De Bijbel

 

创世记 39

Studie

   

1 约瑟被带埃及去。有一个埃及人,是法老的内臣─护卫长波提乏,从那些带他来的以实玛利人买了他去。

2 约瑟住在他埃及的家中,耶和华与他同在,他就百事顺利。

3 人见耶和华与他同在,又见耶和华使他里所办的尽都顺利,

4 约瑟就在主人眼前蒙恩,伺候他主人,并且主人派他管理家务,把一切所有的都交在他里。

5 自从人派约瑟管理家务和他一切所有的,耶和华就因约瑟的缘故赐福与那埃及人的家;凡家里和田间一切所有的都蒙耶和华赐福。

6 波提乏将一切所有的都交在约瑟的中,除了自己所的饭,别的事一概不知。约瑟原来秀雅俊美。

7 这事以,约瑟人的妻以目送情给约瑟,:你与我同寝罢!

8 约瑟不从,对他人的妻:看哪,一切家务,我人都不知道;他把所有的都交在我里。

9 在这家里没有比我的;并且他没有留下一样不交给我,只留下了你,因为你是他的妻子。我怎能作这恶,得罪呢?

10 後来他和约瑟,约瑟却不从他,不与他同寝,也不和他在一处。

11 一天,约瑟进里去办事,家中没有一个在那里,

12 妇人就拉住他的衣裳,:你与我同寝罢!约瑟把衣裳丢在妇人里,跑到外边去了。

13 妇人见约瑟把衣裳丢在他里跑出去了,

14 了家里的,对他们:你们!他带了一个希伯进入我们家里,要戏弄我们。他到我这里,要与我同寝,我就声喊

15 见我放声喊起来,就把衣裳丢在我这里,跑到外边去了。

16 妇人把约瑟的衣裳放在自己那里,等着他人回家,

17 就对他如此如此:你所带到我们这里的那希伯仆人要戏弄我,

18 我放声喊起来,他就把衣裳丢在我这里,跑出去了。

19 约瑟的见他妻子对他所:你的仆人如此如此待我,他就生气,

20 把约瑟下在监里,就是王的囚犯被囚的地方。於是约瑟在那里坐监。

21 耶和华与约瑟同在,向他施恩,使他在司狱的眼前蒙恩。

22 司狱就把监里所有的囚犯都交在约瑟下;他们在那里所办的事都是经他的

23 凡在约瑟的事,司狱一概不察,因为耶和华与约瑟同在;耶和华使他所做的尽都顺利。

   

Van Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #4992

Bestudeer deze passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4992. Behold, my lord knoweth not what is with me in the house. That this signifies that natural good did not desire even appropriation, is evident from the signification of his “lord,” as being natural good (see n. 4973); and from the signification of “not knowing what is with me in the house,” as being not to desire appropriation. That this is the meaning cannot be seen except from the series of things in the internal sense; for a third state is now treated of, in which the celestial of the spiritual was in the natural: in this state the good and truth natural which is spiritual, is separate from the good and truth natural which is not spiritual; and consequently by “not knowing what is in the house” is signified that there is no desire for appropriation. But these things, being arcana, cannot be made clear except by examples. Let the following example therefore serve for illustration. To be conjoined with one’s wife from lust alone, this is natural not spiritual; but to be conjoined with one’s wife from conjugial love, this is spiritual natural; and when the husband is afterward conjoined from lust alone, he believes that he transgresses, as one who does what is lascivious, and therefore he no longer desires that this should be appropriated to him. Let this also serve as an example. To benefit a friend, no matter what his quality, provided he is a friend is natural not spiritual; but to benefit a friend for the sake of the good that is in him, and still more to hold good itself as the friend which is to be benefited, this is spiritual natural; and when anyone is in this, he knows that he transgresses if he benefits a friend who is evil, for then through him he injures others. When he is in this state, he holds in aversion the appropriation of good natural not spiritual, in which good he was before. And so it is with everything else.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Van Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #3387

Bestudeer deze passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3387. Because he feared to say, She is my woman; lest the men of the place should kill me for Rebekah. That this signifies that He could not open Divine truths themselves, because thus Divine good would not be received, is evident from the signification of “fearing to say,” as being not to be able to open; from the signification of “woman,” who here is Rebekah, as being the Lord’s Divine rational as to Divine truth (n. 3012, 3013, 3077); from the signification of “slaying me,” as being that good is not received, for by Isaac, who here is “me,” is represented the Divine good of the Lord’s rational (n. 3012, 3194, 3210), for good is said to be slain, or to perish, when it is not received, because with him who does not receive it, it is nullified; and from the signification of the “men of the place,” as being those who are in the doctrinal things of faith (n. 3385). From all this it now appears what is the internal sense of these words, namely, that if Divine truths themselves were to be opened, they would not be received by those who are in the doctrinal things of faith, because they surpass all their rational apprehension, thus all their belief, and consequently nothing of good from the Lord could flow in. For good from the Lord, or Divine good, can inflow solely into truths, because truths are the vessels of good, as often shown.

[2] Truths or appearances of truth are given man to the intent that Divine good may be able to form his understanding, and thus the man himself. For truths exist to the end that good may flow in; for without vessels or receptacles good finds no place, because it finds no state corresponding to itself; and therefore where there are no truths, or where they are not received, there is no rational or human good, consequently the man has no spiritual life. In order therefore that man may nevertheless have truths, and thereby have spiritual life, appearances of truth are given to everyone according to his apprehension; which appearances are acknowledged as truths, because they are such that Divine things can be in them.

[3] In order that it may be known what appearances are, and that they are such things as serve man instead of truths Divine, let us take examples for illustration. If it should be said that in heaven there is no idea of place, thus none of distance, but that instead of these there are ideas of state, this could not possibly be apprehended by man, for this would cause him to believe that there nothing is distinct, but that everything is confused, that is, all in one, or together; when yet all things there are so distinct that nothing can be more so. (That the places, distances, and spaces, which exist in nature, are in heaven states, may be seen above, n. 3356.) Hence it is manifest that whatever is said in the Word concerning places and spaces, and from them and by means of them, is an appearance of truth; and unless it were said by means of such appearances, it would not be received at all, consequently would be scarcely anything; for so long as he is in the world, that is, in space and time, the idea of space and of time is within almost everything of man’s thought, both in general and in particular.

[4] That the language of the Word is according to appearances of space appears from almost everything in it; as in Matthew:

Jesus asked them saying, How then doth David say, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand till I make Thine enemies Thy foot stool (Matthew 22:43-44)

where to “sit on the right hand” comes from the idea of place, thus according to appearance, when nevertheless what is here described is the state of the Lord’s Divine power. Again:

Jesus said, Henceforth ye shall see the Son of man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming upon the clouds of heaven (Matthew 26:64);

here in like manner “sitting on the right hand,” and also “coming upon the clouds,” are derived from the idea of place with men; but with angels the idea is of the Lord’s power.

In Mark:

The sons of Zebedee said to Jesus, Grant unto us that we may sit, one on Thy right hand, and the other on Thy left hand, in Thy glory. Jesus answered, To sit on My right hand, and on My left, is not Mine to give, except to those for whom it hath been prepared (Mark. 10:37, 40).

From this it is manifest what sort of an idea the disciples had concerning the Lord’s kingdom, namely, that it was to sit on His right hand and on His left; and because they had such an idea, the Lord also answered them according to their apprehension, thus according to what appeared to them.

[5] In David:

He is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run his course. His going forth is from the end of the heavens and His circuit unto the ends of it (Psalms 19:5-6);

speaking of the Lord, whose state of Divine power is here described by such things as are of space.

In Isaiah:

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the dawning! Thou saidst in thine heart, I will ascend into the heavens, I will exalt my throne above the stars of heaven; 1 I will ascend above the heights of the cloud (Isaiah 14:12-14); where “falling from heaven,” “ascending into the heavens,” “exalting the throne above the stars of heaven,” “ascending above the heights of the cloud,” all of which are expressions descriptive of the love of self profaning holy things, are all derived from the idea and appearance of space or place. Inasmuch as celestial and spiritual things are presented before man by means of such things as appear to men, and in accordance with such things, therefore heaven is also described as being on high, when yet it is not on high, but is in what is internal (n. 450, 1380, 2148).

Voetnoten:

1. The Hebrew is “stars of God;” and so Swedenborg renders the expression in n. 257, 3708, 5313, 7375, 8678, and other places. The present reading therefore may be a slip of the pen, yet it is found also in Apocalypse Explained 1029, and 1108.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.