Bible

 

创世记 27

Studie

   

1 以撒年老,眼睛昏花,不能见,就了他大儿子以扫来,:我儿。以扫:我在这里。

2 :我如今老了,不知道一天死。

3 现在拿你的器械,就是箭囊和,往田野去为我打猎,

4 照我所的做成美味,拿给我,使我在未之先给你祝福

5 以撒对他儿子以扫说话,利百加也见了。以扫往田野去打猎,要得野味带来

6 利百加就对他儿子雅各:我见你父亲对你哥哥以扫

7 你去把野兽带来,做成美味给我,我好在未死之先,在耶和华面前给你祝福

8 现在,我儿,你要照着我所吩咐你的,从我的话。

9 你到羊群里去,给我拿两只肥山羊羔来,我便照你父亲的给他做成美味。

10 你拿到你父亲那里给他,使他在未之先给你祝福

11 雅各对他母亲利百加:我哥哥以扫浑身是有毛的,我身上是光滑的;

12 倘若我父亲摸着我,必以我为欺哄人的,我就招咒诅,不得祝福。

13 母亲对他:我儿,你招的咒诅归到我身上;你只管我的话,去把羊羔给我拿来。

14 他便去拿来,交给他母亲;他母亲就照他父亲的做成美味。

15 利百加又把家里所存大儿子以扫上好的衣服给他小儿子雅各穿上,

16 又用山羊包在雅各的上和颈项的光滑处,

17 就把所做的美味和饼交在他儿子雅各里。

18 雅各到他父亲那里:我父亲!他:我在这里。我儿,你是谁?

19 雅各对他父亲:我是你的长子以扫;我已照你所吩咐我的行了。请起来坐着我的野味,好给我祝福

20 以撒对他儿子:我儿,你如何得这麽呢?他:因为耶和华─你的使我遇见好机会得着的。

21 以撒雅各:我儿,你前来,我摸摸你,知道你真是我的儿子以扫不是?

22 雅各就挨父亲以撒以撒摸着他,声音雅各声音却是以扫

23 以撒就辨不出他来;因为他上有毛,像他哥哥以扫一样,就给他祝福

24 :你真是我儿子以扫麽?他:我是。

25 以撒:你递给我,我好儿子的野味,给你祝福。雅各就递给他,他便吃了,又拿酒给他,他也了。

26 父亲以撒对他:我儿,你上前来与我亲嘴。

27 他就上前与父亲亲嘴。他父亲一衣服上的香气,就给他祝福:我儿的香气如同耶和华赐福之田地的香气一样。

28 赐你上的甘上的肥土,并许多五谷新酒

29 愿多民事奉你,多国跪拜你。愿你作你弟兄的主;你母亲的儿子向你跪拜。凡咒诅你的,愿他受咒诅;为你祝福的,愿他蒙福。

30 以撒雅各祝福已毕,雅各从他父亲那里才出,他哥哥以扫正打猎回

31 也做了美味,拿来给他父亲:请父亲起来,儿子的野味,好给我祝福

32 父亲以撒对他:你是谁?他:我是你的长子以扫

33 以撒地战兢,:你未之先,是谁得了野味拿给我呢?我已经吃了,为他祝福;他将也必蒙福。

34 以扫了他父亲,就放声痛哭,:我父阿,求你也为我祝福

35 以撒:你兄弟已经用诡计将你的福分夺去了。

36 以扫:他名雅各,岂不是正对麽?因为他欺骗了我两次:他从前夺了我长子的名分,你看,他现在又夺了我的福分。以扫又:你没有留下为我可祝的福麽?

37 以撒回答以扫:我已立他为你的主,使他的弟兄都他作仆人,并赐他五谷新酒可以养生。我儿,现在我还能为你做甚麽呢?

38 以扫对他父亲:父阿,你只有样可祝的福麽?我父阿,求你也为我祝福以扫就放声而哭。

39 父亲以撒上的肥土必为你所上的甘必为你所得。

40 你必倚靠刀度日,又必事奉你的兄弟;到你强盛的时候,必从你颈项上挣开他的轭。

41 以扫因他父亲雅各祝的福,就怨恨雅各:为我父亲居丧的日子近了,到那时候,我要杀我的兄弟雅各

42 有人把利百加大儿子以扫告诉利百加,他就打发人去,了他小儿子雅各来,对他:你哥哥以扫想要杀你,报仇雪恨。

43 现在,我儿,你要我的话:起来,逃往哈兰、我哥哥拉班那里去,

44 同他些日子,直等你哥哥的怒气消了。

45 哥哥向你消了怒气,忘了你向他所做的事,我便打发人去把你从那里带回来。为甚麽日丧你们人呢?

46 利百加对以撒:我因这赫人的女子连性命都厌烦了;倘若雅各也娶赫人的女子为妻,像这些一样,我活着还有甚麽益处呢?

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3540

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3540. 'And she put the skins of the kids of the she-goats' means the external truths clothing homeborn good. This is clear from the meaning of 'skins' as external things, dealt with below, and from the meaning of 'the kids of the she-goats', coming as they did from the flock bred within the homestead, as the truths which clothe homeborn good, dealt with in 3518, 3519, where it is also evident what homeborn good is and what truths from that source are. Any good whatever has its own truths, and any truths whatever have their own good. And they must be joined together - good to truths - if anything at all is to exist. The reason why 'skins' means external things is that the skin is the outer covering of an animal to which its exterior parts extend, even as the skin or the cuticles is such with a human being. The latter receives its spiritual meaning from what is representative in the next life, where there are people who belong to the province of the skin. These will in the Lord's Divine mercy be described at the ends of chapters below where the Grand Man will be presented as a separate subject. They are people in whom none but external good and the truths which go with this are present. This is why the skin, human or animal, means things that are external. The same is also evident from the Word, as in Jeremiah,

On account of the greatness of your iniquity your skirts have been uncovered, your heels have suffered violence. Can the Ethiopian change his skin and the leopard its spots? Also are you able to do good, having been taught to do evil? Jeremiah 13:22-23.

Here 'skirts' means external truths, 'heels' the lowest goods - 'the heel' and 'shoes' being the lowest natural things, see 259, 1748. And because those truths and goods, as it is said, spring from evil, they are compared to an 'Ethiopian', who was black, and his 'skin', and also to 'a leopard and its spots'.

[2] In Moses,

If you take your neighbour's clothing as a pledge you shall restore it to him before the sun goes down; for this is his only covering; it is his clothing for his skin, in which he will lie down. Exodus 22:26-27.

Inasmuch as all the laws contained in the Word, including civil and judicial ones, have a correspondence with laws in heaven concerning what is good and true, and from this correspondence came to be laid down, so it was with the law just quoted. For why else would it have ever been laid down that they were to restore clothing that had been pledged before the sun went down, and why else is it said that 'it is his clothing for his skin, in which he lies down'? The correspondence is evident from the internal sense, which is that people were not to cheat their neighbour of external truths, which are the matters of doctrine by which they conduct their lives, and also religious observances - 'clothing' meaning such truths, see 297, 1073, 2576, and 'the sun' the good of love or of life that ensues from those truths, 1529, 1530, 2441, 2495. The prevention of that good from perishing is meant by the statement about the restoration of the pledge before the sun went down. And since the things laid down in those laws are the external coverings of interior things, or the outermost aspects of these, the words 'his clothing for his skin in which he lies down' are used.

[3] Because 'skins' meant external things it was commanded that there should be for the tent a covering made of red ram skins and over that a covering of badger skins, Exodus 26:14. For the tent was representative of the three heavens, and so of the celestial and spiritual things of the Lord's kingdom. The curtains enveloping it represented natural things, which are external, 3478; and these are the ram skins and the badger skins. And since external things are those which cover internal, or natural things are those which cover spiritual and celestial, in the way that the body does the soul, that command was therefore given. It was for a like reason commanded that when the camp was on the move Aaron and his sons were to cover the ark of the testimony with the veil and were to place a badger-skin covering over it. And over the table and what was on it they were to spread a twice-dyed scarlet cloth and then cover that with a badger-skin covering. They were likewise required to place the lampstand and all its vessels under a covering made of badger skin - also all the vessels for ministering they were to place under a violet cloth, and then cover them with a badger-skin covering, Numbers 4:5-6, 8, 10-12. Anyone who thinks about the Word in a devout way may see that Divine things were represented by all these objects, such as the ark, the table, the lampstand, and the vessels for ministering, also the coverings of twice-dyed scarlet and of violet, as well as the coverings of badger skin, and that these objects represented Divine things contained within external ones.

[4] Because the prophets represented those who teach, and therefore represented teaching from the Word concerning what is good and true, 2534; and because Elijah represented the Word itself, 2762, as also did John, who for that reason is called the Elijah who is to come, Matthew 17:10-13; and in order that these might represent the nature of the Word in its external form, that is, in the letter,

Elijah wore a skin girdle around his loins. 2 Kings 1:8. And John had a garment of camel hair and a skin girdle around his waist. Matthew 3:4.

Because animal 'skin' and human 'skin' means external things, which in relation to spiritual and celestial are natural things, and because it was customary in the Ancient Church to speak and to write by means of meaningful signs, reference is also made to both types of skin, and with the same meaning, in Job, a book of the Ancient Church. This becomes clear from a number of places in that book, including the following,

I know my Redeemer; He is alive; and at the last He will rise above the dust; and afterwards these things will be encompassed by my skin, and out of my flesh shall I see God. Job 19:25-26.

'Encompassed by skin' stands for the natural as it exists with someone after he has died, dealt with in 3539. 'Out of one's flesh seeing God' is doing so from a proprium made alive. For the proprium is meant by 'flesh', see 148, 149, 780; and the Book of Job is a book of the Ancient Church, a fact which is evident, as has been stated, from its style which draws on representatives and meaningful signs. It is not however one of the books called the Law and the Prophets, the reason being that it has no internal sense in which the one subject is the Lord and His kingdom. For it is this alone that determines whether any book is a Book of the true Word.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.