Библията

 

利未記 8

Проучване

   

1 耶和華曉諭摩西

2 你將亞倫和他兒子一同帶來,並將聖衣、膏,與贖祭的一隻公牛、兩隻公綿、一筐無酵帶來,

3 又招聚會眾會幕口。

4 摩西就照耶和華所吩咐的行了;於是會眾聚集會幕口。

5 摩西告訴會眾:這就是耶和華所吩咐當行的事。

6 摩西帶了亞倫和他兒子來,用了他們。

7 給亞倫穿上內袍,束上腰帶,穿上外袍,又加上以弗得,用其上巧工織的帶子把以弗得繫在他身上,

8 又給他戴上胸牌,把烏陵和土明放在胸牌內,

9 把冠冕戴在他上,在冠冕的前面釘上牌,就是冠,都是照耶和華所吩咐摩西的

10 摩西抹帳幕和其中所有的,使他成聖

11 又用油在上彈了次,又抹了的一切器皿,並洗濯盆和盆座,使他成聖

12 又把倒在亞倫的他,使他成聖

13 摩西帶了亞倫的兒子來,給他們穿上內袍,束上腰帶,包上裹頭巾,都是照耶和華所吩咐摩西的

14 他牽了贖祭的公牛來,亞倫和他兒子按在贖祭公牛的上,

15 就宰了公牛。摩西用指頭蘸血,抹在上四角的周圍,使潔淨,把血倒在的腳那裡,使成聖就潔淨了;

16 又取臟上所有的脂油和上的網子,並兩個腰子與腰子上的脂油,燒在上;

17 惟有公牛,連並糞,用燒在外,都是照耶和華所吩咐摩西的

18 他奉上燔祭的公綿亞倫和他兒子按上,

19 就宰了公羊。摩西把血灑在的周圍,

20 切成塊子,把和肉塊並脂油都燒了。

21 了臟腑和,就把全燒在上為馨的燔祭,是獻給耶和華的火祭,都是照耶和華所吩咐摩西的

22 他又奉上第二隻公綿,就是承接聖職之禮的亞倫和他兒子按上,

23 就宰了羊。摩西把些血抹在亞倫的右耳垂上和右的大拇指上,並右的大拇指上,

24 又帶了亞倫的兒子來,把些血抹在他們的右耳垂上和右的大拇指上,並右的大拇指上,又把血灑在的周圍。

25 取脂油和肥尾巴,並臟上一切的脂油與上的網子,兩個腰子和腰子上的脂油,並右腿,

26 再從耶和華面前、盛無酵餅的筐子裡取出無酵餅,餅,個薄餅,都放在脂和右腿上,

27 把這一切放在亞倫的手上和他兒子的手上作搖祭,在耶和華面前搖一搖。

28 摩西從他們的手上拿下來,燒在上的燔祭上,都是為承接聖職獻給耶和華的火祭。

29 摩西的胸作為搖祭,在耶和華面前搖一搖,是承接聖職之禮,歸摩西的分,都是照耶和華所吩咐摩西的

30 摩西取點膏上的血,彈在亞倫和他的衣服上,並他兒子和他兒子的衣服上,使他和他們的衣服一同成聖

31 摩西亞倫和他兒子:把會幕口,在那裡,又承接聖職筐子裡的餅,按我所吩咐的(或作:按所吩咐我的):這是亞倫和他兒子要的。

32 下的和餅,你們要用焚燒。

33 你們不可出會幕,等到你們承接聖職的日子滿了,因為主叫你們承接聖職。

34 今天所行的都是耶和華吩咐行的,為你們贖罪。

35 你們要晝夜會幕口,遵守耶和華的吩咐,免得你們亡,因為所吩咐我的就是這樣。

36 於是亞倫和他兒子行了耶和華藉著摩西所吩咐的一切事。

   

От "Съчиненията на Сведенборг

 

Arcana Coelestia #10040

Проучете този пасаж

  
/ 10837  
  

10040. Since the flesh of the young bull together with its skin and dung was burned with fire outside the camp, it becomes clear that the good of love was not meant by its 'flesh' but the evil of [self] love, as accords with the things stated above in 10035 regarding its 'flesh', and in 10038 just above regarding 'the camp'. But the reason why they were allowed to eat the flesh of the sacrifice, as becomes clear from places which come further on, was that in its worship that nation was interested in the outward performance but not in anything internal, see the places referred to in 9320(end), 9380. And an outward performance devoid of anything internal is not at all holy because then it is something done merely by the body and spoken by the mouth, and the heart and soul are not in it. Nevertheless the outward performance devoid of anything internal was called holy because it represented holy and internal things, these being everything that belongs to love and faith received from the Lord and offered back to Him. Since that nation was by nature such they were not permitted to eat blood and fat, because 'blood' meant Divine Truth which composes faith, while 'fat' meant Divine Good which constitutes love, both of which are received from the Lord, see above in 10033. But they were permitted to eat the flesh of a sacrifice because this flesh meant the human proprium or selfhood, 10035; and the proprium of that nation was such that they worshipped the outward forms as being holy but made nothing whatever of their inward substance. And that worship - apart from the representative aspect of it, which was holy - was idolatrous, see 4281, 4311. Furthermore that flesh, as a representative sign, had no other meaning, when its blood represented Divine Truth and its fat Divine Good, 10033; for then that flesh represented something which was devoid of life and soul, as the outward devoid of the inward is, which is referred to as being dead and which is in keeping with the following words in Moses,

You shall not eat the blood, because the blood is the soul; and you shall not eat the soul with the flesh. Deuteronomy 12:23.

[2] The worship of the nation of the catholic religion, as it is called 1 , is almost the same; that is to say, its worship is outward, devoid of anything inward. The common people are prevented from knowing the inner truths of the Word, because they are forbidden to read it, for which reason also it has come about in the Lord's Divine Providence that in the Holy Supper the common people are given the bread or flesh, but not the wine or blood. And yet blood is that which gives life to flesh, even as wine gives it to bread. For just as the bread without the wine provides no nourishment to the body, neither therefore does the good of love, meant by the bread and the flesh, without the truth of faith, meant by the wine and the blood, provide any nourishment to the soul. In the Lord's Divine Providence it has also come about there that the priest should drink the wine, because by this is meant nourishing the soul by means of Divine Truth devoid of the good of love, which is something outwardly holy devoid of anything inwardly so. They have no knowledge that this has happened in the Lord's Divine Providence because they venerate outward things in an idolatrous manner and so have no idea about inward things. If it had been otherwise, then not unlike the Jews they would have profaned holy things. That drinking of the wine by the priest alone is also a sign that knowledge of Divine Truth resides with priests alone and not with the common people, except so far as they are willing to give them it. Regarding the Holy Supper, that the bread and flesh in it are the Divine Good of the Lord's Divine Love towards the human race, and people's love offered back to the Lord, and that the blood and wine are the Divine Truth emanating from the Lord's Divine Good, and so the truth of faith received from the Lord and offered back to Him, see 3464, 3813, 4211, 4217, 4735, 4976, 6135, 6377, 6789, 7850, 9127.

As regards when it was that the flesh of sacrifices should be taken outside the camp to be burned with fire, see Leviticus 4:11-12, 21; and when it was, and by whom, that it should be eaten, Leviticus 6:26-30; 7:6, 15-19; 19:5-6; Deuteronomy 12:7, 17-18, 27; 27:6-7.

Бележки под линия:

1. i.e. Roman Catholicism is seen to be a single nation whose secular as well as spiritual head is the Pope.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

От "Съчиненията на Сведенборг

 

Arcana Coelestia #7850

Проучете този пасаж

  
/ 10837  
  

7850. 'And they shall eat the flesh' means enjoyment of what is good. This is clear from the meaning of 'eating' as enjoyment, dealt with immediately above in 7849; and from the meaning of 'the flesh' as the human proprium made alive by the Lord's Divine Human, thus all the celestial and spiritual good present with a person, dealt with in 3813, 6968. The fact that 'flesh' has this meaning was very well known among the ancients; but at the present day people are so ignorant of it that everyone is amazed when 'flesh' is said to mean such. If one speaks of the proprium as the spiritual entity to which 'flesh' corresponds, people have no understanding of this. If one speaks of it as the symbolic meaning of 'flesh' they do, it is true, understand that, yet their idea is entirely different from that in which the natural object corresponds to the entity it symbolizes; that is to say, they see it as something completely separate. But in actual fact the spiritual or symbolized entity to which it corresponds is linked to it as a person's sight is linked to his eye and his hearing to his ear, and as his thought, which is spiritual, is linked to the form his interiors assume, and through that form to his organs of speech, or as his will, which too is spiritual, is linked to the fibres forming his muscles with which he acts. The same kind of relationship exists with every spiritual entity and its counterpart, that is, with every entity that is symbolized and the natural object that has a correspondence with it.

[2] Who can fail to see that 'flesh' is not used by the Lord to mean flesh or 'blood' to mean blood in John,

Truly, truly, I say to you, Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you will have no life in you. Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For My flesh is truly food, and My blood is truly drink. John 6:53-56.

Few at the present day know that 'flesh' was used to mean the Divine Good of the Lord's Divine Love, which comes from His Divine Human, and 'blood' to mean the Divine Truth emanating from His Divine Good, and also a person's reciprocation. And those who are capable of knowing this have no wish to know it. They have no wish to know it because they have no affection for truth for its own sake, only for the sake of inducements the world offers, and also because people who think on a natural level wish to understand everything on that level.

[3] These matters have been stated in order that people may know what is meant by 'eating flesh' in the Passover supper, and what is consequently meant by it in the Holy Supper, which was instituted at the Passover supper. Regarding the bread and wine, which have the same meaning as flesh and blood, in the Holy Supper, see 2165, 2177, 2187, 3464, 3478, 3735, 3813, 4211, 4217, 4735, 4976, 5915. The fact that 'flesh' is not flesh in the spiritual sense of the Word is, in addition to other places, plainly evident from the following in John,

Come and gather yourselves to the supper of the great God, so that you may eat [the flesh of kings, and] the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses and those seated on them, and the flesh of all free men and slaves, both small and great. Revelation 19:17-18.

'The flesh', as it is used here, means varying kinds of good.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.