Bible

 

Postanak 38

Studie

   

1 A u to vreme dogodi se, te Juda otide od braće svoje i uvrati se kod nekog Odolamejca, kome ime beše Iras.

2 I onde vide Juda kćer nekog Hananejca, kome ime beše Sava, i uze je i leže s njom;

3 I ona zatrudne i rodi sina, kome nadede ime Ir.

4 I opet zatrudnevši rodi sina, kome nadede ime Avnan.

5 I opet rodi sina, i nadede mu ime Silom; a Juda beše u Hasvi kad ona toga rodi.

6 I Juda oženi prvenca svog Ira devojkom po imenu Tamara.

7 Ali Ir prvenac Judin beše nevaljao pred Gospodom, i ubi ga Gospod.

8 A Juda reče Avnanu: Uđi k ženi brata svog i oženi se njom na ime bratovo, da podigneš seme bratu svom.

9 A Avnan, znajući da neće biti njegov porod, kad leže sa ženom brata svog prosipaše na zemlju, da ne rodi dece bratu svom.

10 Ali Gospodu ne bi milo što činjaše, te ubi i njega.

11 I Juda reče Tamari snasi svojoj: Ostani udovicom u kući oca svog dokle odraste Silom sin moj. Jer govoraše: Da ne umre i on kao braća mu. I otide Tamara, i živeše u kući oca svog.

12 A kad prođe mnogo vremena, umre kći Savina, žena Judina. I kad se Juda uteši, pođe u Tamnu k ljudima što mu strižahu ovce, sam s Irasom prijateljem svojim Odolamejcem.

13 I javiše Tamari govoreći: Eto svekar tvoj ide u Tamnu da striže ovce svoje.

14 A ona skide sa sebe udovičko ruho svoje, i uze pokrivalo i pokri lice, i sede na raskršće na putu koji ide u Tamnu. Jer vide da je Silom odrastao, a nju još ne udaše za nj.

15 A Juda kada vide, pomisli da je kurva, jer beše pokrila lice svoje.

16 Pa svrnu s puta k njoj i reče joj: Pusti da legnem s tobom. Jer nije poznao da mu je snaha. A ona reče: Šta ćeš mi dati da legneš sa mnom?

17 A on reče: Poslaću ti jare iz stada. A ona reče: Ali da mi daš zalog dokle ga ne pošalješ.

18 A on reče: Kakav zalog da ti dam? A ona reče: Eto, prsten i rubac, i štap što ti je u ruci. I on joj dade, te leže s njom, i ona zatrudne od njega.

19 Posle ustavši Tamara otide i skide pokrivalo sa sebe i obuče udovičko ruho.

20 A Juda posla jare po prijatelju svom Odolamejcu da mu donese natrag od žene zalog. Ali je on ne nađe.

21 Pa pitaše ljude po onom mestu gde je ona bila govoreći: Gde je ona kurva što je bila na raskršću na ovom putu? A oni rekoše: Nije ovde bilo kurve.

22 I vrati se k Judi i reče: Ne nađoh je, nego još rekoše meštani: Nije ovde bilo kurve.

23 A Juda reče: Neka joj, da se ne sramotimo; ja sam slao jare, ali je ti ne nađe.

24 A kad prođe do tri meseca dana, javiše Judi govoreći: Tamara snaha tvoja učini preljubu, i evo zatrudne od preljube. A Juda reče: Izvedite je da se spali.

25 A kad je povedoše, posla k svekru svom i poruči: S čovekom čije je ovo zatrudnela sam. I reče: Traži čiji je ovaj prsten i rubac i štap.

26 A Juda pozna i reče: Pravija je od mene, jer je ne dadoh sinu svom Silomu. I više ne leže s njom.

27 A kad dođe vreme da rodi, a to blizanci u utrobi njenoj.

28 I kad se porađaše, jedno dete pomoli ruku, a babica uze i veza mu crven konac oko ruke govoreći: Ovaj je prvi.

29 Ali on uvuče ruku, i gle izađe brat njegov, a ona reče: Kako prodre? Prodiranje neka ti bude. I nadeše mu ime Fares.

30 A posle izađe brat mu, kome oko ruke beše crveni konac, i nadeše mu ime Zara.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4837

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4837. 'And so it was, when he came [in] to his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground' means the reverse of conjugial love. [This is clear from the following considerations:] 'Er, Judah's firstborn' is used to describe falsity springing from evil which reigned in the Jewish nation at first, and 'Onan the secondborn' to describe evil begotten by falsity springing from evil which reigned in that nation later on. And 'Shelah the third son' is used to describe the idolatry which followed on from this and reigned in that nation at a still later time, 4826. Evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is described by the action Onan took, which was this: Being unwilling to provide seed for his brother, he spilled it on the ground. The reason this means that which is the reverse of conjugial love is that the conjugial relationship is used to mean in the internal sense that which is the essential element of the Church. Essentially the Church is a marriage of goodness and truth; and evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is the complete reverse of that marriage, that is, those with whom that kind of evil exists are the reverse of it.

[2] Nothing of true marriage meant both in a spiritual sense and in a natural one existed with that nation. This is quite evident from the fact that men were permitted to marry more than one wife; for where a marriage meant in a spiritual sense exists - that is, where the good and truth of the Church exist, consequently where the Church exists - that practice is not at all permitted. Genuine marriage cannot possibly exist except among those with whom the Lord's Church or kingdom exists, yet not with these except between pairs, 1907, 2740, 3246. The marriage of a pair in whom genuine conjugial love is present corresponds to the heavenly marriage, that is, to good and truth joined together. That is to say, the husband corresponds to good and the wife to the truth of that good. Also, when genuine conjugial love is present in them, that heavenly marriage is present too. Therefore where the Church exists men are never permitted to marry more than one wife. But because no Church existed among those descended from Jacob, only that which was a representative of the Church - that is, the external shell of the Church without its internal substance, 4307, 4500 - they were therefore permitted to have more than one. Furthermore the marriage of one husband to a number of wives would present in heaven an idea or image in which so to speak one good was joined to a number of truths which do not agree with one another, and so an image in which there was no good at all. For when its truths do not agree with one another good ceases to be good, since good receives its particular nature from truths and their agreement with one another.

[3] It would also present an image in which so to speak the Church was not one Church but many, set apart from one another along the lines of the truths of faith, that is, along doctrinal lines, when in fact the Church is one if good is the essential element there and this receives its particular nature from truths and is so to speak moderated by these. The Church is an image of heaven, because it is the Lord's kingdom on earth. Heaven consists of many distinct and separate general communities, and of smaller ones subordinate to these general ones; nevertheless good makes them a united whole. Good there enables the truths of faith to stand in agreement with one another; for these look to good and are grounded in it. If the truths of faith and not good were the lines along which parts of heaven were separated from one another, heaven would cease to be heaven, because there would not be any unanimity at all. For their oneness of life or unity in soul could not come to them from the Lord and exist among them. That oneness dwells solely within good, that is, within love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour. Love binds everyone together, and when the love of what is good and true is present in each individual, everyone shares that which comes from the Lord, so that the Lord is the One who binds everyone together. The love of what is good and true is called love towards the neighbour, for the neighbour is one with whom good and accompanying truth are present, and in the abstract sense good itself and its truth. From these considerations one may see why within the Church marriage must be a relationship involving one husband and one wife, and why the descendants of Jacob were permitted to marry more than one wife. They were permitted to do so for the reason that no Church existed among them, and therefore a representative of the Church could not be established among them by means of marriages, because the reverse of conjugial love reigned among them.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.