əganen igolənditan.

9 Məššina iṃan-net as di ikfa daɣ aharay n abba nnakmat

10 Daɣ tamert ta n sabdar ən təmenesen ad ənaya daɣ tərgət isawalan əganen əgolənditan əd wiyyad šaɣarnen əd wiyyad farfoznen, as əzagan təntawen n aharay a.

11 Iṇṇ'i angalos ən Məššina daɣ tərgət "Yaqub" Əṇṇeɣ-as "hun".

12 Iṇṇ'i: "Ədkəl aṣawad nak, ad tagga isawalan win əzagnen təntawen n aharay əgan əgolənditan, šaɣera madeɣ farfoza. Adi wər t id'eway ar as ənaya a wa dak iga Laban.

13 Nak Məššina ən Betel wa dak d'inafalalan ɣur Betel edag wa daɣ tənɣala widi fəl təhunt, edag wa daɣ i tədkala arkawal. Əmərədda, əṇkər,əg̣məd akal a, əqqəl akal ən marwan nak.»

14 Təṇṇa Raxil əd Leyya i Yaqub: «Wər nəla tadagart ən təkasit daɣ abba nnana.

15 Idkal ana šilat ən təmagaren id inazzan danaɣ in iga, inɣa azrəf wa din nənza, awalla za ar inɣ ay, azrəf wa as imməkkan a tu nilu.

16 Daɣ adi təgərgist kul ta dd'ibaz Məššina daɣ abba nnana šin maddan-nəna. Əmərədda agu a w'as dak iṇṇa Məššina.»

17 Isammatag Yaqub i təzrek, issəwan maddan-əs əd təḍoden-net olaman,

18 izzərgaz ihərwan-net, eway ərrəzəɣan kul win sər-əs əggaznen daɣ Mesofotami, ikk' akal wa n Kanan ɣur Isxaq abba nnet.

19 Ikka Laban edagg ən talazay ən təḍuft n aharay nnet, tokar du Raxil aṣṣənaṃan-net dəffər-əs.

20 Ikkərras Yaqub Laban wa n aw Aram s as iḍḍəggag dəffər-əs wər das imel.

21 Iḍḍəggag d a wa ila kul, iɣras agarew wa n Fərat, innəmad ikallan n ədɣaɣan win Gilhad.

22 Əzəl wa n karad igraw Laban isalan n əḍəggəg ən Yaqub.

23 Ilkam as ənta əd meddan ən šəqqaɣan-net ewadan tu dəffər əṣṣ' aḍan n əšikəl daɣ ədɣaɣan win Gilhad.

24 As ig' ahad inafalal Məššina i Laban daɣ tərgət iṇṇ'as: «Ənkəd y ad taga arat i Yaqub gər olaɣ wala ibrar.»

25 As ewad Laban Yaqub ikras ahaket-net daɣ akal wa n ədɣaɣan ən Gilhad. Iga Laban əd meddan-net a wen da.

26 Iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Ma təge da? Təkkərrasaɣ i, tewaya šibararen in as taṇṇa šiməskasa n əməgər?

27 Ma fəl du təḍəggaga daɣ əssir? Mas di təkkərrasa sas di wər təmela? Ənnar di təmala ayyaq qay tagla du daɣ tədəwit d aṣak daw maslan ən tandiwen d əṇzadan.

28 Wər di toyyeɣ ad əzələmmeɣ ihayawan in əd təbararen in, agaɣ asan šiwaṭriwen. Təgeɣ təṃətəkwəyt n əmeskəl!

29 Əleɣ fərregat n ad awan əɣšada. Mišan ənḍod imməgrad sər-i Məššina n abba nnak, iṇṇ'i: "Ənkəd y ad tagaɣ arat i Yaqub gər olaɣ wala ibrar."

30 Əgreɣ teklay nak fəlas əṣuf a kay iggazan n aɣaywan nawan mišan ma fəl tokara du aṣṣanaman in?»

31 Iṇṇa Yaqub i Laban: «Awalla, təksəda a əgeɣ as a daɣ i tabəza ašš-ek əs təɣurad.

32 Daɣ batu n aṣṣanaman nak i ɣur tan du təgrawa ad aṃṃat! Səffətəktək a wa əle tədkəla a wa təle dat təgiyyawen n aytedan nana!» Wər iṣṣen Yaqub as Raxil a du tokarat aṣṣanaman.

33 Igla Laban isaffataktak ehan wa n Yaqub d ahan wa n Leyya əd wa n təwahayen-net an ṣanatat, wər igrew wala. Ɣur ag̣amad-net ehan wa n Leyya iggaz wa n Raxil. Ənta Raxil a tədkalat aṣṣanaman təɣbar tan daɣ təxawit-net, təqqim daɣ-as. Adi da fəl təṇṇa y abba-net assaɣa wa d'iggaz šin əsəffətəktək n ahaket-net: «Ad wər təššəka abba nin as wər əbdeda ɣur iguz nak fəlas alɣadat a di təgrawat.» Isaffataktak Laban ahaket-net kul mišan wər igrew aṣṣanaman-net.

36 Iggaz alham Yaqub təzzar imməṣtan əd Laban iṇṇa: «Məni a wa əɣšada? Ma iṃos abakkad in as di təhhore?

37 Daɣ adi əmərədda ad təsaffataktaka ilalan nin kul ma du təgrawa təleq qu? Sakn'ay y aytedan in əd win nak ad aggayen fəl a wa illan gar-ena!

38 Əmərədda ṣanatat təṃərwen n awatay a əge əlle ɣur-ək. Wər kala əgarnat ayfəd nak wala wəlli nnak, wər kala ətšeɣ ijəɣal n əsəgən nak.

39 Teɣsay nak ətšan wəxsan wər dak du tiwəya iləzgan-net, nak tat irazzaman daɣ təɣurad in id təḍgazaɣ i gər təmmitša ehad wala ezal.

40 Nak a təkaggay təfuk s azal, inɣ'i asamed s ahad, aṃaran faw iṃṃokar eṭəs in.

41 Əmmək en da as daɣ ṣanatat təṃərwen n awatay šin əge ɣur-ək: Maraw elan d əkkoz taggalt ən təbararen nak ṣanatat, ṣədis elan fəl aharay-nnak, təyyəwanaɣ əsəṃṃəttəy n alxaqq in.

42 Kundab' as Məššina n abba nin Ibrahin, wa iksud abba nin Isxaq as əheɣ taɣlift-net, illikan as əmərədda təstaɣaɣ i da əqquran fassan nin. Mišan Məššina ogga arkaṇay nin d iket n əššəɣəl iṣṣohen wa dak əge, adi da fəlas əṇdod, immigrad daɣ batu nin.»

43 Iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Šibararen a ši nnu, bararan a i nnu, eharay a i nnu, a wa təhaṇṇaya da kul i nnu. Mišan, əmərədda, wər əle batu fəl təbararen in əd bararan nasnat.

44 «Daɣ a di əmərədda nənəmətkəlet arkawal ən tassaq ad iqqal təgiyya gar-i dər-ək.

45 Təzzar itkal Yaqub təhunt issəɣt-et əs təzzəgrət-net, təqqal təṃətirt.

46 Təzzar iṇṇa Yaqub y aytedan-net: «Amədat-du šihun!» Əgan-tanat sakfaw, ətšan fall-as.

47 Iga Laban i sakfaw wen eṣəm Yəgar-Sahaduta (almaɣna sakfaw wa n təgiyya), daɣ awal-net, ig-as Yaqub eṣəm əntada Galed (almaɣna sakfaw wa n təgiyya).

48 Iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Sakfaw a ən təhun a da ənta iṃosan təgiyya gar-i dər-ək azalada», a di da fəl iga eṣəm Galed.

49 Iga eṣəm tolas Mitsfa (almaɣna edag n ag̣g̣az), id Laban iṇṇa tolas: «Aglet Əməli išišawalana a nəga daɣ ənəməggag.

50 «As təjajjargana šibararen-in madeɣ təzlafa šiyyad šiḍoden, aktəw iṃan-nak as kud ɣur-na wər illa awedan da Məššina a iṃosan təgiyya n arkawal wa nənamatkal!» Təzzar iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Təhunt ta əssəɣta da əs təzzəgrət-net əd sakfaw wa,əssəbdadaq-qan gar-i dər-ək, ad aggayyen as wər ana z-iggəz i tan z-akəyan əhan tu arak ṃan.

53 «Məššina n Ibrahim d Əməli ən Naxor ələkanet-ana!» Dəffər a wen ihad Yaqub əs Məššina wa iksud abba-nnet Isxaq ar ad-iṭṭəf arkawal.

54 Təzzar iga Yaqub takutay fəl adɣaɣ, iššedaw du sər-əs iššəqqaɣan-net. Ədrawan-tat, ənamaṇsan ahad wə di fəl adɣaɣ.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4104

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4104. And lifted his sons and his women upon the camels. That this signifies the elevation of truths and of the affections of them, and their orderly arrangement in generals, is evident from the signification of “sons,” as being truths (see n. 489, 491, 533, 1147, 2693); from the signification of “women,” here Rachel and Leah and also the handmaids, as being the affections of truth, of knowledges, and of memory-knowledges, as shown before; and from the signification of “camels,” as being general memory-knowledges in the natural (see n. 3048, 3071, 3143, 3145).

[2] He who does not know how the case is with representations and correspondences, cannot believe that these words, “he lifted his sons and his women upon the camels,” have such a signification; for they appear to him too remote from such matters to involve and contain within themselves any such spiritual meaning, for he thinks about sons, women, and camels. But the angels, who see and perceive all such things spiritually, do not think about sons, but when “sons” are mentioned they think of truths; nor do they think about women, but when “women” are mentioned they think of the affections of truth, of knowledges, and of memory-knowledges; nor do they think about camels, but instead they think of general things in the natural. For such is the correspondence of all these things; and such is angelic thought; and wonderful to say such is the thought of the internal spiritual man while living in the body, although the external man is entirely unaware of it. For the same reason, when a man who has been regenerated dies, he comes into the like thought, and can think and speak with angels, and this without instruction; which would be quite impossible unless he had had such interior thought. That the thought is of this character comes from the correspondence of natural and spiritual things; and from this it is evident that although the literal sense of the Word is natural, it nevertheless contains within itself and every particular of it spiritual things; that is, such as are of the interior or spiritual thought and the derivative speech; or in other words, such as exist in the thought and speech of the angels.

[3] As regards the elevation of truths and of the affections of them, and their orderly arrangement in generals, the case is this: The truths and the affections are elevated when the things of eternal life and of the Lord’s kingdom are set before those which belong to life in the body and to the kingdom of the world. When a man acknowledges the former as the principal and primary, and the latter as the instrumental and secondary, then with him truths and the affections of them are elevated; for in the same proportion the man is carried away into the light of heaven, within which there are intelligence and wisdom; and in the same proportion the things which are of the light of the world become to him images and as it were mirrors in which he sees the things of the light of heaven. The contrary happens when the man sets the things of the life of the body and of the kingdom of the world before those of eternal life and the Lord’s kingdom; as when he believes that the latter have no existence because he does not see them, and because no one has come from there and made them known; and also when he believes that if they do exist, nothing worse will happen to him than to others; and when he confirms himself in these ideas, and lives the life of the world, and utterly despises charity and faith. With such a man, truths and the affections of them are not elevated, but are either suffocated, or rejected, or perverted; for he is in natural light, into which nothing of heavenly light inflows. From all this it is evident what is meant by the elevation of truths and of the affections of them.

[4] As regards their orderly arrangement in generals, this is a necessary consequence; for insofar as a man sets heavenly things before worldly ones, so far are the things in his natural arranged in order according to the state of heaven, so that as before said they appear therein as images and mirrors of heavenly things, for they are corresponding representatives. It is the ends that effect the arrangement into order, that is, the Lord through the ends in the man. For there are three things that follow in order, namely, ends, causes, and effects. Ends produce causes, and through causes, effects. Such therefore as are the ends, such come forth the consequent causes, and such the consequent effects. Ends are the inmost things with man; causes are middle or mediates, and are called mediate ends; and effects are ultimates, and are called last or ultimate ends. Effects are also what are called generals. From all this it is evident in what consists orderly arrangement in generals, namely, that when the things of eternal life and of the Lord’s kingdom are regarded as the end, all the middle ends or causes, and all the ultimate ends or effects, are arranged in order in accordance with the end itself; and this in the natural, because the effects are there; or what is the same, the generals are there.

[5] Every man of adult age who possesses any judgment, and will give the matter any consideration, is able to know that he is in two kingdoms, namely, in a spiritual kingdom and in a natural kingdom; and also that the spiritual kingdom is interior, and the natural kingdom exterior; and consequently that he can set one before the other, that is, he can regard one as the end in preference to the other; and thus that the one which he regards as his end, or prefers, rules with him. If therefore he regards the spiritual kingdom as his end, and prefers it (that is, the things that belong to this kingdom), he then acknowledges as the principal and primary, love to the Lord and charity toward the neighbor, and consequently all things that confirm this love and charity, and are said to be of faith; for these belong to that kingdom; and in this case all things in his natural are arranged and set in order in accordance therewith, in order that they may be subservient and obedient. But when a man has as his end and sets first the natural kingdom (that is, the things it contains), he then extinguishes all that is of love to the Lord and of charity toward the neighbor, and all that is of faith, insomuch that he makes them of no account whatever; but makes the love of the world and of self, and all that belongs thereto, to be everything. When this is the case, all things in his natural are arranged in order in accordance with these ends, thus in utter contrariety to the things of heaven; and in this way he makes hell in himself. To regard as an end is to love, for every end is of the love, because whatever is loved is regarded as the end.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.