Bible

 

Genesis 30

Studie

   

2 Iggaz t alham-net iṇṇ'as: «Nak wər əṃosa Məššina. Ənta a dam igdalan təla n aratan.»

3 Təṇṇ'as Raxil: «Əkfeq qay taklit in Bilha, tənəməṇsa dər-əs, tile dər-əs bararan, əssədwəlaq qan, agaqqan bararan in. Əddi nak da ad əqqəla anna.»

4 Iqbal Yaqub a wa das təṇṇa Raxil. Təkf'ay Bilha, isawwahay tat, inamaṇsa dər-əs aṃaran.

5 Təga Bilha tadist təgraw du barar i Yaqub.

6 Təzzar təṇṇa Raxil: «Məššina izazzalalaɣ i əššəriɣa, iqbal təwaṭray nin, aṃaran ikf'i barar». Adi da fəl das təg'eṣəm Dan.

7 Təga Bilha tadist tolas təgraw du barar wa n əššin i Yaqub.

8 Təṇṇa Raxil: «Əgeɣ əməgər iṣṣohen əd tamaqqart in, orne.» Təg-as eṣəm Naftali.

9 As din təgra Leyya as ənta təmməzzay d ara təkfa Yaqub taklit-net Zilfa a tat isəwwəhəy.

10 Təzzar təgraw du Zilfa, taklit ən Leyya, barar i Yaqub.

11 Təṇṇa Leyya aṃaran: «Aṇṇasara nin oṣa ddu!», təg as eṣəm Gad.

12 Dəffər a wen təgraw du Zilfa, taklit ən Leyya, barar wa n əššin i Yaqub.

13 Təṇṇa Leyya tolas: «Əkneɣ aṇṇasara wəllen! Ad əsəttəhəqqətnat təḍoden əs tədəwit in.» Təzzar təg'as eṣəm Ašer.

14 Əzəl iyyan daɣ azzaman n allay n alkama eway Ruben d əṣṣuf har d'igraw aratan n annabat wa išatan aššahwat immigal y əggəgru. Eway tan du y anna-nnet Leyya. Təzzar təṇṇa Raxil i Leyya: «Oṇsayaq qam a di tan takfa.»

15 Təṇṇas Leyya: «Awak wər dam igda as ɣur-əm təlla əṇṇiyat n aləs-in, təṣṣərtəyaɣ a wen d əmmud ən barar in?» Təjjəwwab as Raxil: «Ənəy! Aslu! Oyyeɣ Yaqub a ɣur əm aṇsu ahada, fəl ad idu takfa aratan n annabat win d omad barar nam.»

16 As d'edwa Yaqub alməz ifal du təməḍint təssəlkad-as Leyya, təṇṇ as: «Nak ɣur za taṇsa ahada, eṭəs nak əzzinzaq qu əmmud ən barar in.» Təzzar iṇsa ɣur-əs ahad wədi.

17 Iqbal Məššina təwaṭray ən Leyya. Təzzar təga tadist. Təgraw du i Yaqub barar wa n ṣəmmos.

18 Təlas təṇṇa: «Məššina ikf i alxaqq in fəlas əkfeɣ aləs in taklit in.» Təg'i barar eṣəm Issakar.

19 Təlas igi ən tədist, təgraw d'i Yaqub barar wa n ṣədis.

20 Aṃaran təṇṇa: «Məššina ikf i təhəkkut təqqitasat. Əmərədda aləs in ad i agu almaqam id əkfeq qu ṣədis bararan. Adi da fəl das təga eṣəm Zəbulun.

21 Dəffər a wen təgraw du tabarart, təg'as eṣəm Dina.

22 Məššina ikittəw Raxil. Iqbal təwaṭray-net, ikf et fərregat ən təla ən bararan.

23 Təga tadist təgraw barar təṇṇa: «Məššina ikkas i daɣ takarakit.»

24 Təg'as eṣəm Yusəf, təṇṇa: «Ya Əməli šit'i du iyyan barar!»

25 Ihu Yusəf ɣas, iṇṇa Yaqub i Laban: «Sallam i ad akkaɣ aytedan in daɣ akal nana.

26 Akf i šiḍoden in əd bararan in win a fəl ak əšɣala, ad agla, fəlas təṣṣana kay iṃan nak as əgəɣ ak aššəɣəl ihossayan.»

27 Iṇṇ as Laban: «Oṇsayaq qay a di təqbəla tara nin a: "qam harwa", id tənafləyt in əddəlil nak afəl tat əgrawa, if'ik Məššina albaraka.»

28 Iššewal harwa da, iṇṇ as: «Əfrəs i alxaq nak, ad ak k ərzəma.»

29 Iṇṇ as Yaqub: «Iṃan nak təṣṣana a wa dər ola aššəɣəl wa dak əge, d a wa dər tola təttit n aharay nnak ɣur-i.

30 «Aṃaran təṣṣanaɣ as dat aṣṣa nin təla nnak ši əṇdərrat. Mišan əmərədda təga təttit tagget, issiwar kay Məššina albaraka edagg oṣəɣ. Mišan əmərədda ewad alwaq n ad əšɣəla i tələqqawen in.»

31 Iṇṇ as Laban: «Ma kay z akfa?» Ijjəwwab as Yaqub: «Wər di za takfa wala. Aṃaran ad agla, og̣azaɣ ak eharay nnak as təqbala əššərəd wa dak z aga da.

32 «A di tayya, azalada, ərzəga eharay nnak a daɣ-as d əkkəsa ijamaran kul win šaɣarnen əd win bardaɣnen madeɣ win kawalnen daɣ ayfəd əd sagayan kul win šaɣarnen əd win bardaɣnen daɣ wəlli nnak. Ad əqqəlan alxaqq in.

33 «Dəffər a wa as təššəggaraɣ alxaqq in ad təṣṣənaɣ as nak aw tidət: as təgrawa daɣ aharay nin asagay wər nəšaɣar madeɣ wər nəbardaɣ, madeɣ əjemar wər nəkawal, təṣṣənaɣ as əmikər add əgan.

34 Iṇṇa Laban: «Ənta ddi da! Ardəɣ s a wa təṇṇe.»

35 Mišan əzəl wen da ad iṣkat daɣ aharay-net izulaɣ kul win golənditan əd win bardaɣnen, əd wəlli kul šin šaɣarnen əd šin bardaɣnen, kul a wa əhanat təməllawen daɣ aharay nnet. Iṣkat tolas ayfəd kul šin kawalnen. Ig'en daɣ fassan ən maddan əs.

36 Dəffər a wen issaggalat tan s igəg ən karad aḍan n əšikəl gər essan əd Yaqub. Inəṭṭaf Yaqub d a w a dd iqqiman daɣ aharay ən Laban.

37 Iɣtas-du Yaqub iləgwan win əbdagnen daɣ karad rawan n eškan əṃosnen libne, luz d ermon. Təzzar ig'asan izalwakan mallolnen s əzənzəf.

38 Təzzar iṣṣəns'en daɣ təšəšwit ən təjəngərert ta daɣ iṣṣasu aharay nnet.Amazay wen iṃos wan təməzik ən təntawen-net.

39 Ad əzzagnat əhaṇṇaynat iləgwan win issəṇsa Yaqub, a du tarawnat ikərwatan əganen igolənditan, əd win šaɣarnen əd win bardaɣnen.

40 Iššota Yaqub tolas as izammazay ayfəd, təzzar izzəzak kanat i karran dat šin Laban kawalnen əd šin mallolnen n əlkəzan. Idkal Yaqub maddanəs ən tazzog a, iga sər-san əsəgən.

41 Id əssəbdarnat taɣsiwen šin əngaynen ad assaṇsu dat-əsnat ɣur təšəšwit iləgwan win zalwakan mallolnen fəl ad əzəgnat əhaṇṇaynat tan.

42 Mišan wər tan isəṇsu dat šin ənšašnen əmmək en da as eharay wa inšašan kul iqqal in Laban, wa ingayan il'ay Yaqub

43 Adi da a iknan əsəggərgəs ən Yaqub wəllen, iga daɣ aharay wa ənḍərran isəgan zawwarnen,əd ṃənas dəzdan d eklan əd taklaten.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3769

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3769. 'And there was a large stone over the mouth of the well' means that it, that is to say, the Word, was closed up. This becomes clear without explanation. The Word is said to be closed up when it is understood purely according to the sense of the letter and everything there is taken for doctrine. It is even more closed up when those things are acknowledged as doctrine which show favour to the desires that go with self-love and love of the world, for these especially roll the large stone over the mouth of the well, that is, they close the Word up. In this case people neither know nor wish to know that any interior sense exists within the Word. Yet they can see that the Word has an interior sense from the many places where the interior sense is used to explain the literal, and also from the generally accepted teachings within the Church which, by means of various explanations, are brought to bear on the literal sense.

[2] What is meant by the Word's being closed up becomes particularly clear from the Jews who explain every single thing literally, and as a consequence believe that they have been chosen in preference to everybody else in all the world, and that the Messiah is coming who will lead them into the land of Canaan and will exalt them above all nations and peoples of the world. For the Jews are governed by loves of an earthly and bodily nature, which are such that they close the Word altogether so far as interior teachings are concerned. What is more, they do not even know whether any heavenly kingdom exists, whether they are going to live after death, what the internal man is, or even the existence of anything spiritual, let alone that the Messiah has come to save souls. The fact that the Word is in their case closed up may also be seen quite clearly from the consideration that although they live among Christians they nevertheless accept nothing whatever of Christian teaching, in accordance with the following words in Isaiah,

Say to this people, Hearing hear, and do not understand; and seeing see, and do not comprehend. Make the hearts of this people fat and their ears heavy, and plaster over their eyes. And I said, How long, O Lord? And He said, Until cities have been laid waste till no inhabitant [is left], and houses till no man [is left], and the land has been laid waste as a desolation. Isaiah 6:9-11; Matthew 13:14-15; John 12:40-41.

[3] To the extent that someone is under the influence of self-love and love of the world, and of the desires that go with these loves, the Word is to him closed up. For those loves have self as the end in view, an end which fosters natural light but extinguishes heavenly light. As a result people see clearly the things that belong to self and the world but nothing whatever of those that belong to the Lord and to His kingdom. When this is so they may indeed read the Word, but their end in view is the increase of personal position and wealth, or that they may be seen by others; or else they read it because it is the done thing and therefore merely from force of habit, or they read it as a religious duty, but without any amendment of life in view. To these people the Word has in different ways become closed up, for some so closed that they do not wish to know anything at all apart from that which their own teachings - whatever these may be - declare.

[4] If anyone were to say, for example, that the power of opening and of shutting heaven has not been granted to Peter but to faith rooted in love, which faith is meant by Peter's keys, they would never acknowledge it because self-love and love of the world stand in the way. Or if anyone were to say that the saints ought not to be worshipped but the Lord alone, they would not accept that either. Nor would they believe it if someone were to say that the bread and wine in the Holy Supper mean the Lord's love towards the whole human race and man's love for the Lord in return. And if anyone were to say that faith - other than the good of faith, which is charity - does not achieve anything, they would give a completely contrary explanation. And so it would be with everything else. People like these can see nothing at all of the truth contained in the Word and do not wish to see it. Instead they adhere rigidly to their own doctrinal opinions. They do not even wish to hear of the existence of the internal sense in which the holiness and the glory of the Word reside. Indeed when they hear about the existence of it they are revolted because of their detestation of the mere mention of it. So the Word has been closed up. Yet the Word is such that it is open right into heaven, and through heaven towards the Lord, and is closed only in relation to man, that is, insofar as he is subject to the evils of self-love and love of the world where the ends in view of his life are concerned, and is subject to false assumptions resulting from those evils. From this one may see what is meant by 'a large stone over the mouth of the well'.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.