Біблія

 

Sáng thế 38

Дослідження

   

1 Trong lúc đó, Giu-đa, lìa xa các anh em mình, đến ở cùng một người A-đu-lam, tên là Hi-ra.

2 Tại đó, Giu-đa thấy con gái của một người Ca-na-an, tên là Su-a, bèn cưới làm vợ, và ăn ở cùng nàng.

3 Nàng thọ thai, sanh được một con trai, đặt tên là Ê-rơ.

4 Nàng thọ thai nữa, sanh được một con trai đặt tên là Ô-nan;

5 lại sanh thêm một con trai, đặt tên là Sê-la. Vả, lúc vợ sanh sản, thì Giu-đa ngụ tại Kê-xíp.

6 Giu-đa cưới cho Ê-rơ, con trưởng nam, một người vợ tên là Ta-ma.

7 Nhưng Ê-rơ độc ác trước mặt Ðức Giê-hô-va, nên Ngài giết người đi.

8 Giu-đa bèn biểu Ô-nan rằng: Con hãy lại gần vợ anh con, kết bạn cùng nàng như em chồng, đặng nối dòng dõi cho anh.

9 Ô-nan biết rằng dòng dõi nầy sẽ chẳng thuộc về mình, nên đương khi đến cùng nàng, thì làm rơi rớt xuống đất, để đừng sanh dòng dõi cho anh.

10 Nhưng điều người làm vậy không đẹp lòng Ðức Giê-hô-va, nên Ngài cũng giết người luôn đi.

11 Ðoạn, Giu-đa biểu Ta-ma, dâu mình, rằng: Hãy về ở góa bên nhà cha con, cho đến chừng nào Sê-la, con trai cha, sẽ trở nên khôn lớn. Vì người nói rằng: Chúng ta hãy coi chừng, e khi nó cũng chết như hai anh nó chăng. Ta-ma bèn đi về ở nhà cha mình.

12 Ngày qua tháng lại, con gái của Su-a, vợ Giu-đa, qua đời. Khi đã nguôi lòng, thì Giu-đa đi cùng bạn là Hi-ra, người A-đu-lam, lên đến nơi mấy thợ hớt lông chiên mình, tại Thim-na.

13 Người ta cho nàng Ta-ma hay điều đó mà rằng: Nầy, ông gia ngươi đi khiến Thim-na đặng hớt lông chiên.

14 Nàng bèn cổi áo góa bụa mình lại, rồi ngồi trước cửa thành Ê-na-im, bên con đường đi về Thim-na; làm vậy là vì nàng đã thấy Sê-la khôn lớn rồi, nhưng họ không gả mình cho chàng làm vợ.

15 Giu-đa thấy nàng, cho là một kỵ nữ, vì nàng che mặt,

16 bèn lại gần mà nói rằng: Hãy cho ta đến cùng nàng; vì cớ ngươi không biết nàng là dâu mình. Nàng đáp rằng: Ngươi sẽ cho tôi món chi đặng đi đến cùng tôi?

17 Ðáp rằng: Ta sẽ gởi cho nàng một con dê con của bầy ta. Nàng hỏi: Người sẽ cho tôi một của chi làm tin, cho đến chừng nào sẽ gởi con dê?

18 Ðáp rằng: Ta sẽ cho nàng của chi làm tin bây giờ? Nàng đáp: Con dầu, dây và cây gậy của người đương cầm nơi tay. Người liền cho, đi lại cùng nàng; nàng thọ thai vì người vậy. Ðoạn, nàng đứng dậy mà đi,

19 cổi lúp ra và mặc quần áo góa bụa lại.

20 Giu-đa cậy bạn A-đu-lam mình đem cho con dê con đặng chuộc mấy vật tin nơi tay người đờn bà nầy; nhưng tìm nàng chẳng thấy.

21 Bạn bèn hỏi dân tại nơi nàng ở rằng: Người kỵ nữ khi trước ở ngoài đường nơi cửa thành Ê-na-im đâu rồi? Họ đáp rằng: Ở đây chẳng có một kỵ nữ nào hết.

22 Bạn bèn trở về Giu-đa mà rằng: Tôi kiếm nàng không đặng; và dân nơi đó có nói: ở đây chẳng có một kỵ nữ nào.

23 Giu-đa rằng: Nầy, tôi đã gởi dê con đến, mà bạn chẳng thấy nàng; vậy, để cho nàng giữ lấy của tin đó, chẳng nên gây điều nhơ nhuốc cho chúng ta.

24 Cách chừng ba tháng sau, người ta có học lại cùng Giu-đa rằng: Ta-ma, dâu ngươi, đã làm kỵ nữ, và vì nông nổi đó, nàng đã hoang-thai. Giu-đa đáp: Hãy đem nó ra thiêu đi.

25 Ðương khi người ta đem nàng ra, thì nàng sai đến nói cùng ông gia rằng: Xin cha hãy nhìn lại con dấu, dâygậy nầy là của ai. Tôi thọ thai do nơi người mà có các vật nầy.

26 Giu-đa nhìn biết mấy món đó, bèn nói rằng: Nàng phải hơn ta, vì ta không đưa Sê-la, con trai ta, cho nàng. Ðoạn, người không ăn ở cùng nàng nữa.

27 Ðến kỳ sanh nở, nầy trong bụng nàng có thai đôi.

28 Ðương lúc sanh nở, một trong hai đứa đưa tay ra trước; bà mụ bắt lấy tay buộc một sợi chỉ điều, và nói rằng: Ðứa nầy ra trước.

29 Nhưng nó rút tay vào, thì đây, anh nó lại ra. Bà mụ nói rằng: Mầy, tông rách dường nầy! Họ đặt tên là Phê-rết.

30 Kế em nó ra sau, là đứa nơi tay có sợi chỉ điều, và họ đặt tên là Sê-rách.

   

З творів Сведенборга

 

Arcana Coelestia #4750

Вивчіть цей уривок

  
/ 10837  
  

4750. 'And Judah said to his brothers' means the corrupt within the Church who are opposed to all good whatever. This is clear from the representation of 'Judah' in the good sense as the good of celestial love, dealt with in 3654, 3881, but in the contrary sense as an opposition to all good whatever, dealt with below; and from the meaning of 'his brothers' as those in the Church who are adherents to faith separated from charity. The reason 'Judah' here represents those who are opposed to all good whatever is that in the good sense 'Judah' in the Word represents those who are governed by the good of celestial love. Celestial love consists in love to the Lord and from this in love towards the neighbour. Those governed by this love are the ones who are the most closely joined to the Lord and therefore they live in the inmost heaven, and in a state of innocence there. This being so, they are seen by all others as small children, and entirely as visual forms of love. No one else can go near them, and therefore when they are sent to others they are surrounded by other angels, through whom the sphere of love emanating from them is moderated. If not moderated this sphere would cause those to whom they have been sent to faint, for the sphere of their love penetrates even to one's marrow.

[2] Since this love, that is, this form of the good of love, which is called celestial, is represented in the good sense by 'Judah', he therefore represents in the contrary sense the kind of thing that is the opposite of celestial good, and so is opposed to any good whatever. Most things in the Word have two meanings - a good one, and another contrary to this. The good meaning they have enables one to see the nature of their contrary one, for things in the contrary sense are the direct opposite of whatever are meant in the good sense.

[3] Each form of the good of love falls in general into one of two categories - the good of celestial love and the good of spiritual love. The opposite of the good of celestial love is in the contrary sense the evil of self-love, and the opposite of the good of spiritual love is in the contrary sense the evil of love of the world. Those governed by the evil of self-love are opposed to all good whatever, but those governed by the evil of love of the world less so. In the Word 'Judah' in the contrary sense represents those who are governed by self-love, while 'Israel' in the contrary sense represents those who are governed by love of the world, the reason being that 'Judah' represented the Lord's celestial kingdom, and 'Israel' His spiritual kingdom.

[4] The hells too are distinguished in accordance with those two loves. Spirits governed by self-love, being opposed to all good whatever, are in the deepest and consequently the most dreadful hells, whereas those governed by love of the world, being less opposed to all good whatever, are in hells not quite so deep and consequently less dreadful ones.

[5] The evil of self-love is not, as people commonly regard it, the display of superiority which is called arrogance; rather, it is hatred against the neighbour and a resulting burning desire for revenge and a delight in cruelty. These are the more internal features of self-love. Its more external features are contempt for others in comparison with oneself and an aversion to those in whom spiritual good is present. These more external features of it are sometimes accompanied by a manifest display of superiority or arrogance, sometimes they are not. For anyone who hates his neighbour in that fashion loves solely himself inwardly, and only any others whom he regards to be at unity with him, so that they are part of him and he is part of them, solely for the sake of his own selfish ends.

[6] This is what those people are like whom 'Judah' represents in the contrary sense. The Jewish nation was governed by that kind of love right from the start, for it regarded all people throughout the world as the basest slaves, of no value at all compared with themselves, and it also hated them. What is more, when self-love and love of the world did not hold them together they persecuted even their companions and brethren with similar hatred. This disposition remains with that nation even now, but because they have to seek asylum in lands not their own they conceal it.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

З творів Сведенборга

 

Arcana Coelestia #4459

Вивчіть цей уривок

  
/ 10837  
  

4459. 'Jacob's sons answered Shechem and Hamor his father deceitfully means evil thought and intention regarding the truth and the good of the Church among the Ancients. This is clear from the representation of 'Shechem' as truth among the Ancients, or what amounts to the same, truth from the ancient Divine stock, dealt with in 4399, 4454; from the representation of 'Hamor' as the good from which that truth sprang, dealt with in 4399, 4431, 4447, 4454; and from the meaning of 'deceit' as evil thought and intention. In general deceit implies evil against another and against what he says and does, for the thought and intention of the one who is deceitful is different from that of the other person, as is also clear from the outcome of events described in this chapter. From this it is evident that 'the sons of Jacob answered Shechem and Hamor his father deceitfully' means evil thought and intention regarding the truth and the good of the Church among the Ancients.

[2] The sons of Jacob, that is, his descendants, could have none but an evil thought and intention regarding the truth and the good belonging to the internal man, because they were interested in external things devoid of internal, 4281, 4293, 4307, 4429, 4433. They saw no value at all in internal things, and therefore utterly despised them. Such is also the nature of that nation at the present day, and so it is of all who are interested only in external things. People who are interested only in external things do not even know what it is to be interested in internal things, since they have no knowledge of what is internal. If anyone in their presence mentions that which is internal they either endorse the existence of it because they know from doctrine of its existence, though that endorsement is attributable to their deceit, or else they deny the existence of it with their lips as they do in their hearts. For they do not go further than the experiences of the senses of the external man, and as a consequence do not believe in any life after death. Nor do they believe any resurrection to be possible apart from their rising again in the physical body. That being so, they are allowed to have these thoughts concerning the resurrection, or else they would not have any at all. For they centre the whole of life in the body, not knowing that the life of their body flows from the life of their spirit which lives after death. People who are interested only in external things cannot possibly have any faith, for external things with them annihilate all thought concerning internal ones, and consequently all belief in them.

[3] Since this kind of ignorance reigns at the present day, an explanation needs to be given of what it is to be interested in external things devoid of internal. All people who are devoid of conscience are interested only in external things, for the internal man reveals itself through conscience. Anyone is devoid of conscience if he thinks and does what is true and good not for the sake of what is true and good but for the sake of his own personal position and gain, and also merely because he fears the law and fears for his own life. For if reputation, position, gain, and life were not endangered he would plunge without conscience into every unmentionable act. This is quite evident from those in the next life who were such during their lifetime. Because interior things are laid bare in that life those people are constantly endeavouring to destroy others, on account of which they are in hell, where they are held in bonds in a spiritual manner.

[4] To enable anyone to have a fuller knowledge of what is meant by an interest in external things, and what by an interest in internal ones; to enable him to know also that people who are interested only in external things cannot have any conception of what internal ones are and so cannot feel any affection for them (for nobody feels any affection for things of which he has no conception) let the following, for example, be considered. One who is least in heaven is the greatest, one who is humble is exalted, and also one who is poor and needy is rich and affluent. People who are interested only in external things cannot have any conception of these matters, for they think that the least cannot possibly be the greatest, nor the humble be the exalted, and that the poor cannot possibly be rich or the needy affluent. Yet this is precisely how it is in heaven. And because they cannot have any conception of these matters they are consequently unable to feel any affection for them; and when they reflect on them from the point of view of the bodily and worldly things which interest them they feel an aversion to them. How it is in heaven they do not know at all, and as long as they are interested only in external things they do not wish to know, nor indeed are they capable of knowing. For in heaven one who knows, acknowledges, and believes in his heart that is, with affection - that none of his power is self-derived, but that all the power he has comes from the Lord, is called the least. Yet he is the greatest because his power comes from the Lord. Similarly so with one who is humble yet exalted; for one who is humble, acknowledging and believing from affection that he has no self-derived power at all, nor any self-derived intelligence and wisdom, nor any goodness and truth, has power, an intelligent understanding of truth, and a wise discernment of good, conferred on him by the Lord more than on others. And likewise so with the poor and the needy being rich and affluent; for he is called poor and needy who believes in his heart and with affection that nothing he possesses begins in himself, nor does anything he knows and is wise in, nor does anything he has power in. In heaven he is rich and is affluent, the Lord granting him total wealth since he is wiser and richer than all others and lives in most magnificent palaces, 1116, 1626, 1627, and among the treasures constituting all the riches of heaven.

[5] Take as another example someone who is interested only in external things. Such a person cannot have any conception at all that heavenly joy consists in loving the neighbour more than himself and the Lord above all things, and that happiness depends on the amount and the quality of that love. For one interested only in external things loves himself more than his neighbour, and if he does love others it is because they show him favour; and so he loves them for a selfish reason - and he therefore loves himself in them and them in himself. A person like this cannot know what loving others more than himself is; indeed he does not wish to know, and is incapable of knowing. Consequently when told that heaven consists in such love, 548, he is repelled by the idea. Hence those who have been like this during their lifetime are unable to draw near any heavenly community; and when they do draw near, because they feel repelled by it, they cast themselves down headlong into hell.

[6] Because few at the present day know what it is to be interested in external things and what it is to be interested in internal ones, and because the majority believe that those interested in internal things cannot be interested in external ones, and vice versa, let one further example be introduced to illustrate the matter. Take the nourishment of the body and the nourishment of the soul. A person who is interested in merely external pleasures takes care of his own skin, gratifies his stomach, likes to live sumptuously, and finds that the choicest food and drink yields him the highest pleasure. A person however who is interested in internal things also takes delight in those same pleasures, but his governing affection is to nourish the body with pleasurable foods so that it may be healthy, the end in view being a healthy mind in a healthy body. His primary concern is health of mind, for which health of the body serves as a means. One who is a spiritual man does not stop there but regards health of mind or of the soul as the means provided to acquire intelligence and wisdom, not for the sake of reputation, position, or gain, but for the sake of the life after death. And one who is spiritual in a more interior degree regards intelligence and wisdom as a mediate end enabling him to serve as a useful member in the Lord's kingdom; while one who is celestial regards the same as that which enables him to serve the Lord. To him bodily food is a means to the enjoyment of spiritual food; and spiritual food is a means to the enjoyment of celestial food. And because they ought to serve in this manner those foods also correspond, and are therefore called foods. From these examples one may see what is meant by being interested only in external things and what by being interested in internal ones.

[7] The Jewish and Israelite nation, which is the subject in this chapter in the internal historical sense, apart from those who have died as children, are for the most part such. They more than all others are interested in external things, for they are governed by avarice. Those who do not love profit and gain for the sake of any use, only for the sake of gold and silver, and who focus the whole delight of life in those possessions, dwell in the outermost or lowest places, since they are entirely earthly things which they love. But those loving gold and silver because of some use these may serve are people who rise above earthly things, in accordance with that use. The use itself which a person loves is what gives direction to his life and marks him off from others, an evil use making him like one in hell and a good use like one in heaven. It is not indeed the use itself that does so but the love behind it, for everyone's life is inherent in his love.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.