Из Сведенборгових дела

 

真实的基督教 # 1

Проучите овај одломак

  
/ 853  
  

1. 前言:新天國與新教會的信仰

首先, 將本書中所講述的真實的基督徒信仰, 也就是新天國和新教會的信仰, 分別以總體和具體的形式概要地說明。作為接下來全書的引言, 或作為進入聖殿的大門, 又或作為詳細內容的概要。此信仰被稱為新天國和新教會的信仰, 因為天人(angel)組成的天國和世人組成的教會, 如同一個人的靈魂與肉體, 內外一致,行動如一。因此, 若教會之人活在良善與真理之中, 對於思想內在而言, 他就是天國的一名天人。在肉身死後, 他便進入天國, 照著良善與真理在他裡面聯合的狀態在那裡安享極樂。當知道, 在主現在正建立的新天國中, 這樣的信仰是新天國的引言,入門和概要。

  
/ 853  
  

Thanks to our friends at swedenborgwork.com for their permission to use this translation on the New Christian Bible Study site. ( 衷心感谢”史威登堡著作中文网”许可我们使用该中文译文)

Библија

 

但以理书 8

Студија

   

1 伯沙撒王在位第年,有异象现与我─但以理,是在先前所见的异象

2 我见了异象的时候,我以为在以拦省书珊城(或译:宫)中;我见异象又如在乌莱河边。

3 我举目观,见有双角的公绵站在河边,两角都。这角过那角,更的是後长的。

4 我见那公绵往西、往、往抵触,兽在它面前都站立不住,也没有能救护脱离它的,但它任意而行,自高自大。

5 我正思想的时候,见有一只公山羊从西而,遍行全,脚不沾尘。这山羊两眼当中有一非常的角。

6 他往我所见、站在河边有双角的公绵那里去,大发忿怒,向他直闯。

7 我见公山就近公绵,向它发烈怒、抵触它,折断它的两角。

8 山羊极其自高自,正强盛的时候,那角折断了,又在角根上向方(原文是风)长出个非常的角来。

9 四角之中有角长出个小角,向南、向东、向荣美之地,渐渐成为强大。

10 他渐渐强大,象,将些象和宿抛落在,用脚践踏。

11 并且他自高自大,以为高及天象之君;除掉常献给君的燔祭,毁坏君的圣所。

12 因罪过的缘故,有军旅和常献的燔祭交付他。他将真理抛在上,任意而行,无不顺利。

13 见有说话,又有者问那说话:这除掉常献的燔祭和施行毁坏的罪过,将所与军旅(或译:以色列的军)践踏的异象,要到几时才应验呢?

14 他对我:到二日,所就必洁净。

15 我─但以理见了这异象,愿意明白其中的意思。忽有一位形状像人的站在我面前。

16 我又见乌莱河两岸中有人声呼叫:加百列啊,要使此人明白这异象。

17 他便到我所站的地方。他一,我就惊慌俯伏在地;他对我:人子啊,你要明白,因为这是关乎末後的异象

18 他与我说话的时候,我面伏在沉睡;他就摸我,扶我站起来,

19 :我要指示你恼怒临完必有的事,因为这是关乎末後的定期。

20 你所见双角的公绵,就是玛代和波斯

21 那公山羊就是希利尼王(希利尼:原文是雅完;下同);两眼当中的角就是头一王。

22 至於那折断了的角,在其根上又长出角,这角就是国,必从这国里兴起来,只是权势都不及他。

23 这四国末时,犯法的人罪恶满盈,必有一王兴起,面貌凶恶,能用双关的诈语。

24 他的权柄必大,却不是因自己的能力;他必行非常的毁灭,事情顺利,任意而行;又必毁灭有能力的和圣民。

25 他用权术成就中的诡计,心里自高自大,在人坦然无备的时候,毁灭多人;又要站起来攻击万君之君,至终却非因人而灭亡。

26 所说二千三百日的异象是真的,但你要将这异象封住,因为关乎後来许多的日子。

27 於是我─但以理昏迷不醒,病了数日,然後起来办理王的事务。我因这异象惊奇,却无人能明白其中的意思。

   

Из Сведенборгових дела

 

Arcana Coelestia # 2231

Проучите овај одломак

  
/ 10837  
  

2231. 'That he will command his sons, and his house after him, and they will keep the way of Jehovah to do righteousness and judgement' means that from Him comes the entire doctrine of charity and of faith. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'son', 'house', 'way', 'righteousness', and 'judgement', which in short, or when their several meanings are converted into one, mean the entire doctrine of charity and of faith. For 'sons' means all who are governed by truths, 'house' all who are governed by goods, 'way' means the doctrine of faith which they are taught, 'righteousness' that doctrine in regard to good, 'judgement', in regard to truth. Doctrine regarding good is the doctrine of charity, while doctrine regarding truth is the doctrine of faith.

[2] In general there is only one doctrine, that is to say, the doctrine of charity, for, as stated in 2228, all things of faith have charity in view. No other difference exists between charity and faith than that which exists between willing what is good and thinking what is good - for one who wills what is good also thinks what is good - thus than that which exists between will and understanding. People who reflect on the matter know that the will is one thing and the understanding another. The same is also well recognized in the learned world, and it is plain to see in the case of those who will what is evil and yet from thought utter what is good. From such persons it is evident to anyone that the will is one thing and the understanding another, and thus that the human mind is divided into two parts which do not then make a single whole. Yet man was created in such a way that those two parts should constitute one single mind, and no other difference should exist between them than, to use a comparison, between that of a flame and the light shining from it. Love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour were to be like the flame, and all perception and thought like the light shining from it. Thus love and charity were to constitute the whole of perception and thought, that is, to exist in every single part. Perception or thought regarding the essential nature of love and charity is that which is called faith.

[3] But because the human race started to will what was evil, to hate the neighbour, and to practice revenge and cruelty, with the result that the part of the mind called the will was completely corrupted, men started to make a distinction between charity and faith, and to attribute to faith all those matters of doctrine which belonged to their religion and to refer to them by the single term faith. At length they went so far as to say that people could be saved by faith alone, by which they meant their doctrine. They said that provided they believed that doctrine people could be saved no matter how they lived. Charity was accordingly separated from faith, and when that happens it is nothing else, to use a comparison, than some kind of light that has no flame, like sunlight in winter-time which is so cold and icy that the earth's vegetation languishes and dies. But faith that is derived from charity is like the light of spring-time and summer-time which causes all things to sprout and come into flower.

[4] The same may also be recognized from the fact that love and charity are celestial flame, while faith is the spiritual light that shines from it. This is also how faith and charity make a perceptible and visual presentation of themselves in the next life, for in that life the Lord's celestial manifests itself before the angels by means of a flaming radiance like that of the sun, while the Lord's spiritual manifests itself by means of the light shining from this; and that radiance and light act upon the angels and spirits interiorly according to the life of love and charity existing with them. This is the source of the joy and happiness in the next life with all their variations. These considerations show the implications of the assertion that faith alone saves.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.