De Bijbel

 

Sáng thế 25

Studie

   

1 Áp-ra-ham cưới một người vợ khác, tên là Kê-tu-ra.

2 Người sanh cho Áp-ra-ham Xim-ram, Giốc-chan, Mê-đan, Ma-đi-an, Dích-bác và Su-ách.

3 Giốc-chan sanh Sê-ba và Ðê-đan; con cháu của Ðê-đan là họ A-chu-rim, họ Lê-tu-chim và họ Lê-um-mim.

4 Con trai của Ma-đi-an là Ê-pha, Ê-phe, Ha-nóc, A-bi-đa và Eân-đa. Các người trên đây đều là dòng dõi của Kê-tu-ra.

5 Áp-ra-ham cho Y-sác hết thảy gia tài mình; còn cho các con dòng thứ những tiền của;

6 rồi, khi còn sống, người sai họ qua đông phương mà ở, cách xa con dòng chánh, là Y-sác.

7 Áp-ra-ham hưởng thọ được một trăm bảy mươi lăm tuổi;

8 người tuổi cao tác lớn và đã thỏa về đời mình, tắt hơi, được qui về nơi tổ tông.

9 Hai con trai người, Y-sác và Ích-ma-ên, chôn người trong hang đá Mặc-bê-la tại nơi đồng của Ép-rôn, con trai Sô-ha, người Hê-tít, nằm ngang Mam-rê.

10 Ấy là cái đồng mà lúc trước Áp-ra-ham mua lại của dân họ Hếch; nơi đó họ chôn Áp-ra-ham cùng Sa-ra, vợ người.

11 Sau khi Áp-ra-ham qua đời, Ðức Giê-hô-va ban phước cho Y-sác con trai người. Y-sác ở gần bên cái giếng La-chai- oi.

12 Ðây là dòng dõi của Ích-ma-ên, con trai của Áp-ra-ham, do nơi nàng A-ga, người Ê-díp-tô, con đòi của Sa-ra, đã sanh.

13 Và đây là trên các con trai của Ích-ma-ên, sắp thứ tự theo ngày ra đời: Con trưởng nam của Ích-ma-ên là Nê-ba-giốt; kế sau Kê-đa, Át-bê-ên, Mi-bô-sam,

14 Mích-ma, Ðu-ma, Ma-sa,

15 Ha-đa, Thê-ma, Giê-thu, Na-phích, và Kết-ma.

16 Ðó là các con trai của Ích-ma-ên và tên của họ tùy theo làng và nơi đóng trại mà đặt. Ấy là mười hai vị công hầu trong dân tộc của họ.

17 Ích-ma-ên hưởng thọ được một trăm ba mươi bảy tuổi, rồi tắt hơi mà qua đời, được qui về nơi tổ tông.

18 Dòng dõi người ở trước mặt anh em mình, từ Ha-vi-la cho đến Xu-xơ, đối ngang Ê-díp-tô, chạy qua A-si-ri.

19 Ðây là dòng dõi của Y-sác, con trai Áp-ra-ham. Áp-ra-ham sanh Y-sác.

20 Vả, khi Y-sác được bốn mươi tuổi, thì cưới ê-be-ca, con gái của Bê-tu-ên và em gái của La-ban, đều là dân A-ram, ở tại xứ Pha-đan-a-ram.

21 Y-sác khẩn cầu Ðức Giê-hô-va cho vợ mình, vì nàng son sẻ. Ðức Giê-hô-va cảm động lời khẩn cầu đó, nên cho ê-be-ca thọ thai.

22 Nhưng vì thai đôi làm cho đụng nhau trong bụng, thì nàng nói rằng: Nếu quả thật vậy, cớ sao đều nầy xảy đến làm chi? Ðoạn nàng đi hỏi Ðức Giê-hô-va.

23 Ðức Giê-hô-va phán rằng: Hai nước hiện ở trong bụng ngươi, và Hai thứ dân sẽ do lòng ngươi mà ra; dân nầy mạnh hơn dân kia, và đứa lớn phải phục đứa nhỏ.

24 Ðến ngày nàng phải sanh nở, nầy hai đứa sanh đôi trong bụng nàng ra.

25 Ðứa ra trước đỏ hồng, lông cùng mình như một áo tơi lông; đặt tênÊ-sau.

26 Kế em nó lại ra sau, tay nắm lấy gót Ê-sau; nên đặt tênGia-cốp. Khi sanh hai đứa con nầy thì Y-sác đã được sáu mươi tuổi.

27 Khi hai đứa trai nầy lớn lên, thì Ê-sau trở nên một thợ săn giỏi, thường giong ruổi nơi đồng ruộng; còn Gia-cốp là người hiền lành cứ ở lại trại.

28 Y-sác yêu Ê-sau, vì người có tánh ưa ăn thịt rừng; nhưng ê-be-ca lại yêu Gia-cốp.

29 Một ngày kia, Gia-cốp đương nấu canh, Ê-sau ở ngoài đồng về lấy làm mệt mỏi lắm;

30 liền nói cùng Gia-cốp rằng: Em hãy cho anh ăn canh gì đỏ đó với, vì anh mệt mỏi lắm. Bởi cớ ấy, người ta gọi Ê-sau là Ê-đôm.

31 Gia-cốp đáp rằng: Nay anh hãy bán quyền trưởng nam cho tôi đi.

32 Ê-sau đáp rằng: Nầy, anh gần thác, quyền trưởng nam để cho anh dùng làm chi?

33 Gia-cốp đáp lại rằng: Anh hãy thề trước đi. Người bèn thề; vậy, người bán quyền trưởng nam cho Gia-cốp.

34 ồi, Gia-cốp cho Ê-sau ăn bánh và canh phạn đậu; ăn uống xong, người bèn đứng dậy đi. Vậy, Ê-sau khinh quyền trưởng nam là thế.

   

Van Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #3332

Bestudeer deze passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3332. And Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentils. That this signifies the good of life gifted with the good of truth and the good of doctrinal things, is evident from the representation of Esau, as being the good of life (n. 3300, 3322); and from the signification of “bread,” as being the good of love in general, both celestial and spiritual (n. 276, 680, 2165, 2177), thus also the good of truth, for this is spiritual good; and from the signification of “pottage of lentils,” as being the good of doctrinal things; for “pottage” signifies a chaotic mass of doctrinal things (n. 3316), and “lentils” the good thereof. That Jacob gave them to Esau, in the internal sense signifies that these goods come through the doctrine of truth, which is represented by Jacob (n. 3305).

[2] In this last verse, by these words and those which follow there is described the progress as to truth and good of the spiritual man when being regenerated, namely, that he first learns the doctrinal things of truth, next is affected by them (which is the good of the doctrinal things), then that by taking a mental view of these doctrinal things he is affected with the truths in them (which is the good of truth), and lastly that he wills to live according to them, which is the good of life. In this way the spiritual man when being regenerated advances from the doctrine of truth to the good of life. But when he is in the good of life the order is inverted, and from this good he looks to the good of truth, from this to the good of doctrinal things, and from this to the doctrinal things of truth. From this it may be known how man from being a sensuous man becomes spiritual, and of what quality he is when he becomes spiritual.

[3] That these goods, namely, the good of life, the good of truth, and the good of doctrinal things, are distinct from each other can be seen by those who carefully consider the matter. The good of life is that which flows from the will; the good of truth is that which flows from the understanding; and the good of doctrinal things is that which flows from memory-knowledge. The good which is doctrinal has these other goods within it.

[4] That “lentils” signify the good of doctrinal things, is evident from the fact that wheat, barley, beans, lentils, millet, spelt, are such things as mean bread, but with a difference according to the species; that “bread” in general denotes good is manifest from what has been stated and shown above (n. 276, 680, 2165, 2177); thus different species of good are signified by the cereals in question, the more noble species of good by “wheat and barley,” but the less noble by “beans and lentils;” as is also manifest from Ezekiel:

Take thou also unto thee wheat, and barley, and beans, and lentils, and millet, and spelt, and put them into one vessel, and make thee bread thereof (Ezekiel 4:9).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Van Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #2177

Bestudeer deze passage

  
/ 10837  
  

2177. That the “meal of fine flour” denotes the spiritual and the celestial which were then with the Lord, and that “cakes” denote the same when both are conjoined, is very evident from the sacrifices of the Representative Church, and from the meat-offering then made use of, which consisted of fine flour mingled with oil and made into cakes. The chief part of representative worship consisted in burnt-offerings and sacrifices. What these represented has already been stated, where bread is treated of (n. 2165), namely, the celestial things of the Lord’s kingdom in the heavens and of the Lord’s kingdom on the earth (that is, in the church), and also those of the Lord’s kingdom or church with each person; and in general all the things of love and charity, because these are celestial. All these offerings and sacrifices were at that time called “bread,” and to them was adjoined the meat-offering also, which, as already said, consisted of fine flour mingled with oil, to which frankincense was likewise added, as well as a libation of wine.

[2] What these represented is also evident, namely, similar things as the sacrifices, but in a less degree, thus the things which are of the spiritual church, and likewise those of the external church. Everyone can see that such things would never have been commanded unless they had represented Divine things, and also that each one represents something special and peculiar, for unless they had represented Divine things, they would not have differed from similar things in use among the Gentiles, among whom also there were sacrifices—meat-offerings, libations, frankincense, perpetual fires, and many other things, derived to them from the Ancient Church, and especially from the Hebrew Church. But as internal things (that is, the Divine things that were represented) were separated from these Gentile rites, they were merely idolatrous, as also they became with the Jews, who for this reason fell into all kinds of idolatry. From what has been said everyone can see that there were heavenly arcana in every rite, especially in the sacrifices and all their particulars.

[3] As regards the meat-offering, the nature of it and how it was to be prepared into cakes, is described in a whole chapter in Moses (Leviticus 2; also in Numbers 15, and elsewhere). The law of the meat-offering is described in Leviticus in these words:

Fire shall be kept burning upon the altar continually, it shall not go out. And this is the law of the meat-offering: the sons of Aaron shall bring it before Jehovah to the faces of the altar; and he shall take therefrom his handful of the fine flour of the meat-offering, and of the oil thereof, and all the frankincense which is upon the meat-offering, and shall burn it upon the altar, an odor of rest, for a memorial unto Jehovah; and the residue thereof Aaron and his sons shall eat; unleavened shall they be eaten in a holy place; in the court of the tent of meeting shall they eat it. It shall not be baked leavened; I have given it as their portion of My offerings made by fire; it is a holy of holies (Leviticus 6:13-17).

[4] The fire which must be kept burning upon the altar continually, represented the love, that is, the mercy of the Lord, perpetual and eternal. That in the Word “fire” signifies love, see n. 934; hence “offerings made by fire for an odor of rest” signify the Lord’s pleasure in the things which are of love and charity. (That “odor” denotes what is well-pleasing, that is, what is grateful, see n. 925, 1519.) Their “taking a handful” represented that they should love with all the strength, or with all the soul; for the hand, or the palm of the hand, signifies power (as shown n. 878), from which “handful” also signifies power. The fine flour, with the oil and the frankincense, represented all things of charity-the fine flour the spiritual, and the oil the celestial of charity, the frankincense what was in this manner grateful. (That fine flour represents what is spiritual, is evident from what has just been said, and from what follows; that oil represents what is celestial, or the good of charity, may be seen above, n. 886; and also that frankincense, from its odor, represents what is grateful and acceptable, n. 925.)

[5] Its being “unleavened,” or not fermented, signifies that it should be sincere, and thus from a sincere heart, and free from uncleanness. That Aaron and his sons should eat the residue, represented man’s reciprocality and his appropriation, thus conjunction through love and charity; on which account it was commanded that they should eat it in a holy place. Hence it is called a “holy of holies.” These were the things that were represented by the meat-offering; and the representatives themselves were so perceived in heaven; and when the man of the church so apprehended them, he was then in an idea similar to the perception of the angels, thus he was in the Lord’s kingdom itself in the heavens although he was on earth.

[6] The meat-offering is further treated of, as regards what it ought to be in connection with each kind of sacrifice, and how it should be baked into cakes, also what kind should be offered by those who were being cleansed, and what on other occasions; to mention and explain all of which would be too tedious; but concerning all these matters see Exodus 29:39-41; Leviticus 5:11-13; 6:14-23; 10:12-13; 23:10-13, 23:16-17; Numbers 5:15, etc.; 6:15-17, 19-20, 7:1-89, in several places; 28:5, 7, 9, 12-13, 20-21, 28-29; 29:3-4, 9-10, 14-15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 37.

[7] Fine flour made into cakes in general represented the same as bread, namely, the celestial of love, and meal the spiritual of it, as is evident from the passages cited above. The “breads” [or loaves] that were called the “bread of faces,” or the “show bread” [panis propositionis], were made of fine flour, which was prepared in cakes and placed upon the table, for a perpetual representation of the love, that is, the mercy, of the Lord toward the universal human race, and the reciprocality of man. Concerning these loaves we read as follows in Moses:

Thou shalt take fine flour and shalt bake it into twelve cakes; of two tenths shall one cake be; and thou shalt set them in two rows, six in a row, upon the clean table, before Jehovah; and thou shalt put pure frankincense upon each row, and it shall be to the breads for a memorial, an offering made by fire unto Jehovah. On every Sabbath day he shall set it in order before Jehovah continually, from the sons of Israel in a covenant of eternity. And it shall be for Aaron and his sons, and they shall eat it in a holy place, for it is a holy of holies unto him, of the offerings made by fire unto Jehovah by a statute of eternity (Leviticus 24:5-9).

Every particular in this description and all the smallest details represented the holy of love and of charity, the “fine flour” the same as the “meal of fine flour,” namely, the celestial and its spiritual, and the “cake” the two conjoined.

[8] Hence it is evident what is the holiness of the Word to those who are in heavenly ideas, nay, what holiness there was in this very representative rite, on account of which it is called a holiness of holinesses; and on the contrary, how void of holiness it is to those who suppose that there is nothing heavenly in these things, and who abide solely in the externals; as do they who perceive the meal here merely as meal, the fine flour as fine flour, and the cake as a cake, and who suppose these things to have been stated without each particular involving something of the Divine. These do in like manner as do those who think the bread and wine of the Holy Supper to be nothing but a certain rite, containing nothing holy within; whereas there is such holiness that human minds are by that Supper conjoined with heavenly minds, when from internal affection they are thinking that the bread and wine signify the Lord’s love and the reciprocality of man, and are thus in holiness from interior thought and feeling.

[9] The like was involved in that the sons of Israel on their coming into the land of Canaan were to offer a cake of the first of their dough, as a heave-offering unto Jehovah (Numbers 15:20). That such things are signified is also evident in the Prophets, from which we may at present adduce only this from Ezekiel:

Thou wast decked with gold and silver; and thy raiment was fine linen and silk, and broidered work; thou didst eat fine flour, honey, and oil, and thou wast become beautiful very exceedingly, and thou wast prospered unto a kingdom (Ezekiel 16:13); where the subject treated of is Jerusalem, by which is signified the church, that was so decked in its earliest time-that is, the Ancient Church-and which is described by the garments and other ornaments; as also its affections of truth and good by the fine flour, honey, and oil. Everyone can see that all these things have a very different meaning in the internal sense from that in the sense of the letter. And so have these words which Abraham said to Sarah: “Make ready quickly three measures of the meal of fine flour, knead, and make cakes.” (That “three” signifies holy things has been shown before, n. 720, 901)

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.