Біблія

 

2 Mózes 16

Дослідження

   

1 És elindulának Élimbõl és érkezék Izráel fiainak egész gyülekezete a Szin pusztájába, mely Élim között és Sinai között van, a második hónapnak tizenötödik napján, Égyiptom földérõl való kijövetelök után.

2 És zúgolódék Izráel fiainak egész gyülekezete Mózes és Áron ellen a pusztában.

3 S mondának nékik Izráel fiai: Bár megholtunk volna az Úr keze által Égyiptom földén, a mikor a húsos fazék mellett ülünk vala, a mikor jól lakhatunk vala kenyérrel; mert azért hoztatok ki minket ebbe a pusztába, hogy mind e sokaságot éhséggel öljétek meg.

4 És monda az Úr Mózesnek: Ímé én esõképen bocsátok néktek kenyeret az égbõl; menjen ki azért a nép és szedjen naponként arra a napra valót, hogy megkísértsem: akar-é az én törvényem szerint járni, vagy nem?

5 A hatodik napon pedig úgy lesz, hogy mikor elkészítik a mit bevisznek, az kétannyi lesz, mint a mennyit naponként szedegettek.

6 És monda Mózes és Áron Izráel minden fiainak: Estve megtudjátok, hogy az Úr hozott ki titeket Égyiptom földérõl;

7 Reggel pedig meglátjátok az Úr dicsõségét; mert meghallotta a ti zúgolódástokat az Úr ellen. De mik vagyunk mi, hogy mi ellenünk zúgolódtok?

8 És monda Mózes: Estve húst ád az Úr ennetek, reggel pedig kenyeret, hogy jól lakjatok; mert hallotta az Úr a ti zúgolódástokat, melylyel ellene zúgolódtatok. De mik vagyunk mi? Nem mi ellenünk van a ti zúgolódástok, hanem az Úr ellen.

9 Áronnak pedig monda Mózes: Mondd meg az Izráel fiai egész gyülekezetének: Járuljatok az Úr elé; mert meghallotta a ti zúgolódástokat.

10 És lõn, mikor beszéle Áron az Izráel fiai egész gyülekezetének, a puszta felé fordulának, és ímé az Úr dicsõsége megjelenék a felhõben.

11 És szóla az Úr Mózesnek, mondván:

12 Hallottam az Izráel fiainak zúgolódását, szólj nékik mondván: Estennen húst esztek, reggel pedig kenyérrel laktok jól és megtudjátok, hogy én vagyok az Úr a ti Istentek.

13 És lõn, hogy estve fürjek jövének fel és ellepék a tábort, reggel pedig harmatszállás lõn a tábor körûl.

14 Mikor pedig a harmatszállás megszûnék, ímé a pusztának színén apró gömbölyegek valának, aprók mint a dara a földön.

15 A mint megláták az Izráel fiai, mondának egymásnak: Mán ez! mert nem tudják vala mi az. Mózes pedig monda nékik: Ez az a kenyér, melyet az Úr adott néktek eledelül.

16 Az Úr parancsolata pedig ez: Szedjen abból kiki a mennyit megehetik; fejenként egy ómert, a hozzátok tartozók száma szerint szedjen kiki azok részére, a kik az õ sátorában vannak.

17 És aképen cselekedének az Izráel fiai és szedének ki többet, ki kevesebbet.

18 Azután megmérik vala ómerrel, és annak a ki többet szedett, nem vala fölöslege, és annak, a ki kevesebbet szedett, nem vala fogyatkozása: kiki annyit szedett, a mennyit megehetik vala.

19 Azt is mondá nékik Mózes: Senki ne hagyjon abból reggelre.

20 De nem hallgatának Mózesre, mert némelyek hagyának abból reggelre; és megférgesedék s megbüszhödék. Mózes pedig megharagudék reájok.

21 Szedék pedig azt reggelenként, kiki a mennyit megehetik vala, mert ha a nap felmelegedett, elolvad vala.

22 A hatodik napon pedig két annyi kenyeret szednek vala, két ómerrel egyre-egyre. Eljövének pedig a gyülekezet fejedelmei mindnyájan és tudtára adták azt Mózesnek.

23 Õ pedig monda nékik: Ez az, a mit az Úr mondott: A holnap nyugalom napja, az Úrnak szentelt szombat; a mit sütni akartok, süssétek meg, és a mit fõzni akartok, fõzzétek meg; a mi pedig megmarad, azt mind tegyétek el magatoknak reggelre.

24 És eltevék azt reggelre, a szerint a mint Mózes parancsolta vala, és nem büszhödék meg s féreg sem vala benne.

25 És monda Mózes: Ma egyétek azt meg, mert Ma az Úrnak szombatja van; Ma nem találjátok azt a mezõn.

26 Hat napon szedjétek azt, de a hetedik napon szombat van, akkor nem lesz.

27 És lõn hetednapon: kimenének a nép közül, hogy szedjenek, de nem találának.

28 És monda az Úr Mózesnek: Meddig nem akarjátok megtartani az én parancsolataimat és törvényeimet?

29 Lássátok meg! az Úr adta néktek a szombatot; azért ád õ néktek hatodnapon két napra való kenyeret. Maradjatok veszteg, kiki a maga helyén; senki se menjen ki az õ helyébõl a hetedik napon.

30 És nyugoszik vala a nép a hetedik napon.

31 Az Izráel háza pedig Mánnak nevezé azt; olyan vala az mint a kóriándrom magva, fehér; és íze, mint a mézes pogácsáé.

32 És monda Mózes: Ezt parancsolja az Úr: Egy teljes ómernyit tartsatok meg abból maradékaitok számára, hogy lássák a kenyeret, a mellyel éltettelek titeket a pusztában, mikor kihoztalak titeket Égyiptom földérõl.

33 Áronnak pedig monda Mózes: Végy egy edényt és tégy bele egy teljes ómer Mánt és tedd azt az Úr eleibe, hogy megtartassék maradékaitok számára.

34 A mint parancsolta vala az Úr Mózesnek, eltevé azt Áron a bizonyságtétel ládája elé, hogy megtartassék.

35 Az Izráel fiai pedig negyven esztendõn át evék a Mánt, míg lakó földre jutának; Mánt evének mind addig, míg a Kanaán földének határához jutának.

36 Az ómer pedig az éfának tizedrésze.

   

З творів Сведенборга

 

Apocalypse Explained #146

Вивчіть цей уривок

  
/ 1232  
  

146. To him that overcometh, to him will I give to eat of the hidden manna, signifies that those who conquer in temptations will have the delight of heavenly love from the Lord's Divine Human. This is evident from the signification of "overcoming," as being those who conquer in temptations (for it is these that are treated of in what is written to the angel of this church, see above, n. 130; from the signification of "giving to eat," as being to be appropriated and to be conjoined by love and charity (See Arcana Coelestia 2187, 2343, 3168, 3513, 5643) and as it is said "of the hidden manna," which means the Lord in respect to His Divine Human, the "eating" of this here signifies the delight of heavenly love, for this is appropriated by the Lord's Divine Human to those who receive Him in love and faith; also from the signification of the "hidden manna," as being the Lord in respect to His Divine Human. That this is "manna" is manifest from the Lord's own words in John:

Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, as it is written, He gave them bread out of heaven to eat. The bread of God is He who cometh down out of heaven, and giveth life unto the world. I am the bread of life. Your fathers did eat the manna in the wilderness, and they are dead. This is the bread which cometh down out of heaven, that a man may eat thereof and not die. I am the living bread which came down out of heaven; if any man eat of this bread he shall live forever. The bread that I will give is My flesh (John 6:31-58).

That it is the Lord Himself who is meant by "manna" and by "bread," He plainly teaches, for He says, "I am the bread of life which came down out of heaven." That it is the Lord in respect to the Divine Human, He also teaches when He says, "The bread that I will give is My flesh."

[2] The Lord taught the same when He instituted the Holy Supper:

Jesus took bread and blessed it, and gave to the disciples, and said, Take, eat, this is My body (Matthew 26:26; Mark 14:22; Luke 22:19).

"To eat of this bread" is to be conjoined to the Lord by love, for "to eat" signifies to be appropriated and to be conjoined (as above), and love is spiritual conjunction. The same is signified by "eating in the kingdom of God," in Luke:

Blessed is he that eateth bread in the kingdom of God (Luke 14:15).

Ye shall eat and drink at My table in My kingdom (Luke 22:30).

In Matthew:

Many shall come from the east and the west, and shall recline to eat with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of God (Matthew 8:11).

(That by "Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob," the Lord is meant, see Arcana Coelestia 1893, 4615, 6098, 6185, 6276, 6804, 6847) In John:

Work not for the food which perisheth; but for the food which abideth, which the Son of man shall give unto you (John 6:27).

That the "Son of man" is the Lord in respect to the Divine Human, see above, n. 63.

[3] It is called "hidden manna," because the delight of heavenly love, which those receive who are conjoined to the Lord through love, is wholly unknown to those that are in a love not heavenly; and this delight no one is able to receive except he that acknowledges the Lord's Divine Human; for from this the delight proceeds. Because this delight was unknown to the children of Israel in the wilderness, they called it "manna," as appears in Moses:

Jehovah said unto Moses, Behold, I will cause bread to rain from heaven itself for you. And in the morning the dew lay round about the camp. And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold upon the face of the wilderness a small round thing; and when they saw it, they said, This is manna? (what is this)? Moses said unto them, this is the bread which Jehovah giveth you to eat. And the house of Israel called the name thereof manna (Exodus 16:3-36).

In the same:

Jehovah fed thee with manna which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that He might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by all that is uttered by the mouth of Jehovah doth man live (Deuteronomy 8:3).

This delight, which is meant by "manna," was unknown to the sons of Israel, because they were in corporeal delight more than other nations, and those who are in that delight are altogether incapable of knowing anything of heavenly delight. (That the sons of Israel were such, see The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem 248.) The term "delight" is used, and the delight of love is meant, for every delight of life is of love.

[4] As it is the delight of heavenly love that is signified by "eating of the hidden manna," therefore it is called "the bread of the heavens" in David:

Jehovah commanded the skies from above, and opened the doors of the heavens; and He rained down upon them manna for food, and gave them corn of the heavens (Psalms 78:23, 24).

In another place:

Jehovah satisfied them with the bread of the heavens (Psalms 105:40).

It is called the "bread of the heavens," because it rained down from heaven with the dew, but in the spiritual sense it is called the "bread of the heavens" because it flows down from the Lord through the angelic heaven. In that case no other heaven is meant, and no other bread than that which nourishes the soul of man. That it is in this sense that "bread" is to be understood here is evident from the words of the Lord Himself in John:

That He is the manna, or bread, that came down out of heaven (John 6:31-58).

And in Moses:

That Jehovah fed them with manna, that He might make them to know that man doth not live by bread only, but by all that is uttered by the mouth of Jehovah (Deuteronomy 8:3).

"What is uttered by the mouth of Jehovah" is everything that proceeds from the Lord, and this, in a special sense, is Divine truth united with Divine good (See the work on Heaven and Hell 13, 133, 139, 140, 284-290).

[5] This delight is also described by the correspondences in Moses:

The manna appeared like coriander seed, white, and the taste of it was like cakes made with honey (Exodus 16:31).

And in another place in the same:

They made cakes of it; and the taste of it was as the taste of the juice of oil (Numbers 11:7, 8).

The appearance and taste of the manna was such because "coriander seed, white," signifies truth from a heavenly origin; "cake," the good of heavenly love; "honey" its external delight; "oil" that love itself; and its "juice," from which was the taste, its internal delight: and the "rain with dew," in which the manna was, the influx of Divine truth in which that delight is. (That "seed" signifies truth from a heavenly origin, seeArcana Coelestia 3038, 3373, 10248, 10249; that "white" is predicated of that truth, n. 3301, 3993, 4007, 5319; that "cake" signifies the good of heavenly love, n. 7978, 9992, 9993; that "oil" signifies that love itself, n. 886, 3728, 9780, 9954, 10261, 10269; its "juice," therefore, signifies the delight of that love, because the taste is therefrom, and the taste is the delight and pleasantness, see n. 3502, 4791-4805. But more about these matters may be seen in the explanation of chapter 16 of Exodus in The Arcana Coelestia.)

[6] The delight of heavenly love is signified by "eating of the hidden manna," when yet by "the hidden manna" the Lord in respect to the Divine Human is signified, because it is the same whether you say the Lord's Divine Human, or the Divine Love, for the Lord is Divine Love itself, and what proceeds from Him is Divine good united to Divine truth; both are of love, and are also the Lord in heaven; consequently "to eat of Him" is to be conjoined to Him, and this by love from Him. (But these things may be better understood from what is said and shown in the work on Heaven and Hell 13-19, 116-125, 126-140; also in The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem 210-222, 307)

  
/ 1232  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for their permission to use this translation.

З творів Сведенборга

 

Arcana Coelestia #4493

Вивчіть цей уривок

  
/ 10837  
  

4493. 'And they circumcised every male, all who went out of the gate of his city' means the acceptance of externalities. This is clear from the meaning of 'circumcising every male' as being introduced into the representatives and meaningful signs of that people (that is, into those of Jacob's descendants) - solely into the external observances involved in these, dealt with in 4486; and from the meaning of 'going out of the gate of the city' as departing from the doctrine of the Church among the Ancients, dealt with immediately above in 4492. And as the departure from doctrine and the acceptance of externalities is meant, the expression 'those who went out of the gate of his city' occurs twice, without any reference at the same time, as is so elsewhere, to those who went into it. For 'going in' means an acceptance of doctrine and a departure from externalities; but the reverse of this is described here.

[2] The implications of this must now be stated. Members of the Most Ancient Church, the remnants of which Hamor and Shechem with their families were a part, had an entirely different mental constitution and different disposition from adherents to the Ancient Church. The will in the case of the members of the Most Ancient Church contained that which was whole; but this was not so with adherents to the Ancient Church. Because of this the Lord was able with members of the Most Ancient Church to flow in through the will, and therefore by an internal way, but not so with adherents to the Ancient Church, since in these the will had been destroyed. But the Lord flowed into their understanding, and so not by an internal way but by an external one, as stated above in 4489. Flowing in through the will involves flowing in through the good of love, for all good belongs to the will part of the mind, whereas flowing in through the understanding involves flowing in through the truth of faith, for all truth belongs to the understanding part. Within the latter - the understanding - the Lord formed, in the case of adherents to the Ancient Church, a new will when He regenerated them. For goods and truths were implanted in the will part of the mind of members of the Most Ancient Church, see 895, 927, but in the understanding part of that of adherents to the Ancient Church, 863, 875, 895, 927, 2124, 2256, 4328. The new will is formed within the understanding part of the mind, 928, 1023, 1043, 1044, 4328. A parallelism exists between the Lord and the good residing with man, but not between Him and the truth there, 1831, 1832, 2718, 3514. As a consequence adherents to the Ancient Church dwelt in obscurity compared with members of the Most Ancient, 2708, 2715, 2935, 2937, 3246, 3833. From all this it may be seen that members of the Most Ancient Church had an entirely different mental constitution and different disposition from adherents to the Ancient Church.

[3] It was for this reason that those who belonged to the Most Ancient Church were internal people and had no external forms of worship, while those who belonged to the Ancient Church were external people and did have them. For the former saw external things in the light of internal ones, as if by the light of the sun in the daytime, whereas the latter saw internal things in the light of external ones, as if by the light of the moon or stars at night. This also explains why the Lord is seen by the former in heaven as the Sun, but by the latter as the Moon, 1521, 1529-1531, 2441, 2495, 4060. The former are those who in explanations above are called celestial, the latter those who are called spiritual.

[4] To illustrate the essential difference between the two let an example be taken. If a member of the Most Ancient Church had read the Word, the historical or the prophetical, he would have seen its internal sense without prior instruction or any explanation. He would have seen it so perfectly that the celestial and spiritual things belonging to the internal sense would have instantly met his eyes, and scarcely anything belonging to the sense of the letter. Thus the internal sense would have been for him in brightness, but the sense of the letter in obscurity. He would be like someone listening to a person speaking, and taking in only the sense and paying no attention to the words used by the speaker. But if a member of the Ancient Church had read the Word he would not have been able, without prior instruction or explanation, to see its internal sense, and so the internal sense would have been for him in obscurity but the sense of the letter in brightness. He would be like someone listening to a person speaking and in thought hanging on to the words used by him, all the while paying no attention to the sense of them, which would therefore be lost on him. But when a member of the Jewish Church reads the Word he does not understand anything beyond the sense of the letter. He does not know of and also denies the existence of any internal sense. And it is similar with the member of the Christian Church at the present day.

[5] These considerations show the essential difference between those represented here by Hamor and Shechem who, being part of the remnants of the Most Ancient Church, were interested in internal things and not in external ones, and those meant by the sons of Jacob who were interested in external things and not in internal ones. Those considerations show in addition that Hamor and Shechem could not have acceded to external things and accepted those which existed among the sons of Jacob unless their internals were closed. But if these had been closed they would have perished for ever.

[6] This is the hidden reason why Hamor and Shechem with their families were slain, a deed that would not otherwise have been allowed. Not that this absolves the sons of Jacob from blame for having committed that hideous crime. They had no knowledge of that hidden reason, nor did they have that as their end in view. Everyone is judged according to the end he has in view, that is, his intention; and it is plainly stated in verse 13 that their intention was deceitful. When the Lord allows any such crime as this it is carried out by the evil and by those in hell who instigate it. But all evil which the evil intend and do to the good the Lord converts into good, as is the case here in that Hamor and Shechem with their families were [eternally] saved.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.