Bible

 

創世記 14

Studie

   

1 シナルの王アムラペル、エラサルの王アリオク、エラムの王ケダラオメルおよびゴイムの王テダルの世に、

2 これらの王はソドムの王ベラ、ゴモラの王ビルシャ、アデマの王シナブ、ゼボイムの王セメベル、およびベラすなわちゾアルの王と戦った。

3 これら五人の王はみな同盟してシデムの、すなわちに向かって行った。

4 すなわち彼らは十二年の間ケダラオメルに仕えたが、十三年目にそむいたので、

5 十四年目にケダラオメルは彼と連合した王たちと共にきて、アシタロテ・カルナイムでレパイムびとを、ハムでズジびとを、シャベ・キリアタイムでエミびとを撃ち、

6 セイル地でホリびとを撃って、荒野のほとりにあるエル・パランに及んだ。

7 彼らは引き返してエン・ミシパテすなわちカデシへ行って、アマレクびとの国をことごとく撃ち、またハザゾン・タマルに住むアモリびとをも撃った。

8 そこでソドムの王、ゴモラの王、アデマの王、ゼボイムの王およびベラすなわちゾアルの王は出てシデムので彼らに向かい、戦いの陣をしいた。

9 すなわちエラムの王ケダラオメル、ゴイムの王テダル、シナルの王アムラペル、エラサルの王アリオクの人の王に対する五人の王であった。

10 シデムのにはアスファルトの穴が多かったので、ソドムの王とゴモラの王は逃げてそこに落ちたが、残りの者はにのがれた。

11 そこで彼らはソドムとゴモラの財産と食料とをことごとく奪って去り、

12 またソドム住んでいたアブラムの弟のロトとその財産を奪って去った。

13 時に、ひとりの人がのがれてきて、ヘブルびとアブラムに告げた。この時アブラムはエシコルの兄弟、またアネルの兄弟であるアモリびとマムレのテレビンの木のかたわらに住んでいた。彼らはアブラムと同盟していた。

14 アブラムは身内の者が捕虜になったのを聞き、訓練したの子十八人を引き連れてダンまで追って行き、

15 そのしもべたちを分けて、かれらを攻め、これを撃ってダマスコの北、ホバまで彼らを追った。

16 そして彼はすべての財産を取り返し、また身内の者ロトとその財産および女たちと民とを取り返した。

17 アブラムがケダラオメルとその連合の王たちを撃ち破って帰った時、ソドムの王はシャベの、すなわち王のに出て彼を迎えた。

18 その時、サレムの王メルキゼデクパンぶどう酒とを持ってきた。彼はいと高き神の祭司である。

19 彼はアブラム祝福して言った、「願わくは天地の主なるいと高き神が、アブラム祝福されるように。

20 願わくはあなたのをあなたのに渡されたいと高き神があがめられるように」。アブラムは彼にすべての物の十分の一を贈った。

21 時にソドムの王はアブラムに言った、「わたしには人をください。財産はあなたが取りなさい」。

22 アブラムソドムの王に言った、「天地のなるいと高き神、をあげて、わたしは誓います。

23 わたしは糸一本でも、くつひも一本でも、あなたのものは何にも受けません。アブラムませたのはわたしだと、あなたが言わないように。

24 ただし若者たちがすでに食べた物は別です。そしてわたしと共に行った人々アネルとエシコルとマムレとにはその分を取らせなさい」。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1748

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1748. That from a thread even to the thong [or latchet] of a shoe. That this signifies all natural and corporeal things that were unclean, is evident from the signification of “the thong of a shoe.” In the Word the sole of the foot and the heel signify the ultimate natural (as before shown, n. 259). A shoe is that which covers the sole of the foot and the heel; a “shoe” therefore signifies what is natural still further, thus the corporeal itself. The signification of a “shoe” is according to the subject. When predicated of goods it is taken in a good sense; and when of evil, in a bad sense; as here in treating of the substance of the king of Sodom, by whom evil and falsity are signified, the “thong of a shoe” signifies unclean natural and corporeal things. By the “thread of a shoe” falsity is signified, and by the “thong of a shoe” evil, and this the most worthless of all, because the word is a diminutive.

[2] That such things are signified by a “shoe,” is evident also from other passages in the Word; as when Jehovah appeared to Moses out of the midst of the bush, and said to Moses:

Draw not nigh hither; put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground (Exodus 3:5).

The prince of the army of Jehovah said in like manner to Joshua:

Put off thy shoe from off thy foot; for the place whereon thou standest is holiness (Josh. 5:15).

Here everyone can see that the shoe would take away nothing from the holiness, provided the man were holy in himself; but that it was said for the reason that the shoe represented the ultimate natural and corporeal which was to be put off.

[3] That it is the unclean natural and corporeal, is also plain in David:

Moab is my washpot, upon Edom will I cast My shoe (Psalms 60:8).

The command to the disciples involves what is similar:

Whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, as ye go out of that house or that city, shake off the dust of your feet (Matthew 10:14; Mark 6:11; Luke 9:5); where the “dust of the feet” has a signification like that of a “shoe,” namely, uncleanness from evil and falsity, because the sole of the foot is the ultimate natural. They were commanded to do this because they were at that time in representatives, and thought that heavenly arcana were stored up in these alone, and not in naked truths.

[4] Because a “shoe” signified the ultimate natural, the putting off of the shoe, or the shoe-loosing, signified that one should be divested of the ultimate things of nature; as in the case of him who was not willing to fulfill the duty of brother-in-law, spoken of in Moses:

If the man is not willing to fulfill the duties of a husband’s brother, then his brother’s wife shall come unto him in the eyes of the elders, and draw his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face; and she shall answer and say, So shall it be done to the man that doth not build up his brother’s house. And his name shall be called in Israel, The house of him that hath his shoe taken off (Deuteronomy 25:5-10);

meaning that which is devoid of all natural charity.

[5] That a “shoe” signifies the ultimate natural, in a good sense also, is likewise evident from the Word; as in Moses, concerning Asher:

Blessed be Asher above the sons; let him be acceptable unto his brethren, and let him dip his foot in oil; iron and brass shall thy shoe be (Deuteronomy 33:24-25); where the “shoe” denotes the ultimate natural; a “shoe of iron” natural truth, a “shoe of brass” natural good, as is evident from the signification of iron and brass (see n. 425, 426). And because a “shoe” signified the ultimate natural and corporeal, it became a symbol of what is least and most worthless; for the ultimate natural and corporeal is the most worthless of all things in man. This was meant by John the Baptist, when he said,

There cometh One that is mightier than I, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose (Luke 3:16; Mark 1:7; John 1:27).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.