Библија

 

民数记 13

Студија

   

1 耶和华晓谕摩西

2 你打发去窥探我所赐以色列人迦南,他们每支派中要打发,都要作首领的。

3 摩西就照耶和华的吩咐,从巴兰的旷野打发他们去;他们都是以色列人的族长。

4 他们的名字:属流便支派的有撒刻的儿子沙母亚。

5 西缅支派的有何利的儿子的沙法。

6 犹大支派的有耶孚尼的儿子迦勒。

7 属以萨迦支派的有约色的儿子以迦。

8 以法莲支派的有嫩的儿子何西阿

9 属便雅悯支派的有拉孚的儿子帕提。

10 属西布伦支派的有梭底的儿子迦叠。

11 约瑟的子孙属玛拿西支派的有稣西的儿子迦底。

12 属但支派的有基玛利的儿子亚米利。

13 属亚设支派的有米迦勒的儿子西帖。

14 属拿弗他利支派的有缚西的儿子拿比。

15 属迦得支派的有玛基的儿子臼利。

16 这就是摩西所打发窥探那之人的名字摩西就称嫩的儿子何西阿为约书亚。

17 摩西打发他们去窥探迦南:你们从去,

18 如何,其中所的民是强是弱,是多是少,

19 是歹,所之处是盘是坚城。

20 又看那土是肥美是瘠薄,其中有树木没有。你们要放开胆量,把那的果子带些来。那时正是葡萄初熟的时候。

21 他们上去窥探那,从寻的旷野到利合,直到哈马口。

22 他们从地上去,到了希伯仑;在那里有亚衲族人亚希幔、示筛、挞买。原希伯仑城被建造埃及的锁安城早年。

23 他们到了以实各谷,从那里砍了葡萄树的枝,上头有挂葡萄,两个人用杠抬着,又带了些石榴无花果

24 因为以色列人从那里砍来的那挂葡萄,所以那地方做以实各谷。

25 过了四十,他们窥探那回来

26 到了巴兰旷野的加低斯,见摩西亚伦,并以色列的全会众,回报摩西亚伦,并全会众,又把那的果子给他们

27 又告诉摩西我们到了你所打发我们去的那,果然是流奶与蜜之;这就是那的果子。

28 然而的民强壮,城邑也坚固宽,并且我们在那里见了亚衲族的人。

29 亚玛力人;赫人、耶布斯人、亚摩利人、;迦边并约但河旁。

30 迦勒在摩西面前安抚百姓,我们立刻上去得那地罢!我们足能得胜。

31 但那些和他同去的人:我们不能上去攻击那民,因为他们比我们强壮。

32 探子中有人论到所窥探之,向以色列人报恶信,说:我们所窥探、经过之是吞居民,我们在那里所见的人民都身量高大。

33 我们在那里见亚衲族人,就是伟人;他们是伟人的後裔。据我们,自己就如蚱蜢一样;据他们,我们也是如此。

   

Из Сведенборгових дела

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4763

Проучите овај одломак

  
/ 10837  
  

4763. 'And he rent his clothes' means mourning. This is clear from the meaning of 'rending clothes' as mourning, that is to say, mourning on account of the loss of truth, or the fact that no faith exists. In the Word, especially the historical part, one often reads about people rending their clothes, but the origin of that practice is not known at the present day. Nor is it known that it was representative of grief on account of the loss of truth. This practice became representative from the fact that 'clothes' meant truths, as has been shown and may be seen in 4545. Further on in this chapter it is also said that when Jacob recognized his son's tunic he rent his clothes, verse 34, by which mourning for lost truth is meant. Similar instances of this practice occur elsewhere in the Word, where it is stated that when the Rabshakeh was sent by Sennacherib king of Asshur and uttered insults against Jerusalem, Eliakim who was over the king's house, and Shebna the secretary, and Joash the recorder 1 rent their clothes and reported these things to king Hezekiah; and when he heard them the king too rent his clothes and covered himself with sackcloth, Isaiah 36:22; 37:1; 2 Kings 18:37; 19:1. The insults he uttered were directed against God, the king, and Jerusalem, and so against Divine Truth, as is even more evident from the internal sense of this narrative. It was to express mourning therefore that their clothes were rent.

[2] When Jehudi had read before the king the scroll which Jeremiah wrote, it is said that he threw it into the fire, but the king and his servants who were listening to all those words did not tear their clothes apart, Jeremiah 36:23-24. 'They did not tear their clothes apart' meant that they did not mourn on account of the non-acceptance of Divine Truth. Something similar is implied by Joshua the son of Nun and Caleb the son of Jephunneh rending their clothes, when the spies spoke in opposition to them, by speaking unfavourably about the land of Canaan, Numbers 14:6; for 'the land of Canaan' means the Lord's kingdom, and 'to speak in opposition to this' describes falsity in opposition to Divine Truth. Mourning over the loss of Divine Truth and Divine Good is meant where it is said, in 1 Samuel 4:11-12, that when the ark of God was captured by the Philistines and both of Eli's sons died, a man ran from the line of battle to Shiloh, with rent clothes and dust on his head. Because 'the ark' represented the Lord's kingdom, and in the highest sense the Lord Himself, and consequently represented everything holy in the Church, 'rent clothes' meant grief over the loss of Divine Truth, while 'dust on his head' meant grief over the loss of Divine Good.

[3] In the narrative about Samuel and Saul one reads,

When Samuel turned to go away Saul took hold of the skirt of his tunic, and it was torn away. Therefore Samuel said to him, Jehovah has torn the kingdom of Israel from upon you this day and has given it to your companion. I will not return with you, for you have rejected the word of Jehovah, and Jehovah has rejected you from being king over Israel. 1 Samuel 15:26-28.

The tearing away by Saul of the skirt of Samuel's tunic represented that which Samuel then stated - that the kingdom would be torn from him and that he would not be the king of Israel any longer. For 'the kingdom' in the internal sense means Divine Truth, 1672, 2547, 4691, as also does 'king' and 'kingship', 1672, 1728, 2015, 2069, 3009, 3670, 4575, 4581, especially the king and the kingdom of Israel, since 'Israel' represented the Lord's kingship. The meaning is similar in what is recorded concerning Jeroboam and Ahijah the prophet,

When Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem, and Ahijah the prophet found him on the road, when he was covered with a new garment and both were alone in the field, Ahijah took hold of the new garment that was on him and rent it into twelve pieces; and he said to Jeroboam, Take for yourself ten pieces; for thus said Jehovah, the God of Israel, behold, I am rending [the kingdom] from the hand of Solomon and I will give you ten tribes. 1 Kings 11:29-31.

[4] The second Book of Samuel likewise records that when Saul was killed in battle they tore their clothes apart,

When Saul was killed in battle, on the third day a man came from the camp, whose clothes had been rent. And when David heard about the death of Saul, David took hold of his garments and tore them apart; and so did all his servants who were with him. 2 Samuel 1:2, 10-12.

This too represented mourning because of Divine Truth, lost and cast away by those who adhered to faith separated from charity. For as stated above, 'kingship' meant Divine Truth, while 'the Philistines' by whom Saul was slain represented adherents to faith separated from charity, 1197, 1198, 3412, 3413. The same is also evident from David's lament over him, in verses 18-27 of the same chapter.

[5] When Absalom had slain Amnon his brother and the news reached David that Absalom had slain all the king's sons, David tore his clothes apart and lay on the ground; and all his servants standing by tore their clothes apart, 2 Samuel 13:28, 30-31. This too was done for the sake of the representation that truths from the Divine were lost, those truths being meant in the internal sense by 'the king's sons'. A similar meaning exists in the reference to Hushai the Archite who with his tunic torn apart came to meet David when he fled from Absalom, 2 Samuel 15:32; for in the Word 'a king', and in particular David, represents Divine Truth. The meaning is also very similar in the reference to Ahab, who tore his clothes apart and put sackcloth over his flesh when Elijah told Ahab the king of Israel the words of Jehovah, to the effect that he would be completely wiped out for the evil he had done, 1 Kings 21:27-29.

[6] The fact that tearing apart or rending clothes represented mourning the loss of Truth is additionally clear from the following: Hilkiah the priest found the Book of the law in the house of Jehovah. When Shaphan read it before king Josiah and the king heard the words of the Book of the law, he tore his clothes apart, 2 Kings 22:11. Plainly the king did so because the Word, that is, Divine truth, had been lost for so long and in their hearts and life had been blotted out.

[7] The tearing apart of his own clothes by the high priest, when the Lord confessed He was the Christ the Son of God, and his declaration that He had spoken utter blasphemy, Matthew 26:63-65; Mark 14:63-64, meant that the high priest was absolutely convinced that the Lord had spoken against the Word and so against Divine truth. When Elijah went up in the whirlwind, and Elisha saw it, it is said,

He took hold of his own clothes and tore them into two pieces. And he took up Elijah's tunic that had fallen from upon him, and he struck the waters and they were divided this way and that, and Elisha went over. 2 Kings 2:11-14.

Elisha tore his own clothes apart at that time to express mourning the loss of the Word, that is, of Divine Truth; for 'Elijah' represents the Lord as regards the Word, that is, Divine Truth, 2762. When the tunic fell from Elijah and was picked up by Elisha, the continuation of Elijah's representation by Elisha was represented, 'the tunic' meaning Divine Truth, see 4677. This also explains why the garment torn apart when such mourning took place was the tunic, as is evident from some of the places that have been quoted. Because 'a garment' meant the truth possessed by the Church, and in the highest sense Divine Truth, it was therefore shameful, except when one was mourning, to go about with clothes that were torn. This is evident from what was done to David's servants by Hanun king of the children of Ammon, when he cut off half the beard of each one, and their garments at the middle even to their buttocks, for which reason they were not allowed to come to David, 2 Samuel 10:4-5.

Фусноте:

1. Reading commemorator (recorder) for commentator (interpreter)

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.