Bible

 

士师记 5

Studie

   

1 那时底波拉和亚比挪庵的儿子巴拉作歌,

2 因为以色列中有军长率领,百姓也甘心牺牲自己,你们应当颂赞耶和华

3 啊,要子啊,要侧耳而!我要向耶和华;我要歌颂耶和华以色列的

4 耶和华啊,你从西珥出来,由以东行走。那时漏,云也落雨。

5 耶和华的面就震动,西乃耶和华以色列的面也是如此。

6 在亚拿之子珊迦的时候,又在雅亿的日子,大道无人行走,都是绕道而行。

7 以色列中的官长停职,直到我底波拉兴起,等我兴起作以色列的母。

8 以色列人选择新,争战的事就临到城。那时,以色列四万人中岂能见盾牌枪矛呢?

9 倾向以色列的首领,他们在民中甘牺牲自己。你们应当颂赞耶和华

10 白驴的、绣花毯子的、行的,你们都当传扬!

11 在远离弓箭响声打水之处,人必述说耶和华的作为,就是他治理以色列的作为。那时耶和华的到城

12 “底波拉啊,兴起!兴起!你当兴起,兴起,唱歌。亚比挪庵的儿子巴拉啊,你当奋兴,掳掠你的敌人。

13 那时有馀剩的贵胄和百姓一同下来;耶和华降临,为我攻击勇士。

14 本在亚玛力人的地,从以法莲来的;便雅悯在民中跟随。有掌权的从玛吉来;有持杖检点民数的从西布伦来;

15 以萨迦的首领与底波拉同来;以萨迦怎样,巴拉也怎样。众人都跟随巴拉冲下平原;在流便的溪水旁有中定志的。

16 你为何在羊圈内群中吹笛的声音呢?在流便的溪水旁有中设谋的。

17 基列人安居在约但河外。但人为何等在上?亚设人在口静,在港口安居。

18 西布伦人是拚命敢的;拿弗他利人在田野的处也是如此。

19 争战。那时迦南在米吉多水旁的他纳争战,却未得掳掠

20 宿从上争战,从其轨道攻击西西拉。

21 基顺古把敌人冲没;我的灵啊,应当努力前行。

22 那时壮驰驱,踢跳,奔腾。

23 耶和华的使者:应当咒诅米罗斯,大大咒诅其中的居民;因为他们不帮助耶和华,不帮助耶和华攻击勇士。

24 愿基尼人希百的妻雅亿比众妇人多得福气,比住帐棚的妇人更蒙福祉。

25 西西拉求,雅亿给他奶子,用宝贵的盘子给他奶油

26 雅亿左拿着帐棚的橛子,右拿着匠人的锤子,击打西西拉,打伤他的,把他的鬓角打破穿通。

27 西西拉在他前曲身仆倒,在他前曲身倒卧;在那里曲身,就在那里死亡。

28 西西拉的母亲从窗户里往外观看,从窗棂中呼叫说:他的战车为何耽延不呢?他的车轮为何行得慢呢?

29 聪明的宫女安慰他(原文是回答他),他也自言自语地说:

30 他们莫非得财而分?每人得了一两个女子?西西拉得了彩衣为掳物,得绣花的彩衣为掠物。这彩衣两面绣花,乃是披在被掳之人颈项上的。

31 耶和华啊,愿你的仇敌都这样灭亡!愿你的人如日头出现,光辉烈烈!这样,国中太平四十年。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1679

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1679. And smote all the field of the Amalekites. That this signifies the kinds of falsities, is evident from the representation and signification of the Amalekite nation. By all the nations that were in the land of Canaan there were represented different kinds of evils and falsities, as will be evident, of the Lord’s Divine mercy, from what follows. Falsities were signified by “the Amalekites,” and evils derived from the falsities, by “the Amorites in Hazezon-tamar.” That falsities by which truths are attacked are signified by the Amalekites, may be seen from the things that are related concerning them (see Exodus 17:13-16; Numbers 13:29; 24:20; Deuteronomy 25:17-19; Judges 5:13-14; 1 Samuel 15:1-35; 27:8; Psalms 83:7-8.

[2] By the Rephaim, Zuzim, Emim, and Horites, spoken of in verses 5 and 6, were signified the persuasions of falsity that arise from cupidities of evil, that is, from evils; but by the Amalekites and the Amorite in Hazezon-tamar, are signified the falsities from which come evils. Falsity from evil is one thing, and falsity and the evil derived from it is another. Falsities spring either from cupidities, which are of the will, or from received principles, which are of the understanding. Falsities that are from the cupidities of the will are foul, nor do they suffer themselves, like others, to be easily rooted out, for they cohere with the man’s very life. The very life of man is that which desires, that is, loves. While a man is confirming in himself this life, or cupidity, or love, all the things which confirm are falsities, and are implanted in his life. Such were the antediluvians.

[3] But the falsities from received principles, which are of the understanding, cannot be thus rooted in the will part of man. False or heretical doctrines, for instance, have their origin outside of the will, from the man’s being imbued with such things from infancy, and afterwards from confirmation in adult age. But as they are false, they cannot but produce evils of life; as for instance in the case of a man who believes in meriting salvation by works, and confirms himself in this belief,—the merit itself, self-justification, and confidence, are the evils that come from it; or on the other hand one who believes that it is impossible to have piety of life without placing merit in works,—the evil from this is that he extinguishes in himself all piety of life, and gives himself up to cupidities and pleasures. So in many other cases. Such are the falsities and the evils derived from them that are treated of in this verse.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.