Библията

 

創世記 25

Проучване

   

1 アブラハムは再びをめとった。名をケトラという。

2 彼女はジムラン、ヨクシャン、メダン、ミデアン、イシバクおよびシュワを産んだ。

3 ヨクシャンのはシバとデダンデダン孫はアシュリびと、レトシびと、レウミびとである。

4 ミデアンの孫はエパ、エペル、ヘノク、アビダ、エルダアであって、これらは皆ケトラ孫であった。

5 アブラハムはその所有をことごとくイサクに与えた。

6 またそのそばめたちのらにもアブラハムは物を与え、なお生きている間に彼らをそのイサクから離して、東の方、東のに移らせた。

7 アブラハムの生きながらえた年は十五年である。

8 アブラハムは高齢に達し、老人となり、年が満ちて息絶え、死んでその民に加えられた。

9 そのイサクとイシマエルは彼をヘテびとゾハルのエフロンにあるマクペラのほら穴に葬った。これはマムレの向かいにあり、

10 アブラハムがヘテの人々から、買い取ったであって、そこにアブラハムとそのサラが葬られた。

11 アブラハムが死んだはそのイサクを祝福された。イサクはベエル・ラハイ・ロイのほとりに住んだ。

12 サラのつかえめエジプトびとハガルアブラハムに産んだアブラハムのイシマエルの系図は次のとおりである。

13 イシマエルのらの名を世代にしたがって、その名をいえば次のとおりである。すなわちイシマエルの長はネバヨテ、次はケダル、アデビエル、ミブサム

14 ミシマ、ドマ、マッサ

15 ハダデ、テマ、エトル、ネフシ、ケデマ

16 これはイシマエルの子らであり、と宿営とによる名であって、その氏族による十二人の君たちである。

17 イシマエルのよわいは三十七年である。彼は息絶えて死に、その民に加えられた。

18 イシマエルの子らはハビラからエジプトの東、シュルまでの間に住んで、アシュルに及んだ。イシマエルはすべての兄弟の東に住んだ。

19 アブラハムのイサクの系図は次のとおりである。アブラハムのはイサクであって、

20 イサクは四十歳の時、パダンアラムアラムびとベトエルの娘で、アラムびとラバンのリベカにめとった。

21 イサクはが子を産まなかったので、妻のためにに祈り願った。はその願いを聞かれ、リベカはみごもった。

22 ところがそのらが胎内で押し合ったので、リベカは言った、「こんなことでは、わたしはどうなるでしょう」。彼女は行ってに尋ねた。

23 は彼女に言われた、「つの民があなたの胎内にあり、つの民があなたのから別れて出る。一つの民は他の民よりも強く、兄は弟に仕えるであろう」。

24 彼女の出産のがきたとき、胎内にはふたごがあった。

25 さきに出たのは赤くて全身ごろものようであった。それで名をエサウと名づけた。

26 そのに弟が出た。そのエサウかかとをつかんでいた。それで名をヤコブと名づけた。リベカが彼らを産んだ時、イサクは六十歳であった。

27 さてその子らは成長し、エサウ巧みな狩猟者となり、野の人となったが、ヤコブは穏やかな人で、天幕に住んでいた

28 イサクは、しかの肉が好きだったので、エサウしたが、リベカはヤコブをした。

29 ある日ヤコブが、あつものを煮ていた時、エサウは飢え疲れて野から帰ってきた。

30 エサウはヤコブに言った、「わたしは飢え疲れた。お願いだ。赤いもの、その赤いものをわたしに食べさせてくれ」。彼が名をエドム呼ばれたのはこのためである。

31 ヤコブは言った、「まずあなたの長子の特権をわたしに売りなさい」。

32 エサウは言った、「わたしは死にそうだ。長子の特権などわたしに何になろう」。

33 ヤコブはまた言った、「まずわたしに誓いなさい」。彼は誓って長子の特権をヤコブに売った

34 そこでヤコブはパンレンズ豆のあつものとをエサウに与えたので、彼は飲み食いして、立ち去った。このようにしてエサウは長子の特権を軽んじた。

   

От "Съчиненията на Сведенборг

 

Arcana Coelestia #3235

Проучете този пасаж

  
/ 10837  
  

3235. And Abraham added, and took a woman. That this signifies another state of the Lord, whom Abraham represents, and that Abraham and Sarah represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial, and Abraham and Keturah as to the Divine spiritual, is evident from the things hitherto said and shown concerning Abraham and Sarah his wife, and from those here related concerning Abraham and Keturah. But as it is said that Abraham here represents another state of the Lord, and that Abraham and Sarah represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial, but Abraham and Keturah the Lord as to the Divine spiritual, it should be known what the Divine celestial is, and what the Divine spiritual.

[2] The Divine celestial and the Divine spiritual are such in respect to those who receive the Divine of the Lord, for the Lord appears to everyone according to the nature of him who receives, as may be seen from what has been said above (n. 1838, 1861), and is clearly manifest from the fact that the Lord appears in one way to the celestial, but in another to the spiritual; for to the celestial He appears as a sun, but to the spiritual as a moon (n. 1529-1531, 1838). The Lord appears to the celestial as a sun, because they are in celestial love, that is, in love to the Lord; but to the spiritual as a moon, because they are in spiritual love, that is, in charity toward the neighbor. The difference is like that between the light of the sun in the daytime and the light of the moon by night; it is also like the difference between the heat of the one and the heat of the other, from which springs vegetation. This is what is meant in the first chapter of Genesis by the words:

And God made two great lights, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night (Genesis 1:16).

[3] Speaking generally, the Lord’s kingdom is both celestial and spiritual; that is, it consists of those who are celestial, and of those who are spiritual. And it is because the Divine of the Lord appears to the celestial as celestial, and to the spiritual as spiritual, that it is here said that Abraham and Sarah represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial, and that Abraham and Keturah represented Him as to the Divine spiritual. But as scarcely any know what the celestial is and what the spiritual, or who the celestial and the spiritual are, see what has already been said and shown concerning them, namely: What the celestial is, and what the spiritual (n. 1155, 1577, 1824, 2048, 2184, 2227, 2507): Who are celestial and who are spiritual (n. 2088, 2669, 2708, 2715): That the celestial man is a likeness of the Lord and does good from love, and the spiritual man is an image of the Lord and does good from faith (n. 50-52, 1013): That the celestial perceive truth from good, and that they never reason concerning truth (n. 202, 337, 607, 895, 1121, 2715): That in the celestial man good is implanted in his will part, but in the spiritual man it is implanted in his intellectual part, and that in this part a new will is created in those who are spiritual (n. 863, 875, 895, 897, 927, 1023, 1043, 1044, 2256): That the celestial from good itself see indefinite things, but that the spiritual, because they reason whether a thing is so, cannot attain to the first boundary of the light of the celestial (n. 2718): That the spiritual are in relative obscurity (n. 1043, 2708, 2715): That the Lord came into the world in order to save the spiritual (n. 2661, 2716, 2833, 2834).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

От "Съчиненията на Сведенборг

 

Arcana Coelestia #1013

Проучете този пасаж

  
/ 10837  
  

1013. For in the image of God made He man. That this signifies charity, which is the “image of God” follows as a consequence. In the preceding verse charity was treated of, which was signified by “blood” and that it should not be extinguished was signified by “not shedding blood.” Here now it follows that He made man into the image of God; from which it is evident that charity is the image of God. What the image of God is, hardly anyone knows at the present day. They say that the image of God was lost in the first man, whom they call Adam, and that it was a certain perfection 1 of the nature of which they are ignorant. And indeed there was perfection, for by “Adam” or “Man” is meant the Most Ancient Church” which was a celestial man, and had perception, such as had no church after it; by reason of which it was also a likeness of the Lord. A likeness of the Lord signifies love to Him.

[2] After this church perished in the course of time, the Lord created a new church, which was not a celestial but a spiritual church. This was not a likeness, but an image of the Lord. An “image” signifies spiritual love, that is, love to the neighbor, or charity, as has been shown before n. 50-51). That this church was, from spiritual love, or charity, an image of the Lord, is evident from this verse; and that charity is itself an image of the Lord is evident from its being said, “for in the image of God made He man” that is to say, charity itself made him so. That charity is the “image of God” is most clearly evident from the very essence of love, or charity. Nothing else than love and charity can make an image and likeness of anyone. It is the essence of love and charity to make of two as it were one. When one person loves another as himself, and more than himself, he then sees the other in himself, and himself in the other. This may be known to everyone if he only directs his attention to love, or to those who love each other-the will of the one is the will of the other, they are interiorly as it were joined together, and only in body distinct the one from the other.

[3] Love to the Lord makes man one with the Lord, that is, a likeness of Him. So does charity, or love toward the neighbor, make him one with the Lord, but as an image. An image is not a likeness, but is according to or after a likeness [est ad similitudinem]. This oneness arising from love the Lord describes in John:

I pray that they all may be one; even as Thou Father art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in Us; and the glory which Thou hast given unto Me I have given unto them; that they may be one, even as We are one; I in them, and Thou in Me (John 17:21-23).

This “being one” is that mystical union which some think about, and which is by love alone. Again:

I live, and ye shall live; in that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you; he that hath My commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me; if a man love Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come unto him, and make Our abode with him (John 14:19-23).

Hence it is evident that it is love which conjoins, and that the Lord has His abode with him who loves Him, and also with him who loves his neighbor, for this is love of the Lord.

[4] This union, which makes a likeness and image, cannot be so well seen among men, but is seen in heaven, where from mutual love all the angels are as a one. Each society, which consists of many, constitutes as it were one man. And all the societies together-or the universal heaven-constitute one man, which is also called the Grand Man (see n. 457, 550). The universal heaven is a likeness of the Lord, for the Lord is the all in all who are therein. So also is each society a likeness, and so is each angel. The celestial angels are likenesses, the spiritual angels are images. Thus heaven consists of as many likenesses of the Lord as there are angels, and this solely through mutual love-one loving another more than himself (see n. 548, 549). For in order that the general or universal heaven may be a likeness, the parts, or individual angels, must be likenesses, or images that are according to likenesses. Unless the general consists of parts like itself, it is not a general that makes a one. From these things it may be seen as from an archetype, or pattern, 2 what makes a likeness and image of God, namely, love to the Lord and love toward the neighbor; consequently, that every regenerate spiritual man, from love or charity, which is from the Lord alone, is His image. And he who is in charity from the Lord, is in “perfection;” of which perfection, by the Divine mercy of the Lord hereafter.

Бележки под линия:

1. “Perfect” is used here in the sense of “whole,” “entire.” Swedenborg’s word is integer. [Reviser.]

2. Latin idea, which is evidently used here in its Platonic sense. See the Republic, Book X [Reviser].

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.