Bible

 

出埃及记 22

Studie

   

1 牛或,无论是宰了,是了,他就要以五牛赔一牛,赔一

2 人若遇见挖窟窿,把打了,以至於,就不能为他有流血的罪。

3 太阳已经出来,就为他有流血的罪。贼若被拿,总要赔还。若他一无所有,就要被,顶他所偷的物。

4 若他所偷的,或牛,或,或羊,仍在他下存活,他就要加倍赔还。

5 若在田间或在葡萄园里放牲畜,任凭牲畜上别的田里去吃,就必拿自己田间上好的和葡萄园上好的赔还。

6 若点焚烧荆棘,以致将别人堆积的禾捆,站着的禾稼,或是田园,都烧尽了,那点的必要赔还。

7 若将或家具交付邻舍看守,这物从那的家被去,若把到了,要加倍赔还;

8 不到,那家主必就近审判官,要看看他拿了原主的物件没有。

9 两个人的案件,无论是为甚麽过犯,或是为牛,为,为羊,为衣裳,或是为甚麽失掉之物,有一人:这是我的,两造就要将案件禀告审判官,审判官定谁有罪,谁就要加倍赔还。

10 若将,或牛,或羊,或别的牲畜,交付邻舍守,牲畜,或受伤,或被赶去,无见,

11 那看守的人要凭着耶和华起誓,里未曾拿邻舍的物,本就要罢休,看守的人不必赔还。

12 牲畜若从看守的那里被去,他就要赔还本主;

13 若被野兽撕碎,看守的要带来当作证据,所撕的不必赔还。

14 若向邻舍甚麽,所的或受伤,或,本主没有同在一处,总要赔还;

15 若本主同在一处,他就不必赔还;若是雇的,也不必赔还,本是为雇价的。

16 若引诱没有受聘的处女,与他行淫,他总要交出聘礼,娶他为妻。

17 若女子的父亲决不肯将女子他,他就要按处女的聘礼,交出来。

18 行邪术的女人,不可容他存活。

19 凡与淫合的,总要把他治

20 祭祀别,不单单祭祀耶和华的,那人必要灭绝。

21 不可亏负寄居的,也不可欺压他,因为你们在埃及也作过寄居的。

22 不可苦待寡妇和孤儿

23 若是苦待他们一点,他们向我一哀求,我总要他们的哀声,

24 并要发烈怒,用刀杀你们,使你们的妻子为寡妇,儿女为孤儿

25 我民中有贫穷人与你同住,你若给他,不可如放债的向他取利。

26 你即或拿邻舍的衣服作当头,必在日落以先归还他;

27 因他只有这一件当盖头,是他盖身的衣服,若是没有,他拿甚麽睡觉呢?他哀求我,我就应允,因为我是有恩惠的。

28 不可毁谤;也不可毁谤你百姓的官长。

29 你要从你庄稼中的谷和酒瓶中滴出来的酒拿来献上,不可迟延。你要将头生的儿子归我。

30 你牛头生的,也要这样;当跟着母,第八要归我。

31 你要在我面前为圣洁的人。因此,田间被野兽撕裂牲畜的,你们不可,要丢给

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5828

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5828. 'And I said, He has surely been torn to pieces' means a perception that it was destroyed by evils and falsities. This is clear from the meaning of 'saying' as perception, dealt with often; and from the meaning of 'being torn to pieces as being destroyed by evils and internal good represented by 'Joseph' was destroyed, 5805. 'Being torn to pieces' has this meaning because no other kind of tearing to pieces takes place in the spiritual world than that of good by evils and falsities. It is the same with death and anything having to do with death, by which is meant in the spiritual sense not natural death but spiritual death, which is damnation. No other kind of death occurs in the spiritual world. So too with 'a tearing to pieces'. This does not mean in the spiritual sense the kind of tearing to pieces that wild animals engage in, but the tearing to pieces of good by evils and falsities. Also, in the spiritual sense, 'wild animals that tear to pieces' means evil desires and derivative false ideas; and such ideas are also represented in the next life by wild animals.

[2] The good which constantly comes from the Lord to a person is destroyed by nothing other than evils and derivative falsities, and by falsities and consequent evils. For as soon as that constantly inflowing good, coming by way of the internal man, reaches the external or natural man it encounters evil and falsity, which - acting like wild animals - employ various methods to tear apart and annihilate that good. For that reason the inflow of good by way of the internal man is blocked and halted, and the interior mind through which the inflow comes is consequently closed. Only as much of what is spiritual is allowed through as will enable the natural man to reason and speak, though he does so in terms that are solely earthly, bodily, and worldly, either in opposition to what is good and true, or else in keeping with such but in a false or deceitful way.

[3] It is a universal law that an inflow adjusts itself to the outflow, and if the outflow is blocked, so is the inflow. Through the internal man there is an inflow of good and truth from the Lord, and through the external there should be an outflow, an outflow into life, that is, in the exercise of charity. As long as that outflow is taking place the inflow from heaven, that is, from the Lord by way of heaven, is continuous. If however no outflow takes place but something stands in the way in the external or natural man, namely evil and falsity which tear the inflowing good to pieces and annihilate it, it follows from the universal law mentioned above that the inflow adjusts itself to the outflow. All this being so, the inflow of good holds itself back and accordingly closes the internal through which the inflow comes; and that closing of it leads to stupidity in spiritual matters, which is so great that the person who is like this neither knows nor wishes to know anything at all about eternal life. At length he becomes so senseless that he raises falsity as an obstacle to truth, calling falsities truths and truths falsities, and raises evil as an obstacle to good, regarding evils as forms of good and forms of good as evils. In this way he tears good completely to pieces.

[4] The word 'torn' occurs in various places in the Word, the proper meaning of which is falsities that arise from evils, while that which is destroyed by evils is called 'a carcass'. When however the expression 'torn' is used by itself, both ideas are meant since the one includes the meaning carried by the other. It is different when the one is referred to together with the other, because in that case a distinction is being made. Since what had been torn meant in the spiritual sense what had been destroyed by falsities arising from evils, people were forbidden in the representative Church to eat anything torn. They would never have been forbidden to eat it if that spiritual evil had not been meant in heaven. Apart from this, what evil could have lain in eating flesh torn by a wild animal?

[5] Regarding their not eating anything torn the following is stated in Moses,

The fat of a carcass and the fat of that which has been torn may be put to any use, provided that you do not eat it at all. Leviticus 7:24.

In the same author,

He shall not eat a carcass or that which has been torn, to be defiled by it. I am Jehovah. Leviticus 12:8.

In the same author,

You shall be men who are sanctified to Me; therefore you shall not eat flesh torn in the field, you shall throw it to the dogs. Exodus 21:31.

In Ezekiel,

Ah Lord Jehovih! The prophet says, Behold, my soul has not been polluted, and from my youth even till now I have not eaten any carcass or that which has been torn, so that abominable flesh has not come into my mouth. Ezekiel 4:14.

From these quotations it is evident that it was an abomination to eat what had been torn, not because it had been torn but because a tearing to pieces of good by falsities arising from evils was meant, 'a carcass' on the other hand being the death of good caused by evils.

[6] A tearing to pieces of good by falsities and evils is also meant in the internal sense of the following places in David,

The wicked is like a lion, he desires to tear, and like a young lion who sits in hiding-places. Psalms 17:12.

Elsewhere,

They opened their mouth against me - a lion tearing and roaring. Psalms 22:13.

And in yet another place,

Lest like a lion they seize my soul, tearing it to pieces and there is none to deliver. Psalms 7:1.

'A lion' stands for those who lay waste the Church. Above, where Joseph was the subject - at the point where he was sold by his brothers, and his tunic, which had been dipped in blood, was sent to his father - his father too said at that time,

My son's tunic! An evil wild animal has devoured him; Joseph has been torn to pieces. Genesis 37:33.

'His having been torn to pieces' means being scattered by falsities arising from evils, see 4777.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.