Le texte de la Bible

 

Luke 24:13-35 : The Road to Emmaus

Étudier

13 And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs.

14 And they talked together of all these things which had happened.

15 And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.

16 But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.

17 And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad?

18 And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass therein these days?

19 And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people:

20 And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him.

21 But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.

22 Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre;

23 And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive.

24 And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not.

25 Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

26 Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.

28 And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further.

29 But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them.

30 And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them.

31 And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.

32 And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?

33 And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them,

34 Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon.

35 And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.

Commentaire

 

On the Road to Emmaus

Par Joe David

Lelio Orsi's painting, Camino de Emaús, is in the National Gallery in London, England.

Each of the four gospels contains a story about Jesus appearing to His disciples after the Sunday morning when they had found the sepulcher empty. For example, see Matthew 28:16-20; Mark 16:14-19; Luke 24:13-33; John 20:19-31, and John 21.

In Luke, there’s a story of two disciples walking from Jerusalem to the village of Emmaus, a walk of about seven miles. Shortly after they leave the city they are approached by another traveler who has noticed their troubled faces and serious talk and asks them what is troubling them. Walking along together, they ask the stranger, “Haven’t you heard of the troubles in Jerusalem, how the prophet from Galilee, who we hoped would be the one to save Israel, was given up to be crucified? And strange to say, when some of the women went on the third day to anoint His body, they saw angels who told them that he was not there but was risen from the dead.”

On hearing this, the traveler chides them for not believing, and says “Don’t you see that Christ had to suffer these things and to enter into his glory?” The stranger then tells the two disciples many things concerning Jesus, from the books of Moses, and the prophets, in the Old Testament. The two disciples listen with awe, but do not recognize the stranger. At length they arrive at Emmaus. The stranger appears to want to go on when the two stop, but they beg him to stop also, because it’s getting late in the day, and they want to hear more. So they all sit down to share the evening meal, and when the stranger takes up the loaf of bread and breaks it and gives them pieces, their eyes are opened and they recognize Him, and He vanishes.

One can imagine the stunned awe that came over them both as they realized that this was Jesus. They knew He was crucified, and yet He had walked and talked to them for several hours. The women were right! The angels were right! He was alive!

The New Church believes that there are internal meanings to all the stories in the Word of the Lord, the sacred scriptures, and that this internal meaning, within the literal stories about Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, Joshua, Samuel, David, and the rest, and all the sayings of the prophets from Isaiah to Malachi, and the four gospels… this meaning is what makes the Word holy.

So what can we see here in this story? Well, that internal meaning in “Moses and the prophets” is the story of Jesus’ life in the world, from His birth in Bethlehem through all His growing years until His “death” and then His rising. Because Jesus knew that, and had certainly read the Scriptures and understood them internally, He knew for a long time how His earthly life was going to close, and that it was necessary for it to close as had been “written”, in order to save the human race. So He told the two disciples that story as they walked toward Emmaus.

More about that walk... In the Word, any mention of walking is really referring to how we live our lives from day to day. In many stories of the Word, it is said that someone walked with God. It is said that we should walk in His ways and that we should walk the straight and narrow path.

Also in this story we are told that this was a journey of sixty stadia (in the original Greek). Sixty (or other multiples of "six") represents the lifelong work of rejecting the temptations that come from our inborn selfishness. Apocalypse Explained 648. So, this journey to Emmaus means our life’s journey - as a person that is trying to follow the Lord’s teachings and become an angel.

The destination was Emmaus. In the Word any city represents a doctrine, an organized set of truths that we have put in order so that we can live according to them -- our rules of life. See Arcana Coelestia 402. They are not necessarily good, as with Jerusalem or Bethlehem, but can also be evil doctrines, e.g. Sodom or Babylon. My dictionary tells me that the name Emmaus means “hot springs”. Another universal meaning in the Word is that water means truth in its beneficial uses, but can also mean truth twisted into falsity by those in hell, in an opposite sense. See, for example, Arcana Coelestia 790. Think of the wells that Abraham dug, or the waters that Jesus promised to the woman of Samaria as they talked by Jacob’s well, or the pure river of water flowing out from under the throne in the New Jerusalem in the book of Revelation. In its converse sense, where water is destructive, think of the flood that destroyed all but Noah and his family, or the Red Sea that had to be parted so that the children of Israel could cross. The springs represented by Emmaus were holy truths bubbling up from the Word for us to use. And these are hot springs, and heat means love. So that's our destination, where truth and love together are flowing out for us to use, in a continual stream from the Lord.

This plain little anecdote about the disciples meeting the Lord on the road to Emmaus isn't just a story about Jesus's resurrection with a spiritual body. It is also a story of how we should be living our lives. We can be traveling toward heaven, listening to the Lord, walking in the way with him, and at the end He will break bread and have supper with us.

Des oeuvres de Swedenborg

 

The New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Teachings #37

Étudier ce passage

  
/ 325  
  

37. Each one of us has an inner level and an outer level, but they are not the same for good people as they are for evil ones. For good people, their inner level is in heaven and in its light, while their outer level is in the world and in its light. Further, for good people this latter light is brightened by heaven's light, so their inner and outer levels act in unison like an efficient cause 1 and its effect, or like what is prior and what is subsequent. For evil people, though, their inner level is in this world and its light, and the same holds true for their outer level as well. This means that they cannot see anything in heaven's light, only in this world's light, which they call " the light of nature. " 2 That is why heavenly matters are in darkness for them and worldly matters are in the light.

We can see from this that good people have an inner self and an outer self, while [in effect] evil people have no inner self, only an outer one. 3

Notes de bas de page:

1. The term "efficient cause" (Latin causa efficiens) here represents one of the four main categories of cause introduced by the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 B. C. E.) and adopted by Scholastic philosophers; see Physics 193b21-195b30 (= Aristotle 1984, 330-334). Aristotle's "efficient cause" generally corresponds to what people today think of simply as "cause. " Specifically, the efficient cause of an effect is the force or agent that brings the effect about, as when a fire (the effect) is started by a lit match (the efficient cause). The other three main Aristotelian causes correspond to what are now generally considered purposes or conditions; they are material cause, formal cause, and final cause. [JSR, RS]

2. The idea of an informative "light" that is associated with nature or the material world has been a commonplace in Western theology and philosophy for millennia. One prominent example is attested in the writings of Augustine (354-430); see his On Two Souls: Against the Manichaeans (written in 391), chapters 2-5, a passage that is in fact cited by Swedenborg in this connection in Quotations on Various Philosophical and Theological Topics (= Swedenborg 1976b), 26. Though the specific term the light of nature itself has been put to various uses over the centuries, it is often contrasted to knowledge that stems from religious faith. In the current passage it refers metaphorically to human reason unassisted by the Divine (compare the phrase "light of reason" in True Christianity 473). In short, it is the very sort of "light" that many thinkers of Swedenborg's day considered to be indicated by the term Enlightenment. This is the meaning in which the term was utilized in such philosophical and theological works as Novum Organum (1620; see book 1, aphorism 42 there), by Francis Bacon (1561-1626); An Elegant and Learned Discourse of the Light of Nature (1652), by the Cambridge Platonist Nathaniel Culverwell (1619-1651); and The Light of Nature Pursued (1768-1778), by the English utilitarian Abraham Tucker (1705-1774). Generally Swedenborg expresses this idea with the term "this world's light"; for examples of this use and further references to the symbolism of light in Swedenborg's theology, see New Jerusalem 48[3], 49. For examples of Swedenborg's use of the contrasting term "heaven's light," or "the light of heaven," in specific, see the notes in New Jerusalem 24[4] and Last Judgment 38:2. For an overview of the process of being raised from one form of light to a higher form, see Secrets of Heaven 6310-6313, 6315. [SS]

3. The statement that "evil people have no inner self" must be read functionally rather than literally. As pointed out in New Jerusalem 43-44, in evil people the inner self is closed off and therefore undeveloped and largely nonfunctional rather than being literally nonexistent. For further references on this subject, see New Jerusalem 47[11-15]. See also note 1 in New Jerusalem 33, on will and understanding in good and evil people. [LSW]

  
/ 325  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for their permission to use this translation.