Le texte de la Bible

 

創世記 25

Étudier

   

1 アブラハムは再びをめとった。名をケトラという。

2 彼女はジムラン、ヨクシャン、メダン、ミデアン、イシバクおよびシュワを産んだ。

3 ヨクシャンのはシバとデダンデダン孫はアシュリびと、レトシびと、レウミびとである。

4 ミデアンの孫はエパ、エペル、ヘノク、アビダ、エルダアであって、これらは皆ケトラ孫であった。

5 アブラハムはその所有をことごとくイサクに与えた。

6 またそのそばめたちのらにもアブラハムは物を与え、なお生きている間に彼らをそのイサクから離して、東の方、東のに移らせた。

7 アブラハムの生きながらえた年は十五年である。

8 アブラハムは高齢に達し、老人となり、年が満ちて息絶え、死んでその民に加えられた。

9 そのイサクとイシマエルは彼をヘテびとゾハルのエフロンにあるマクペラのほら穴に葬った。これはマムレの向かいにあり、

10 アブラハムがヘテの人々から、買い取ったであって、そこにアブラハムとそのサラが葬られた。

11 アブラハムが死んだはそのイサクを祝福された。イサクはベエル・ラハイ・ロイのほとりに住んだ。

12 サラのつかえめエジプトびとハガルアブラハムに産んだアブラハムのイシマエルの系図は次のとおりである。

13 イシマエルのらの名を世代にしたがって、その名をいえば次のとおりである。すなわちイシマエルの長はネバヨテ、次はケダル、アデビエル、ミブサム

14 ミシマ、ドマ、マッサ

15 ハダデ、テマ、エトル、ネフシ、ケデマ

16 これはイシマエルの子らであり、と宿営とによる名であって、その氏族による十二人の君たちである。

17 イシマエルのよわいは三十七年である。彼は息絶えて死に、その民に加えられた。

18 イシマエルの子らはハビラからエジプトの東、シュルまでの間に住んで、アシュルに及んだ。イシマエルはすべての兄弟の東に住んだ。

19 アブラハムのイサクの系図は次のとおりである。アブラハムのはイサクであって、

20 イサクは四十歳の時、パダンアラムアラムびとベトエルの娘で、アラムびとラバンのリベカにめとった。

21 イサクはが子を産まなかったので、妻のためにに祈り願った。はその願いを聞かれ、リベカはみごもった。

22 ところがそのらが胎内で押し合ったので、リベカは言った、「こんなことでは、わたしはどうなるでしょう」。彼女は行ってに尋ねた。

23 は彼女に言われた、「つの民があなたの胎内にあり、つの民があなたのから別れて出る。一つの民は他の民よりも強く、兄は弟に仕えるであろう」。

24 彼女の出産のがきたとき、胎内にはふたごがあった。

25 さきに出たのは赤くて全身ごろものようであった。それで名をエサウと名づけた。

26 そのに弟が出た。そのエサウかかとをつかんでいた。それで名をヤコブと名づけた。リベカが彼らを産んだ時、イサクは六十歳であった。

27 さてその子らは成長し、エサウ巧みな狩猟者となり、野の人となったが、ヤコブは穏やかな人で、天幕に住んでいた

28 イサクは、しかの肉が好きだったので、エサウしたが、リベカはヤコブをした。

29 ある日ヤコブが、あつものを煮ていた時、エサウは飢え疲れて野から帰ってきた。

30 エサウはヤコブに言った、「わたしは飢え疲れた。お願いだ。赤いもの、その赤いものをわたしに食べさせてくれ」。彼が名をエドム呼ばれたのはこのためである。

31 ヤコブは言った、「まずあなたの長子の特権をわたしに売りなさい」。

32 エサウは言った、「わたしは死にそうだ。長子の特権などわたしに何になろう」。

33 ヤコブはまた言った、「まずわたしに誓いなさい」。彼は誓って長子の特権をヤコブに売った

34 そこでヤコブはパンレンズ豆のあつものとをエサウに与えたので、彼は飲み食いして、立ち去った。このようにしてエサウは長子の特権を軽んじた。

   

Des oeuvres de Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #3235

Étudier ce passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3235. And Abraham added, and took a woman. That this signifies another state of the Lord, whom Abraham represents, and that Abraham and Sarah represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial, and Abraham and Keturah as to the Divine spiritual, is evident from the things hitherto said and shown concerning Abraham and Sarah his wife, and from those here related concerning Abraham and Keturah. But as it is said that Abraham here represents another state of the Lord, and that Abraham and Sarah represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial, but Abraham and Keturah the Lord as to the Divine spiritual, it should be known what the Divine celestial is, and what the Divine spiritual.

[2] The Divine celestial and the Divine spiritual are such in respect to those who receive the Divine of the Lord, for the Lord appears to everyone according to the nature of him who receives, as may be seen from what has been said above (n. 1838, 1861), and is clearly manifest from the fact that the Lord appears in one way to the celestial, but in another to the spiritual; for to the celestial He appears as a sun, but to the spiritual as a moon (n. 1529-1531, 1838). The Lord appears to the celestial as a sun, because they are in celestial love, that is, in love to the Lord; but to the spiritual as a moon, because they are in spiritual love, that is, in charity toward the neighbor. The difference is like that between the light of the sun in the daytime and the light of the moon by night; it is also like the difference between the heat of the one and the heat of the other, from which springs vegetation. This is what is meant in the first chapter of Genesis by the words:

And God made two great lights, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night (Genesis 1:16).

[3] Speaking generally, the Lord’s kingdom is both celestial and spiritual; that is, it consists of those who are celestial, and of those who are spiritual. And it is because the Divine of the Lord appears to the celestial as celestial, and to the spiritual as spiritual, that it is here said that Abraham and Sarah represented the Lord as to the Divine celestial, and that Abraham and Keturah represented Him as to the Divine spiritual. But as scarcely any know what the celestial is and what the spiritual, or who the celestial and the spiritual are, see what has already been said and shown concerning them, namely: What the celestial is, and what the spiritual (n. 1155, 1577, 1824, 2048, 2184, 2227, 2507): Who are celestial and who are spiritual (n. 2088, 2669, 2708, 2715): That the celestial man is a likeness of the Lord and does good from love, and the spiritual man is an image of the Lord and does good from faith (n. 50-52, 1013): That the celestial perceive truth from good, and that they never reason concerning truth (n. 202, 337, 607, 895, 1121, 2715): That in the celestial man good is implanted in his will part, but in the spiritual man it is implanted in his intellectual part, and that in this part a new will is created in those who are spiritual (n. 863, 875, 895, 897, 927, 1023, 1043, 1044, 2256): That the celestial from good itself see indefinite things, but that the spiritual, because they reason whether a thing is so, cannot attain to the first boundary of the light of the celestial (n. 2718): That the spiritual are in relative obscurity (n. 1043, 2708, 2715): That the Lord came into the world in order to save the spiritual (n. 2661, 2716, 2833, 2834).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Des oeuvres de Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #920

Étudier ce passage

  
/ 10837  
  

920. In this verse there is described the worship of the Ancient Church in general, and this by the “altar” and the “burnt-offering” which were the principal things in all representative worship. In the first place, however, we will describe the worship that existed in the Most Ancient Church, and from that show how there originated the worship of the Lord by means of representatives. The men of the Most Ancient Church had no other than internal worship, such as there is in heaven; for with them heaven was in communication with man, so that they made a one; and this communication was perception, of which we have often spoken before. Thus being angelic they were internal men, and although they sensated the external things of the body and the world, they cared not for them; for in each object of sense they perceived something Divine and heavenly. For example, when they saw a high mountain, they perceived an idea, not of a mountain, but of elevation, and from elevation, of heaven and the Lord, from which it came to pass that the Lord was said to dwell in the highest, He himself being called the “Most High and Lofty One;” and that afterwards the worship of the Lord was held on mountains. So with other things; as when they observed the morning, they did not then perceive the morning of the day, but that which is heavenly, and which is like a morning and a dawn in human minds, and from which the Lord is called the “Morning” the “East” and the “Dawn” or “Day-spring.” So when they looked at a tree and its leaves and fruit, they cared not for these, but saw man as it were represented in them; in the fruit, love and charity, in the leaves faith; and from this the man of the church was not only compared to a tree, and to a paradise, and what is in him to leaves and fruit, but he was even called so. Such are they who are in a heavenly and angelic idea.

[2] Everyone may know that a general idea rules all the particulars, thus all the objects of the senses, as well those seen as those heard, so much so that the objects are not cared for except so far as they flow into the man’s general idea. Thus to him who is glad at heart, all things that he hears and sees appear smiling and joyful; but to him who is sad at heart, all things that he sees and hears appear sad and sorrowful; and so in other cases. For the general affection is in all the particulars, and causes them to be seen in the general affection; while all other things do not even appear, but are as if absent or of no account. And so it was with the man of the Most Ancient Church: whatever he saw with his eyes was heavenly to him; and thus with him everything seemed to be alive. And this shows the character of his Divine worship, that it was internal, and by no means external.

[3] But when the church declined, as in his posterity, and that perception or communication with heaven began to be lost, another state of things commenced. Then no longer did men perceive anything heavenly in the objects of the senses, as they had done before, but merely what is worldly, and this to an increasing extent in proportion to the loss of their perception; and at last, in the closing posterity which existed just before the flood, they apprehended in objects nothing but what is worldly, corporeal, and earthly. Thus was heaven separated from man, nor did they communicate except very remotely; and communication was then opened to man with hell, and from thence came his general idea, from which flow the ideas of all the particulars, as has been shown. Then when any heavenly idea presented itself, it was as nothing to them, so that at last they were not even willing to acknowledge that anything spiritual and celestial existed. Thus did the state of man become changed and inverted.

[4] As the Lord foresaw that such would be the state of man, He provided for the preservation of the doctrinal things of faith, in order that men might know what is celestial and what is spiritual. These doctrinal things were collected from the men of the Most Ancient Church by those called “Cain” and also by those called “Enoch” concerning whom above. Wherefore it is said of Cain that a mark was set upon him lest anyone should kill him (see Genesis 4:15, n. 393, 394); and of Enoch that he was taken by God (Genesis 5:24). These doctrinal things consisted only in significative, and thus as it were enigmatical things, that is, in the significations of various objects on the face of the earth; such as that mountains signify celestial things, and the Lord; that morning and the east have this same signification; that trees of various kinds and their fruits signify man and his heavenly things, and so on. In such things as these consisted their doctrinal things, all of which were collected from the significatives of the Most Ancient Church; and consequently their writings also were of the same nature. And as in these representatives they admired, and seemed to themselves even to behold, what is Divine and heavenly, and also because of the antiquity of the same, their worship from things like these was begun and was permitted, and this was the origin of their worship upon mountains, and in groves in the midst of trees, and also of their pillars or statues in the open air, and at last of the altars and burnt-offerings which afterwards became the principal things of all worship. This worship was begun by the Ancient Church, and passed thence to their posterity and to all nations round about, besides many other things, concerning which of the Lord’s Divine mercy hereafter.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.