Bible

 

創世記 36

Studie

   

1 以掃就是以東,他的後代記在下面。

2 以掃迦南的女子為妻,就是赫人以倫的女兒亞大和希未人祭便的孫女、亞拿的女兒阿何利巴瑪,

3 又娶了以實瑪利的女兒、尼拜約的妹子巴實抹。

4 亞大給以掃生了以利法;巴實抹生了流珥;

5 阿何利巴瑪生了耶烏施、雅蘭、可拉。這都是以掃的兒子,是在迦南生的。

6 以掃帶著他的妻子、兒女,與家中一切的人口,並他的羊、牲畜,和一切貨財,就是他在迦南所得的,往別處去,離了他兄弟雅各

7 因為二人的財物群畜甚多,寄居的方容不下他們,所以不能同居。

8 於是以掃在西珥裡;以掃就是以東

9 以掃是西珥以東人的始祖,他的後代記在下面。

10 以掃眾子的名字如下。以掃妻子亞大生以利法;以掃妻子巴實抹生流珥。

11 以利法的兒子是提幔、阿抹、洗玻、迦坦、基納斯。

12 亭納是以掃兒子以利法的妾;他給以利法生了亞瑪力。這是以掃妻子亞大的子孫。

13 流珥的兒子是拿哈、謝拉、沙瑪、米撒。這是以掃妻子巴實抹的子孫。

14 以掃妻子阿何利巴瑪是祭便的孫女,亞拿的女兒;他給以掃生了耶烏施、雅蘭、可拉

15 以掃子孫中作族長的記在下面。以掃長子以利法的子孫中,有提幔族長、阿抹族長、洗玻族長,基納斯族長、

16 可拉族長、迦坦族長、亞瑪力族長。這是在以東從以利法所出的族長,都是亞大的子孫。

17 以掃兒子流珥的子孫中,有拿哈族長、謝拉族長、沙瑪族長、米撒族長。這是在以東從流珥所出的族長,都是以掃妻子巴實抹的子孫。

18 以掃妻子阿何利巴瑪的子孫中,有耶烏施族長、雅蘭族長、可拉族長。這是從以掃妻子,亞拿的女兒,阿何利巴瑪子孫中所出的族長。

19 以上的族長都是以掃的子孫;以掃就是以東

20 原有的居民─何利人西珥的子孫記在下面:就是羅坍、朔巴、祭便、亞拿、

21 底順、以察、底珊。這是從以東的何利人西珥子孫中所出的族長。

22 羅坍的兒子是何利、希幔;羅坍的妹子是亭納。

23 朔巴的兒子是亞勒文、瑪拿轄、以巴錄、示玻、阿南。

24 祭便的兒子是亞雅、亞拿〈當時在曠野放他父親祭便的,遇著溫泉的,就是這亞拿〉。

25 亞拿的兒子是底順;亞拿的女兒是阿何利巴瑪。

26 底順的兒子是欣但、伊是班、益蘭、基蘭。

27 以察的兒子是辟罕、撒番、亞干。

28 底珊的兒子是烏斯、亞蘭。

29 從何利人所出的族長記在下面:就是羅坍族長、朔巴族長、祭便族長、亞拿族長、

30 底順族長、以察族長、底珊族長。這是從何利人所出的族長,都在西珥,按著宗族作族長。

31 以色列人未有君治理以先,在以東的記在下面。

32 比珥的兒子比拉在以東作王,他的京城名叫亭哈巴。

33 比拉死了,波斯拉人謝拉的兒子約巴接續他作王。

34 約巴死了,提幔的人戶珊接續他作王。

35 戶珊死了,比達的兒子哈達接續他作王;這哈達就是在摩押地殺敗米甸人的,他的京城名叫亞未得。

36 哈達死了,瑪士利加人桑拉接續他作王。

37 桑拉死了,大邊的利伯人掃羅接續他作王。

38 掃羅死了,亞革波的兒子巴勒哈南接續他作王。

39 亞革波的兒子巴勒哈南死了,哈達接續他作王,他的京城名叫巴烏;他的妻子名叫米希他別,是米薩合的孫女,瑪特列的女兒。

40 以掃所出的族長,按著他們的宗族、住處、名字記在下面:就是亭納族長、亞勒瓦族長、耶帖族長、

41 阿何利巴瑪族長、以拉族長、比嫩族長、

42 基納斯族長、提幔族長、米比薩族長、

43 瑪基疊族長、以蘭族長。這是以東人在所得為業的上,按著他們的處。〈所有的族長都是以東人的始祖以掃的後代。〉

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4738

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4738. 'So that he might therefore rescue him out of their hands, to return him to his father' means so that it might lay claim to it for the Church. This is clear from the meaning of 'rescuing out of their hands' as delivering, as above in 4732, and from the meaning of 'returning to his father' as laying claim to it for the Church; for Jacob, to whom 'father' refers here, represents the Jewish religion which sprang from the Ancient Church, as above in 4700, 4701. What was laid claim to for the Church was the Divine Truth concerning the Lord's Divine Human, for, as stated already, 'Joseph' means that truth specifically.

[2] To know more regarding this truth, it should be recognized that the Ancient Church acknowledged it, as also did the Primitive Christian Church. But there came a time when the papacy so extended its authority that it had control over every human soul; it exalted itself in the way the king of Babel is said to have done, in Isaiah,

You said in your heart. I will go up into the heavens, above the stars of God 1 I will raise my throne, and I will sit on the mount of assembly, I will go up above the heights of the clouds, and I will make myself like the Most High. Isaiah 14:13-14.

Then - at that time - Divinity was taken away from the Lord's Human, that is, His Divine was made distinct and separate from His Human.

[3] The way in which this distinction was decreed in a certain council 2 has also been revealed to me. I saw some people appear on the right in front of me, some distance away on a level with the sole of my foot. They were talking among themselves, but I did not hear what about. I was told that they were some of those who had come together in the council when the decree was made regarding the Lord's two Natures - His Divine one and His Human one. Shortly after that I was allowed to talk to them. They said that those who had the greatest influence in the council and who held higher positions and had higher authority than the rest met together. They did so in a room that was dark, where they decided that both Divinity and Humanity should be attributed to the Lord, the main reason for their decision being that otherwise the papacy could not have remained in being. For if they had acknowledged that the Lord was one with the Father, as He Himself says, no one could then have been acknowledged as His vicar on earth. Schisms were developing at that time, which would have toppled and destroyed the power of the papacy, had they not made that distinction. To strengthen it they also assembled proof texts from the Word and swayed the rest of the council.

[4] Those who spoke to me added that by doing this they were able to have control in heaven and on earth. They knew from the Word that all power in heaven and on earth had been given to the Lord, and this power could not have been granted to any vicar [of Christ] if the Human too were acknowledged to be Divine. For they knew that no one was allowed to make himself equal to God and that that power existed essentially in the Divine, not in the Human unless it was granted to it as it was also subsequently granted to Peter. They said that by doing what they did they were then able to keep the schismatics quiet who were most astute, and were also able to strengthen the power of the papacy. From this it is clear that they invented the distinction they made purely for the sake of having control, and that therefore they had no wish to know that the gift of power to the Lord's Human in heaven and on earth demonstrates that His Human too is Divine. It is also clear that 'Peter', to whom the Lord gave the keys of heaven, does not mean the man Peter but faith rooted in charity, which is received from the Lord alone and is therefore a power that belongs to the Lord alone - see Preface to Genesis 22.

Poznámky pod čarou:

1. The Latin means heaven, but the Hebrew means God, which Swedenborg has in other places where he quotes this verse.

2. Council of Chalcedon 451 AD

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.