Bible

 

創世記 30

Studie

   

1 ラケルは自分がヤコブにを産まないのを知った時、姉をねたんでヤコブに言った、「わたしにどもをください。さもないと、わたしは死にます」。

2 ヤコブはラケルに向かい怒って言った、「あなたの胎に子どもをやどらせないのはです。わたしがに代ることができようか」。

3 ラケルは言った、「わたしのつかえめビルハがいます。彼女の所におはいりなさい。彼女が子を産んで、わたしのひざに置きます。そうすれば、わたしもまた彼女によって子を持つでしょう」。

4 ラケルはつかえめビルハを彼に与えて、とさせたので、ヤコブは彼女の所にはいった。

5 ビルハは、みごもってヤコブにを産んだ。

6 そこでラケルは、「はわたしの訴えに答え、またわたしの声を聞いて、わたしにを賜わった」と言って、名をダンと名づけた。

7 ラケルのつかえめビルハはまた、みごもって第二のをヤコブに産んだ。

8 そこでラケルは、「わたしは激しい争いで、姉と争って勝った」と言って、名をナフタリと名づけた。

9 さてレアは自分が子を産むことのやんだのを見たとき、つかえめジルパを取り、としてヤコブに与えた。

10 レアのつかえめジルパはヤコブにを産んだ。

11 そこでレアは、「幸運がきた」と言って、名をガドと名づけた。

12 レアのつかえめジルパは第二のをヤコブに産んだ。

13 そこでレアは、「わたしは、しあわせです。娘たちはわたしをしあわせな者と言うでしょう」と言って、名をアセルと名づけた。

14 さてルベンは麦刈りのに野に出て、野で恋なすびを見つけ、それをレアのもとに持ってきた。ラケルはレアに言った、「あなたのの恋なすびをどうぞわたしにください」。

15 レアはラケルに言った、「あなたがわたしのを取ったのは小さな事でしょうか。その上、あなたはまたわたしのの恋なすびをも取ろうとするのですか」。ラケルは言った、「それではあなたのの恋なすびに換えて、今彼をあなたと共に寝させましょう」。

16 夕方になって、ヤコブが野から帰ってきたので、レアは彼を出迎えて言った、「わたしのの恋なすびをもって、わたしがあなたを雇ったのですから、あなたはわたしの所に、はいらなければなりません」。ヤコブはそのレアと共に寝た。

17 はレアの願いを聞かれたので、彼女はみごもって五番目のをヤコブに産んだ。

18 そこでレアは、「わたしがつかえめをに与えたから、がわたしにその価を賜わったのです」と言って、名をイッサカルと名づけた。

19 レアはまた、みごもって番目のをヤコブに産んだ。

20 そこでレアは、「はわたしに良い賜物をたまわった。わたしは人の子をに産んだから、今こそ彼はわたしと一緒に住むでしょう」と言って、その名をゼブルンと名づけた。

21 その、彼女はひとりの娘を産んで、名をデナと名づけた。

22 次にはラケルを心にとめられ、彼女の願いを聞き、その胎を開かれたので、

23 彼女は、みごもって男のを産み、「はわたしのをすすいでくださった」と言って、

24 名をヨセフと名づけ、「がわたしに、なおひとりのを加えられるように」と言った。

25 ラケルがヨセフを産んだ時、ヤコブはラバンに言った、「わたしを去らせて、わたしの故郷、わたしのへ行かせてください。

26 あなたに仕えて得たわたしの子を、わたしに与えて行かせてください。わたしがあなたのために働いた骨折りは、あなたがごぞんじです」。

27 ラバンは彼に言った、「もし、あなたの心にかなうなら、とどまってください。わたしはがあなたのゆえに、わたしを恵まれるしるしを見ました」。

28 また言った、「あなたの報酬を申し出てください。わたしはそれを払います」。

29 ヤコブは彼に言った、「わたしがどのようにあなたに仕えたか、またどのようにあなたの家畜を飼ったかは、あなたがごぞんじです。

30 わたしが来るには、あなたの持っておられたものはわずかでしたが、ふえて多くなりました。はわたしの行く所どこでも、あなたを恵まれました。しかし、いつになったらわたしも自分のを成すようになるでしょうか」。

31 彼は言った、「何をあなたにあげようか」。ヤコブは言った、「なにもわたしにくださるに及びません。もしあなたが、わたしのためにこの一つの事をしてくださるなら、わたしは今一度あなたの群れを飼い、守りましょう。

32 わたしはきょう、あなたの群れをみな回ってみて、その中からすべてぶちとまだらの、およびすべてい小と、やぎの中のまだらのものと、ぶちのものとを移しますが、これをわたしの報酬としましょう。

33 あとで、あなたがきて、あなたのでわたしの報酬をしらべる時、わたしの正しい事が証明されるでしょう。もしも、やぎの中にぶちのないもの、まだらでないものがあったり、小羊の中に黒くないものがあれば、それはみなわたしが盗んだものとなるでしょう」。

34 ラバンは言った、「よろしい。あなたの言われるとおりにしましょう」。

35 そこでラバンはその、雄やぎのしまのあるもの、まだらのもの、すべて雌やぎのぶちのもの、まだらのもの、すべて白みをおびているもの、またすべて小羊の中の黒いものを移して子らのにわたし、

36 ヤコブとの間に路の隔たりを設けた。ヤコブはラバンの残り群れを飼った。

37 ヤコブは、はこやなぎと、あめんどうと、すずかけの木のなまの枝を取り、皮をはいでそれに白い筋をつくり、枝の白い所を表わし、

38 皮をはいだ枝を、群れがきてを飲む鉢、すなわちぶねの中に、群れに向かわせて置いた。群れを飲みにきた時に、はらんだ。

39 すなわち群れは枝の前で、はらんで、しまのあるもの、ぶちのもの、まだらのものを産んだ。

40 ヤコブはその小を別においた。彼はまた群れラバンの群れのしまのあるものと、すべて黒いものとに向かわせた。そして自分の群れを別にまとめておいて、ラバンの群れには、入れなかった。

41 また群れの強いものが発情した時には、ヤコブは水ぶねの中に、その群れの前に、かの枝を置いて、枝の間で、はらませた。

42 けれども群れの弱いものの時には、それを置かなかった。こうして弱いものはラバンのものとなり、強いものはヤコブのものとなったので、

43 この人は大いにみ、多くの群れと、男女の奴隷、およびらくだ、ろばを持つようになった。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3957

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3957. 'And she called his name Issachar' means the essential nature of it. This is clear from the meaning of 'calling the name' as the essential nature, as above in 3923, 3935. For he was given the name Issachar from the word 'reward', a name which therefore embodies the things stated above concerning 'reward', and at the same time the things meant by the rest of the words uttered by Leah. Since 'Issachar' means reward, and 'reward' in the external sense is mutual love and in the internal sense the joining together of good and truth, let it be said that very few nowadays in the Christian world know that 'reward' has such a meaning. And the reason why they do not know is that they do not know what mutual love is, still less that good has to be joined to truth if the heavenly marriage is to exist in a person. I have been allowed in the next life to talk about this to very many who were from the Christian world, including the more learned. But what is surprising, scarcely any one of those I talked to knew anything about it, even though they could have come to know much about those matters for themselves if only they had been willing to use their reason. But because they were not concerned about life after death, only about life in the world, they were not interested in such matters. The things they could have known for themselves if only, as has been stated, they had been willing to use their reason were the following:

[2] a When a person is stripped of the body he has a far more enlightened power of understanding than when he is living in the body, the reason being that when he is in the body worldly and bodily interests occupy his thoughts and bring obscurity there. But once he has been stripped of the body those worldly and bodily interests do not get in the way, but through the removal of his mind from sensory experiences of external things he is like those whose thought is more interior. From this consideration they could have known that in the state after death a person is far more clear-sighted and enlightened than in the state before death, and that when a person dies he passes from shade into that which, in comparison with it, is light, because he passes from the things which belong to the world to those which belong to heaven, and from those which belong to the body to those which belong to the spirit. But what is amazing, although people have the ability to understand these things they still think the contrary. That is to say, they think it is in the state of life within the body that a person enjoys clear-sightedness, as compared with the state of life after being stripped of the body, which to them is a state of obscurity.

[3] b They are able to know, if only they use their reason, that the life which a person acquires to himself in the world follows him when he dies, that is, his life is the same after death. For they are able to know that nobody can cast aside the life he has acquired to himself since earliest childhood except by death itself, and that that life cannot be transformed in a moment into any other life, let alone into a contrary life. For example: Someone who has acquired to himself a life of deceit and finds the delight of his life in that deceit cannot cast aside the life of deceit but goes on with that life after death. Or to take another example, people who are governed by self-love and consequently by forms of hatred and revenge against those who are not subservient, or by other similar traits, continue to be governed by these after the life of the body, for they are the things which they love and which constitute the delights of their life and so their very life itself. Such traits cannot therefore be taken away from them unless everything making up their life is wiped out at the same time. And the same applies to all other kinds of life that people have acquired.

[4] c A person is able to know for himself that when he passes into the next life he leaves many things behind him. He knows - since they have no place there - that he leaves behind, for example, anxious cares over food, clothing, accommodation, and the acquisition of money and wealth, as well as anxious cares about his promotion to positions of importance - matters to which a person gives so much thought during the life of the body. Indeed he knows that other things which do not belong to the earthly kingdom take the place of these.

[5] d From this he is able to know that anyone who in the world has thought about nothing else than worldly things such as these, so much so that they have taken a complete hold on him, and who has acquired a delight of life in those things alone, is not suited to be among those who delight to think of heavenly matters, that is, of things of heaven.

[6] e From this in turn he is able to know that if the external things of the body and of the world are taken away from those people, the individual is in that case such as he has been inwardly, that is to say, he thinks and wills as he did previously. If the thoughts within had at that time been deceits, schemings, aspirations after positions of importance, gain, and reputation on account of these; if hatred and revenge and similar passions have been present within, he goes on thinking such things, and so thinking the things of hell, though to achieve those ends he has concealed his thoughts from other people and to outward appearance has seemed honourable and produced in others the conviction that he was not turning such thoughts over in his mind. Knowledge that such outward appearance or presence at being honourable is removed in the next life may also be had from the fact that outward things are cast aside along with the body and have no further use. From this anyone can decide for himself that a person's real character will then be visible to the angels.

[7] f A person is also able to know that heaven, or the Lord by means of heaven, is constantly at work, flowing in with good and truth. But if there is not within a person's interior man that lives after death of the body some solid surface or some plane so to speak to receive good and truth, these cannot be received at all when they flow in. Therefore while a person is living in the world he ought to be anxious to obtain such an interior plane within himself. But he cannot obtain this unless he thinks of good towards his neighbour, desires for him that which is good, and consequently does this for him, and so acquires to himself the delight of life in such actions. This plane is acquired by means of charity towards the neighbour, that is, by mutual love; and it is what is called conscience. Into this plane good and truth from the Lord are able to flow in and be received there. But where charity does not exist, and so conscience does not exist, good and truth flowing in pass through and are converted into evil and falsity.

[8] g A person is able to know for himself that love to God and love towards the neighbour are what make a person a human being, different from animals, and that those things constitute heavenly life or heaven itself and their opposites hellish life or hell itself. But these things are not known by a person because, for one thing, he has no wish to know them since he is leading a life to the contrary; for another, he does not believe in the existence of life after death; and for yet another, ideas about faith but none about charity have taken hold of him, and therefore he believes, as many teach, that if there is a life after death he can be saved by faith, no matter what kind of life he has led, and that he can be saved if faith is received by him only in his last hour when he is dying.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.