8152. En hij jaagde na achter de zonen Israëls; dat dit betekent het streven om degenen te onderwerpen die in het met de naastenliefde verbonden geloof zijn, staat vast uit de betekenis van najagen, namelijk het streven om te onderwerpen, nr. 8136; en uit de uitbeelding van de zonen Israëls, namelijk zij die van de geestelijke Kerk zijn, waarover eerder; dus degenen die in het met de naastenliefde verbonden geloof zijn, want zij die van de Kerk zijn, zijn in dat geloof zowel ten aanzien van de leer als ten aanzien van het leven, het goede van het geloof of de naastenliefde is het wezenlijke, dus op de eerste plaats voor degenen die van de echte geestelijke Kerk zijn maar voor hen die het geloof hebben dat gescheiden is van zijn goede, zowel ten aanzien van de leer als ten aanzien van het leven, is het ware van het geloof of het geloof het wezenlijke of op de eerste plaats; deze mensen zijn niet van de Kerk, want het leven maakt de Kerk, maar niet de leer, tenzij voor zoveel als deze van het leven wordt.

Daaruit blijkt dat de Kerk van de Heer niet hier is of daar, maar dat zij overal is, zowel binnen die rijken waar de Kerk is, als buiten die, waar men leeft volgens de geboden van de naastenliefde.

Vandaar komt het, dat de Kerk van de Heer verspreid is over het gehele wereldrond en dat zij toch één is; wanneer immers het leven de Kerk maakt en niet de van het leven gescheiden leer, dan is de Kerk één, maar wanneer de leer de Kerk maakt, dan zijn het er verscheidene.

8208. 'And the Egyptians pursued' means the attempt by falsity arising from evil to do violence. This is clear from the meaning of 'pursuing', when done by the Egyptians, as the attempt to bring under their control, dealt with in 8136, 8152, 8154, thus to do violence; and from the representation of 'the Egyptians' as those steeped in falsities arising from evil, dealt with in 8132, 8135, 8146, 8148, and so also as falsities arising from evil.

3833. 'And so it was in the evening' means when the state was still obscure. This is clear from the meaning of 'the evening' as an obscure state, dealt with in 3056. Furthermore feasts held in the evening, that is, suppers, meant nothing else among the ancients who had appropriate religious observances than the introductory state which comes before an actual joining together, which is obscure compared with that state when the joining together has taken place. Indeed when a person is being introduced into truth and from this into good, everything he learns at that time is obscure. But once good is joined to him and he regards truth from the standpoint of good, everything he learns becomes clear to him, gradually and increasingly so. For he is now no longer in doubt about whether something exists or whether it is true but knows that it exists and is true.

[2] Once a person has reached this state he starts to know countless things, for he now proceeds from the good and truth which he believes and perceives. He proceeds so to speak from the central point out to the peripheral regions; and in the measure that he proceeds from such good and truth, he sees in the same measure the things round about, and gradually more and more widely since he is constantly pushing out and extending the boundaries. Thereafter he also begins from each subject situated in the space within those boundaries, and from those subjects as new centres he pushes out new peripheral regions; and so on in the spaces within these. Consequently the light of truth radiating from good increases enormously and becomes one expanse of light, for he is now bathed in the light of heaven which shines from the Lord. But to people who are prone to doubt and who question whether something exists and is true, those countless, indeed limitless things are not visible at all. To them every single one is totally obscure. Those things are scarcely seen by them as a single whole which definitely exists, only as a single whole whose very existence they are uncertain of. Such is the condition into which human wisdom and intelligence has fallen at the present day. Being able to reason cleverly whether something exists is now the mark of a wise man, and being able to reason that it does not exist is the mark of one wiser still.

[3] Take for example the question whether in the Word an internal sense exists which such people call the mystical sense. Until they believe in the existence of it they cannot know a single one of the countless things existing within that sense, so many that they fill the whole of heaven in unending variety. Take as another example one who reasons about whether Divine Providence is merely universal and does not extend to specific details. That person cannot know the countless arcana which have to do with Providence, as many in number as the occurrences in everyone's life from start to finish and in the world from its creation to its end, and even for ever. Take as yet another example one who reasons whether good can exist in anyone, seeing that the will of man is fundamentally depraved. He cannot possibly be aware of all the arcana that have to do with regeneration, nor even that a new will is implanted by the Lord and the arcana concerning this. And the same is so with everything else. From this one may recognize what obscurity surrounds such people and that they do not even see, let alone reach, the outskirts of wisdom.