Bible

 

創世記 38

Studie

   

1 那時,猶大離開他弟兄去,到一個亞杜蘭名叫希拉的家裡去。

2 猶大在那裡見一個迦南名叫書亞的女兒,就娶他為妻,與他同房,

3 他就懷孕生了兒子,猶大給他起名珥。

4 他又懷孕生了兒子,母親給他起名俄南。

5 他復又生了兒子,給他起名示拉。他生示拉的時候,猶大正在基悉。

6 猶大長子珥娶妻,名叫他瑪。

7 猶大長子珥在耶和華眼中看為惡,耶和華就叫他死了。

8 猶大對俄南:你當與你哥哥妻子同房,向他盡你為弟的本分,為你哥哥生子立後。

9 俄南知道生子不歸自己,所以同房的時候便遺在,免得哥哥留後。

10 俄南所做的在耶和華眼中看為惡,耶和華也就叫他死了

11 猶大心裡:恐怕示拉也,像他兩個哥哥一樣,就對他兒婦他瑪:你去,在你父親裡守寡,等我兒子示拉長大。他瑪就回去,在他父親裡。

12 過了許久,猶大妻子書亞的女兒死了猶大得了安慰,就和他朋友亞杜蘭人希拉上亭拿去,到他剪毛的人那裡。

13 有人告訴他瑪說:你的公公上亭拿剪毛去了。

14 他瑪見示拉已經長大,還沒有娶他為妻,就脫了他作寡婦的衣裳,用帕子蒙著臉,又遮住身體,在亭拿上的伊拿印城口。

15 猶大見他,以為是妓女,因為他蒙著臉。

16 猶大就到他那裡去,罷!讓我與你同寢。他原不知道是他的兒婦。他瑪:你要與我同寢,把甚麼我呢?

17 猶大:我從羊群裡取一隻山羊羔,打發人送來你。他瑪:在未送以先,你願意我一個當頭麼?

18 :我你甚麼當頭呢?他瑪:你的印、你的帶子,和你裡的杖。猶大就了他,與他同寢,他就從猶大懷了孕。

19 他瑪起來走了,除去帕子,仍舊穿上作寡婦的衣裳。

20 猶大託他朋友亞杜蘭人送一隻山羊羔去,要從那女人裡取回當頭來,卻不著他,

21 就問那地方的人:伊拿印旁的妓女在那裡?他們:這裡並沒有妓女。

22 他回去見猶大:我沒有著他,並且那地方的人:這裡沒有妓女。

23 猶大:我把這山羊羔送去了,你竟不著他。任憑他拿去罷,免得我們被羞辱。

24 約過了,有人告訴猶大:你的兒婦他瑪作了妓女,且因行淫有了身孕。猶大:拉出他來,把他燒了!

25 他瑪被拉出來的時候便打發去見他公公,對他:這些東西是誰的,我就是從誰懷的孕。請你認一認,這印和帶子並杖都是誰的?

26 猶大承認:他比我更有,因為我沒有將他我的兒子示拉。從此猶大不再與他同寢了。

27 他瑪將要生產,不料他腹裡是一對雙生。

28 到生產的時候,一個孩子伸出一隻來;收生婆拿紅線拴在他上,說:這是頭生的。

29 隨後這孩子把收回去,他哥哥生出來了;收生婆:你為甚麼搶著來呢?因此給他起名法勒斯。

30 後來,他兄弟上有紅線的也生出來,就給他起名謝拉。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4818

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4818. And Judah saw there a daughter of a man, a Canaanite. That this signifies the affection of evil from the falsity of evil, is evident from the signification of a “daughter,” as being the affection of good (n. 2362), and in the opposite sense the affection of evil (n. 3024); and from the signification of a “man,” as being one who is intelligent, and in the abstract sense truth, but in the opposite sense one who is not intelligent, and falsity, as just above (n. 4816); and from the signification of a “Canaanite,” as being evil (n. 1573, 1574). From this it is evident that by a “daughter of a man a Canaanite” is signified evil which is from the falsity of evil. What evil from the falsity of evil is, will be shown below.

[2] Here something must first be said about the origins of the tribe of Judah, for they are described in this chapter. There are three origins of this tribe, or of the Jewish nation-one from Shelah, the son of Judah, by his Canaanite wife; another from Perez, and the third from Zerah, the sons of Judah by Tamar his daughter-in-law. That the whole Jewish nation was from these three sons of Judah is evident from the enumeration of the sons and grandsons of Jacob who came with him into Egypt (Genesis 46:12); and also from their classification according to families, in Moses:

The sons of Judah according to their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Perezites; of Zerah, the family of the Zerahites (Numbers 26:20; 1 Chron. 4:21);

this shows what the origin of that nation was, namely, that one third of them was from the Canaanite mother, and that two thirds of them were from the daughter-in-law; consequently that all were from an illegitimate connection, for marriages with the daughters of the Canaanites were strictly forbidden (as is evident from Genesis 24:3; Exodus 34:16; Deuteronomy 7:3; 1 Kings 11:2; Ezra 9:1-15 10:1-44 d to lie with one’s daughter-in-law was a capital offense, as is evident in Moses:

If a man lie with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall surely be put to death; they have wrought confusion; their bloods shall be upon them (Leviticus 20:12).

Judah’s referring this deed with his daughter-in-law to the levirate law in which an ordinance is made regarding the brother, but by no means regarding the father (as appears from verse 26 of this chapter), implies that his sons by Tamar should be acknowledged as the sons of Er his firstborn, who was born of the Canaanite mother, and who was evil in the eyes of Jehovah, and was therefore caused to die (verse 7); for those who were born first to the husband’s brother were not his by whom they were conceived, but his whose seed they raised up, as is evident fromDeuteronomy 25:5-6, and also from verses 8 and 9 of this chapter. Moreover, those who were born of Tamar were born of fornication; for Judah thought when he went unto her that she was a harlot (verses 15-16, 21). This shows whence and of what quality was the origin of the Jewish nation, and that they spoke falsely when they said, “We were not born of fornication” (John 8:41).

[3] What this origin involves and represents is plain from what follows, namely, that their interiors were of such a quality, or had such an origin. Judah’s marrying a Canaanite involves an origin from the evil which is from the falsity of evil, for this is signified in the internal sense by “a daughter of a man, a Canaanite;” his lying with his daughter-in-law involves and represents damnation from falsified truth from evil, for everywhere in the Word whoredom signifies the falsification of truth (n. 3708). Evil from the falsity of evil is evil of life from false doctrine which has been hatched by the evil of the love of self (that is, by those who are in this evil), and confirmed by the sense of the letter of the Word. Such is the origin of evil with the Jewish nation, and such is its origin with some in the Christian world, especially with those who in the Word are meant by Babylon. This evil is of such a nature that it closes every way to the internal man, insomuch that nothing of conscience can be formed therein; for the evil which a person does from false doctrine, he believes to be good, because he believes it to be true; and therefore he does it freely and with delight, as allowable. Thus heaven is so closed to him that it cannot be opened.

[4] The quality of this evil may be shown by an example. With those who from the evil of the love of self believe that Jehovah has chosen a single nation only, and that all the rest of mankind are relatively slaves, and so vile that they may be killed at pleasure or be cruelly treated—as the Jewish nation believed, and at this day the Babylonish nation also believes—and confirm this belief from the sense of the letter of the Word, then whatever evil they do from this false doctrine and others built upon this as a foundation, is evil from the falsity of evil, and destroys the internal man, preventing any conscience from ever being formed therein. These are they spoken of in the Word who are said to be “in bloods,” for they are in cruel rage against the whole human race which does not adore their articles of faith, and thus themselves, and does not offer its gifts upon their altars.

[5] Take another example: with those who from the evil of the love of self and of the world believe that there must be someone as the Lord’s vicar on earth, who has the power of opening and shutting heaven, and thus of ruling over the minds and consciences of all, and who confirm this falsity from the sense of the letter of the Word, whatever of evil they do from this belief is evil from the falsity of evil, which in like manner destroys the internal man with those who from this evil claim for themselves this power, and in this way rule; and this evil is destructive to such a degree that they no longer know what the internal man is, nor that anyone has conscience, consequently they no longer believe that there is any life after death, nor that there is a heaven or a hell, no matter how they may speak of these things.

[6] This evil, as regards its quality, cannot be distinguished by men in the world from other evils, but in the other life it is known by the angels as in clear day; for evils and falsities are manifest in that life as to their distinctions of quality and origin, which are innumerable; and according to the genera and species of these also are the distinctions of the hells. Concerning these innumerable differences man knows scarcely anything; he merely believes that evil exists, but what its quality is he does not know, and this for the sole reason that he does not know what good is, and this because he does not know what charity is; for if he had known the good of charity he would have known also the opposites or evils, with their distinctions.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.