圣经文本

 

synty第25章

学习

   

1 Ja Abraham taas otti emännän nimeltä Ketura.

2 Hän synnytti hänelle Simran ja Joksan, ja Medan ja Midian, ja Jesbakin ja Suan.

3 Mutta Joksan siitti Seban ja Dedanin. Dedanin lapset olivat: Asserim, Letusin ja Luumim.

4 Midianin lapset olivat: Epha, Epher, Hanok, Abida, ja Eldaa: nämät kaikki ovat Keturan pojat.

5 Ja Abraham antoi kaikki mitä hänellä oli Iisakille.

6 Mutta niille lapsille, jotka jalkavaimoista olivat, antoi hän lahjoja, ja lähetti heidät pois poikansa Isaakin tyköä, vielä eläissänsä, idän puoleen, itäiselle maalle.

7 Ja tämä on Abrahamin elinaika, kuin hän eli: sata ja viisikahdeksattakymmentä ajastaikaa.

8 Ja hän tuli riutuneeksi, ja kuoli levollisassa ijässä, vanhana ja elämästä kyllänsä saanut: ja koottiin kansansa tykö.

9 Ja hänen poikansa Isaak ja Ismael hautasivat hänen Makpelan luolaan: Ephronin Hetiläisen Zoarin pojan vainiossa, Mamren kohdalle:

10 Sille kedolle, jonka Abraham oli ostanut Hetin lapsilta: siihen on Abraham haudattu, ja Saara hänen emäntänsä.

11 Ja Abrahamin kuoleman jälkeen siunasi Jumala hänen poikansa Isaakin: Ja Isaak asui sen elävän, joka minun näkee, kaivon tykönä.

12 Mutta nämät ovat Ismaelin Abrahamin pojan sukukunnat, jonka Hagar Egyptiläinen Saaran piika synnytti.

13 Ja nämä ovat Ismaelin poikain nimet, heidän nimeinsä ja sukukuntainsa jälkeen: Ismaelin esikoinen oli Nebaot, Kedar, Abdeel, Mibsam,

14 Misma, Duma, Masa,

15 Hadar, Tema, Jetur, Naphis ja Kedma.

16 Nämät ovat Ismaelin lapset, ja nämät heidän nimensä, heidän kylissänsä ja kaupungeissansa: kaksitoistakymmentä ruhtinasta heidän kansoissansa.

17 Ja tämä on Ismaelin ikä: sata ja seitsemänneljättäkymmentä ajastaikaa: ja hän tuli riutuneeksi, ja kuoli, ja koottiin kansansa tykö.

18 Mutta he asuivat Hevilasta hamaan Surriin asti, joka on Egyptin kohdalla Assyriaan mentäissä. Kaikkein hänen veljeinsä kohdalle lankesi (hänen arpansa).

19 Ja nämät ovat Isaakin Abrahamin pojan sukukunnat: Abraham siitti Isaakin.

20 Ja Isaak oli neljänkymmenen ajastaikainen, koska hän otti Rebekan Betuelin Syrialaisen tyttären Mesopotamiasta, Labanin syrialaisen sisaren, itsellensä emännäksi.

21 Ja Isaak rukoili Herraa emäntänsä edestä; sillä hän oli hedelmätöin, ja Herra kuuli häntä: niin Rebekka hänen emäntänsä tuli raskaaksi.

22 Ja lapset sysäsivät toinen toistansa hänen kohdussansa. Niin hän sanoi: jos näin piti käymän, miksi minä olen (raskaaksi tullut?) ja meni kysymään Herralta.

23 Ja Herra sanoi hänelle: kaksi kansaa ovat sinun kohdussas, ja kahtalainen väki erkanee sinun ruumiistas: mutta toinen kansa voittaa toisen, ja suurempi palvelee vähempää.

24 Koska aika tuli synnyttää; katso, kaksoiset olivat hänen kohdussansa.

25 Ensimäinen joka tuli ulos, oli ruskia ja karvainen niinkuin vaate: sentähden kutsuivat he hänen nimensä Esau.

26 Senjälkeen tuli ulos hänen veljensä, joka piti kädellänsä Esaun kantapäästä, ja se kutsuivat hänen nimensä Jakob. Kuudenkymmenen ajastaikainen oli Isaak heidän syntyissänsä.

27 Ja poikaiset kasvoivat, ja Esau tuli jaloksi metsä- ja peltomieheksi. Mutta Jakob oli yksivakainen mies, ja asui majoissa.

28 Ja Isaak rakasti Esauta; sillä hän söi mielellänsä hänen metsäsaalistansa. Mutta Rebekka rakasti Jakobia.

29 Koska Jakob oli keittänyt herkun, tuli Esau metsästä, ja oli väsyksissä.

30 Ja Esau sanoi Jakobille: anna minun syödä tästä ruskiasta herkusta: sillä minä olen väsyksissä. Sentähden kutsutaan hänen nimensä Edom.

31 Mutta Jakob sanoi: myy minulle tänäpänä sinun esikoisuutes.

32 Esau vastasi: katso, minä kuolen kuitenkin; mitä minun esikoisuudesta on?

33 Ja Jakob sanoi: niin vanno minulle tänäpänä: ja hän vannoi hänelle, ja myi Jakobille esikoisuutensa.

34 Niin Jakob antoi Esaulle leivän, ja sen ruskian herneherkun, ja hän söi ja joi, ja nousi ja meni pois. Ja niin Esau katsoi esikoisuutensa ylön.

   


SWORD version by Tero Favorin (tero at favorin dot com)

来自斯威登堡的著作

 

Arcana Coelestia#3427

学习本章节

  
/10837  
  

3427. 'And he called the name of the well Esek, because they contended with him' means an attitude of denial on account of those things, and also others, as being contrary to those persons, and on account of more things besides. This is clear from the fact that names given in early times were meaningful signs of a thing or of a state, 3422. In this way they were enabled to recollect many details about that thing or state, especially its essential nature. Here the well took its name from the incident of the herdsmen of Gerar disputing with Isaac's herdsmen. The fact that 'disputing' or 'contending' also means an attitude of denial, see 3425. This is the origin of the name Esek which in the original language means contention or dispute, and is derived from a related word which means oppression and violence. And since 'a well' here means the Word as regards the literal sense which holds the internal sense, 'Esek' or contention means a denial of the existence of the internal sense of the Word. The same word also includes the reasons for such denial, which, it is evident, lie with those things described just above in 3425, that is to say, things that appear to be contraries and with other things also.

[2] Thus the position with the internal sense of the Word is that those in whom no more than a knowledge of cognitions exists, who are referred to as 'the Philistines', and those in whom no more than matters of doctrine concerning faith are present, who are called 'the herdsmen of the Valley of Gerar', and with whom no charity towards the neighbour exists, inevitably refuse to recognize the existence of the internal sense of the Word. There are several reasons why they do so, the chief of which is that they do not acknowledge the Lord in their hearts, however much they confess Him with their lips. Nor in their hearts do they love the neighbour, however much they outwardly declare their love towards him. And anyone who in his heart does not acknowledge the Lord and does not in his heart love the neighbour inevitably refuses to recognize the internal sense of the Word, for the Word does not in the internal sense have anything else as its subject than love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour, on account of which the Lord says that on those two commandments depend the Law and the Prophets, that is, the whole Word, Matthew 22:37-40. I have also been allowed to see the extent to which those people do not recognize the internal sense of the Word from those who are like them in the next life. At the mere mention of the existence of the internal sense of the Word, which is not apparent in its literal sense, and of the fact that its subject is love to the Lord and towards the neighbour, not only is denial of its existence noticeable in those people but also repugnance and even loathing.

[3] This is the chief reason. A second reason is that they turn the Word completely upside down by placing the bottom on top, or what amounts to the same, making what is secondary primary. Indeed they set up faith as the essential thing of the Church, and the things that constitute love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour as the fruits of faith. But the truth is that if love to the Lord is compared to the tree of life in the paradise of Eden, charity and its works are the fruits from it, while faith and everything that is part of faith are merely the leaves. When therefore people so turn the Word upside down that they derive the fruit not from the tree but from the leaves, it is not surprising that they fail to recognize the internal sense of the Word and acknowledge merely its literal sense. For as is well known. the literal sense can be used to confirm any dogma, including the most heretical.

[4] A further reason why they do not recognize the internal sense is that the faith of people who are concerned solely with matters of doctrine concerning faith and not with goodness of life is inevitably persuasion of what is false, that is, it is a faith based on false assumptions as well as true ones. As a consequence they are more stupid than all others, for insofar as anyone is persuaded by what is false he is stupid, but insofar as anyone is concerned with goodness of life, that is, with love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour, he has intelligence, that is, faith from the Lord. Consequently the former cannot do other than have a negative attitude regarding the internal sense of the Word, whereas the latter cannot do other than have a positive attitude. For the interiors of people who have merely a knowledge of matters of doctrine and are devoid of the good of life are closed, so much so that the light of truth from the Lord cannot flow in and enable them to discern that it is so, whereas the interiors of those in whom love to the Lord exists are open, so much so that the light of truth from the Lord can flow in, inspire their minds with affection, and enable them to discern that it is so.

[5] There is yet another reason why they do not take any delight in reading the Word, except to gain position and wealth, and a reputation on account of these things - which delight is the delight that goes with self-love and love of the world. So true is this that if such gains are not to be had they reject the Word altogether. Such people in their hearts refuse to recognize not only the internal sense of the Word when they hear about it but also the literal sense itself, no matter how much they imagine they do believe in it. For anyone whose end in view is the delight that goes with self-love and love of the world casts out of his heart altogether everything that has to do with eternal life, and speaks from his natural and bodily-minded man when he speaks about the kind of things that he calls truths not for the sake of the Lord and of His kingdom but for the sake of himself and those who are his own. These and many other considerations are what cause people called 'the herdsmen of the Valley of Gerar' and 'the Philistines' to refuse to recognize the internal sense of the Word.

  
/10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.