Библија

 

Luke 24:13-35 : The Road to Emmaus

Студија

13 And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs.

14 And they talked together of all these things which had happened.

15 And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.

16 But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.

17 And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad?

18 And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass therein these days?

19 And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people:

20 And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him.

21 But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.

22 Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre;

23 And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive.

24 And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not.

25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

28 And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further.

29 But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them.

30 And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them.

31 And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.

32 And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?

33 And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them,

34 Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon.

35 And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.

Коментар

 

На путу за Еммаус

Од стране Joe David (машински преведен у Srpski, Српски)

Lelio Orsi's painting, Camino de Emaús, is in the National Gallery in London, England.

У сваком Еванђељу има нешто о појави Исуса Његовим ученицима након недељног јутра када су гроб нашли празним. На пример, види Јеванђеље по Матеју 28:16-20; Јеванђеље по Марку 16:14-19; Јеванђеље по Луки 24:13-33; Јеванђеље по Јовану 20:19-31, и Јеванђеље по Јовану 21.

У Луки, постоји прича о двојици ученика који су од Јерузалема до села Еммаус ходали око седам километара. Убрзо након што напусте град, прилази им други путник који је приметио њихова проблематична лица и озбиљне разговоре и пита их шта их мучи. Ходајући заједно, питају странца: "Зар нисте чули за невоље у Јерусалиму, како је пророк из Галилеје, за кога смо се надали да ће спасити Израел, бити распет?" И чудно је рећи, када су неке жене отишле трећег дана да помажу Његово тело, угледале су анђеле који су им рекли да он није тамо, али да је васкрснуо из мртвих. "

Чувши то, путник их изјављује да не верују и каже: "Зар не видите да је Христ морао да трпи те ствари и да уђе у своју славу?" Незнанац тада каже двојици ученика многе ствари које се тичу Исуса, из Мојсијевих књига и пророка, у Старом завету. Двоје ученика слуша са страхом, али не препознају странца. Дуго стижу у Еммаус. Чини се да је странац желио наставити када њих двоје стану, али га моле и да престане, јер касно долази дан, а они желе да чују више. Тако сви сједе да подијеле вечеру, а кад странац узме хљеб круха и сломи га и подијели му комаде, отворе се очи и препознају га и он нестаје.

Може се замислити запањено страхопоштовање које их је обузело обојица док су схватили да је то Исус. Знали су да је распет, а ходао је и разговарао с њима неколико сати. Жене су биле у праву! Анђели су били у праву! Био је жив!

Нова Црква верује да постоје унутрашње значење свих прича у Речи Господњој, светим писмима и да је то унутрашње значење, у дословним причама о Абрахаму, Изаку и Јакову, Јошуи, Самуелу, Давиду и почивај, и све изреке пророка од Изаије до Малахија, и четири еванђеља ... ово значење чини Реч светим.

Па шта овде можемо видети у овој причи? Па, тај унутрашњи смисао у "Мојсију и пророцима" је прича о Исусовом животу у свету, од његовог рођења у Бетлехему, кроз све његове године раста, до његове "смрти", а потом и његовог успона. Пошто је Исус то знао и сигурно је читао Свето писмо и разумео их изнутра, дуго је знао како ће се затворити његов земаљски живот и да је потребно да се затвори као што је „написано“, како би се спаси људски род. Тако је рекао двојици ученика ту причу док су ходали према Еммаусу.

Више о тој шетњи ... У Речи, свако спомињање ходања заиста се односи на то како живимо свој живот из дана у дан. У многим причама Речи каже се да је неко ходао с Богом. Каже се да требамо ићи Његовим путевима и да морамо ићи правом и уском стазом.

Такође у овој причи нам је речено да је ово било путовање од шездесет стадија (на изворном грчком). Шездесет (или осталих вишеструких "шест") представља доживотно дело одбацивања искушења која потичу из наше урођене себичности. Објаснио апокалипсу 648. Дакле, ово путовање до Емауса значи путовање нашег живота - као особе која покушава да следи Господинова учења и постане анђео.

Одредиште је био Еммаус. У Речи било који град представља науку, организовани скуп истина које смо поставили да бисмо могли да живимо у складу са њима - нашим животним правилима. Види Duhovnom Dnevniku 402. Они нису нужно добри, као што су Јерусалим или Бетлехем, али могу бити и зле доктрине, нпр. Содом или Бабилон. Мој речник ми каже да име Еммаус значи „врели извори“. Друго универзално значење Речи је да вода значи истину у њеним корисним употребама, али такође може значити истину коју су они који су у паклу искривљени у лаж, у супротном смислу. Погледајте, на пример, Duhovnom Dnevniku 790. Помислите на бунаре које је Абрахам ископао, или на воде које је Исус обећао жени Самарији док су разговарали са Јаковљевим бунаром, или на чисту реку воде која извире испод трона у Новом Јерусалиму у књизи Откривења. У свом обрнутом смислу, где је вода деструктивна, помислите на поплаву која је уништила све осим Ноа и његову породицу, или на Црвено море које је требало раздвојити да би деца Израела могла да пређу. Извори које је Емаус заступао биле су свете истине које су одјекнуле од Речи за употребу. А то су врели извори, а топлота значи љубав. То је наше одредиште, где истина и љубав заједно извиру за нас у кориштењу, у непрекидном Господину.

Ова обична мала анегдота о томе како ученици сусрећу Господа на путу за Емаус нису само приче о Исусовом васкрсењу са духовним телом. То је такође прича о томе како би требало да живимо свој живот. Можемо путовати према небу, слушати Господа, ходати путем с њим, а на крају ће он сломити хлеб и вечерати с нама.

Из Сведенборгових дела

 

Arcana Coelestia # 10125

Проучите овај одломак

  
/ 10837  
  

10125. 'And you shall anoint it' means consecration to represent the Divine Good of Love from the Lord as He exists in heaven and in the Church. This is clear from the meaning of 'anointing' as consecration to represent the Lord in respect of the Divine Good of Divine Love from His Divine Human, dealt with in 9474, 9954, 10019, at this point from the Lord as He exists in heaven and in the Church; for the subject is the influx and reception of Him there. Whatever represents the Lord also represents Him as He is present with people of the Church and with angels of heaven, and so represents heaven and the Church, since people who have the Church within them constitute the Church in general, and angels who have heaven within them constitute heaven in general. Not that those people regarded in themselves constitute the Church, only the Lord present with them does so. Nor therefore do the angels regarded in themselves constitute heaven, only the Lord present with them. For the Lord does not dwell in anything that is a person's or an angels's own, only in what is His with them. So it is that when the words 'the Church and heaven' are used, what is Divine and the Lord's with those who are there is meant. From all this it is evident how the statements that the Lord is the All in all of heaven and the Church and that the Lord Himself is heaven and the Church ought to be understood. This is also evident from the teaching known and accepted in the Christian world that all the good of faith and love comes from God and none at all from man, and that whatever comes from man's own self is not good. For this reason also no one has any merit or any righteousness by virtue of what is his own.

[2] These matters have been stated in order that people may know what is meant by 'the Lord as He exists in heaven and in the Church', thus what heaven and the Church are, and consequently in what way the altar and the anointing of it were representative of the Lord. All the objects that were going to represent the Lord and the Divine things that came from the Lord were anointed - the altar, the tent of meeting, the tables within it, the lampstand, the ark, Aaron himself, his sons, and their garments. And when they had been anointed they were called holy, not because the oil imparted any holiness but because when anointed they would represent the Divine things from the Lord, which alone are holy. The reason why oil was employed for this purpose was that oil was a sign of the good of love, and the Divine Good of Divine Love is the Divine Himself, for He is the Essential Being (ipsum Esse) of all things. So in order to represent that Good, consecration was effected by the use of oil. The Divine Himself, the Essential Being of all things, was within the Lord alone, for He was conceived from Jehovah; and everyone derives the being (esse) of his life, called his soul, from his father. From this it is clear that the Divine Good of Divine Love was within the Lord's Humanity as a father's soul is within his child. With the human being nothing possesses life except the soul. The body without the soul has no life; indeed the whole body is fashioned by the soul in its own image, to bring the soul into a condition suitably adapted to the functions it performs on the lowest levels of order, that is, in the world. These facts about the human being lead to the conclusion that the Essential Being within the Lord's Humanity was Jehovah, or the Divine Good of Divine Love, the Being of life, and that this Being makes everything which exists from it a likeness of itself. Thus the Lord, acting from the Divine [Being] that was within Him and so was His, also made His Human into the Divine Good of Divine Love.

[3] Furthermore the Athanasian Creed which hands down the faith accepted in the Christian world states,

As body and soul is one man (homo), so Divine and Human in the Lord is one Christ 1 .

Anyone therefore who knows about the union of soul and body in the body, and about the image of the soul in the body, can have some conception of the union of the Divine and Human within the Lord, and of the image of the one in the other. And from this he would recognize that the Divine, called the Father, and the Human, called the Son, were one, also that each was in the other, that is, the Father was in Him and He in the Father, according to the Lord's words in John 10:30; 14:10-11. But since there is no awareness at the present day of what the soul is, and scarcely any awareness that it is derived from the father, that the body is an image of it, and that the two are one, as prior and posterior are, or as being and manifestation of that being are, mankind has separated the Divine from the Human within the Lord, dividing them into two natures. As a consequence of this no other idea has been formed of the Lord's Humanity than of its being like anyone else's humanity. But in fact anyone else's soul from his father is finite and has evil within it owing to heredity, whereas the Lord's soul, being derived from Jehovah, was infinite and was nothing other than the Divine Good of Divine Love; and therefore His Human after glorification was not like anyone else's.

[4] For the same reason the Lord took up into heaven His entire Humanity that had been glorified, that is, had been made Divine by Him; He left nothing of it in the tomb, which is different from what happens with anyone else. The fact that the Lord glorified His actual body right down to the last and lowest constituents of it, which are its bones and flesh, the Lord also made plain to the disciples, saying,

See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see Me having. Luke 24:39.

And yet He came in through closed doors, and after He had revealed Himself became invisible, John 20:19; Luke 24:31.

These things have been stated in order that people may know that the Lord alone in respect of His Human was Jehovah's Anointed. He was not anointed with oil however but with the Divine Good of Divine Love, which 'oil' is the sign of and which 'anointing' represented, see 9954.

Фусноте:

1. Swedenborg does not use the exact words of the traditional version of the Athanasian Creed.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.