圣经文本

 

Genesis第21章

学习

   

3 Ig'Ibrahim i rur-es wa igraw əd Sarata da eṣəm Isxaq.

4 Isammaṇkad-tu əzəl wa d-iga əṭṭam aḍan əd təhut, təməwit t'as t'omar Məššina.

5 Iga Ibrahim ɣur təhut n Isxaq temeḍay n awatay.

6 Təṇṇa Sarata: «Məššina isisag-i taḍaza ən tədəwit. Aytedan kul win əslanen Isxaq ad-agin taḍaza ta əgeɣ.»

7 Təlas təṇṇa: «Ma iṃos wa z-issuḍəfan Ibrahim as Sarata ilkam daɣ-as əsəṇkəs ən bararan? Ənta əkfeq-qu barar daɣ tušaray-nnet.»

8 Idwal barar. Əzəl w'ad təmməzay Sarata d əsəṇkəs-net ig'Ibrahim ṣaksas zəwwəran ən tədəwit.

9 Tənay Sarata barar ən wələt Maṣar ta təgat Hajara, wa təla d Ibrahim, itajab daɣ barar-net Isxaq.

10 Təṇṇa y Ibrahim: «Əstəɣ taklit a da ənta əd rur-es. Wa da, wər z-inəməkusət əd barar-in Isxaq»

11 Awalan win əkman Ibrahim wəllen fəlas Ismaɣil ənta da rur-es.

12 Mišan iṇṇ-as Məššina: «A-kay-wər-takmu batu ən barar əd tawahayt-nak. Ardu s igi n a w'as dak təṇṇa Sarata. Id fəlas aganna wa n Isxaq a daɣ z-agu əzzurriya-nnak.

13 Amaran barar wa n tawahayt ad-iqqəl amaraw ən tamattay iyyat, id ənta da rur-ek.»

14 Aɣóra ṭufat inzay Ibrahim daɣ adakal ən təgəlla d əṇwar iḍnayan aṃan, ikf-en i Hajara, issəwar-tan əzir-net, ikf-et barar, issəgl-et. Təgla, teway əd taṇeray ən Ber-Šeba, təxrak.

15 As əɣradan aṃan daɣ əṇwar, toyya-ddu rur-es daw təfsəq.

16 Təzzar təkk-as əḍḍəkud ən taggor təqqim fəl-as təṇṇa: «Wər areɣ ad haṇṇaya barar-in itiba-tu.» Təqqim-in sen da ad təhallu.

17 Məššina isla i tala ən barar təzzar iɣra-ddu Angalos ən Məššina daɣ jənnawan Hajara iṣṣəstan-tat: «Ma kam igrawan, Hajara? Ad wər tərməɣa. Məššina isla i barar ihallu daɣ adag wa daq-q in toyye.

18 Əbdəd! Ədkəl barar-nam, əṣṣən daɣ-as, id ad-t-aga əmaraw ən tamattay tagget.

19 Olam Məššina šiṭṭawen ən Hajara təzzar togg'aṇu. Təgla təḍnay aṇwar təššəšwa barar-net. Daɣ təɣlift ən Məššina idwal barar, iqqal ənaṇḍab ən təganzay isaḍasan. Iɣsar daɣ taṇeray ən Faran. Təzzəzlaf-tu ṃa-s wələt Maṣar.

22 Daɣ azzaman win di Abimelek oṣa-ddu Ibrahim, iddew əd Fikol əmənokal ən nammagaran-net. Iṇṇa Abimelek y Ibrahim: «Məššina og̣az kay daɣ a wa tətagga kul.

23 Əmərədda əhəḍ-i əs Məššina as wər di-za-takkaddala nak wala bararan-in wala əzzurriya-nnin. Əmmək w'as dak-əmmozala s əlləllu, mazal-i sər-əs, nak d akal a daɣ təɣsara.»

24 «Əhaḍa sər-əs» iṇṇa Ibrahim.

25 Mišan išaššawad Ibrahim Abimelek təṇṇa ta təgat daɣ batu n aṇu wa əgdalan eklan-net.

26 Ijjəwwab-as Abimelek: «Wər əṣṣena wa igan a di. Kay iṃan-nak wər di-təṇṇeɣ araṭ, amaran wər əsleɣ i sər-əs immigradan har azalada.»

27 Idkal Ibrahim eharay wa ənḍərran əd šitan ikf-en y Abimelek, əsammarkaṣan taṣṣaq gar-essan.

28 Iṣkat Ibrahim šibəgag əṣṣayat daɣ aharay-nnet.

29 «Ma fəl ənṣanat, iṇṇ-as Abimelek, əṣṣayat təbəgag šin təṣkata da?»

30 «Əṣṣayat təbəgag a da a tanat təqbəla əg̣mədnat-in əfuṣ-in, əṃosnat təgəyya n as nak a iɣazan aṇu a da.»

31 A di da a fəl ig'adagg a da eṣəm Ber-Šeba: anu wa fəl əhaḍan ket-nasan.

32 Dəffər as saṃṃarkasan taṣṣaq daɣ Ber-Šeba iqqal Abimelek akal ən Kəl Filist, ənta əd Fikol wa n əmənokal ən nammagaran-net.

33 Ibrahim iṇbal ašək igan eṣəm ešel daɣ Ber-Šeba, amaran iɣbad Əməli, Məššina Amaɣlol daɣ adag wen.

34 Igla Ibrahim iɣsar daɣ akal ən Kəl Filist har iga tamert.

   

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#2516

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

2516. 'Behold, you will die because of the woman' means that the doctrine of faith would be ruined if the rational were consulted as regards the contents of that doctrine. This is clear from the meaning of Abimelech, to whom 'you' refers here, as the doctrine of faith; from the meaning of 'dying' as being brought to ruin; and from the meaning of 'a sister', called 'the woman' here, as the rational, dealt with in 2508. Consequently the statement that Abimelech would die because of the woman means that the doctrine of faith would be brought to ruin if the rational were consulted.

[2] The reason no doctrine of faith from the rational exists is that the rational is immersed in the appearances of good and truth, and such appearances are not truths in themselves, as shown already in 2053, 2196, 2203, 2209. What is more, the rational bases itself on illusions, which are the product of external sensory impressions confirmed by facts which introduce haziness into those appearances of truth. The rational for the most part is merely human, as also becomes clear from its birth. This then is why nothing of the doctrine of faith can even be started, let alone be built up from it. Such doctrine must stem from the Lord's Divine itself and His Divine Human. This is the origin of it, so much so indeed that the Lord is doctrine itself. It is for this reason also that in the Word He is called the Word, the truth, the light, the way, and the door. Furthermore - and this is an arcanum - all doctrine is derived from Divine Good and Divine Truth and possesses the heavenly marriage within it. Doctrine which does not possess this within it is not the genuine doctrine of faith. Consequently every detail of the Word, the source of doctrine, holds the image of a marriage within it, see 683, 793, 801.

[3] It does indeed seem in the literal or external sense of the Word as though the doctrine of faith possessed much from the rational and indeed from the natural. But the reason for this is that the Word exists for the sake of man, for whom it has been adapted in this way. Nevertheless in itself the Word is spiritual from a celestial origin, that is, it is derived from Divine Truth joined to Divine Good. The fact that doctrine would be brought to ruin if the rational were consulted as regards the contents of that doctrine will be illustrated by examples in what follows.

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.