Библията

 

تكوين 16

Проучване

   

1 واما ساراي امرأة ابرام فلم تلد له. وكانت لها جارية مصرية اسمها هاجر.

2 فقالت ساراي لابرام هوذا الرب قد امسكني عن الولادة. ادخل على جاريتي. لعلي أرزق منها بنين. فسمع ابرام لقول ساراي.

3 فاخذت ساراي امرأة ابرام هاجر المصرية جاريتها من بعد عشر سنين لاقامة ابرام في ارض كنعان واعطتها لابرام رجلها زوجة له.

4 فدخل على هاجر فحبلت. ولما رأت انها حبلت صغرت مولاتها في عينيها.

5 فقالت ساراي لابرام ظلمي عليك. انا دفعت جاريتي الى حضنك. فلما رأت انها حبلت صغرت في عينيها. يقضي الرب بيني وبينك.

6 فقال ابرام لساراي هوذا جاريتك في يدك. افعلي بها ما يحسن في عينيك. فاذلّتها ساراي. فهربت من وجهها

7 فوجدها ملاك الرب على عين الماء في البرية. على العين التي في طريق شور.

8 وقال يا هاجر جارية ساراي من اين أتيت والى اين تذهبين. فقالت انا هاربة من وجه مولاتي ساراي.

9 فقال لها ملاك الرب ارجعي الى مولاتك واخضعي تحت يديها.

10 وقال لها ملاك الرب تكثيرا اكثر نسلك فلا يعد من الكثرة.

11 وقال لها ملاك الرب ها انت حبلى فتلدين ابنا. وتدعين اسمه اسماعيل لان الرب قد سمع لمذلّتك.

12 وانه يكون انسانا وحشيّا. يده على كل واحد ويد كل واحد عليه. وامام جميع اخوته يسكن.

13 فدعت اسم الرب الذي تكلم معها انت ايل رئي. لانها قالت أههنا ايضا رأيت بعد رؤية.

14 لذلك دعيت البئر بئر لحي رئي. ها هي بين قادش وبارد

15 فولدت هاجر لابرام ابنا. ودعا ابرام اسم ابنه الذي ولدته هاجر اسماعيل.

16 وكان ابرام ابن ست وثمانين سنة لما ولدت هاجر اسماعيل لابرام

   

От "Съчиненията на Сведенборг

 

Arcana Coelestia #1916

Проучете този пасаж

  
/ 10837  
  

1916. That 'I am despised in her eyes' means that at its conception this rational despised truth itself that was allied to good is clear from what has been stated just above in 1911, 1914.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

От "Съчиненията на Сведенборг

 

Arcana Coelestia #1914

Проучете този пасаж

  
/ 10837  
  

1914. That 'may the wrong done to me be on you! I gave my servant-girl into your bosom' means its unwillingness to take any blame is clear without explanation. In the internal sense these words embody within themselves the truth that the Lord perceived this first rational to be such as despised intellectual truth, and for that reason He reproached it. The Lord did indeed think from intellectual truth, as stated above in 1904; and because that truth was superior to the rational, He was able to perceive and see the nature of the rational, that is to say, that it held that truth in contempt.

[2] The Lord's being able from the interior man to perceive and see the nature of the new rational within Himself becomes clear from the fact that what is interior is able to perceive that which occurs in the exterior, or what amounts to the same, what is higher is able to see that which occurs in that which is lower, but not the reverse. Moreover, those who have conscience are able and are accustomed to do the same, for when anything contrary to the truth constituting conscience enters their thought or the intentions of their will, they not only recognize it for what it is but also pour blame upon it; indeed it grieves them that their own nature is such. This is all the more true of those who have perception, for perception is more interior within the rational. What then could the Lord not do who had Divine celestial perception and whose thought sprang from the affection for intellectual truth which is above the rational? Therefore He could not be anything else but righteously angry since He knew that no evil or falsity at all stemmed from Himself and that from the affection for truth He strove anxiously with all His might so that the rational might be pure. From this it becomes clear that the Lord did not despise intellectual truth, yet perceived that the first rational with Him did so.

[3] What thinking from intellectual truth is cannot be explained intelligibly, all the less so because nobody except the Lord has ever thought from that affection and that kind of truth. Anyone who thinks from them is above the angelic heaven, for the angels of the third heaven do not think from intellectual truth but from the interior part of the rational. But to the extent that the Lord united the Human Essence to the Divine Essence, He thought from Divine Good itself, that is, from Jehovah.

[4] The early fathers of the Most Ancient Church, who had perception, thought from the interior rational. The fathers of the Ancient Church, who did not have perception but conscience, thought from the exterior or natural rational. But all who do not have conscience never think from the rational at all, since they have no rational however much they appear to do so. Instead they think from the sensory and the bodily experience of the natural. People who do not have conscience are unable to think from the rational for the reason, as has been stated, that they have no rational. The rational man is one in whom the good and truth of faith are the substance of his thought and never one who thinks in opposition to these. Those in whom evil and falsity are the substance of their thought are insane as to their thought and therefore the rational cannot be attributed to them.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.