Lidé mají společnou tendenci činit negativní úsudky o jiných lidech. Na středních školách se tato tendence projevuje v klikách. Několik populárních dětí se dostane do skupiny a postupně si začnou myslet, že jsou lepší než ostatní, protože se jim více líbí. Děti, které nejsou „v“, se mohou stát předměty lítosti, pohrdání nebo dokonce krutých vtipů. Tak či onak klika předává důvtipný úsudek ostatním jako nižší třídě lidských bytostí.

Stejná tendence dívat se dolů na ostatní se projevuje v různých náboženstvích. Některé náboženské skupiny jsou tak soustředěny na sebe, že věří, že nikdo z jiné víry nemůže jít do nebe. Když to vezmeme do extrému, je tento druh přístupu krutější než snobské dospívající kliky.

Učení Bible je v rozporu s tím. Nejprve nám Boží slovo říká, že bychom neměli označovat lidi jako „spasené“ nebo „hříšníky“. Ježíš řekl:

„Nesuďte, abyste nebyli odsouzeni. Proč se díváte na skvrnu v oku svého bratra, ale nepovažujete prkno za své oko?“ (Matouš 7:1, 3)

Učeník James to řekl takto: „Existuje jeden zákonodárce, který je schopen zachránit a zničit. Kdo jste, abyste soudili jiného?“ (List Jakubův 4:1)

Když byl Pán na zemi, mezi vedoucími církve převládal soudný postoj. Mnozí si mysleli, že když přišel Mesiáš, zachránil Židy a ne ostatní. Když Ježíš přišel, odsoudili ho za to, že se spojil s nežidy a Židy.

Ježíš tento přístup odradil. Jednou mluvil s některými lidmi, kteří „důvěřovali sobě“, že byli spaseni a jiní ne. Požádal je, aby zvážili dvě modlitby: „Bože, děkuji ti, že nejsem jako ostatní lidé,“ a „Bože, buď milostivý, hříšník!“ Ježíš chválil muže, který si myslel, že je hříšník. (Lukáš 18:9-14)

Je lepší myslet na sebe jako na hříšníka, než na to, že jste spaseni.

Možná si vzpomenete na podobenství o dobrém Samaritánovi, který se zastavil, aby pomohl zraněnému u silnice. Přestože byl tento Samaritán „špatnou“ vírou (z židovského hlediska), Ježíš řekl, že Samaritán by měl být milován jako soused, protože byl dobrý člověk. Ve skutečnosti řekl, že člověk, který chce věčný život, by měl být jako tento Samaritán (Lukáš 10:29-37), i když Samaritán nebyl ani křesťan, ani židovský. Ježíš viděl - a vidí - to, co je v srdci člověka, nejen to, do jaké církve patří.

Bible jasně uvádí, že to, jak člověk žije, ne jen to, v co věří, určuje, zda jde do nebe nebo ne. Ježíš řekl: „Ne každý, kdo mi říká:‚ Pane, Pane ', nevstoupí do nebeského království, ale ten, kdo činí vůli mého Otce v nebi. “ (Matouš 7:21)

Znovu: „Odmění každého podle svých skutků.“ (Matouš 16:27)

„Ti, kteří udělali dobro,“ říká, „půjdou„ ke vzkříšení života a ti, kteří udělali zlo, ke vzkříšení odsouzení “. (Jan 5:29)

Protože život člověka, nejen jeho víra, určuje jeho věčné množství, Ježíš předpověděl, že mnoho křesťanů nebude spaseno, protože žili zlým životem.

„Mnozí mi v ten den řeknou:‚ Pane, Pane, ne prorokovali jsme ve tvém jménu, vyháněli ve tvém jménu démony a ve tvém jménu jsme udělali mnoho zázraků? ' A pak jim prohlásím: ‚Nikdy jsem tě neznal: odejdi ode mě ty, kdo praktikuje bezpráví! '“ (Matouš 27:22-23, Lukáš 13:25-27)

Jedním z důvodů, proč lze nekřesťana zachránit, je to, že může milovat svého souseda. Každý, kdo skutečně miluje svého souseda, miluje také Krista, i když si to nemusí uvědomit. Ježíš řekl: „Protože jsi sloužil jednomu z těchto mých bratří, udělal jsi mi to.“ (Matouš 25:40)

Víra v Ježíše, bez lásky k sousedovi nemá smysl.

"I když mám veškerou víru, abych mohl odstranit hory, ale nemilovat, nejsem nic." (1. list Korintským 13:2)

Skutečná láska je naproti tomu znamením, že člověk zná Pána ve svém srdci, bez ohledu na náboženství, které vyznává navenek.

"Láska věří všem věcem." (1. list Korintským 13:7)

"Ten, kdo činí dobro, je od Boha, ale ten, kdo činí zlo, Boha neviděl." (3. list Janův 1:11)

„Milujme se navzájem, protože láska je z Boha a každý, kdo miluje, se narodil z Boha a zná Boha. Bůh je láska a každý, kdo zůstává v lásce, zůstává v Bohu a Bůh v něm.“ (1. list Janův 4:7-11)

Souhrn:

Některé křesťanské církve to učí: Pouze křesťané jsou spaseni.

Co Bible skutečně říká (a co učí Nová křesťanská církev): Dobří lidé ze všech náboženství jsou spaseni.

Některé odkazy z učení Nové křesťanské církve: Nebe a Peklo 318-328, Božská Prozřetelnost 326

Používá se svolením Johna Odhnera, autora tohoto velmi užitečného webu: http://whatthebiblesays.info/Introduction.html

2417. 'Do not look back behind you' means that he was not to look to matters of doctrine. This is clear from the meaning of 'looking back behind him' when the city was behind him and the mountain in front of him; for 'a city' means doctrinal teaching, 402, 2268, 2451, while 'a mountain' means love and charity, 795, 1430. That this is the meaning will be evident in the explanation at verse 26, where it is said that his wife looked back behind him and she became a pillar of salt. Anyone may recognize that these words - 'looking back behind him' - have some Divine arcanum within them and that this lies too far down to be visible. For looking back behind him seems to involve nothing reprehensible at all, and yet it is of such great importance that it is said that he was to escape for his life, that is, he was to be concerned about his life to eternity by not looking back behind him. What is meant by looking to matters of doctrine however will be seen in what follows.

[2] Here let it be merely stated what doctrinal teaching is. Such teaching is twofold: one kind has to do with love and charity, the other with faith. Each of the Lord's Churches at the outset, while still very young and virginal, neither possesses nor desires any other doctrinal teaching than that which has to do with charity, for this has to do with life. In course of time however a Church turns away from this kind of teaching until it starts to despise it and at length to reject it, at which point it acknowledges no other kind of teaching than that called the doctrine of faith. And when it separates faith from charity such doctrinal teaching colludes with a life of evil.

[3] This was so with the Primitive or gentile Church after the Lord's Coming. At the outset it possessed no other doctrinal teaching than that which had to do with love and charity, for such is what the Lord Himself taught, see 2371 (end). But after His time, as love and charity started to grow cold, doctrinal teaching regarding faith gradually crept in, and with it disagreements and heresies which increased as men leant more and more towards that kind of teaching.

[4] Something similar had happened to the Ancient Church which came after the Flood and which was spread throughout so many kingdoms, 2385. This Church at the outset knew no other teaching than that which had to do with charity, for that teaching looked towards and permeated life; and so they were concerned about their eternal welfare. After a time however some people started to foster doctrinal teaching about faith which they at length separated from charity. Members of this Church called such people 'Ham' however because they led a life of evil, see 1062, 1063, 1076.

[5] The Most Ancient Church which existed before the Flood and which was pre-eminently called Man enjoyed the perception itself of love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour, and so had teaching about love and charity inscribed within them. But there also existed at that time those who fostered faith, and when these at length separated it from charity they were called Cain, for Cain means such faith, and Abel whom he killed means charity; see the explanation to Genesis 4.

[6] From this it becomes clear that doctrinal teaching is twofold, one kind having to do with charity, the other with faith, although in themselves the two are one, for teaching to do with charity includes everything to do with faith. But when doctrinal teaching comes to be drawn solely from things to do with faith, such teaching is said to be twofold because faith is separated from charity. Their separation at the present day becomes clear from the consideration that what charity is, and what the neighbour, is utterly unknown. People whose teaching is solely about faith know of charity towards the neighbour as nothing other than giving what is their own to others and taking pity on everyone, for they call everyone their neighbour indiscriminately, when in fact charity consists in all the good residing with the individual - in his affection, and in his ardent zeal, and consequently in his life - while the neighbour consists in all the good residing with people which affects the individual. Consequently the neighbour consists in people with whom good resides - and quite distinctly and separately from one person to the next.

[7] For example, charity and mercy are present with him who exercises righteousness and judgement by punishing the evil and rewarding the good. Charity resides within the punishment of the evil, for he who imposes the punishment is moved by a strong desire to correct the one who is punished and at the same time to protect others from the evil he may do to them. For when he imposes it he is concerned about and desires the good of him who does evil or is an enemy, as well as being concerned about and desiring the good of others and of the state, which concern and desire spring from charity towards the neighbour. The same holds true with every other kind of good of life, for such good cannot possibly exist if it does not spring from charity towards the neighbour, since this is what charity looks to and embodies within itself.

[8] There being so much obscurity, as has been stated, as to what charity is and what the neighbour, it is plain that after doctrinal teaching to do with faith has seized the chief position, teaching to do with charity is then one of those things that have been lost. Yet it was the latter teaching alone that was fostered in the Ancient Church. They went so far as to categorize all kinds of good that flow from charity towards the neighbour, that is, to categorize all in whom good was present. In doing so they made many distinctions to which they gave names, calling them the poor, the wretched, the oppressed, the sick, the naked, the hungry, the thirsty, the prisoners or those in prison, the. sojourners, the orphans, and the widows. Some they also called the lame, the blind, the deaf, the dumb, and the maimed, and many other names besides these. It was in accordance with this kind of teaching that the Lord spoke in the Old Testament Word, and it explains why such expressions occur so frequently there; and it was in accordance with the same that the Lord Himself spoke, as in Matthew 25:35-36, 38-40, 42-45; Luke 14:13, 21; and many times elsewhere. This is why those names have quite a different meaning in the internal sense. So that doctrinal teaching regarding charity may be restored therefore, some discussion will in the Lord's Divine mercy appear further on as to who such people are, and what charity is, and what the neighbour, generally and specifically.