Bible

 

创世记 38

Studie

   

1 那时,犹大离开他弟兄去,到一个亚杜兰名叫希拉的家里去。

2 犹大在那里见一个迦南名叫书亚的女儿,就娶他为妻,与他同房,

3 他就怀孕生了儿子,犹大给他起名珥。

4 他又怀孕生了儿子,母亲给他起名俄南。

5 他复又生了儿子,给他起名示拉。他生示拉的时候,犹大正在基悉。

6 犹大长子珥娶妻,名叫他玛。

7 犹大长子珥在耶和华眼中看为恶,耶和华就叫他死了。

8 犹大对俄南:你当与你哥哥妻子同房,向他尽你为弟的本分,为你哥哥生子立後。

9 俄南知道生子不归自己,所以同房的时候便遗在,免得哥哥留後。

10 俄南所做的在耶和华眼中看为恶,耶和华也就叫他死了

11 犹大心里:恐怕示拉也,像他两个哥哥一样,就对他儿妇他玛:你去,在你父亲里守寡,等我儿子示拉长大。他玛就回去,在他父亲里。

12 过了许久,犹大妻子书亚的女儿死了犹大得了安慰,就和他朋友亚杜兰人希拉上亭拿去,到他剪毛的人那里。

13 有人告诉他玛说:你的公公上亭拿剪毛去了。

14 他玛见示拉已经长大,还没有娶他为妻,就脱了他作寡妇的衣裳,用帕子蒙着脸,又遮住身体,在亭拿上的伊拿印城口。

15 犹大见他,以为是妓女,因为他蒙着脸。

16 犹大就到他那里去,罢!让我与你同寝。他原不知道是他的儿妇。他玛:你要与我同寝,把甚麽我呢?

17 犹大:我从羊群里取一只山羊羔,打发人送来你。他玛:在未送以先,你愿意我一个当头麽?

18 :我你甚麽当头呢?他玛:你的印、你的带子,和你里的杖。犹大就了他,与他同寝,他就从犹大怀了孕。

19 他玛起来走了,除去帕子,仍旧穿上作寡妇的衣裳。

20 犹大托他朋友亚杜兰人送一只山羊羔去,要从那女人里取回当头来,却不着他,

21 就问那地方的人:伊拿印旁的妓女在那里?他们:这里并没有妓女。

22 他回去见犹大:我没有着他,并且那地方的人:这里没有妓女。

23 犹大:我把这山羊羔送去了,你竟不着他。任凭他拿去罢,免得我们被羞辱。

24 约过了,有人告诉犹大:你的儿妇他玛作了妓女,且因行淫有了身孕。犹大:拉出他来,把他烧了!

25 他玛被拉出来的时候便打发去见他公公,对他:这些东西是谁的,我就是从谁怀的孕。请你认一认,这印和带子并杖都是谁的?

26 犹大承认:他比我更有,因为我没有将他我的儿子示拉。从此犹大不再与他同寝了。

27 他玛将要生产,不料他腹里是一对双生。

28 到生产的时候,一个孩子伸出一只来;收生婆拿红线拴在他上,说:这是头生的。

29 随後这孩子把收回去,他哥哥生出来了;收生婆:你为甚麽抢着来呢?因此给他起名法勒斯。

30 後来,他兄弟上有红线的也生出来,就给他起名谢拉。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4837

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4837. 'And so it was, when he came [in] to his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground' means the reverse of conjugial love. [This is clear from the following considerations:] 'Er, Judah's firstborn' is used to describe falsity springing from evil which reigned in the Jewish nation at first, and 'Onan the secondborn' to describe evil begotten by falsity springing from evil which reigned in that nation later on. And 'Shelah the third son' is used to describe the idolatry which followed on from this and reigned in that nation at a still later time, 4826. Evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is described by the action Onan took, which was this: Being unwilling to provide seed for his brother, he spilled it on the ground. The reason this means that which is the reverse of conjugial love is that the conjugial relationship is used to mean in the internal sense that which is the essential element of the Church. Essentially the Church is a marriage of goodness and truth; and evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is the complete reverse of that marriage, that is, those with whom that kind of evil exists are the reverse of it.

[2] Nothing of true marriage meant both in a spiritual sense and in a natural one existed with that nation. This is quite evident from the fact that men were permitted to marry more than one wife; for where a marriage meant in a spiritual sense exists - that is, where the good and truth of the Church exist, consequently where the Church exists - that practice is not at all permitted. Genuine marriage cannot possibly exist except among those with whom the Lord's Church or kingdom exists, yet not with these except between pairs, 1907, 2740, 3246. The marriage of a pair in whom genuine conjugial love is present corresponds to the heavenly marriage, that is, to good and truth joined together. That is to say, the husband corresponds to good and the wife to the truth of that good. Also, when genuine conjugial love is present in them, that heavenly marriage is present too. Therefore where the Church exists men are never permitted to marry more than one wife. But because no Church existed among those descended from Jacob, only that which was a representative of the Church - that is, the external shell of the Church without its internal substance, 4307, 4500 - they were therefore permitted to have more than one. Furthermore the marriage of one husband to a number of wives would present in heaven an idea or image in which so to speak one good was joined to a number of truths which do not agree with one another, and so an image in which there was no good at all. For when its truths do not agree with one another good ceases to be good, since good receives its particular nature from truths and their agreement with one another.

[3] It would also present an image in which so to speak the Church was not one Church but many, set apart from one another along the lines of the truths of faith, that is, along doctrinal lines, when in fact the Church is one if good is the essential element there and this receives its particular nature from truths and is so to speak moderated by these. The Church is an image of heaven, because it is the Lord's kingdom on earth. Heaven consists of many distinct and separate general communities, and of smaller ones subordinate to these general ones; nevertheless good makes them a united whole. Good there enables the truths of faith to stand in agreement with one another; for these look to good and are grounded in it. If the truths of faith and not good were the lines along which parts of heaven were separated from one another, heaven would cease to be heaven, because there would not be any unanimity at all. For their oneness of life or unity in soul could not come to them from the Lord and exist among them. That oneness dwells solely within good, that is, within love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour. Love binds everyone together, and when the love of what is good and true is present in each individual, everyone shares that which comes from the Lord, so that the Lord is the One who binds everyone together. The love of what is good and true is called love towards the neighbour, for the neighbour is one with whom good and accompanying truth are present, and in the abstract sense good itself and its truth. From these considerations one may see why within the Church marriage must be a relationship involving one husband and one wife, and why the descendants of Jacob were permitted to marry more than one wife. They were permitted to do so for the reason that no Church existed among them, and therefore a representative of the Church could not be established among them by means of marriages, because the reverse of conjugial love reigned among them.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.