Bible

 

創世記 38

Studie

   

1 那時,猶大離開他弟兄去,到一個亞杜蘭名叫希拉的家裡去。

2 猶大在那裡見一個迦南名叫書亞的女兒,就娶他為妻,與他同房,

3 他就懷孕生了兒子,猶大給他起名珥。

4 他又懷孕生了兒子,母親給他起名俄南。

5 他復又生了兒子,給他起名示拉。他生示拉的時候,猶大正在基悉。

6 猶大長子珥娶妻,名叫他瑪。

7 猶大長子珥在耶和華眼中看為惡,耶和華就叫他死了。

8 猶大對俄南:你當與你哥哥妻子同房,向他盡你為弟的本分,為你哥哥生子立後。

9 俄南知道生子不歸自己,所以同房的時候便遺在,免得哥哥留後。

10 俄南所做的在耶和華眼中看為惡,耶和華也就叫他死了

11 猶大心裡:恐怕示拉也,像他兩個哥哥一樣,就對他兒婦他瑪:你去,在你父親裡守寡,等我兒子示拉長大。他瑪就回去,在他父親裡。

12 過了許久,猶大妻子書亞的女兒死了猶大得了安慰,就和他朋友亞杜蘭人希拉上亭拿去,到他剪毛的人那裡。

13 有人告訴他瑪說:你的公公上亭拿剪毛去了。

14 他瑪見示拉已經長大,還沒有娶他為妻,就脫了他作寡婦的衣裳,用帕子蒙著臉,又遮住身體,在亭拿上的伊拿印城口。

15 猶大見他,以為是妓女,因為他蒙著臉。

16 猶大就到他那裡去,罷!讓我與你同寢。他原不知道是他的兒婦。他瑪:你要與我同寢,把甚麼我呢?

17 猶大:我從羊群裡取一隻山羊羔,打發人送來你。他瑪:在未送以先,你願意我一個當頭麼?

18 :我你甚麼當頭呢?他瑪:你的印、你的帶子,和你裡的杖。猶大就了他,與他同寢,他就從猶大懷了孕。

19 他瑪起來走了,除去帕子,仍舊穿上作寡婦的衣裳。

20 猶大託他朋友亞杜蘭人送一隻山羊羔去,要從那女人裡取回當頭來,卻不著他,

21 就問那地方的人:伊拿印旁的妓女在那裡?他們:這裡並沒有妓女。

22 他回去見猶大:我沒有著他,並且那地方的人:這裡沒有妓女。

23 猶大:我把這山羊羔送去了,你竟不著他。任憑他拿去罷,免得我們被羞辱。

24 約過了,有人告訴猶大:你的兒婦他瑪作了妓女,且因行淫有了身孕。猶大:拉出他來,把他燒了!

25 他瑪被拉出來的時候便打發去見他公公,對他:這些東西是誰的,我就是從誰懷的孕。請你認一認,這印和帶子並杖都是誰的?

26 猶大承認:他比我更有,因為我沒有將他我的兒子示拉。從此猶大不再與他同寢了。

27 他瑪將要生產,不料他腹裡是一對雙生。

28 到生產的時候,一個孩子伸出一隻來;收生婆拿紅線拴在他上,說:這是頭生的。

29 隨後這孩子把收回去,他哥哥生出來了;收生婆:你為甚麼搶著來呢?因此給他起名法勒斯。

30 後來,他兄弟上有紅線的也生出來,就給他起名謝拉。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4926

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4926. 'And she said, Why have you made a breach upon yourself?' means this truth's apparent separation from good. This is clear from the meaning of 'a breach' as an infringement upon and perversion of truth through its separation from good, dealt with below. Here 'making a breach' plainly means pulling away the twice-dyed thread from the hand and so separating good; for good is meant by 'twice-dyed', 4922. As regards this separation being an apparent one, this follows from the fact that it appeared to the midwife that a separation had taken place; but in reality it was not the twin with the twice-dyed thread who came out but his brother, who represents truth. On these matters, see what has been shown immediately above in 4925, where it is shown that good is in actual fact the firstborn but that truth appears to be such. This can be illustrated further still from the functions and members within the human body. The appearance is that the members and organs are first and that the functions these perform are subsequent; for the organs and members present themselves to the eye and are also known before their functions are seen or known. But in spite of this appearance the functions are prior to the members and organs since these derive their existence from the functions they serve and so receive their own forms to accord with these functions. Indeed the function itself gives them these forms and accommodates them to itself. If this were not so, all the individual parts of the human body could not possibly act together in so harmonious a way that they make a single whole. The same may be said about good and truth. The appearance is that truth is first, but in reality good is, in that good gives truths the forms they take and accommodates them to itself. Therefore regarded essentially truths are nothing else than goods which have been given form, that is, they are the forms good takes. In relation to good, truths are also like the internal organs and the fibres of the body in relation to the functions these perform. Also, regarded essentially good is nothing else than the function.

[2] The meaning of 'a breach' as an infringement upon truth and a perversion of it through its separation from good is also clear from other places in the Word, as in David,

Our storehouses are full, yielding food and still more food; our flocks are thousands, and ten thousands in our streets, our oxen are laden; there is no breach. Psalms 144:13-14.

This refers to the Ancient Church as it was in its youth. 'The food' with which 'the storehouses are full' stands for spiritual food, that is, for truth and good. 'Flocks' and 'oxen' stand for forms of good, internal and external. 'There is no breach' stands for the fact that truth has not suffered any infringement upon it or perversion of it through separation from good.

[3] In Amos,

I will raise up the tent of David that is fallen down, and I will close up their breaches, and I will restore its destroyed places; and I will build it as in the days of old. Amos 9:11.

This refers to a Church where good is present. 'The tent of David that is fallen down' means the good of love and charity received from the Lord. For 'a tent' meaning that good, see 414, 1102, 2145, 2152, 3312, 4128, 4391, 4599, and 'David' the Lord, 1888. 'Closing up the breaches' stands for correcting falsities which have entered in through the separation of truth from good. 'Building it as in the days of old' stands for as the state of the Church was in ancient times. In the Word that state at that time is called 'the days of eternity', 'the days of old', and also 'of generation upon generation'.

[4] In Isaiah,

He that is of you is building the waste places of old; raise up the foundations of generation upon generation, and may you be called the one repairing the breach, the one restoring paths to dwell in. Isaiah 58:12.

This refers to a Church where charity and life are the essential thing. 'Repairing the breach' again stands for correcting falsities which have crept in through the separation of good from truth, the origin of all falsity. 'Restoring paths to dwell in' stands for truths which are linked to good, for 'paths' or ways are truths, 627, 2333, and 'dwelling in' is used in reference to good, 2268, 2451, 2712, 3613.

[5] In the same prophet,

You saw that the breaches of the city of David were very many, and you collected the waters of the lower pool. Isaiah 22:9.

'The breaches of the city of David' stands for falsities of doctrine. 'The waters of the lower pool' stands for traditions by which they introduced blemishes into the truths contained in the Word, Matthew 15:1-6; Mark 7:1-13. In Ezekiel,

You have not gone up into the breaches and made a hedge for the house of Israel, so that you might stand in war on the day of Jehovah. Ezekiel 13:5.

In the same prophet,

I sought from among them a man making a hedge and standing in the breach before Me for the land, that I should not destroy it; but I found none. Ezekiel 22:30.

'Standing in the breach' stands for defending and guarding against the intrusion of falsities. In David,

Jehovah said He would destroy the people, unless Moses His chosen had stood in the breach before Him. Psalms 106:23.

'Standing in the breach' again means guarding against the intrusion of falsities; 'Moses' here meaning the Word - see Preface to Chapter 18 of Genesis, and 4859 (end).

[6] In Amos,

They will drag out the last of you with fish-hooks; you will go out through the breaches, every one from her own region; and you will cast down the palace. Amos 4:2-3.

'Going out through the breaches' stands for doing so through falsities resulting from reasonings. 'The palace' means the Word and consequently the truth of doctrine that is grounded in good. And because 'breaches' means falsity which arises through the separation of good from truth, the same is also meant in the representative sense by 'strengthening and repairing the breaches of the house of Jehovah', 2 Kings 12:5, 7-8, 12; 22:5. In the second Book of Samuel,

It grieved David that Jehovah had made a breach into Uzzah; therefore he called that place Perez Uzzah. 2 Samuel 6:8.

This refers to Uzzah, who died because he touched the ark. 'The ark' represented heaven, or in the highest sense the Lord, and therefore Divine Good. But 'Uzzah' represented that which ministers, and so represents truth since truth ministers to good. This separation is meant by 'a breach into Uzzah'.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.