Bible

 

Γένεση 40

Studie

   

1 Και μετα τα πραγματα ταυτα, ο οινοχοος του βασιλεως της Αιγυπτου και ο αρτοποιος ημαρτησαν εις τον κυριον αυτων τον βασιλεα της Αιγυπτου.

2 Και ωργισθη ο Φαραω κατα των δυο αυλικων αυτου, κατα του αρχιοινοχοου, και κατα του αρχισιτοποιου.

3 Και εβαλεν αυτους υπο φυλαξιν εν τω οικω του αρχοντος των σωματοφυλακων, εις την οχυραν φυλακην, εις τον τοπον οπου ο Ιωσηφ ητο πεφυλακισμενος.

4 Ο δε αρχων των σωματοφυλακων ενεπιστευθη αυτους εις τον Ιωσηφ και ουτος υπηρετει αυτους· ησαν δε καιρον τινα εν τη φυλακη·

5 και ο οινοχοος και ο αρτοποιος του βασιλεως της Αιγυπτου, οιτινες ησαν πεφυλακισμενοι εν τη οχυρα φυλακη, ενυπνιασθησαν ενυπνιον αμφοτεροι, εκαστος το ενυπνιον αυτου κατα την αυτην νυκτα, εκαστος κατα την εξηγησιν του ενυπνιου αυτου.

6 Ο δε Ιωσηφ εισελθων προς αυτους το πρωι, ειδεν αυτους· και ιδου, ησαν τεταραγμενοι.

7 Και ηρωτησε τους αυλικους του Φαραω, τους οντας μετ' αυτου εν τη φυλακη εν τω οικω του κυριου αυτου, λεγων, Δια τι τα προσωπα σας ειναι σκυθρωπα σημερον;

8 Οι δε ειπον προς αυτον, Ενυπνιασθημεν ενυπνιον και δεν ειναι ουδεις οστις να εξηγηση αυτο. Και ειπε προς αυτους ο Ιωσηφ, Δεν ανηκουσιν εις τον Θεον αι εξηγησεις; διηγηθητε μοι, παρακαλω.

9 Και διηγηθη ο αρχιοινοχοος το ενυπνιον αυτου προς τον Ιωσηφ και ειπε προς αυτον, Ειδον εις το ονειρον μου και ιδου, αμπελος εμπροσθεν μου·

10 και εις την αμπελον ησαν τρεις κλαδοι και εφαινετο ως βλαστανουσα και τα ανθη αυτης εξηνθησαν και οι βοτρυες της σταφυλης ωριμασαν·

11 το δε ποτηριον του Φαραω ητο εν τη χειρι μου· και ελαβον τα σταφυλια και εθλιψα αυτα εις το ποτηριον του Φαραω και εδωκα το ποτηριον εις την χειρα του Φαραω.

12 Και ειπεν ο Ιωσηφ προς αυτον, Αυτη ειναι η εξηγησις αυτου· οι τρεις κλαδοι ειναι τρεις ημεραι·

13 μετα τρεις ημερας, ο Φαραω θελει υψωσει την κεφαλην σου και θελει σε αποκαταστησει εις το υπουργημα σου· και θελεις δωσει το ποτηριον του Φαραω εις την χειρα αυτου κατα την προτεραν συνηθειαν, οτε ησο οινοχοος αυτου·

14 πλην ενθυμηθητι με, οταν γεινη εις σε το καλον· και καμε, παρακαλω, ελεος προς εμε και αναφερε περι εμου προς τον Φαραω και εξαγαγε με εκ του οικου τουτου·

15 επειδη τη αληθεια εκλεφθην εκ της γης των Εβραιων· και εδω παλιν δεν επραξα ουδεν, ωστε να με βαλωσιν εις τον λακκον τουτον.

16 Και ιδων ο αρχισιτοποιος οτι η εξηγησις ητο καλη, ειπε προς τον Ιωσηφ, Και εγω ειδον εις το ονειρον μου και ιδου, τρια κανιστρα λευκα επι της κεφαλης μου·

17 εν δε τω κανιστρω τω ανωτερω ησαν εκ παντων των φαγητων του Φαραω, της τεχνης του αρτοποιου· και τα πτηνα ετρωγον αυτα εκ του κανιστρου επανωθεν της κεφαλης μου.

18 Και αποκριθεις ο Ιωσηφ ειπεν, Αυτη ειναι η εξηγησις τουτου· τα τρια κανιστρα ειναι τρεις ημεραι·

19 μετα τρεις ημερας ο Φαραω θελει υψωσει την κεφαλην σου επανωθεν σου και θελει σε κρεμασει εις ξυλον και τα πτηνα θελουσι φαγει την σαρκα σου επανωθεν σου.

20 Και την τριτην ημεραν, ημεραν των γενεθλιων του Φαραω, εκαμε συμποσιον εις παντας τους δουλους αυτου· και υψωσε την κεφαλην του αρχιοινοχοου και την κεφαλην του αρχισιτοποιου μεταξυ των δουλων αυτου.

21 Και τον μεν αρχιοινοχοον αποκατεστησεν εις την οινοχοιαν αυτου, και εδωκε το ποτηριον εις την χειρα του Φαραω·

22 τον δε αρχισιτοποιον εκρεμασε, καθως εξηγησεν ο Ιωσηφ εις αυτους.

23 Ο αρχιοινοχοος ομως δεν ενεθυμηθη τον Ιωσηφ, αλλα ελησμονησεν αυτον.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5077

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5077. 'The cupbearer of the king of Egypt' means among the things of the body which are subject to the understanding Part of the mind. This is clear from the meaning of 'the cupbearer' as the external or bodily senses that are subordinate or subject to the understanding part of the internal man, dealt with in what follows below; and from the meaning of 'the king of Egypt' as the natural man, dealt with below in 5079. Since the cupbearer and the baker are the subject of the narrative that follows and these mean the external senses belonging to the body, something must first be said about these. It is well known that the external or bodily senses are five in number - sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch - and also that these constitute the entire life of the body. For without those senses the body has no life at all, for which reason also when deprived of them it dies and becomes a corpse. The actual bodily part of the human being therefore is nothing else than a receiver of sensory impressions and consequently of the life resulting from these. The part played by the senses is the principal one and that by the body the instrumental. The instrumental without its principal which it is fitted to serve cannot even be called the body that a person carries around while living in the world; but the instrumental together with its principal, when they act as one, can be called such. The two together therefore constitute the body.

[2] A person's external senses are directly related to his internal ones, for they have been given to a person and placed within his body to serve his internal man while he is in the world and to exist subject to the sensory powers of that internal man. Consequently when a person's external senses begin to rule his internal ones he is done for. When this happens his internal sensory powers are regarded as no more than servants whose function is to reinforce whatever the external senses imperiously demand. When this is the state in which the external senses operate, order in their case has become turned around, a situation dealt with immediately above in 5076.

[3] A person's external senses are, as stated, directly related to his internal ones, in general to the understanding and to the will. Consequently some external senses are subject or subordinate to the understanding part of the human mind, others are subject to the will part. One sensory power specifically subject to the understanding is sight; another subject to the understanding, and after that to the will also, is hearing. Smell, and more especially taste, are subject to both simultaneously, while the power subject to the will is touch. Much evidence could be introduced to show that the external senses are subject to the understanding and the will, and also to show how they are subject; but it would take up too much space to carry the explanation so far. Something of what is involved may be recognized from what has been shown at the ends of preceding chapters about the correspondence of those senses.

[4] In addition it should be recognized that all truths that are called the truths of faith belong to the understanding part, and that all forms of good which are those of love and charity go with the will part. Consequently it is the function of the understanding to believe, acknowledge, know, and see truth - and good also. But the function of the will is to feel an affection for that truth and to love it; and whatever a person feels an affection for and loves is good. But how the understanding influences the will when truth passes into good, and how the will influences the understanding when it puts that good into effect, are matters for still deeper examination - In the Lord's Divine mercy those matters will be discussed at various points further on.

[5] The reason 'the cupbearer' means the senses subject or subordinate to the understanding Part of the internal man is that everything which serves as drink, or which is consumed as such, for example, wine, milk, or water, is related to truth, which feeds the understanding and so belongs to the understanding. Also, because the external or bodily senses play a ministering role, 'a cupbearer' therefore means those senses or what is perceived by them. For in general 'drinking' has reference to truths which feed the understanding, see 3069, 3071, 3168, 3772, 4017, 4018; the specific meaning of 'wine' is truth deriving from good, or faith from charity, 1071, 1798, while 'water' means truth, 680, 2702, 3058, 3424, 4976. From all this one may now see what 'the cupbearer' means.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.