Här är vi på 2000-talet. Vi vet att universum är en enorm plats. Vi spricker bara av vetenskaplig kunskap. Men hur har vi det med de ännu större idéerna? Våra mänskliga samhällen verkar radera dem eller ignorera dem - kanske tror vi att vi är för upptagna för dem.

Här på webbplatsen New Christian Bible Study, kommer vi att utveckla trenden. Vi vill utforska de stora idéerna som ger oss en ram för att leva bättre liv. Här är en början på en lista med stora idéer ur ett nytt kristen perspektiv. För varje idé finns det en fotnot som listar några referenser i Swedenborgs teologiska verk:

1. Gud existerar. Bara en Gud, som skapade och upprätthåller hela universumet i alla dess dimensioner, andliga och fysiska. ¹

2. Guds väsen är kärleken själv. Det är kraften som driver allt. ²

3. Guds väsen blir till, det vill säga att den existerar, i och genom skapelsen. ³

4. Det finns nivåer eller grader av skapelse - allt från andliga som vi inte kan upptäcka med våra fysiska sinnen eller sensorer, till nivån i det fysiska universum där det mesta av vår medvetenhet är när vi lever här. ⁴

5. Det skapade universum härstammar från Gud, och det upprätthålls av Gud, men på ett viktigt sätt är det separerat från Gud. Han vill att det ska vara separat så att friheten kan existera. ⁵

6. Gud fungerar från kärlek genom visdom - villiga goda saker och förståelse för hur de ska åstadkommas. ⁶

7. Den fysiska skapelsenivån finns för att ge människor en möjlighet att välja i frihet, med rationalitet, oavsett om man erkänner eller samarbetar med Gud eller inte. ⁷

8. Gud ger alla människor överallt, oavsett religion, frihet att välja att leva ett kärleksliv till Gud och till grannen. ⁸

9. Gud älskar alla. Han vet att sann lycka bara kommer när vi är osjälviska; när vi verkligen motiveras av en kärlek till Herren som är grundad i en kärlek till grannen. Han strävar efter att leda alla, men kommer inte att tvinga oss att följa mot vår vilja. ⁹

10. Gud dömer oss inte. Han berättar vad som är bra och vad som är ont, och flyter in i våra sinnen för att leda oss mot det goda. Men vi är fria att avvisa hans ledande och istället välja att älska oss själva mest. Dag för dag skapar vi vanor av generositet eller själviskhet och lever ut ett liv i enlighet med dessa vanor. Dessa vanor blir de verkliga "oss", vår härskande kärlek. ¹⁰

11. Våra fysiska kroppar dör så småningom, men den andliga delen av våra sinnen fortsätter. Det har redan fungerat på ett spirituellt plan, men vår medvetenhet förändras - så att vi blir fullt medvetna om den andliga verkligheten. ¹¹

Bilješke:

11. (iv) THERE ARE MANY REASONS WHY NATIONS AND PEOPLES HAVE FORMED VARYING IDEAS OF THE NATURE OF THAT ONE GOD, AND CONTINUE TO DO SO.

The first reason is that knowledge about God, and consequently acknowledgment of God, is impossible without revelation, and that knowledge about the Lord and consequently the acknowledgment that 'in Him all the fulness of the Godhead dwells bodily' can only come from the Word, which is the crown of revelations. Because revelation has been granted, a person is able to go to meet God and be acted upon by Him, and so from being natural become spiritual. The revelation of early ages spread throughout the world, and was perverted by natural men in many ways. This is the origin of the divisions, dissensions, heresies and schisms which have affected religions.

The second reason is that a natural man cannot form and apply to himself any perception of God, but only of the world. This is why it is one of the principles of the Christian Church that the natural man is opposed to the spiritual and they fight each other. This too is why those who have learned the existence of God from the Word [or] another revelation have differed and still do concerning the nature of God and His oneness.

[2] For this reason those whose mental vision has been dependent upon the bodily senses, and have none the less wished to see God, have made for themselves images of gold, silver, stone and wood, so that in these forms as visible objects they could worship God. This is why also others whose religion led them to reject such images, made themselves images of God out of the sun, the moon and the stars and various terrestrial objects. But those who thought their intelligence above the common herd, yet remained natural men, were led by the immensity of God and His omnipresence in creating the world to acknowledge nature as God, in some cases in its inmost, in others in its outermost forms. Some, in order to maintain a distinction between God and nature, thought up some extremely universal principle, which they called 'the Being of the Universe'; and because they know nothing more about God, this Being becomes for them a mere concept, which is meaningless.

[3] Is there anyone who cannot grasp that things known about God are mirrors held up to God? Those who know nothing of God see Him not in a mirror held up to their eyes, but in a mirror turned back to front, which is covered with quicksilver or a black composition that does not reflect an image but blots it out. Belief in God comes into man by the front door, that is, from the soul into the higher regions of the understanding. But knowledge about God comes in by the back door, because it is absorbed by the understanding from the revelation of the Word by means of the bodily senses. The two paths leading in meet in the midst of the understanding; there, natural belief, which is merely a strongly held opinion, becomes spiritual, that is to say, a real acknowledgment. So the human understanding is like an exchange where currencies are changed.

71. It Is a Law of Divine Providence That We Should Act in Freedom and in Accord with Reason

It is generally recognized that we have a freedom to think and intend whatever we wish but not a freedom to say whatever we think or to do whatever we wish. The freedom under discussion here, then, is freedom on the spiritual level and not freedom on the earthly level, except to the extent that the two coincide. Thinking and intending are spiritual, while speaking and acting are earthly.

There is a clear distinction between these kinds of freedom in us, since we can think things that we do not express and intend things that we do not act out; so we can see that the spiritual and the earthly in us are differentiated. As a result, we cannot cross the line from one to the other except by making a decision, a decision that can be compared to a door that has first to be unlocked and opened.

This door stands open, though, in people who think and intend rationally, in accord with the civil laws of the state and the moral laws of society. People like this say what they think and do what they wish. In contrast, the door is closed, so to speak, for people who think and intend things that are contrary to those laws. If we pay close attention to our intentions and the deeds they prompt, we will notice that there is this kind of decision between them, sometimes several times in a single conversation or a single undertaking.

I mention this at the outset so that the reader may know that "acting from freedom and in accord with reason" means thinking and intending freely, and then freely saying and doing what is in accord with reason.