Bibliorum

 

Genesis 19

Study

   

2 Iṇṇ-asan: «Oṇsayaq-qawan, məssaw-i, a-di-tagim sadkal n a-du-təṃṃəram ehan-in, ehan n əkli-nnawan, təšširədam iḍaran-nawan, taṇsim ɣur-i, ṭufat tənzəyam, təggəzam tarrayt-nawan.» «Kala, əṇṇan-as, ad-naṇsu daɣ tarrayt daɣ aṃṃas n əɣrəm.»

3 Mišan Lot iḍgaz wəllen har ardan s iki n ahan-net. Ig-asan imeṇsewan, issəŋŋ-asan tagəlla, ətšan.

4 Harwa da wər əṇsen as əɣalayɣalayan meddan ən Sədom ehan-net, win maḍrornen əd win waššarnen kul əllan əddi, wər din-iqqim waliyyan.

5 Əɣran Lot əṇṇan-as: «Magan meddan win d-edwanen ehan-nak? Suɣəb-tan-du. A nara a dər-san nag'əzzəna.»

6 Iqqab-du Lot dat ahan ihar-t-idu dəffər-əs.

7 Təzzar iṇṇ-asan: «Kala, kala, imidawan-in, ad-wər-tagim ark-əmazal di.

8 Ələɣ šibararen ṣanatat wər nəzday meddan, a-dawan-tanat-akfa, tagim-asnat a wa taram. Mišan ad wər təɣšədam arat i meddan a da, imagaran-in a əṃosan, əhan taɣlift-in.»

9 «Əg̣məd a di! əjjəwwaban-as. Kay iṃan-nak amagar a təṃosa, tarəɣ a-dana-taga əššəriɣa daɣ akal-nana. Ad-ak-nagu aššar ogaran wa dasan-za-nagu!» Əbdaɣan-in Lot əs təɣurad əhozan-du imi n ahan fəl a-tt-arzin.

10 Assaɣa di ad obəzan meddan ann əššin, Lot, əgan-t-id daɣ aṃṃas n ahan təzzar əlasan-tu təməhirt.

11 S ig'a wen meddan win əllanen dat ahan əwatan-tan əs taḍḍarɣalt win maḍrornen əd win waššarnen, haras orn-asan ad əṣṣənan dad illa əmi n ahan. Əṇṇan meddan ann əššin i Lot: «Awak əllan-tu marwan-nak da? Əḍaggal, bararan, šibararen, madeɣ imarwan a əqqalan, əkkəs-tan daɣ əɣrəm a, fəlas ahluk a tu-za-nagu. Šiɣəttas-net aggotnen oṣanat-in Əməli, issokanaq-q-idu a-tu-nəhlək.»

14 Lot deɣ ikka iḍulan-net imal-asan: «Tarmad! Əg̣mədat edagg a da fəlas Əməli ad-ihlək aɣrəm a da.» Mišan əɣilan as addal a itag.

15 Ɣur təɣəttawt n azaɣan, əḍgazan angalosan Lot fəl ad-aglu: «Əbəz tarrayt! əṇṇan-as. Ədkəl taɣur-ək əd təbararen-nak an ṣanatat, amər wər iga a di a-kawan-əg̣mədan ṃan, as irzam əɣrəm aššar-net.»

16 As ənayan meddan as Lot ih-ay sandad, əbazan-tu s əfus ənta əd taɣur-əs əd təbararen-net an ṣanatat əkkasan-tu daɣ əɣrəm, fəlas Əməli a das ihanatten.

17 As tan əkkasan daɣ əɣrəm iṇṇa iyyan daɣ-san i Lot: «Daggag fəl ad-tassafsa təmməddurt-nak, a du wər təṣwəḍa dəffər-ək, ad wər təsəlluleɣ iṃan-nak daɣ aṃadal a da, ḍaggag s ədɣaɣ made təhləka.»

18 Ijjəwwab Lot: «Kala, kala, məšš-i, ad wər təgməya daɣ əkli-nnak a di!

19 Əṣṣanaɣ as əgrawa arraxmat aṃaran təhəkkawt zəwwərat as di-tog̣aza iṇfas-in. Mišan nak wər əfrega azzal har ədɣaɣ dat ad-i-d-awəḍ albas, təzzar ib-i.

20 Təhaṇṇaya a wen ən təɣrəmt ten ? Təkna ihəz fəl ad-azəla har den. Taɣrəmt ənḍərrat a təṃos, ayy-i a daɣ-as əlɣəsa fəl a daɣ-as əgrəwa efsan ən təməddurt-in.»

21 «Ənta di da, iṇṇ-as, ardeɣ-ak tolas s ad wər igrew arat waliyyan taɣrəmt ta as təganna.

22 Aglu tarmad, əlɣəs, fəlas wər əfrega igi n arat iket wər teweda.» (Təmməḍrəyt ən təɣrəmt ta ənta a fəlas itawagga eṣəm Tsohar)

23 Təfuk tətag̣azzay as din-ewad Lot Tsohar.

24 Assaɣa wen da a dd-issərtak Əməli əlkəbrit ibilaglagan daɣ jənnawan fəl Sədom əd Gamora.

25 Issəba tamayyamayt ən ɣərman win əd tatawla ket-net əd win tan əzdaɣnen d annabatan n aṃadal.

26 Tanṭut ən Lot a din təṣwadat dəffər-əs təqqal əwelwel n əsaləɣ.

27 Ibrahim inzay ṭufat s adag wa daɣ d-iqqal dəffər Əməli as dər-əs imməgrad.

28 Iṣwad daɣ anamod ən Sədom əd Gamora əd tatawla kul, ihaṇṇay əhu itag̣azzay daɣ aṃadal olan d eqqad zəwwəran.

29 Assaɣa wa d-ihlak Əməli iɣərman əd tatawla win as kala tan təha təməɣsurt ən Lot, ikta-ddu Məššina Ibrahim təzzar issəfsa Lot daɣ əlmihlak.

30 Lot iggəlat daɣ Tsohar iɣsar daɣ ədɣaɣ, ənta əd təbararen-net, id fəlas təh-ay ṭasa daɣ Tsohar. Izdaɣ əɣəɣi ənta əd təbararen-net an ṣanatat.

31 Təṇṇa ta waššarat i ta ənḍərrat: «Abba-nnana iwaššaran, amaran wər t-əllen meddan daɣ əhazi əngəm akkin-ana-du, a wa itawaggan daɣ əddənet kul.

32 Ayaw ad-naššašu abba-nnana esmad, a dər-əs nənəməṇsu fəl a-tu-nakfu əzzurriya.»

33 Təzzar əššəšwanat abba-nnasnat esmad ahad wədi, tənamaṇsa dər-əs ta waššarat wər ila iggi y asarod-net wala taṇakra-nnet.

34 As ṭufat təṇṇa i tamaḍrayt-net: «Əssirtaya iṃan-nin d abba-nin əṇdod, šašwanaq-qu esmad tolas ahad a tənəməṇsa dər-əs kam da fəl a-tu-nakfu əzzurriya.»

35 Ahad wədi ənta da sammaswadnat abba-nnasnat tolas tənamaṇsa dər-əs ta n tamaḍrayt, daɣ-as wər ila iggi y asarod-net wala taṇakra-nnet.

36 Əmmək wa da as əganat təbararen ən Lot šidusen əs ši-ssanat.

37 Ta waššarat təgraw barar təg-as eṣəm Mohab, ənta a dd-əg̣madan Kəl Mohab win n azala.

38 Ta ənḍərrat ənta da təgraw barar təg-as eṣəm Ben-Hammi, ənta a dd-əg̣madan Kəl Hammon win n azala.

   

from the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #2444

Studere hoc loco

  
/ 10837  
  

2444. 'Jehovah rained on Sodom and on Gomorrah brimstone and fire' means the hell of those governed by the evils of self-love, and by falsities deriving from these. This is clear from the meaning of 'raining on' as to be condemned, of 'brimstone' as the hell of the evils of self-love, and of 'fire' as the hell of falsities deriving from these, dealt with in the paragraphs that follow this; and also from the meaning of 'Sodom' as evil that stems from self-love, and of 'Gomorrah' as falsity deriving from this evil, dealt with in 2220, 2246, 2322. Here 'Gomorrah' as well is mentioned; no previous mention of it has been made in this chapter for the reason that 'Gomorrah' means falsity, which is the product of the evil of self-love. For inside the Church, whose final period or judgement is the subject at this point, this is the evil which in the main acts against good, and falsity deriving from evil which acts against truth. These two are joined together in such a way that anybody who is subject to the one is subject to the other, and indeed in a like ratio and to a like degree. It does indeed seem to be other than this, but the reality reveals itself in the next life if not in this world. Regarding the nature of self-love, and how great the evils are which arise from it, and that the hells have their origin in it, see 693, 694, 760, 1307, 1308, 1321, 1594, 1691, 2041, 2045, 2051, 2057, 2219.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

from the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #1594

Studere hoc loco

  
/ 10837  
  

1594. That 'they were separated, man from his brother' means that those things bring the separation about follows from what has just been stated. What 'a man, a brother' is has already been stated above at verse 8, namely unity, and therefore 'being separated, man from brother' means severance. What it is that severs the external man from the internal, the individual does not know; and there are a number of reasons for his not knowing. For one thing he does not know of - or if he has heard of, does not believe in - the existence of the internal man. And for another thing he does not know - or if he has heard, does not believe - that self-love and its desires are what cause the severance, also the love of the world and its desires, though not so much as self-love.

[2] The reason he does not know of - or if he has heard of, does not believe in - the existence of the internal man is that the life he leads is immersed in things of the body and the senses, which cannot possibly see what is interior. Interior things are able to see that which is exterior, but exterior things cannot possibly see what is interior. Take the power of sight; the internal sight can see what external sight is, but external sight cannot possibly see what internal sight is. Or take the power of understanding and of rationality; this is able to perceive what factual knowledge is, and the nature of it, but not vice versa. A further reason why the existence of the internal man is not known or believed in by the individual is that he does not believe in the existence of the spirit which is separated from the body at death, and scarcely in the existence of that internal life which people call the soul. For when the person whose mind is immersed in things of the body and the senses thinks of the spirit being separated from the body it strikes him as an impossibility because he regards the body as the place where life resides, and confirms himself in this view from the fact that animals have life as well and yet do not live on after death, in addition to many other considerations. All these ideas of his arise from the fact that the life he leads is immersed in things of the body and the senses, a life which regarded in itself is little different from the life of animals. The only difference is that man is able to think and to reason about whatever he encounters; but even then he does not reflect on this ability which places him above animals.

[3] But this is not the major cause of the severance of the external man from the internal man, for the greater number of people possess such unbelief, the highly learned more than the simple. That which causes the severance is chiefly self-love, and also love of the world, though not so much as self-love does. The reason a person does not know this is that his life is devoid of charity, and when his life is devoid of charity, how can he see that the life of self-love and its desires is so contrary to heavenly love? Also there is within self-love and its desires a kind of flame, and from it a feeling of delight which so affect a person's life that he can scarcely conceive of eternal happiness consisting of anything else. For this reason also many people suppose that eternal happiness means becoming great following the life of the body and being served by others, even by angels, while they themselves are not willing to serve anybody except for the concealed motive of being served themselves. When at such times they assert that they wish to serve the Lord alone, it is a lie, for people who are ruled by self-love wish that even the Lord should serve them. And to the extent this does not happen they depart, so strong is the desire in their hearts to become lords and rule the entire universe. What kind of government it would be when the majority, or indeed all, are like this, anyone can think out for himself. Would it not be a government like that exercised in hell where everyone loves himself more than anybody else? This is what lies hidden within self-love. From this it may become clear what the nature of self-love is, and also from the fact that it conceals within itself hatred of all who do not submit themselves to it as its slaves. And because it conceals hatred, it also conceals forms of revenge, cruelty, deceit, and further unspeakable things.

[4] Mutual love however, which alone is heavenly, consists in not only saying but also acknowledging and believing that one is utterly undeserving, and something worthless and filthy, which the Lord in His infinite mercy is constantly drawing away and holding back from the hell into which the person constantly tries, and indeed longs, to cast himself. He acknowledges and believes this because it is the truth. Not that the Lord or any angel wishes him to acknowledge and believe it just to gain his submission, but to prevent his vaunting himself when he is in fact such. This would be like excrement calling itself pure gold, or a dung-fly a bird of paradise. To the extent therefore that a person acknowledges and believes that he really is what he in fact is, he departs from self-love and its desires, and loathes himself. To the extent that this happens he receives from the Lord heavenly love, that is, mutual love, which is willing to serve all. These are the people meant by the least who become the greatest in the Lord's kingdom, Matthew 20:26-28; Luke 9:46-48.

[5] These considerations show what it is that severs the external man from the internal - chiefly self-love. And the chief thing that unites the external man to the internal is mutual love, which is in no way attainable until self-love departs, for they are complete opposites. The internal man is nothing else than mutual love. The human spirit itself, or soul, is the interior man which lives after death. It is organic, for it is joined to the body so long as the person lives in the world. This interior man - that is, his soul or spirit - is not the internal man, but the internal man is within the interior when the latter has mutual love within it. The things that belong to the internal man are the Lord's, so that one may say that the internal man is the Lord. Yet because the Lord grants an angel or man, so long as his life has mutual love in it, a heavenly proprium so that he has no idea but that he does good from himself, an internal man is therefore attributed to a person as though it were his own. The person in whom mutual love dwells however acknowledges and believes that everything good and true is not his own but the Lord's. He acknowledges and believes that his ability to love another as himself - and if he is like the angels, more than himself - is a gift from the Lord and that he ceases to enjoy that gift and its happiness to the extent he departs from acknowledging that it is the Lord's.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.