Bible

 

Génesis 40

Studie

   

1 Y aconteció después de estas cosas, que pecaron el maestresala del rey de Egipto, y el panadero, contra su señor el rey de Egipto.

2 Y el Faraón se enojó contra sus dos oficiales, contra el principal de los maestresalas, y contra el principal de los panaderos;

3 y los puso en la cárcel de la casa del capitán de los de la guardia, en la casa de la cárcel donde José estaba preso.

4 Y el capitán de los de la guardia dio cargo de ellos a José, y él les servía; y estuvieron días en la cárcel.

5 Y ambos a dos, el maestresala y el panadero del rey de Egipto, que estaban presos en la cárcel, soñaron un sueño, cada uno su sueño en una misma noche, cada uno conforme a la declaración de su sueño.

6 Y vino a ellos José por la mañana, y los miró, y he aquí que estaban tristes.

7 Y él preguntó a aquellos oficiales del Faraón, que estaban con él en la cárcel de la casa de su señor, diciendo: ¿Por qué parecen hoy mal vuestros rostros?

8 Y ellos le dijeron: Hemos tenido un sueño, y no hay quién lo declare. Entonces les dijo José: ¿No son de Dios las declaraciones? Contádmelo ahora.

9 Entonces el principal de los maestresalas contó su sueño a José, y le dijo: Yo soñaba que veía una vid delante de mí,

10 y en la vid tres sarmientos; y ella como que florecía, salía su renuevo, maduraron sus racimos de uvas;

11 y que el vaso de Faraón estaba en mi mano, y que yo tomaba las uvas, y las exprimía en el vaso del Faraón, y daba el vaso en la mano del Faraón.

12 Y le dijo José: Esta es su declaración: Los tres sarmientos son tres días;

13 al cabo de tres días el Faraón levantará tu cabeza, y te hará volver a tu asiento; y darás el vaso al Faraón en su mano, como solías cuando eras su maestresala.

14 Por tanto te acordarás de mí dentro de ti cuando tuvieres bien, y te ruego que hagas conmigo misericordia, que hagas mención de mí al Faraón, y me saques de esta casa;

15 porque he sido hurtado de la tierra de los hebreos; y tampoco he hecho aquí porqué me hubiesen de poner en la cárcel.

16 Y viendo el principal de los panaderos que había declarado para bien, dijo a José: También yo soñaba que veía tres canastillos blancos sobre mi cabeza;

17 y en el canastillo más alto había de todas las viandas del Faraón, obra de panadero; y que las aves las comían del canastillo de sobre mi cabeza.

18 Entonces respondió José, y dijo: Esta es su declaración: Los tres canastillos tres días son.

19 Al cabo de tres días quitará el Faraón tu cabeza de sobre ti, y te hará colgar en la horca, y las aves comerán tu carne de sobre ti.

20 Y fue al tercer día el día del nacimiento del Faraón, e hizo banquete a todos sus siervos; y alzó la cabeza del príncipe de los maestresalas, y la cabeza del príncipe de los panaderos, entre sus siervos.

21 E hizo volver a su oficio al príncipe de los maestresalas; y dio el vaso en mano del Faraón.

22 Mas hizo colgar al príncipe de los panaderos, como le había declarado José.

23 Y el príncipe de los maestresalas no se acordó de José, sino que se olvidó de él.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5365

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5365. 'And the people cried out to Pharaoh for bread' means the need of good which was felt by truth. This is clear from the meaning of 'crying out' as the expression of someone enduring pain and grief, and so of someone in need; from the meaning of 'people' as truth, dealt with in 1259, 1260, 3295, 3581; from the representation of 'Pharaoh' as the natural, dealt with in 5079, 5080, 5095, 5160; and from the meaning of 'bread' as the celestial element of love, and so good, dealt with in 276, 680, 2165, 2177, 3464, 3478, 3735, 3813, 4211, 4217, 4735, 4976. From these meanings it follows that 'the people cried out to Pharaoh for bread' means the need of good that was felt by truth in the natural. This meaning seems, it is true, to be remote from the historical sense of the letter. Nevertheless, since people acquainted with the internal sense understand 'crying out', 'the people', 'Pharaoh', and 'bread' in no other way than mentioned above, such is the meaning that emerges from those words.

[2] What is implied by the need of good which was felt by truth must be stated. Truth has a need of good, and good has a need of truth; also, when truth has a need of good, truth is joined to good, and when good has a need of truth, good is joined to truth. The reciprocal joining together of good and truth - that is to say, the joining of truth to good, and of good to truth - is the heavenly marriage. During the initial phases when a person is being regenerated truth is multiplied, but good less so. And because at these times truth has no good to which it is joined, truth is therefore drawn into and deposited within the interior parts of the natural, so that it may be called forth from there in the measure that good is increased. In this state truth stands in need of good, and in the measure that good enters the natural a joining of truth to good is effected. Even so, this joining together does not lead to any fruitfulness. But once the person has been regenerated good increases, and as it does so it stands in need of truth and also acquires truth to itself and becomes joined to it. This is a joining of good to truth, and when this takes place truth is made fruitful by good, and good by truth.

[3] This process is one about which people in the world are totally ignorant, whereas those in heaven have a very good knowledge of it. If people in the world however knew, and not only knew but also had a perception of what celestial love or love to the Lord was, and what spiritual love or charity towards the neighbour was, they would also know what good was; for all good is the object of those loves. Above all they would know that good had a desire for truth, and truth had a desire for good, and that this desire and the essential nature of it determine the extent to which the two are joined together. Such would be evident to them from the fact that whenever they are thinking about truth, good presents itself linked together with that truth; and when good is stimulated, truth presents itself linked together with that good. And whenever both present themselves together they are accompanied by affection, desire, delight. or sacred yearning, from which they would then know what the joining together was essentially like. But because no knowledge is acquired by them as a result of an inner awareness or perception of what good is, such matters do not begin to be recognized by them. For what people know nothing about is unintelligible to them even if it happens to them.

[4] Also, because people are ignorant of what spiritual good is - that it is charity towards the neighbour - controversy therefore exists in the world, especially among the learned, over what the highest good may be. Scarcely anyone says 1 it is the feeling of delight, bliss, blessedness, and happiness which flows from mutual love that does not have any selfish or worldly end in view attached to it and which constitutes heaven itself. From this it is also evident that the world at the present day knows nothing at all about what spiritual good is. Still less does it know that good and truth form themselves into a marriage, or that heaven consists in this marriage, or that those in whom the marriage exists possess wisdom and intelligence, or that they enjoy feelings of bliss and happiness in endless, indescribable variety. The world knows nothing about even a single one of those variations; consequently it neither acknowledges nor believes that any such thing exists, when in fact it is heaven itself or heavenly joy itself, about which the Church has so much to say.

Poznámky pod čarou:

1. Reading dicit (says), which Swedenborg has in his rough draft, for dixit (has said)

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.