Библија

 

Genesis 27

Студија

   

2 Iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Nak əmərədda waššara, wər əṣṣena da daɣ-i təlla taṃattant.

3 Daɣ adi əmərədda əgmaya daɣ-ak ad tətkəla təganzay nnak əd ṃarran-net təggəzaɣ əṣuf tanɣaɣ i du iṣan ən tawaqqast.

4 Tassaŋŋaɣ i aṃensay izodan s əmmək wa as tareɣ tawəyaɣ i t'id at t'atša fəl a fall- ak ag'albaraka nin dat taṃattant in.»

5 Wa iššewal Isxaq y Esaw təṣṣisam asan Raqqiyetu. Igla Esaw, ikka tagmərt.

6 Təṇṇa i rures Yaqub: «Əmərədda ad əsleɣ y abba nnak iššewal y amaqqar nak Esaw, iṇṇ'as:

7 "Awəy i du iṣan ən tawaqqast tagaɣ i aṃensay izodan az z'atša a fall-ak ag'albaraka nin dat Əməli harwa di wər aba"

8 Daɣ adi əmərədda barar in ṣəsəm i tagaɣ a w'as kay omara.

9 A daɣ-ak areɣ at tagla takka eharay wa ənḍərran tabəza du əššin sagayan fəl a daɣ-san akna ameṇsay izodan y abba nnak s əmmək w'as t'ira.

10 Aṃaran tawəyaɣ as tu atš'ay fəl a fall-ak ag'albaraka-net dat taṃattant-net.»

11 Mišan Yaqub iṇṇa y anna-net Raqqiyetu: «Nak əṣṣanaɣ as amaqqar in Esaw ibəndəlan, nak abo.

12 As di iḍas abba nin, iṣṣan as bahu a das əge, a di abəz daɣ təkaddilt issəwər i allaɣanat daɣ adag n albaraka nnet».

13 «Təwəret i allaɣanat», təṇṇ'as ṃas. «Səsəm i ɣas aglu, ag'awa as dak əṇṇeɣ.»

14 Igla ilway tan du y anna-net təkna daɣ san ameṇsay wa izodan əmmək w'as t'ira abba nnet.

15 Dəffər adi tədkal du Raqqiyetu isəlsa n Esaw win əhossaynen as kala da əhan ehan-net təssəls'en i Yaqub wa n amaḍray nnet.

16 Təssəlsa tawšeten-net d iri-net agašek ən sagayan.

17 Dəffər a wen təkfa Yaqub ameṇsay wa izodan əd təgəlla a du təkna da.

18 Eway tan y abba-net issəslam fall as. Ibaz as tu Isxaq iṇṇ'as: «Ma təṃosa daɣ bararan in?»

19 Iṇṇ'as Yaqub: «nak Esaw, wa n aɣafadday nnak. Əgeɣ aw'as di təṇṇeɣ. Əgmaya daɣ ak a du taqqama, tatša awa d əgrawa daɣ təgmərt in fəl a fall-i tag' albaraka nnak.»

20 Iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Ma təge as du təgrawa awaqqas s ətrub?» Ijjəwwab iṇṇ'as: «Əməli Məššina nnak a di dər əs isaṃṃanayan.»

21 Iṇṇa Iškaq i Yaqub: «Ihaz i du barar in a kay əḍəsa ad əṣṣəna kud tidət as kay Esaw.

22 Ihoz t'idu, isallamamas tu iṇṇa: «əməsli in Yaqub mišan ifassan in Esaw».

23 Ig̣mad as tazdit fəlas ifassan-net əlsan tan aṇzadan šilat ən win Esaw. Isammatag'as, inniyat du a fall-as ag'albaraka nnet

24 mišan ilas tu əṣəstan: «Tidət da as kay Esaw?» Ijjəwwab as Yaqub: «Awalla»

25 Iṇṇ'as aṃaran: «Awəy du sər-i a wa du tənɣe daɣ təgmərt fəl ad tatša aga fall-ak albaraka nin.» Eway as du Yaqub ameṇsay, itš-ay, ikf-ay du esmad išw-ay.

26 Dəffər a di iṇṇ-as Isxaq: «Ihaz i du, təzələmmeɣ i barar in.»

27 Ihoz t id izalammat tu təzzar iwat Isxaq aḍu ən səlsa win izlag, iga fall-as albaraka s as iṇṇa: «Hay aḍu ən barar in ola d aḍu n səgyakan win daɣ igar Əməli albarakatan

28 Akfet kay Məššina ikonakan agu iṃədlan nak kul idəɣran akf ik tilwat n alkamatan d esmad təleq qu w'aynayan

29 Šimattiwen kul dak ikkəwanan Iɣərfan deɣ dak əssəjədan Iməḍrayan nak daw-ək ərəsan Ayt mak kul dak əssəjədan Ilɣan Əməli i kay imənzaɣan Itəwəbərrək i kay ibərrakan.

30 Zama ad iɣrad Isxaq tehakkay ən Yaqub albaraka-net iqqab, oṣa ddu Esaw wa n amaqqar-net ifal du tagmərt.

31 Ikna ddu əntada ameṇsay wa izodan eway tu y abba-net iṇṇ'as: «Qam abba nin tatša awa dd'ig̣madan tagmərt in, fəl a fall-i tag'albaraka nnak».

32 «Ma təṃosa?» iṣəstan t'Isxaq, abba nnet. «Nak Esaw wa n aɣafadday nnak.»

33 Irmaɣ Isxaq har iqqim issiwal əs taysəst, iṇṇa: «Ma iṃos za wa dd'inɣan awaqqas eway i t'id ətšeq qu dat aṣṣa nnak. Əgeɣ fall-as albaraka, əmərədda iwar tu.

34 As isla Esaw y awalan n abba-net ig̣mad tu əməsli labasan iḍnay atkər, ad itigunun abba nnet: «Səwər i albaraka nnak nak da, abba nin.»

35 Mišan iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Amaḍray nnak a di ikkərrasan təzzar idkal albaraka nnak.»

36 Iṇṇ-as Esaw: «Adi da fəl iga eṣəm Yaqub ṣanatat təkkərrəs a di iga: əstizarat idkal fall-i alxaq wa n təla nin fall-as temsay dəffər adi idkal fall-i albaraka nnak.» Iṇṇ'as harwa: «Wər di təṣsənsa albaraka iyyan?»

37 Iṇṇ'as: «Əmərədda əgeq qu məšš-ik,əgeq qu məššis ən šəqqaɣan-net, əššilwaq qu s alkama d asmad w'aynayan. Daɣ adi mas tareɣ a dak k aga barar in?»

38 Iṇṇ'as Esaw: «Wər təleɣ ar albaraka iyyanda, abba? Səwər i tu nak da, abba nin.» Iḍbaɣ as ətkər.

39 Təzzar iṇṇ'as abba-net Isxaq: «Təməɣsurt nak akal wa n maṇṇa, Ikonakan dər-san təneməggəga.

40 Təməddurt nak takoba əd ṭarna. Əššəɣəl n amaḍray nnak kul tu takna Har taffalaga y a tu tarna Tasaddarfa iṃan-nak tala tat tarza.»

41 Igzar Esaw Yaqub fəl əddəlil n albaraka wa fall-as ig'abba nnet. Iṇṇa daɣ ṃan-net: «Daɣ a ihozan abba nnana ad t iba. Dəffər awen ad əfrəga ad anɣa Yaqub.

42 Təsla Raqqiyetu gezzar n Esaw Yaqub. Təssassaɣr'ay du, təṇṇ'as: «Amaqqar nak Esaw ira a daɣ-ak izzəzəl, s a kay anɣu.

43 Əmərədda barar in ṣəsəm i: «Taggar əs Xaran ɣur amaqqar in Laban.

44 Agu ɣur-əs tamert har tiṣmad taɣašašit n amaqqar nak,

45 har t'ig̣məd alham nak, aṭṭaw in a wa das təɣšada. Əddi a din assagla awedan dər-ək d'iglan. Fəlas wər areɣ a di tagim ag̣amad iyyanda ket-nawan fəl əššin-ewwan.

46 Təṇṇa y Isxaq wər əṃṃəndaya təməddurt fəl əddəlil ən təḍoden šinn aššet Xet. Ma əkkeɣ i təməddurt izlaf Yaqub iyyat daɣ Kəl Xet šilat ən šin, daɣ akal a.

   

Из Сведенборгових дела

 

Apocalypse Explained # 1158

Проучите овај одломак

  
/ 1232  
  

1158. Verse 14. And the fruits of the desire of thy soul have departed from thee, signifies that the gladnesses and joys they expected from worship and life according to the traditions of the Babylonish nation are turned into weeping and mourning. This is evident from the signification of "the fruits of the desire of the soul," as being the gladnesses and joys they hoped for from worship and life according to the traditions of the Babylonish religion. This is the signification of these words, because the things enumerated in verses 12 and 13 signify all things of the doctrine and worship of that religious persuasion from which those who believe in a life after death expect gladnesses and joys; therefore these are "the fruits of the desire of their souls." Also from the signification of "have departed from thee," as being that these have been dissipated, and have been turned into weeping and mourning, because into the torments of hell. Those gladnesses and joys which they expect are merely external, thus corporeal and worldly, for such do not know what internal gladnesses and joys are, because they have no truths from the Word, thus no truths from the Lord, but only from him whom they call His vicar, from whom falsities can come forth but no truths, because they have dominion for their end. Therefore that the people may be kept under the yoke of that dominion, such things from self and the world as delight the body are offered them.

(Continuation respecting the Athanasian Faith)

[2] 7. The seventh law of the Divine providence is, That man is let into the truths of faith and into the goods of love by the Lord only so far as he can be kept in them until the end of life; for it is better that he should continue to be evil than that he should be good and afterwards evil, for he thus becomes profane. The permission of evil is from this cause. To every man of sound reason the Lord can give the affection of truth and faith therefrom and the affection of good and love therefrom by withholding him from evil loves, which belong to his own [proprium] ; for so far as man is withheld from these he is in the understanding of truth and in the will of good. I have seen the very devils brought back to such a state; and while they were in it they talked about truths from understanding and faith, and did good from will and love. They were brought into this state because they had denied that they were unable to understand truths and do good. But as soon as withholding from their own loves had relaxed, and they had returned into the lusts of their loves, in place of faith in truth they had faith in falsity, and in place of love of good they had love of evil. This has often been witnessed, and in the presence of many. From this it is clear that everyone is capable of being reformed, and that being reformed is nothing else than being removed from evil loves. How man is removed from those loves has been told above. The Lord does not thus withhold man from evils for the reason that those who come into the affection of truth and thence into faith, and into the affection of good and thence into love, and do not continue in these affections to the end of life, but fall back into the loves from which they had abstained, profane holy things.

[3] There are many kinds of profanation, but this kind is the most grievous of all. The lot of such after death is terrible. They are not in hell but beneath hell; and there they neither think nor will, but merely see and act. They see things that are not, and do not see the things that are. They act as if they were doing everything, and yet they do nothing. They are nothing but deliriums of fantasy. And as they neither think nor will, they are no longer men, for the human is thinking and willing.

Consequently they are not called "he" nor "she," but in the neuter gender "it" or "that." When seen in any heavenly light they appear like skeletons covered over with a black skin. Such is the condition of those that have been reformed and do not remain so. Why their lot is so horrible shall be told. By their reformation a communication is established between them and heaven, whereby goods and truths flow in; and by these the interiors of their minds are opened, and evils are removed to the sides. If they remain in this state till death they are happy, but if they do not they become unhappy, for the evils that have been removed then flow back and mingle themselves with the truths and goods; thus hell is so mixed with heaven in them that the two cannot be separated; for if anything has once been impressed on the mind of man by love it can never be rooted out; since, therefore, after death the goods cannot be separated from the evils nor the truths from the falsities, the mind is wholly overthrown, and such spirits no longer have any thought or will, but what remains is like a shell when the kernel is removed, or like the skin with the skeleton when the flesh is gone, for this is all that is left of the man. Let it be known, therefore, that the danger is not in passing from evil to good, but the danger is in passing from good to evil.

  
/ 1232  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for their permission to use this translation.