Bible

 

何西阿书 14

Studie

   

1 以色列啊,你要归向耶和华─你的;你是因自己的罪孽跌倒了。

2 当归向耶和华,用言语祷告他:求你除净罪孽,悦纳善行;这样,我们就把嘴唇的祭代替犊献上。

3 我们不向亚述求,不埃及的,也不再对我们所造的:你是我们。因为孤儿在你─耶和华那里得蒙怜悯。

4 我必医治他们背道的病,甘心他们;因为我的怒气向他们消。

5 我必向以色列如甘;他必如百合花开放,如利巴嫩的树木扎

6 他的枝条必延长;他的荣华如橄榄树;他的香气如利巴嫩的柏树。

7 在他荫下的必归回,发旺如五谷,开花如葡萄树。他的香气如利巴嫩的酒。

8 以法莲:我与偶像还有甚麽关涉呢?我─耶和华回答他,也必顾念他。我如青翠的松树;你的果子从我而得。

9 谁是智慧人,可以明白这些事;谁是通达人,可以知道这一切。因为,耶和华的道是正直的;人必在其中行走,罪人却在其上跌倒。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

属天的奥秘 # 5353

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5353. “和我父的全家” 表遗传之恶的移除. 这从 “父的家” 的含义清楚可知, “父的家” 在此是指遗传之恶. “家” 在内义上表示一个人, 事实上表示他的心智, 要么是他的理性心智, 要么是他的属世心智, 尤表那里的意愿, 因而表示良善或邪恶, 因为这些作为意愿的属性而存在 (参看710, 2233, 2234, 3128, 4973, 4982, 5023节); 故 “父的爱” 在此表示遗传之恶. “玛拿西” 所表示的性质就包含在这些和此前的话里. 在原文, “玛拿西” 表示 “遗忘”, 因而在内义上表示邪恶的移除, 无论人实际所行的邪恶还是遗传的邪恶; 因为一旦这些邪恶被移除, 一个新意愿就会产生. 这个新意愿通过来自主的良善的流注产生. 来自主的这种良善的流注在人身上是持续不断的; 但却有邪恶存在于那里, 无论他自己所行的邪恶, 还是遗传的邪恶, 阻碍并挡住了对它的接受. 不过, 一旦这些邪恶被移除, 一个新意愿就会产生. 这时, 它的产生在那些遭受不幸, 磨难或疾病的人当中是显而易见的. 在这些经历期间, 为一切邪恶源头的自我之爱和尘世之爱被除去; 于是人便好好思想神和邻舍, 还渴望他的邻舍好. 试探也一样, 试探是属灵的痛苦, 因而是内在的悲伤和绝望. 这些经历主要是为了除去邪恶, 待它们被除去后, 天上的良善就会从主流入, 一个新意愿从这良善而在属世层里面得以形成; 这个新意愿就是代表意义上的 “玛拿西”.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to our friends at swedenborgwork.com for their permission to use this translation on the New Christian Bible Study site. ( 衷心感谢”史威登堡著作中文网”许可我们使用该中文译文)

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4493

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4493. 'And they circumcised every male, all who went out of the gate of his city' means the acceptance of externalities. This is clear from the meaning of 'circumcising every male' as being introduced into the representatives and meaningful signs of that people (that is, into those of Jacob's descendants) - solely into the external observances involved in these, dealt with in 4486; and from the meaning of 'going out of the gate of the city' as departing from the doctrine of the Church among the Ancients, dealt with immediately above in 4492. And as the departure from doctrine and the acceptance of externalities is meant, the expression 'those who went out of the gate of his city' occurs twice, without any reference at the same time, as is so elsewhere, to those who went into it. For 'going in' means an acceptance of doctrine and a departure from externalities; but the reverse of this is described here.

[2] The implications of this must now be stated. Members of the Most Ancient Church, the remnants of which Hamor and Shechem with their families were a part, had an entirely different mental constitution and different disposition from adherents to the Ancient Church. The will in the case of the members of the Most Ancient Church contained that which was whole; but this was not so with adherents to the Ancient Church. Because of this the Lord was able with members of the Most Ancient Church to flow in through the will, and therefore by an internal way, but not so with adherents to the Ancient Church, since in these the will had been destroyed. But the Lord flowed into their understanding, and so not by an internal way but by an external one, as stated above in 4489. Flowing in through the will involves flowing in through the good of love, for all good belongs to the will part of the mind, whereas flowing in through the understanding involves flowing in through the truth of faith, for all truth belongs to the understanding part. Within the latter - the understanding - the Lord formed, in the case of adherents to the Ancient Church, a new will when He regenerated them. For goods and truths were implanted in the will part of the mind of members of the Most Ancient Church, see 895, 927, but in the understanding part of that of adherents to the Ancient Church, 863, 875, 895, 927, 2124, 2256, 4328. The new will is formed within the understanding part of the mind, 928, 1023, 1043, 1044, 4328. A parallelism exists between the Lord and the good residing with man, but not between Him and the truth there, 1831, 1832, 2718, 3514. As a consequence adherents to the Ancient Church dwelt in obscurity compared with members of the Most Ancient, 2708, 2715, 2935, 2937, 3246, 3833. From all this it may be seen that members of the Most Ancient Church had an entirely different mental constitution and different disposition from adherents to the Ancient Church.

[3] It was for this reason that those who belonged to the Most Ancient Church were internal people and had no external forms of worship, while those who belonged to the Ancient Church were external people and did have them. For the former saw external things in the light of internal ones, as if by the light of the sun in the daytime, whereas the latter saw internal things in the light of external ones, as if by the light of the moon or stars at night. This also explains why the Lord is seen by the former in heaven as the Sun, but by the latter as the Moon, 1521, 1529-1531, 2441, 2495, 4060. The former are those who in explanations above are called celestial, the latter those who are called spiritual.

[4] To illustrate the essential difference between the two let an example be taken. If a member of the Most Ancient Church had read the Word, the historical or the prophetical, he would have seen its internal sense without prior instruction or any explanation. He would have seen it so perfectly that the celestial and spiritual things belonging to the internal sense would have instantly met his eyes, and scarcely anything belonging to the sense of the letter. Thus the internal sense would have been for him in brightness, but the sense of the letter in obscurity. He would be like someone listening to a person speaking, and taking in only the sense and paying no attention to the words used by the speaker. But if a member of the Ancient Church had read the Word he would not have been able, without prior instruction or explanation, to see its internal sense, and so the internal sense would have been for him in obscurity but the sense of the letter in brightness. He would be like someone listening to a person speaking and in thought hanging on to the words used by him, all the while paying no attention to the sense of them, which would therefore be lost on him. But when a member of the Jewish Church reads the Word he does not understand anything beyond the sense of the letter. He does not know of and also denies the existence of any internal sense. And it is similar with the member of the Christian Church at the present day.

[5] These considerations show the essential difference between those represented here by Hamor and Shechem who, being part of the remnants of the Most Ancient Church, were interested in internal things and not in external ones, and those meant by the sons of Jacob who were interested in external things and not in internal ones. Those considerations show in addition that Hamor and Shechem could not have acceded to external things and accepted those which existed among the sons of Jacob unless their internals were closed. But if these had been closed they would have perished for ever.

[6] This is the hidden reason why Hamor and Shechem with their families were slain, a deed that would not otherwise have been allowed. Not that this absolves the sons of Jacob from blame for having committed that hideous crime. They had no knowledge of that hidden reason, nor did they have that as their end in view. Everyone is judged according to the end he has in view, that is, his intention; and it is plainly stated in verse 13 that their intention was deceitful. When the Lord allows any such crime as this it is carried out by the evil and by those in hell who instigate it. But all evil which the evil intend and do to the good the Lord converts into good, as is the case here in that Hamor and Shechem with their families were [eternally] saved.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.