圣经文本

 

Genesi第38章

学习

   

1 OR avvenne in quel tempo, che Giuda discese d’appresso a’ suoi fratelli, e si ridusse ad albergare in casa di un uomo Adullamita, il cui nome era Hira.

2 E Giuda vide quivi una figliuola di un uomo Cananeo, il nome del quale era Sua; ed egli la prese per moglie, ed entrò da lei.

3 Ed ella concepette e partorì un figliuolo, al quale Giuda pose nome Er.

4 Poi ella concepette ancora, e partorì un figliuolo, e gli pose nome Onan.

5 Ed ella partorì ancora un figliuolo, e gli pose nome Sela; or Giuda era in Chezib, quando ella lo partorì.

6 E Giuda prese una moglie ad Er, suo primogenito, il cui nome era Tamar.

7 Ma Er, primogenito di Giuda, dispiacque al Signore, e il Signore lo fece morire.

8 E Giuda disse ad Onon: Entra dalla moglie del tuo fratello, e sposala per ragion di consanguinità, e suscita progenie al tuo fratello.

9 Ma Onan, sapendo che quella progenie non sarebbe sua, quando entrava dalla moglie del suo fratello, si corrompeva in terra, per non dar progenie al suo fratello.

10 E ciò ch’egli faceva dispiacque al Signore; ed egli fece morire ancora lui.

11 E Giuda disse a Tamar, sua nuora: Stattene vedova in casa di tuo padre, finchè Sela, mio figliuolo, sia divenuto grande; perciocchè egli diceva: E’ si convien provvedere che costui ancora non muoia, come i suoi fratelli. Tamar adunque se ne andò, e dimorò in casa di suo padre.

12 E, dopo molti giorni, morì la figliuola di Sua, moglie di Giuda; e, dopo che Giuda si fu consolato, salì in Timna, con Hira Adullamita, suo famigliare amico, a’ tonditori delle sue pecore.

13 Ed e’ fu rapportato a Tamar, e detto: Ecco, il tuo suocero sale in Timna, per tonder le sue pecore.

14 Allora ella si levò d’addosso gli abiti suoi vedovili, e si coperse di un velo, e se ne turò il viso, e si pose a sedere alla porta di Enaim, ch’è in sulla strada, traendo verso Timna; perciocchè vedeva che Sela era divenuto grande, e pure ella non gli era data per moglie.

15 E Giuda la vide, e stimò lei essere una meretrice; conciossiachè ella avesse coperto il viso.

16 E, stornatosi verso lei in su la via, le disse: Deh! permetti che io entri da te perciocchè egli non sapeva ch’ella fosse sua nuora. Ed ella gli disse: Che mi darai, perchè tu entri da me?

17 Ed egli le disse: Io ti manderò un capretto della greggia. Ed ella disse: Mi darai tu un pegno, finchè tu me l’abbi mandato?

18 Ed egli disse: Qual pegno ti darò io? Ed ella disse: Il tuo suggello, e la tua benda, e il tuo bastone che tu hai in mano. Ed egli le diede quelle cose, ed entrò da lei, ed ella concepette di lui.

19 Poi si levò, e se ne andò, e si levò d’addosso il suo velo, e si rivestì i suoi abiti vedovili.

20 E Giuda mandò il capretto per le mani di quell’Adullamita, suo famigliare amico, per ritrarre il pegno da quella donna; ma egli non la trovò.

21 E ne domandò gli uomini del luogo dove era stata, dicendo: Dove è quella meretrice ch’era alla porta di Enaim in sulla strada? Ed essi risposero: Qui non è stata alcuna meretrice.

22 Ed egli se ne ritornò a Giuda, e gli disse: Io non ho trovata colei; ed anche gli uomini di quel luogo mi hanno detto: Qui non è stata alcuna meretrice.

23 E Giuda disse: Tengasi pure il pegno, che talora noi non siamo in isprezzo: ecco, io le ho mandato questo capretto; ma tu non l’hai trovata.

24 Or intorno a tre mesi appresso, fu rapportato, e detto a Guida: Tamar, tua nuora, ha fornicato, ed anche ecco, è gravida di fornicazione. E Giuda disse: Menatela fuori, e sia arsa.

25 Come era menata fuori, mandò a dire al suo suocero: Io son gravida di colui al quale appartengono queste cose. Gli mandò ancora a dire: Riconosci ora di cui è questo suggello, e queste bende, e questo bastone.

26 E Giuda riconobbe quelle cose, e disse: Ell’è più giusta di me; conciossiachè ella abbia fatto questo, perciocchè io non l’ho data per moglie a Sela, mio figliuolo. Ed egli non la conobbe più da indi innanzi.

27 Or avvenne che al tempo ch’ella dovea partorire, ecco, avea due gemelli in corpo.

28 E, mentre partoriva, l’uno porse la mano; e la levatrice la prese, e vi legò dello scarlatto sopra, dicendo: Costui è uscito il primo.

29 Ma avvenne ch’egli ritrasse la mano; ed ecco, il suo fratello uscì fuori; e la levatrice disse: Qual rottura hai tu fatta? la rottura sia sopra te; e gli fu posto nome Fares.

30 Poi uscì il suo fratello che avea lo scarlatto sopra la mano; e gli fu posto nome Zara.

   


To many Protestant and Evangelical Italians, the Bibles translated by Giovanni Diodati are an important part of their history. Diodati’s first Italian Bible edition was printed in 1607, and his second in 1641. He died in 1649. Throughout the 1800s two editions of Diodati’s text were printed by the British Foreign Bible Society. This is the more recent 1894 edition, translated by Claudiana.

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#4818

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

4818. 'And there Judah saw the daughter of a man, a Canaanite' means the affection for evil begotten by falsity springing from evil. This is clear from the meaning of 'the daughter' as the affection for good, dealt with in 2362, and in the contrary sense as the affection for evil, 3024; from the meaning of 'a man' as one who has intelligence and, in the abstract sense, as truth, but in the contrary sense as one who has no intelligence and as falsity, dealt with just above in 4816; and from the meaning of 'a Canaanite' as evil, dealt with in 1573, 1574. From these meanings it is evident that 'the daughter of a man, a Canaanite' means evil begotten by falsity springing from evil. What evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is will be stated below.

[2] Here the origins of the tribe of Judah must be stated first, since these are the subject in this chapter. That tribe, or the Jewish nation, has three origins, the first being Shelah, Judah's son by his Canaanite wife, the second and third being Perez and Zerah, Judah's sons by his daughter-in-law. The descent of the whole Jewish nation from these three sons of Judah is evident from the list of Jacob's sons and grandsons who accompanied him into Egypt, Genesis 46:12, and also from the grouping of them into families, referred to in Moses,

The sons of Judah according to their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Parzites; of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites. Numbers 26:20; 1 Chronicles 4:21.

From this the nature of that nation's origin is evident; that is to say, a third of them were descended from a Canaanite mother and two thirds from a daughter-in-law. They were all therefore the product of an illicit union, because marriages to daughters of the Canaanites were strictly forbidden - as may be seen in Genesis 24:3; Exodus 34:16; Deuteronomy 7:3; 1 Kings 11:2; and Chapters 9, 10 of Ezra - while lying with a daughter-in-law was a capital offence, as is evident in Moses,

As regards a man who has lain with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall be killed; they have committed perversion; 1 their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:12.

What Judah and his daughter-in-law had done together was linked by him to the law regarding leviratical marriages, which lays down the duty of a brother but never of a father, as is evident from verse 26 of the present chapter. Judah's linking of their deed together to this law implies that the sons of Tamar were to be recognized as the sons of Er the firstborn, who was born from the Canaanite mother, and who was evil in Jehovah's eyes and was therefore made to die, verse 7. For initially those born in a leviratical marriage did not belong to the one from whom they had been conceived but to him whose seed was being raised up, as is clear from Deuteronomy 25:5-6, and also from verses 8 and 9 of the present chapter. Furthermore, the sons whom Tamar bore were the result of whoredom, for when Judah went in to her he thought she was a prostitute, verses 15-16, 21. From all this one can see the origin of the Jewish nation and what kind of origin this was; and one can see that their words in John were founded on a lie,

The Jews said to Him, We were not born of whoredom. John 8:41.

[3] As regards what that origin implies and what it represents, this is evident from what follows. That is to say, those people's interiors were the same or had the same origin. Judah's marriage to a Canaanite implies and represents an origin that consisted in evil begotten by falsity springing from evil, for this is what is meant in the internal sense by 'the daughter of a man, a Canaanite'. And his lying through whoredom with his daughter-in-law implies and represents condemnation due to truth falsified by evil, for throughout the Word 'whoredom' means the falsification of truth, see 3703. 2 Evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is an evil life resulting from a false teaching hatched by the evil of self-love - that is, by those governed by this evil - and backed up by a use of the sense of the letter of the Word. This is what the origin of the evil in the Jewish nation is like, and what the origin of the evil is like in the Christian world, especially among those meant in the Word by Babel. The nature of that evil is such that it closes every path leading into the internal man, closing every path so completely that no conscience at all can be formed there. For if any evil done by a person is due to a false teaching, he believes that this is good because he believes that it is true. He accordingly does it, because he has warrant to do so, with a sense of freedom and delight. All this being so, heaven is closed so completely against him that it cannot be opened.

[4] As an example to explain what this evil is like, take those who from the evil of self-love believe the following: One nation alone is Jehovah's chosen people, in comparison with whom all the rest of mankind are slaves. The rest, they believe, are so base that they may be killed at will and may be treated in a cruel fashion. Such ideas, likewise backed up by a use of the sense of the letter of the Word, were the beliefs of the Jewish nation, as they are also of the Babylonish 3 nation at the present day. Whatever kind of evil done by the latter that is the result of that false teaching, and of any other false teachings built on that one as their foundation, is evil begotten by falsity springing from evil. It destroys the internal man and shuts out even the possibility of any conscience being formed there. These people are referred to in the Word as those immersed in bloodshed; for they treat in savage ways the entire human race because it does not venerate what they believe and so themselves too, and because it does not present its gifts on their altars.

[5] Take another example - those who from the evil of self-love and love of the world believe in the necessity for someone to act as the Lord's vicar on earth. They believe that this person has power to open and close heaven, and so to control everyone's mind and conscience, and they back up this falsity by a use of the sense of the letter of the Word. In their case whatever kind of evil they perform as a result of these ideas is evil begotten by falsity springing from evil, which similarly destroys the internal man in those who are led by that evil to lay claim to that power and so control others. That evil destroys the internal man so completely that people cease to know any longer what the internal man is, or to know of the existence of conscience in anyone, with the result that they cease to believe any longer in a life after death, or in the existence of hell and of heaven, however much they talk about these.

[6] The nature of this evil is such that people in the world cannot tell it apart from other evils; but in the next life angels recognize it quite clearly. For in the next life the countless differences in the essential nature and the origin of evils and falsities are in full view; and it is also the genera and species to which these evils and falsities belong that mark off the hells from one another. Of these countless differences man knows scarcely anything. He believes in the existence of evil but has no knowledge of its essential nature, for the simple reason that he does not know what good is, and does not know what good is because he does not know what charity is. If he knew what the good of charity was he would also know its opposites, which are evils, and also their differences.

脚注:

1. literally, confusion

2. Reading 3703 for 3708

3. i. e. Papal

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.