Biblija

 

Genesis 35

Studija

   

1 Dievas tarė Jokūbui: “Kelkis ir eik į Betelį, ir apsistok ten; pastatyk aukurą Dievui, kuris tau pasirodė, kai bėgai nuo savo brolio Ezavo”.

2 Jokūbas įsakė saviesiems ir visiems, buvusiems su juo: “Pašalinkite svetimus dievus, kurie yra tarp jūsų, apsivalykite ir pakeiskite drabužius!

3 Eikime į Betelį, ten pastatysiu aukurą Dievui, kuris mane išklausė pavojuje ir buvo su manimi kelyje, kuriuo aš ėjau!”

4 Jie atidavė Jokūbui visus svetimus dievus, kuriuos jie turėjo, ir auskarus, o Jokūbas juos užkasė po ąžuolu prie Sichemo.

5 Jie iškeliavo, ir siaubas nuo Dievo apėmė aplinkinius miestus, kad niekas nedrįso vytis Jokūbo sūnų.

6 Taip Jokūbas ir visi su juo esantys žmonės atėjo į Lūzą, dar vadinamą Beteliu, kuri yra Kanaano šalyje.

7 Ten jis pastatė aukurą ir tą vietą pavadino El Betelis, nes ten jam pasirodė Dievas, kai jis bėgo nuo savo brolio veido.

8 Ten mirė Debora, ebekos auklė, ir buvo palaidota prie Betelio po ąžuolu, kurį pavadino audos ąžuolu.

9 Dievas vėl pasirodė Jokūbui, kai jis atvyko iš Mesopotamijos, ir jį palaimino.

10 Ir Dievas tarė jam: “Tavo vardas Jokūbas, bet tu nebesivadinsi Jokūbu. Tavo vardas bus Izraelis!

11 Aš esu Dievas Visagalis. Būk vaisingas ir dauginkis! Tauta ir daugelis tautų atsiras iš tavęs, ir karaliai išeis iš tavo strėnų!

12 Tą žemę, kurią daviau Abraomui ir Izaokui, atiduosiu tau ir po tavęs duosiu tavo palikuonims”.

13 Tada Dievas pasitraukė nuo jo iš tos vietos, kur su juo kalbėjo.

14 Jokūbas pastatė akmeninį paminklą toje vietoje, kur Dievas kalbėjo su juo, išliejo ant jo geriamąją auką ir aliejaus.

15 Jokūbas pavadino tą vietą, kur Dievas su juo kalbėjo, Beteliu.

16 Iš Betelio jie keliavo toliau. Nepasiekus Efratos, achelė gimdė, ir jos gimdymas buvo sunkus.

17 Jai esant gimdymo kančiose, pribuvėja jai tarė: “Nebijok! Ir šį kartą turėsi sūnų”.

18 Kai jos siela buvo beatsiskirianti, nes ji buvo prie mirties, ji pavadino jį Ben Oniu, bet tėvas jį pavadino Benjaminu.

19 Ir achelė mirė ir buvo palaidota prie kelio, einančio į Efratą, tai yra Betliejų.

20 Jokūbas pastatė ant jos kapo paminklą; tas achelės kapo paminklas tebestovi iki šios dienos.

21 Izraelis keliavo toliau ir apsistojęs pasistatė palapines anapus Edero bokšto.

22 Izraeliui gyvenant anoje šalyje, ubenas miegojo su savo tėvo sugulove Bilha. Izraelis tai sužinojo. Jokūbo sūnų buvo dvylika.

23 Lėjos sūnūs: Jokūbo pirmagimis ubenas, Simeonas, Levis, Judas, Isacharas ir Zabulonas.

24 achelės sūnūs: Juozapas ir Benjaminas.

25 achelės tarnaitės Bilhos sūnūs: Danas ir Neftalis.

26 Lėjos tarnaitės Zilpos sūnūs: Gadas ir Ašeras. Šitie yra Jokūbo sūnūs, gimę jam Mesopotamijoje.

27 Jokūbas atėjo pas savo tėvą Izaoką į Mamrę, į Kirjat Arbos miestą, tai yra Hebroną, kur Abraomas ir Izaokas buvo ateiviai.

28 Izaokas sulaukė šimto aštuoniasdešimties metų.

29 Ir Izaokas atidavė savo dvasią, ir mirė, ir susijungė su savo tauta, būdamas senas ir pasisotinęs gyvenimu. Jį palaidojo jo sūnūs Ezavas ir Jokūbas.

   

Iz Swedenborgovih djela

 

Arcana Coelestia #4563

Proučite ovaj odlomak

  
/ 10837  
  

4563. And Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died. That this signifies that hereditary evil was expelled, is evident from the signification of “dying,” as being the end, or that a thing ceases to be such (see n. 494, 3253, 3259, 3276), here therefore expelled, because the subject treated of is hereditary evil; and from the representation of Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, as being hereditary evil. In nourishing and suckling an infant a nurse properly signifies the insinuation of innocence by means of what is celestial spiritual, for milk denotes the celestial spiritual (n. 2184), and the infant she suckles denotes innocence (n. 430, 1616, 2126, 2305, 2306) But here by “Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse,” is signified that which was received from the mother and nourished from infancy. That this was the hereditary evil from the mother against which the Lord fought, may be seen from what has been shown regarding this hereditary (n. 1414, 1444, 1573), and from His expelling it, so that at last He was not the son of Mary (see n. 2159, 2574, 2649, 3036).

[2] It is known that man derives evil from both his parents, and that this evil is called hereditary evil. He is therefore born into it, but still it does not manifest itself until the man becomes an adult and acts from his understanding and the derivative will, and meanwhile it lies hidden, especially during infancy. And as of the Lord’s mercy no one is blamed for what is hereditary, but for what is actual (n. 966, 2308), and what is hereditary cannot become actual until the man acts from his own understanding and his own will, therefore infants are led by the Lord by means of infants and angels from Him, and hence they appear in a state of innocence while hereditary evil still lurks in everything they do (n. 2300, 2307, 2308). This hereditary evil yields them nourishment, or is as a nurse, until the time when they judge for themselves (n. 4063); and then if they are being regenerated they are brought by the Lord into a state of new infancy, and at last into heavenly wisdom; thus into genuine infancy, that is, into innocence; for genuine infancy or innocence dwells in wisdom (n. 2305, 3183). The difference is, that the innocence of infancy is without, and hereditary evil within; whereas the innocence of wisdom is within, and evil both actual and hereditary is without. From these and other things that have been already stated, it is evident that hereditary evil acts as a nurse from the earliest infancy to the age of new infancy; and hence it is that by a “nurse” is signified hereditary evil, and also that by a “nurse” is signified the insinuation of innocence by means of the celestial spiritual.

[3] As in the internal sense of this chapter the disposition and arrangement of truths by good in the Lord’s natural is treated of (n. 4536), and the consequent progression to interior things, therefore hereditary evil is also treated of, in that it was expelled. This is the reason why mention is made in this verse of Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, that she died and was buried under an oak, which is not a thing of sufficient moment to interrupt the series unless it involved such things.

[4] The very mystery that is specifically signified by “Rebekah’s nurse” cannot as yet be disclosed, for before this is done it is necessary to know the nature of the influx of the rational into the natural, namely, that it is from the good of the rational immediately into the good of the natural, and from the good of the rational mediately, through the truth there into the good of natural truth. “Rebekah” is the truth of the rational (n. 3012, 3013, 3077); and “Isaac” is the good of the rational (n. 3012, 3194, 3210); “Esau” is the good of the natural by immediate influx from the good of the rational, or “Isaac;” and “Jacob” is the good or good of truth of the natural by mediate influx through the truth of the rational, or “Rebekah.” (In regard to this influx, mediate and immediate, see above, n. 3314, 3573.) This must be known before it is possible to have any specific knowledge of the mystery why by “Rebekah’s nurse” is here signified and described hereditary evil; for it is from this that the nature of this evil can be seen.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Iz Swedenborgovih djela

 

Arcana Coelestia #2025

Proučite ovaj odlomak

  
/ 10837  
  

2025. I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land of thy sojournings. That this signifies that the Lord acquired to Himself all things by His own forces or powers, which are “the land of the sojournings,” is evident from the signification of “sojourning,” as being to be instructed (see n. 1463). And as a man acquires life to himself especially by means of instruction in memory-knowledges, doctrinal matters, and the knowledges of faith, therefore “sojourning,” signifies the life so acquired. As applied to the Lord, “sojourning” signifies the life which He procured to Himself by means of knowledges, combats of temptations, and victories therein; and as He procured for Himself that life by His own forces, this is here signified by “the land of the sojournings.”

[2] That the Lord procured all things to Himself by His own forces, and by His own forces united the Human Essence to the Divine Essence, and the Divine Essence to the Human Essence; and that He alone thus became righteousness, is clearly evident in the Prophets. As in Isaiah:

Who is this that cometh from Edom, marching in the multitude of his strength? I have trodden the winepress alone, and of the peoples there was none with Me; I looked around, and there was no one helping; and I was amazed, and there was no one upholding; therefore Mine arm brought salvation unto Me (Isaiah 63:1, 3, 5)

“Edom” denotes the Lord’s Human Essence; “strength,” and “arm,” power that this was from what was His own is clearly said, in that “there was no one helping,” “no one upholding,” and that “His own arm brought salvation unto Him.”

[3] In the same Prophet:

He saw that there was not anyone, and He was amazed that there was none to intercede; and His arm achieved salvation unto Him, and His righteousness supported Him; and He put on righteousness as a coat of mail, and a helmet of salvation upon His head (Isaiah 59:16-17)

meaning in like manner by His own power, and that thereby He became righteousness. That the Lord is righteousness is stated in Daniel:

Seventy weeks are decreed to expiate iniquity, and to bring in the righteousness of the ages, and to seal up vision and prophet, and to anoint the holy of holies (Dan 9:24). And in Jeremiah:

I will raise unto David a righteous offshoot, and He shall reign as King, and shall act intelligently, and shall do judgment and righteousness in the land.

In His days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell in confidence; and this is His name whereby they shall call Him, Jehovah our righteousness (Jeremiah 23:5-6; 33:15-16).

For this reason He is also called “the Habitation of righteousness,” in Jeremiah (31:23; 50:7); and in Isaiah (9:6), “Wonderful,” and “Hero.”

[4] The reason why the Lord so often attributes to the Father that which is His own, has been explained above (n. 1999, 2004); for Jehovah was in Him, and consequently in everything that was His. This can be illustrated by what is similar, though not equal, in man. A man’s soul is in him; and as it is in him, it is in the veriest singulars of him, that is in the veriest singulars of his thought, and of his action. Whatever has not his soul in it, is not his. The Lord’s soul was Life itself, or Being [Esse] itself, which is Jehovah, for He was conceived from Jehovah; and consequently Jehovah or Life itself was in His veriest singulars; and as Life itself, or Being itself, which is Jehovah, was His, as the soul is man’s, so that which was Jehovah’s was His, which is what the Lord says: that He “is in the bosom of the Father” (John 1:18), and that “all things whatsoever that the Father hath are His” (John 16:15, 17:10-11).

[5] From good, which is Jehovah’s, He united the Divine Essence to the Human Essence; and from truth He united the Human Essence to the Divine Essence; thus He did all things both in general and in particular from Himself; in fact His Human was left to itself, in order that He might fight of Himself against all the hells, and overcome them; and as He had life in Himself that was His own-as already said-He overcame them by His own power and by His own forces, as is also clearly stated in the Prophets, in the passages that have been cited. Consequently, as He acquired all things for Himself by His own forces, He became righteousness, emancipated the world of spirits from infernal genii and spirits, and thereby delivered the human race from destruction-for the human race is ruled by means of spirits-and so redeemed it. For this reason He is so often called in the Word of the Old Testament the Deliverer and the Redeemer, and the Saviour, which is the meaning of His name Jesus.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.